Submitted:
16 October 2023
Posted:
17 October 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Eligibility Criteria
2.2. Information Sources
2.3. Search
2.4. Study Limitations
2.5. Study Selection
2.6. Analytical Framework
3. Recent Studies of UAVs in Planning
3.1. Overview of UAV usage in planning
3.2. Main application analysis
3.3. Common themes
3.4. Common method and model
3.5. Critical challenges and notable gaps in the literature
4. Existing Limitations and Barriers of UAV 3D Modeling for Planning
4.1. Policy
4.2. Environment
4.3. Disciplinary
4.4. Hardware
4.5. Software
5. Discussions
6. Conclusions
7. Future Prospects
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hostert, P., Advances in Urban Remote Sensing: Examples From Berlin (Germany). In Applied Remote Sensing for Urban Planning, Governance and Sustainability; Netzband, M.; Stefanov, W.L.; Redman, C., Eds.; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007; pp. 37–51. [CrossRef]
- Bakogiannis, E.; Kyriakidis, C.; Zafeiris, V. Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to Analyze the Urban Environment. European Journal of Formal Sciences and Engineering 2022, 5, 49–60. [CrossRef]
- de Castro, A.I.; Shi, Y.; Maja, J.M.; Peña, J.M. UAVs for Vegetation Monitoring: Overview and Recent Scientific Contributions. Remote Sensing 2021, 13. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Wang, L.; Tian, T.; Yin, J. A Review of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Low-Altitude Remote Sensing (UAV-LARS) Use in Agricultural Monitoring in China. Remote Sensing 2021, 13. [CrossRef]
- Kleinschroth, F.; Banda, K.; Zimba, H.; Dondeyne, S.; Nyambe, I.; Spratley, S.; Winton, R.S. Drone imagery to create a common understanding of landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 2022, 228, 104571. [CrossRef]
- Shakhatreh, H.; Sawalmeh, A.H.; Al-Fuqaha, A.; Dou, Z.; Almaita, E.; Khalil, I.; Othman, N.S.; Khreishah, A.; Guizani, M. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): A Survey on Civil Applications and Key Research Challenges. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 48572–48634. [CrossRef]
- Tan, R.; Li, P.; Lin, W.; Pan, C. Improvement of 3D Urban Modeling Method Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Oblique Photography. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping 2016, pp. 39–42.
- Herwitz, S.; Johnson, L.; Dunagan, S.; Higgins, R.; Sullivan, D.; Zheng, J.; Lobitz, B.; Leung, J.; Gallmeyer, B.; Aoyagi, M.; Slye, R.; Brass, J. Imaging from an unmanned aerial vehicle: agricultural surveillance and decision support. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2004, 44, 49–61. [CrossRef]
- Yao, H.; Qin, R.; Chen, X. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing Applications—A Review. Remote Sensing 2019, 11. [CrossRef]
- Allouche, M. The integration of UAVs in airspace. Air & Space Europe 2000, 2, 101–104. [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Ye, Y.; Wang, Z. Curbing Sprawl with Development-limiting Boundaries in Urban China: A Review of Literature. Journal of Planning Literature 2020, 35, 25–40. [CrossRef]
- Watts, A.C.; Ambrosia, V.G.; Hinkley, E.A. Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Remote Sensing and Scientific Research: Classification and Considerations of Use. Remote Sensing 2012, 4, 1671–1692. [CrossRef]
- Liénard, J.; Vogs, A.; Gatziolis, D.; Strigul, N. Embedded, real-time UAV control for improved, image-based 3D scene reconstruc- 895 tion. Measurement 2016, 81, 264–269. doi:.
