Submitted:
27 September 2023
Posted:
29 September 2023
Read the latest preprint version here
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Research Methodology
3. Results and Discussions
3.1. Egg Consumption Trends
3.1.1. Egg Consumption from 1963 to 2020
3.1.2. Egg Consumption vs. Population Growth
3.1.3. Egg Consumption vs. GNI
3.2. Estimation of the Waste Eggshells
3.2.1. Estimation of Present and Future Waste of Eggshells
3.3. Quantity of Waste Eggshells vs. Other Comparable Wastes
3.4. City Wide Survey
3.4.1. Individuals
3.4.2. Families
4.3.3. Restaurants
4. Conclusions
- Hong Kong has emerged as the highest consumer of eggs globally, with an average consumption rate of 24.52 kg per capita annually in 2020. An extraordinary increase of approximately 100% in egg consumption was observed from 2008 to 2020, attributed to both improved economic conditions and population growth. However, a slight decline of 8.21% occurred in 2020 due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
- The estimated quantity of waste eggshells in 2020 was approximately 17,100 tons, considering an average eggshell weight of 10% and accounting for 10% wastage. This translated to a daily waste generation rate of 47 tons. If conditions akin to the pre-Covid-19 era, including economic stability, egg consumption trends, and population growth, persist, it is projected that Hong Kong could generate over 45,000 tons of waste eggshells annually by 2050, with a daily waste generation rate of up to 125 tons.
- Given the absence of other local industries that can utilize waste eggshells as a resource in their manufacturing processes, their incorporation into cementitious products emerges as the most practical and viable option. Chicken eggs are the preferred choice among Hong Kong residents, and Chinese eggs are particularly popular, likely due to their competitive pricing. Unfortunately, more than 90% of municipal waste eggshells end up in landfill sites. Encouragingly, the people of Hong Kong exhibit strong support for recycling waste eggshells, with restaurants displaying a particularly positive attitude towards such initiatives. These findings emphasize the potential for sustainable waste management practices involving waste eggshells in Hong Kong.
Acknowlegement
References
- Ajayan, N., K. P, S., A. U., A., Soman, S., 2020. Quantitative Variation in Calcium Carbonate Content in Shell of Different Chicken and Duck Varieties. Adv. Zool. Bot. 8, 1–5. [CrossRef]
- Altuntas, E., Sekeroglu, A., 2010. Mechanical behavior and physical properties of chicken egg as affected by different egg weights. J. Food Process Eng. 33, 115–127. [CrossRef]
- Annunziata, A., Agovino, M., Ferraro, A., Mariani, A., 2020. Household food waste: A case study in southern Italy. Sustain. 12. [CrossRef]
- ASTM, 2015. ASTM C150-Standard Specification for Portland Cement, in: ASTM Standards. West Conshohocken, PA, pp. 1–10. [CrossRef]
- ASTM, 2011. ASTM C911-Standard Specification for Quick Lime, Hydrated Lime, and Limestone for Selected Chemical and Industrial Uses, in: ASTM Standards. West Conshohocken, PA, pp. 6–8. [CrossRef]
- Bilska, B, Tomaszewska, M., Kołozyn-Krajewska, D., 2020. Analysis of the behaviors of polish consumers in relation to food waste. Sustain. 12. [CrossRef]
- Butcher, G.D., Miles, R., 2012. Concepts of Eggshell Quality.
- Casiraghi, E., Hidalgo, A., Rossi, M., 2005. Influence of weight grade on shell characteristics of marketed hen eggs, in: XI Th European Symposium on the Quality of Eggs and Egg Products. Doorwerth, Netherlands, pp. 23–26.
- Chang, S., Gunnell, D., Sterne, J.A.C., Lu, T., Cheng, A.T.A., 2009. Was the economic crisis 1997 – 1998 responsible for rising suicide rates in East / Southeast Asia ? A time – trend analysis for Japan, Hong Kong, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and Thailand. Soc. Sci. Med. 68, 1322–1331. [CrossRef]
- Chung, S.S., Poon, C.S., 1994. Hong Kong citizens’ attitude towards waste recycling and waste minimization measures. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 10, 377–400. [CrossRef]
- Environment Bureau, 2014. A Food Waste & Yard Waste Plan for Hong Kong 2014-2022.
- Environment Bureau, 2013. Blueprint for sustainable use of resources 2013 – 2022. Hong Kong.
- EPD, 2022. Monitoring of Solid Waste in Hong Kong - Waste statistics for 2021. Hong Kong Environ. Bur. Environ. Prot. Dep.
- EPD, 2021. Monitoring of solid waste in Hong Kong - Waste statistics for 2020. Hong Kong Environ. Bur. Environ. Prot. Dep.
- EPD, 2020. Monitoring Solid Waste in Hong Kong - Waste statistics for 2019. Hong Kong Environ. Bur. Environ. Prot. Dep.
- EPD, 2019a. Monitoring of solid waste in Hong Kong - Waste statistics for 2017. Hong Kong Environ. Bur. Environ. Prot. Dep.
