Submitted:
25 October 2023
Posted:
26 October 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Vinyl Functionalized Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles (V-MS)
2.2. Characterization of Vinyl Functionalized Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles
2.3. Manufacturing Method of Polyethylene Compound
2.4. Characterization of Polyethylene Compounds
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhang, F.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, D.; Yan, M.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, P.; Ding, T.; Chen, L.; Chen, C. Current technologies for plastic waste treatment: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 282, 124523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thiounn, T.; Smith, R.C. Advances and approaches for chemical recycling of plastic waste. J. Polym. Sci. 2020, 58, 1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, K.; Wu, Y.; Hu, Z.; Wang, S.; Jiao, X.; Zhu, J.; Sun, Y.; Xie, Y. Progress and perspective for conversion of plastic wastes into valuable chemicals. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2023, 52, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maitlo, G.; Ali, I.; Maitlo, H.A.; Ali, S.; Unar, I.N.; Ahmad, M.B.; Bhutto, D.K.; Karmani, R.K.; Naich, S.R.; Sajjad, R.U.; Ali, S.; Afridi, M.N. Plastic Waste Recycling, Applications, and Future Prospects for a Sustainable Environment. Sustainability. 2022, 14, 11637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, J.; Anh, Y.; Kim, J. Optimal sorting and recycling of plastic waste as a renewable energy resource considering economic feasibility and environmental pollution. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2023, 169, 685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hidalgo-Crespo, J.; Soto, M.; Amaya-Rivas, J.L.; Santos-Mendez, M. Carbon and water footprint for the recycling process of expanded polystyrene (EPS) post-consumer waste. Procedia CIRP. 2022, 105, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdy, C.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Yang, Y.; Artamendi, I.; Allen, B. Pyrolysis of polyolefin plastic waste and potential applications in asphalt road construction: A technical review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 180, 106213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, H.; Li, C.; Shan, R.; Zhang, J.; Wu, Y.; Chen, Y. Recent developments on the zeolites catalyzed polyolefin plastics pyrolysis. Fuel Process. Technol. 2022, 238, 107531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Priyananda, P.; Nguyen, D.; Huynh, V.; Hawkett, B.S. Decohesion of a polyolefin overlay from a substrate high density polyethylene layer by impact induced stress waves. Waste Manag. 2023, 171, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, H.; Tian, B.; Yan, X.; Bai, Y.; Gao, J.; Li, X.; Xie, Q.; Yang, T.; Li, Y. Copyrolysis of Waste Cartons and Polyolefin Plastics under Microwave Heating and Characterization of the Products. ACS Omega. 2023, 8, 7331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dziadowiec, D.; Matykiewicz, D.; Szostak, M.; Andrzejewski, J. Overview of the Cast Polyolefin Film Extrusion Technology for Multi-Layer Packaging Applications. Mater. 2023, 16, 1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tyuftin, A.A.; Pecorini, F.; Zanardi, E.; Kerry, J.P. Parameters Affecting the Water Vapour Permeability of Gelatin Films as Evaluated by the Infrared Detecting Method ASTM F1249. Sustainability. 2022, 14, 9018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaikwad, K.K.; Lee, S.M.; Lee, J.S.; Lee, Y.S. Development of antimicrobial polyolefin films containing lauroyl arginate and their use in the packaging of strawberries. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2017, 11, 1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stanley, J.; John, A.; Cresnar, K.P.; Zemljic, L.F.; Lambropoulou, D.A.; Bikiaris, D.N. Active Agents Incorporated in Polymeric Substrates to Enhance Antibacterial and Antioxidant Properties in Food Packaging Applications. Macromol. 2023, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velásquez, E.; Dicastillo, C.L.; Vidal, C.P.; Copello, G.; Reyes, C.; Gurada, A.; Galotto, M.J. Feasibility of Valorization of Post-Consumer Recycled Flexible Polypropylene by Adding Fumed Nanosilica for Its Potential Use in Food Packaging toward Sustainability. Polymers. 2023, 15, 1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luna, M.S.; Filippone, G. Effects of nanoparticles on the morphology of immiscible polymer blends – Challenges and opportunities. Eur. Polym. J. 2016, 79, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garofalo, E.; Di Maio, L.; Scarfato, P.; Di Gregorio, F.; Incarnato, L. Reactive compatibilization and melt compounding with nanosilicates of post-consumer flexible plastic packagings. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2018, 152, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stu¨rzel, M.; Kurek, A.; Anselm, M.; Halbach, T.; Mu¨lhaupt, R. Polyolefin Nanocomposites and Hybrid Catalysts. Adv. Polym. Sci. 2013, 258, 279. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmadi, M.; Hanifpour, A.; Ghiassinejad, S.; van Ruymbeke, E. Polyolefins Vitrimers: Design Principles and Applications. Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 10249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghosh, A. Performance modifying techniques for recycled thermoplastics. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 175, 105887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collar, E.P.; García-Martínez, J.M. On Chemical Modified Polyolefins by Grafting of Polar Monomers: A Survey Based on Recent Patents Literature. Recent Pat. Mater. Sci. 2010, 3, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mangaraj, D. Role of Compatibilization in Recycling Rubber Waste by Blending with Plastics. Rubber Chem. Technol. 2005, 78, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hees, T.; Zhong, F.; Stürzel, M.; Mülhaupt, R. Tailoring Hydrocarbon Polymers and All-Hydrocarbon Composites for Circular Economy. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2018, 1800608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stürzel, M.; Mihan, S.; Mülhaupt, R. From Multisite Polymerization Catalysis to Sustainable Materials and All-Polyolefin Composites. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arandes, J.M.; Eren˜a, J.; Azkoiti, M.J.; Olazar, M.; Bilbao, J. Thermal recycling of polystyrene and polystyrene-butadiene dissolved in a light cycle oil. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 2003, 70, 747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choudhury, A.; Adhikari, B. Dynamic vulcanization of recycled milk pouches (LDPE–LLDPE) and EPDM blends using dicumyl peroxide. Polym. Int. 2007, 56, 1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, M.; Lee, J.-t.; Bae, J.Y. Facile Mesoporous Hollow Silica Synthesis for Formaldehyde Adsorption. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bae, J.Y.; Jang, S.G. Characteristics of CO2 Capture by Tetraethylenepentamine Modified Mesoporous Silica Morphology. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2019, 19, 6291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bae, J.Y.; Jang, S.G. Preparation and Characterization of Amine-Functionalized Mesoporous Hollow Silica for CO2 Capture. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2020, 20, 7070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Zheng, K.; Tian, X.; Hu, K.; Wnag, R.; Liu, C.; Li, Y.; Cui, P. Double Glass Transitions and Interfacial Immobilized Layer in in-Situ-Synthesized Poly(vinyl alcohol)/Silica Nanocomposites. Macromolecules. 2010, 43, 1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laguna-Gutierrez, E.; Saiz-Arroyo, C.; Velasco, J.I.; Rodriguez-Perez, M.A. Low Density Polyethylene/Silica Nanocomposite Foams. Relationship between Chemical Composition, Particle Dispersion, Cellular Structure and Physical Properties. Eur. Polym. J. 2016, 81, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osman, M.A.; Rupp, J.E.P.; Suter, U.W. Tensile properties of polyethylene-layered silicate nanocomposites. Polymer 2005, 46, 1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahankari, S.S.; Kar, K.K. Processing of styrene butadiene rubber–carbon black nanocomposites with gradation of crosslink density: Static and dynamic mechanical characterization. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2008, 491, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]




| Sodium Silicate (mL) | VTMS (mL) | |
|---|---|---|
| V00-MS | 40 | 0 |
| V05-MS | 35 | 5 |
| V10-MS | 30 | 10 |
| V15-MS | 25 | 15 |
| BET (m2/g) | Pore Size (nm) | Pore volume (cc/g) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| V00-MS | 1263 | 3.826 | 0.387 |
| V05-MS | 1139 | 3.486 | 0.463 |
| V10-MS | 1012 | 3.168 | 0.513 |
| V15-MS | 883 | 3.817 | 0.626 |
| Sample | Melt Index (g/10min) |
Tensil Strength (kg/cm2) |
Elongation (%) |
Elastic Modulus (kg/mm2) |
Flexural Strength (kg/cm2) |
Flexural Modulus (kg/mm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
STD PE_A rePE_A 100phr V05-MS 0 phr |
2.6 ±0.5 |
97.1 ±9.7 |
113.6 ±11.3 |
15.3 ±1.5 |
48.5 ±4.8 |
14.0 ±1.4 |
|
V05-MS_PE_A #1 rePE_A 100phr V05-MS 1 phr |
2.3 ±0.5 |
100.5 ±10.0 |
101.8 ±10.1 |
15.7 ±1.5 |
50.1 ±5.0 |
13.9 ±1.3 |
|
V05-MS_PE_A #2 rePE_A 100 phr V05-MS 2 phr |
1.3 ±0.5 |
113.1 ±11.3 |
84.1 ±8.4 |
9.7 ±0.9 |
65.8 ±6.5 |
7.2 ±0.7 |
|
V05-MS_PE_A #3 rePE_A 100 phr V05-MS 3 phr |
0.6 ±0.5 |
124.9 ±12.4 |
70.2 ±7.0 |
5.4 ±0.5 |
77.4 ±7.7 |
3.3 ±0.3 |
| Sample | Melt Index (g/10min) |
Tensile Strength (kg/cm2) |
Elongation (%) |
Elastic Modulus (kg/mm2) |
Flexural Strength (kg/cm2) |
Flexural Modulus (kg/mm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
STD PE_A rePE_A 100phr V05-MS 0 phr |
2.6 ±0.5 |
97.1 ±9.7 |
113.6 ±11.3 |
15.3 ±1.5 |
48.5 ±4.8 |
14.0 ±1.4 |
|
V00-MS_PE_A rePE_A 100phr V00-MS 1 phr |
2.5 ±0.5 |
101.1 ±8.6 |
90.6 ±8.0 |
14.4 ±0.6 |
41.8 ±4.1 |
10.6 ±0.8 |
|
V05-MS_PE_A rePE_A 100phr V05-MS 1 phr |
2.3 ±0.5 |
100.5 ±10.0 |
101.8 ±10.1 |
15.7 ±1.5 |
50.1 ±5.0 |
13.9 ±1.3 |
|
V10-MS_PE_A rePE_A 100phrV10-MS 1 phr |
2.4 ±0.5 |
109.5 ±10.2 |
121.4 ±12.1 |
20.5 ±2.0 |
65.6 ±6.5 |
16.0 ±1.6 |
|
V15-MS_PE_A rePE_A 100phr V15-MS 1 phr |
2.3 ±0.5 |
102.1 ±10.2 |
103.3 ±10.3 |
17.7 ±1.7 |
60.2 ±6.0 |
11.0 ±1.1 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).