- Gatziolis, D.; Lienard, J.F.; Vogs, A.; Strigul, N.S. 3D tree dimensionality assessment using photogrammetry and small unmanned aerial vehicles. bioRxiv 2015. [CrossRef]
- Alsadik, B.; Gerke, M.; Vosselman, G. Automated camera network design for 3D modeling of cultural heritage objects. Journal of Cultural Heritage 2013, 14, 515–526. [CrossRef]
- Westoby, M.; Brasington, J.; Glasser, N.; Hambrey, M.; Reynolds, J. ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology 2012, 179, 300–314. [CrossRef]
- Musakwa, W.; van Niekerk, A. Earth Observation for Sustainable Urban Planning in Developing Countries: Needs, Trends, and Future Directions. Journal of Planning Literature 2015, 30, 149–160. [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y. Using Google Street View to investigate the association between street greenery and physical activity. Landscape and Urban Planning 2019, 191, 103435. [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Chen, X. Research on 3D modeling method of geological section based on UAV Aerial Photography. Scientific and Technological Innovation 2021, 9, 55–56.
- Wan, D. Research on the Application Practice of UAV in Urban Planning Measurement. Management & Technology of SME 2021, 660, 188–190.
- Kikuchi, N.; Fukuda, T.; Yabuki, N. Future landscape visualization using a city digital twin: integration of augmented reality and drones with implementation of 3D model-based occlusion handling. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering 2022, 9, 837–856. [CrossRef]
- Jeziorska, J. UAS for Wetland Mapping and Hydrological Modeling. Remote Sensing 2019, 11. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B.; Zhang, L. Study on the application of 3D modeling based on UAV photography in urban planning — Taking Yi Jiequ area in Du Jiangyan as an example. AIP Conference Proceedings 2017, 1864, 020226. [CrossRef]
- Butilă, E.V.; Boboc, R.G. Urban Traffic Monitoring and Analysis Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): A Systematic Literature 917 Review. Remote Sensing 2022, 14. doi:.
- Hurtado, P.; Gomez, A. Smart City Digital Twins Are a New, Hi-Tech Tool for Scenario Planning. American Planning Association 2021. Available online: https://www.planning.org/planning/2021/spring/smart-city-digital-twins-are-a-new-tool-for-scenario-planning/ (accessed 1 November 2023).
- Minner, J.; Chusid, J. Time, Architecture, and Geography: Modeling the Past and Future of Cultural Landscapes. APT Bulletin 2016, 47, 49–58.
- Minner, J.; Chusid, J.; Shi, X.; Feng, Y.; Sun, F.; Azel, N.; Taru, T. Visualizing the Past, Present, and Future of New York City’s 1964-5 World’s Fair Site Using 3D GIS and Procedural Modeling 2017.
- Bobylev, N.; Syrbe, R.U.; Wende, W. Geosystem services in urban planning. Sustainable Cities and Society 2022, 85, 104041. [CrossRef]
- Garstki, K. Virtual representation: The production of 3d digital artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2017, 24, 726–750. [CrossRef]
- Deng, L.; Mao, Z.; Li, X.; Hu, Z.; Duan, F.; Yan, Y. UAV-based multispectral remote sensing for precision agriculture: A comparison between different cameras. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2018, 146, 124–136. [CrossRef]
- Maes, W.H.; Steppe, K. Perspectives for Remote Sensing with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Precision Agriculture. Trends in Plant Science 2019, 24, 152–164. [CrossRef]
- Messina, G.; Modica, G. Applications of UAV Thermal Imagery in Precision Agriculture: State of the Art and Future Research Outlook. Remote Sensing 2020, 12. [CrossRef]
- Rejeb, A.; Abdollahi, A.; Rejeb, K.; Treiblmaier, H. Drones in agriculture: A review and bibliometric analysis. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2022, 198, 107017. [CrossRef]
- Yunus, A.M.; Hamzah, A.H.; Azmi, F.A.M. Drone Technology as A Modern Tool in Monitoring the Rural-Urban Development. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2020, 540, 012076. [CrossRef]
- Kim, D. Pedestrian and Bicycle Volume Data Collection Using Drone Technology. Journal of Urban Technology 2020, 27, 45–60. [CrossRef]
- Bhatnagar, S.; Gill, L.; Regan, S.; Waldren, S.; Ghosh, B. A nested drone-satellite approach to monitoring the ecological conditions of wetlands. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2021, 174, 151–165. [CrossRef]
- Donaire, J.A.; Galí, N.; Gulisova, B. Tracking visitors in crowded spaces using zenith images: Drones and time-lapse. Tourism Management Perspectives 2020, 35, 100680. [CrossRef]
- Karachaliou, E.; Georgiou, E.; Psaltis, D.; Stylianidis, E. UAV FOR MAPPING HISTORIC BUILDINGS: FROM 3D MODELLING TO BIM. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 2019, XLII-2/W9, 397–402. [CrossRef]
- Li, Y. UAV Photogrammetry and its Application in Urban Planning. Metallurgy and Materials 2018, 38, 181–182.
