Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Validation of the Cognitive Reserve Index Questionnaire (CRIq) in Arabic

Version 1 : Received: 22 October 2023 / Approved: 23 October 2023 / Online: 23 October 2023 (05:03:13 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Farran, N.; Darwish, H. Validation of the Cognitive Reserve Index Questionnaire (CRIq) in Arabic. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 1006. Farran, N.; Darwish, H. Validation of the Cognitive Reserve Index Questionnaire (CRIq) in Arabic. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 1006.

Abstract

Cognitive reserve is the adaptability of cognitive processes in the face of brain aging and pathology. This study aimed to validate the Arabic version of the Cognitive Reserve Index Questionnaire (CRIq) in a healthy Lebanese sample. CRIq assesses cognitive reserve through three domains: education, working activity, and leisure time. Statistical measures, including descriptive and regression analysis along with structural equation modeling, were utilized to investigate the convergent and discriminant validity of CRIq, incorporating fluid intelligence (Gf) and measures of cognitive function, long-term memory encoding and retrieval (Glr), and processing speed (Gs). Results from 174 participants revealed that the activities assessed by CRIq-Arabic were comparable to the original CRIq study, with slight cultural differences. The internal consistency of CRIq-Arabic was good (Cronbach's α = 0.88), indicating reliability. Convergent validity was confirmed, with moderate to high loadings on the cognitive reserve latent construct. Discriminant validity was supported as correlations between cognitive reserve variables and non-target constructs (Gf, Glr, Gs) were less than 1. The findings provide an initial psychometric validation of the CRIq-Arabic. Further research in clinical samples is needed to enhance its utility in neuropsychological practice.

Keywords

cognitive reserve 2; Cognitive Reserve Index Questionnaire (CRIq); Arabic; Lebanon; psychometric validation

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Neuroscience and Neurology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.