- Tariq, A.; Gillani, S.M.O.A.; Qureshi, H.K.; Haneef, I. Heritage preservation using aerial imagery from light weight low cost Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). 2017 International Conference on Communication Technologies (ComTech), 2017, pp. 201–205. [CrossRef]
- Berrett, B.E.; Vernon, C.A.; Beckstrand, H.; Pollei, M.; Markert, K.; Franke, K.W.; Hedengren, J.D. Large-Scale Reality Modeling of a University Campus Using Combined UAV and Terrestrial Photogrammetry for Historical Preservation and Practical Use. Drones 2021, 5. [CrossRef]
- Erenoglu, R.; Erenoglu, O.; Arslan, N. Accuracy Assessment of Low Cost UAV Based City Modelling for Urban Planning. Tehnicki Vjesnik 2018, 25, 1708–1714. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, D.; Xu, F.; Pun, C.M.; Yang, Y.; Lan, R.; Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Gao, H. Virtual Reality Aided High-Quality 3D Reconstruction by Remote Drones. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 2021, 22. [CrossRef]
- Campbell, D.A. Drones, Machetes, and Virtual Reality: 21st-Century Tools for Historic Preservation. 2018 3rd Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHERITAGE) held jointly with 2018 24th International Conference on Virtual Systems & Multimedia (VSMM 2018), 2018, pp. 1–4. [CrossRef]
- Skondras, A.; Karachaliou, E.; Tavantzis, I.; Tokas, N.; Valari, E.; Skalidi, I.; Bouvet, G.A.; Stylianidis, E. UAV Mapping and 3D Modeling as a Tool for Promotion and Management of the Urban Space. Drones 2022, 6. [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z.; Wu, L.; Gerke, M.; Wang, R.; Yang, H. Skeletal camera network embedded structure-from-motion for 3D scene reconstruction from UAV images. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2016, 121, 113–127. [CrossRef]
- Ferworn, A.; Tran, J.; Ufkes, A.; D’Souza, A. Initial experiments on 3D modeling of complex disaster environments using unmanned aerial vehicles. 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics, 2011, pp. 167–171. [CrossRef]
- Mohd Noor, N.; Ibrahim, I.; Abdullah, A.; Abdullah, A.A.A. Information Fusion for Cultural Heritage Three-Dimensional Modeling of Malay Cities. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2020, 9. [CrossRef]
- Manajitprasert, S.; Tripathi, N.K.; Arunplod, S. Three-Dimensional (3D) Modeling of Cultural Heritage Site Using UAV Imagery: A Case Study of the Pagodas in Wat Maha That, Thailand. Applied Sciences 2019, 9. [CrossRef]
- Remondino, F. Heritage Recording and 3D Modeling with Photogrammetry and 3D Scanning. Remote Sensing 2011, 3, 1104–1138. [CrossRef]
- Yan, F.; Xia, E.; Li, Z.; Zhou, Z. Sampling-Based Path Planning for High-Quality Aerial 3D Reconstruction of Urban Scenes. Remote Sensing 2021, 13. [CrossRef]
- Koch, T.; Körner, M.; Fraundorfer, F. Automatic and Semantically-Aware 3D UAV Flight Planning for Image-Based 3D Reconstruction. Remote Sensing 2019, 11. [CrossRef]
- Duan, P.; Wang, M.; Lei, Y.; Li, J. Research on Estimating Water Storage of Small Lake Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle 3D Model. Water Resources 2021, 48, 690–700. [CrossRef]
- Jo, Y.H.; Hong, S. Three-Dimensional Digital Documentation of Cultural Heritage Site Based on the Convergence of Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Photogrammetry. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2019, 8. [CrossRef]
- Papadopoulou, E.E.; Vasilakos, C.; Zouros, N.; Soulakellis, N. DEM-Based UAV Flight Planning for 3D Mapping of Geosites: The Case of Olympus Tectonic Window, Lesvos, Greece. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2021, 10. [CrossRef]
- Templin, T.; Popielarczyk, D. The Use of Low-Cost Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in the Process of Building Models for Cultural Tourism, 3D Web and Augmented/Mixed Reality Applications. Sensors 2020, 20. [CrossRef]
- Liang, H.; Li, W.; Zhang, Q.; Zhu, W.; Chen, D.; Liu, J.; Shu, T. Using unmanned aerial vehicle data to assess the three-dimension green quantity of urban green space: A case study in Shanghai, China. Landscape and Urban Planning 2017, 164, 81–90. [CrossRef]
- Whitehurst, D.and Friedman, B.K.K.S.V.W.J. Drone-based community assessment, planning, and disaster risk management for sustainable development. Applied Sciences 2021, 13. [CrossRef]
- Papadopoulou, E.E.; Papakonstantinou, A.; Zouros, N.; Soulakellis, N. Scale-variant flight planning for the creation of 3d geovisualization and augmented reality maps of geosites: The case of voulgaris gorge, lesvos, greece. Applied Sciences 2021, 11. [CrossRef]
- Soulakellis, N.; Vasilakos, C.and Chatzistamatis, S.K.D.T.G.P.E.E.P.A.R.O.K.T. Post-earthquake recovery phase monitoring and mapping based on uas data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2020, 9. [CrossRef]
- Nagasawa, R.; Mas, E.; Moya, L.; Koshimura, S. Model-based analysis of multi-UAV path planning for surveying postdisaster building damage. Scientific Reports 2021, 11, 18588. [CrossRef]
- Girindran, R.; Boyd, D.S.; Rosser, J.; Vijayan, D.; Long, G.; Robinson, D. On the reliable generation of 3d city models from open data. Urban Science 2020, 4, 47. [CrossRef]
- Hamin Infield, E.; Shi, L.; Garcia, I.; Minner, J.; Goh, K.; Hsu, D.; J, A.; Boswell, M.; Stone, B.; Whittington, J. Planning for Climate Leadership 2023. Revised paper accepted with minor revisions at Journal of Planning Education and Research.
- Heisel, F.; McGranahan, J.; Ferdinando, J.; Dogan, T. High-resolution combined building stock and building energy modeling to evaluate whole-life carbon emissions and saving potentials at the building and urban scale. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2022, 177, 106000. [CrossRef]
- Worth, G.; Fernandes, A.; Heisel, F.; Minner, J.; O’Malley, C. How Cities Can Stop Wasting Buildings: The Case for Deconstruction; Circular Construction and Circular Economy, 2022; pp. 32–37.
- Pantoja-Rosero, B.G.; Achanta, R.; Beyer, K. Damage-augmented digital twins towards the automated inspection of buildings. Automation in Construction 2023, 150, 104842. [CrossRef]
- Park, K.; Ewing, R. The usability of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for measuring park-based physical activity. Landscape and Urban Planning 2017, 167, 157–164. [CrossRef]
- Outay, F.; Mengash, H.A.; Adnan, M. Applications of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in road safety, traffic and highway infrastructure management: Recent advances and challenges. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2020, 141, 116–129. [CrossRef]
- Nelson, J.R.; Grubesic, T.H.; Wallace, D.; Chamberlain, A.W. The View from Above: A Survey of the Public’s Perception of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Privacy. Journal of Urban Technology 2019, 26, 83–105. [CrossRef]
- Watkins, S.; Burry, J.; Mohamed, A.; Marino, M.; Prudden, S.; Fisher, A.; Kloet, N.; Jakobi, T.; Clothier, R. Ten questions concerning the use of drones in urban environments. Building and Environment 2020, 167, 106458. [CrossRef]
- Kunovjanek, M.; Wankmüller, C. Containing the COVID-19 pandemic with drones - Feasibility of a drone enabled back-up transport system. Transport Policy 2021, 106, 141–152. [CrossRef]
- Sabino, H.; Almeida, R.V.; de Moraes, L.B.; da Silva, W.P.; Guerra, R.; Malcher, C.; Passos, D.; Passos, F.G. A systematic literature review on the main factors for public acceptance of drones. Technology in Society 2022, 71, 102097. [CrossRef]
- Hodgson, C.; Chang, K. Using drone technology to collect school transportation data. Travel Behaviour and Society 2023, 31, 1–9. [CrossRef]
- Grubesic, T.H.; Wallace, D.; Chamberlain, A.W.; Nelson, J.R. Using unmanned aerial systems (UAS) for remotely sensing physical disorder in neighborhoods. Landscape and Urban Planning 2018, 169, 148–159. [CrossRef]
- Fairley, I.; Williamson, B.J.; McIlvenny, J.; King, N.; Masters, I.; Lewis, M.; Neill, S.; Glasby, D.; Coles, D.; Powell, B.; Naylor, K.; Robinson, M.; Reeve, D.E. Drone-based large-scale particle image velocimetry applied to tidal stream energy resource assessment. Renewable Energy 2022, 196, 839–855. [CrossRef]
- Sziroczak, D.; Rohacs, D.; Rohacs, J. Review of using small UAV based meteorological measurements for road weather management. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 2022, 134, 100859. [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.A.; Ectors, W.; Bellemans, T.; Janssens, D.; Wets, G. UAV-Based Traffic Analysis: A Universal Guiding Framework Based on Literature Survey. Transportation Research Procedia 2017, 22, 541–550. "19th EURO Working Group on Transportation Meeting, EWGT2016, 5-7 September 2016, Istanbul, Turkey", . [CrossRef]
- Shao, H.; Song, P.; Mu, B.; Tian, G.; Chen, Q.; He, R.; Kim, G. Assessing city-scale green roof development potential using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) imagery. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 2021, 57, 126954. [CrossRef]
- Zhou, L.; Meng, R.; Tan, Y.; Lv, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, B.; Zhao, F. Comparison of UAV-based LiDAR and digital aerial photogrammetry for measuring crown-level canopy height in the urban environment. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2022, 69, 127489. [CrossRef]
- Lyu, X.; Li, X.; Dang, D.; Dou, H.; Wang, K.; Lou, A. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Remote Sensing in Grassland Ecosystem Monitoring: A Systematic Review. Remote Sensing 2022, 14. [CrossRef]
- Drones · NYC311. Available online: https://portal.311.nyc.gov/article/?kanumber=KA-01541 (accessed 2023-01-08).
- FAA. Small unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) Regulations (Part 107). Available online: https://www.faa.gov/newsroom/small-unmanned-aircraft-systems-uas-regulations-part-107 (accessed 2023-01-10).
- Benchekroun, S.; Ullah, I.I.T. Preserving the Past for an Uncertain Future: Accessible, Low-Cost Methods for 3-D Data Creation, Processing, and Dissemination in Digital Cultural Heritage Preservation; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2022; Web3D ’21. [CrossRef]
- Buy dji mavic 3 series low-noise propellers—Dji store. Accessed: 10-01-2023, https://store.dji.com/product/dji-mavic-3-low-noise-propellers.
- Specs—Matrice 300 rtk—Dji enterprise. Accessed: 10-01-2023, https://enterprise.dji.com/matrice-300/photo.
- Griwodz, C.; Gasparini, S.; Calvet, L.; Gurdjos, P.; Castan, F.; Maujean, B.; De Lillo, G.; Lanthony, Y. AliceVision Meshroom: An open-source 3D reconstruction pipeline. Proceedings of the 12th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference 2021, p. 241–247. [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Bonelli, W.P.; Pietrzyk, P.; Bucksch, A. Comparison of open-source three-dimensional reconstruction pipelines for maize-root phenotyping. The Plant Phenome Journal 2023, 6(1), e20068. [CrossRef]
- Narazaki, Y.; Hoskere, V.; Chowdhary, G.; Spencer, B.F. Vision-based navigation planning for autonomous post-earthquake inspection of reinforced concrete railway viaducts using unmanned aerial vehicles. Automation in Construction 2022, 137, 104214. [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.; Narazaki, Y.; Spencer Jr., B.F. Automated bridge component recognition using close-range images from unmanned aerial vehicles. Engineering Structures 2022, 274, 115184. [CrossRef]
- Levine, N.M.; Narazaki, Y.; Spencer, B.F. Development of a building information model-guided post-earthquake building inspection framework using 3D synthetic environments. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 2023, 22(2), 279–307. [CrossRef]
- Liu, B.; Tang, Y.; Ma, C.; Bai, S. Application of 3D modeling of UAV tilt photography in urban rain flood risk assessment. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping 2019, pp. 46–50.
- Liu, P.; Ke, R.; He, W. Application of UAV Remote Sensing Technology in Smart City Construction. Intelligent City 2021, 7, 43–44.
- Quan, C. Discussion on the Application of UAV Oblique Photography 3D Model in Urban Planning. Intelligent City 2020, 6, 71–72. [CrossRef]



| Author | Findings | Implications for Future Work | Hardware | Software |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karachaliou et al., 2019 [38] | UAV-based photogrammetry is a cost-effective and efficient tool for mapping historic buildings and can produce results from high-quality 3D models to Building Information Models (BIM). | The authors suggest that using Building Information Modeling (BIM) can be beneficial in preserving historical buildings and propose that future research should concentrate on enhancing BIM-based documentation for heritage sites. | DJI Phantom 3 Pro | REVIT Autodesk, Agisoft PhotoScan |
| Li, 2018 [39] | Paper on UAV photogrammetry and its implications in urban planning: Oblique photogrammetry can significantly improve mapping accuracy, and has more intersection light than vertical photogrammetry, resulting in higher 3D model accuracy. | The potential of oblique photogrammetry in various areas such as spatial analysis, investigating illegal construction, assisting with planning approval, and safeguarding historical buildings requires further exploration through research. | NA | NA |
| Tariq et al., 2017 [40] | UAV photogrammetry can be used to develop realistic 3D models of archeological sites with high accuracy to preserve digital 3D models in the management system for future reconstruction of historical sites. | The application of photogrammetry in the management of historical sites can be further explored to make it a mainstream tool for archaeological conservation. | DJI Phantom 4, Sony A5100 | Photoscan |
| Berrett et al., 2021 [41] | Automated UAV techniques can be applied along with terrestrial photogrammetry to generate hyper-realistic 3D models, which can be used for large-scale university campus planning and historic preservation and public outreach, as well as potential virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) tours. | The application of advanced technologies like LiDAR in generating 3D models can be further explored to improve accuracy and generate more realistic representations of real-world environments. | DJI Phantom 4 RTK, Inspire 2 with Zenmuse X4S, Nikon D750, Canon EOS 5D Mark III, TOPCON GR-3 GPS unit | Lightroom, ArcGIS Pro, 3D Acute |
| Kikuchi et al., 2022 [21] | Augmented reality combined with drones can facilitate public participation in urban design decision-making processes through implementing detailed 3D models of the city (digital twins), which can achieve both first-person and overhead views in outdoor AR with occlusion handling. | There is potential for further exploration of the use of augmented reality in urban planning and design, particularly in enhancing public participation during the decision-making process. | DJI Mavic Mini | SketchUp Make, InfraWorks, OBS Studio for AR |
| Erenoglu et al., 2018 [42] | UAV-assisted 3D modeling can be a time-efficient and cost-effective approach for urban planning and can be used for mapping damages safely and efficiently after natural hazards. | Further research is needed to optimize processing parameters, such as camera characteristics, image scale, quality of imagery, and hardware capacity, to improve the accuracy of UAV-assisted 3D modeling. | Mikrocopter XL 8, Canon EOS-M, Satlab Sl500 GPS, Kolida KTS-442 RLC station | Agisoft Photoscan, ArcMap |
| Zhang et al., 2022 [43] | The use of a telexistence drone system empowered with artificial intelligence and virtual reality can achieve real-time 3D reconstruction with high-quality results. | Further exploration is required to determine the practical applications of the telexistence drone system in data analysis and decision-making. Additionally, efforts can be made to reduce the latency caused by different components of the system to improve its overall performance. | MYNT AI D1000-50/Color stereo camera, ICP Tracker | Agisoft PhotoScan |
| Campbell, 2018 [44] | Drone photogrammetry and VR are effective tools for historic preservation efforts and can provide new data and experiences for decision-making, VR experiences generated were positively received by government officials and other professionals. | Applying photogrammetry and VR to other preservation efforts of culturally significant artifacts. Developing and refining best practices for photogrammetry and VR workflow in preservation efforts. | DJI Phantom 4 Pro, Canon EOS Rebel DSLR | Autodesk (Recap Photo, 3ds Max), 3DR Site Scan, Visualive3D Mobilive, Geotag Photos, Trimble SketchUp |
| Alsadik et al., 2013 [15] | The proposed automated camera network method for 3D modeling of cultural heritage objects showed improved accuracy and average coverage with a significant reduction in the number of cameras required. | The image orientation steps required for obtaining high-resolution images need improvement in the future, and more reliable bundle adjustment can be achieved by using the sparse bundle adjustment package. | NA | Agisoft Photoscan, Microsoft Photosynth |
| Skondras et al., 2022 [45] | UAV can fly in urban areas that airplane cannot operate and produce high-resolution 3D modeling, thus the use of UAV is expected to increase in the future. | Future studies could investigate the integration of data obtained from the built environment with local spatial knowledge, and the creation of geo-referenced and scaled models. | DJI Phantom 4 Pro | Pix4D Capture and Mapper, Blender |
| Xu et al., 2016 [46] | Using a minimum spanning tree to construct scene correlation network can reduce the computational cost of image matching in Structure from Motion (SfM) for 3D scene reconstruction from UAV images while preserving the accuracy and completeness of the final scene geometry. | The computation required for large volumes of images in Structure from Motion (SfM) based methods for 3D scene reconstruction has increased significantly. Future work is needed during the image matching phase, which is among the most time-consuming stages of SfM methods. | Fixed-wing UAV, Canon EOS 5D mark II | Pix4Dmapper, PhotoScan, Micmac |
| Ferworn et al., 2011 [47] | Commercial off-the-shelf hardware can be used to create a system that aids in disaster response efforts by allowing for aerial surveying and the creation of 3D models. | Develop a more autonomous system, improve data quality and consistency, and create real-time, onboard point cloud modeling to immediately direct search and rescue efforts. | MK Hexakopter 2 | Microsoft Kinect video game peripheral |
| Gatziolis et al., 2015 [14] | GPS-enabled UAVs can be used for precise scaling of reconstructed tree point clouds. Higher image overlap does not significantly improve the accuracy or completeness of tree reconstructions. | Further research is needed for navigation precision in confined areas and obstacle avoidance in forested environments. | APM: Copter, Custom built DJI f550 UAV hexacopter | Mission Planner |
| Mohd Noor et al., 2020 [48] | The integration of MLS and UAV data can produce high-quality 3D models of building structures for cultural heritage purposes based on results of Malay cities. | Expansion of the MLS approach to capture other elements of the urban environment such as vegetation, infrastructure, and natural features. | DJI Phantom 3, Topcon IP-S3 HD laser scanner | Agisoft PhotoScan, ESRI City Engine |
| Manajitprasert et al., 2019 [49] | The study found that the UAV-SfM approach is an effective and accurate tool for modeling 3D cultural heritage after conducting a case study in Thailand. | Subsequent research could explore the incorporation of oblique images to identify and document minute details, thereby enhancing the effectiveness and precision of this technique as a substitute for laser scanning. | DJI Inspire 1 Pro, Riegl LMS-Z210 scanner | Pix4D, CloudCompare |
| Remondino, 2011 [50] | The authors found that 3D modeling and scanning technology significantly contributed to the documentation, conservation, and presentation of heritage information. | Developing new algorithms and methodologies to improve the 3D restitution pipeline, increase data storage, and improve the accessibility of geospatial data to non-expert users. | Helicopter, SLR camera | 3D Studio Max, Maya, Sketchup, Blender |
| Yan et al., 2021 [51] | Using the optimized trajectory can significantly improve the performance and quality of aerial 3D urban reconstruction. | Future work may focus on further improving the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method and extending it to other types of scenes. | DJI Phantom 4 Pro | Unreal4, COLMAP |
| Koch et al., 2019 [52] | An automatic 3D UAV flight framework can generate high-quality 3D models while ensuring safe flight paths in complex and densely built environments. | Future research could encompass a more flexible strategy for viewpoint placement, which includes multiple orientations for each camera viewpoint, while also taking into account the material of individual object parts. | DJI Mavic Pro 2 | Pix4D, Blender |
| Duan et al., 2021 [53] | Using UAV data to generate a real 3D model and extract the lake boundary enables an accurate representation of the lake’s actual scene. | Future work can explore the potential of automatic driving technology in lake estimation. | DJI Phantom 4 Pro, Huawei no. 3/Apache 3 | Bentley Context Capture Center 4.4, DP-Modeler 2.3 |
| Jo and Hong, 2019 [54] | Combining terrestrial laser scanning and UAV photogrammetry into a hybrid technology can enhance the reliability and applicability of 3D digital documentation and spatial analysis for cultural heritage sites. | Further investigation is required to decrease positional inconsistencies between the two survey technologies and to assess how they vary depending on various scales and geomorphic environments. | Leica Aibot X6, Sony Alpha 6000, Trimble R6 Model 3 | Agisoft PhotoScan Profesional Edition |
| Papadopoulou et al., 2021 [55] | Using a digital elevation model (DEM) as a source of information for designing UAV flight plans tailored to the topography of each geosite can offer significant advantages over conventional image collection methods. | Subsequent research can focus on developing a fully automated algorithm based on the DEM of the study area. | DJI Phantom 4 Pro | AgiSoft Metashape Professional Edition, ESRI ArcMap, CloudCompare |
| Templin and Popielarczyk, 2020 [56] | UAV-based photogrammetry is a cost-effective and efficient approach for accurately scanning, surveying, and capturing reality in 3D when documenting cultural heritage. | Future work includes exploring the possibilities of using higher resolution cameras for better results. | DJI Phantom 4 PRO, Sony RX100 II, Leica ScanStation C10 | CloudCompare, AgiSoft Metashape Professional Edition, Cyclone |
| Liang et al., 2017 [57] | The study found that UAV 3D modeling with high-resolution RS data can accurately calculate the three-dimension green quantity (3DGQ) of urban green spaces after conducting a case study in China. | Future work should include more time points to improve accuracy and use 3DGQ in urban green space design and planning. | Zero UAV YS09 | Pix4D |
| Type | Limitation |
|---|---|
| Policy | |
| Environment | |
| Disciplinary |
|
| Hardware | |
| Software |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