- EPD, 2019b. Monitoring of Solid Waste in Hong Kong - Waste Statistics for 2018. Hong Kong Environ. Bur. Environ. Prot. Dep.
- EPD, 2018. Monitoring of Solid Waste in Hong Kong -Waste Statistics for 2016. Hong Kong Environ. Bur. Environ. Prot. Dep.
- EPD, 2017. Monitoring of solid waste in Hong Kong - Waste statistics for 2015. Hong Kong Environ. Bur. Environ. Prot. Dep.
- EPD, 2015a. Monitoring of solid waste in Hong Kong - Waste statistics for 2013. Hong Kong Environ. Bur. Environ. Prot. Dep.
- EPD, 2015b. Monitoring of solid waste in Hong Kong - Waste statistics for 2014. Hong Kong Environ. Bur. Environ. Prot. Dep.
- EPD, 2014. Monitoring of solid waste in Hong Kong - Waste statistics for 2012. Hong Kong Environ. Bur. Environ. Prot. Dep.
- EPD, 2012. Monitoring of solid waste in Hong Kong - Waste statistics for 2011. Hong Kong Environ. Bur. Environ. Prot. Dep.
- EPD, 2011. Monitoring of solid waste in Hong Kong - Waste statistics for 2010. Hong Kong Environ. Bur. Environ. Prot. Dep.
- EPD, 2010a. Monitoring of solid waste in Hong Kong - Waste statistics for 2008. Hong Kong Environ. Bur. Environ. Prot. Dep.
- EPD, 2010b. Monitoring of solid waste in Hong Kong - Waste statistics for 2009. Hong Kong Environ. Bur. Environ. Prot. Dep.
- EPD, 2008. Monitoring of solid waste in Hong Kong - Waste statistics for 2007. Hong Kong Environ. Bur. Environ. Prot. Dep.
- EPD, 2007. Monitoring of Solid Waste in Hong Kong - Waste statistics for 2006. Hong Kong Environ. Bur. Environ. Prot. Dep.
- EPD, 2006. Monitoring of solid waste in Hong Kong - Waste statistics for 2005. Hong Kong Environ. Bur. Environ. Prot. Dep.
- EPD, 2005a. Territory Wide Source Separation Program [WWW Document]. Environ. Prot. Dep. Available online: https://www.wastereduction.gov.hk/en/household/source_intro.htm (accessed on 31 May 2022).
- EPD, 2005b. Waste Charging and Producer Responsibility Scheme (PRS) [WWW Document]. Waste Charg. Available online: https://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/psb_charging/en/introduction/index.html.
- EPD, 2005c. Monitoring of solid waste in Hong Kong - Waste statistics for 2004. Hong Kong Environ. Bur. Environ. Prot. Dep.
- EPD, 2004. Monitoring of solid waste in Hong Kong - Waste statistics for 2003. Hong Kong Environ. Bur. Environ. Prot. Dep.
- EPD, 2003. Monitoring of solid waste in Hong Kong - Waste statistics for 2002. Hong Kong Environ. Bur. Environ. Prot. Dep.
- EPD, 2002. Monitoring of solid waste in Hong Kong - Waste statistics for 2001. Hong Kong Environ. Bur. Environ. Prot. Dep.
- EPD, 2001. Monitoring of solid waste in Hong Kong - Waste statistics for 2000, Hong Kong Environment Bureau, Environmental Protection Department. Hong Kong.
- EPD, 2000. Monitoring of solid waste in Hong Kong 1999. Environ. Prot. Dep. Hong Kong Gov.
- EPD, 1999. Monitoring of Solid Waste in Hong Kong 1998. Environ. Prot. Dep. Hong Kong Gov.
- EPD, 1998. Monitoring of Solid Waste in Hong Kong 1997. Environ. Prot. Dep. Hong Kong Gov.
- FAO, FAOSTAT - Food Balances [WWW Document]. Food Agric. Organ. 2023. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS (accessed on 28 June 2023).
- FAO, FAOSTAT- New Food Balances [WWW Document]. Food Agric. Organ. 2021. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS (accessed on 31 May 2022).
- FAO, FAOSTAT- Old Food Balances [WWW Document]. Food Agric. Organ. 2013. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBSH (accessed on 28 June 2023).
- Freire, M.N., Sousa, S.J.G., Holanda, J.N.F., 2008. Using eggshell waste in red wall tiles. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Waste Resour. Manag. 161, 23–27. [CrossRef]
- Galic, A., Filipovic, D., Janjecic, Z., Bedekovic, D., Kovacev, I., Copec, K., Pliestic, S., 2019. Physical and mechanical characteristics of Hisex Brown hen eggs from three different housing systems. South African. J. Anim. Sci. 49, 468–476. [CrossRef]
- Godfray, H., Crute, I., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J., Nisbett, N., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Toulmin, C., Whiteley, R., 2010. The future of the global food system. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 365, 2769–2777. [CrossRef]
- Grasso, A.C., Olthof, M.R., Boevé, A.J., van Dooren, C., Lähteenmäki, L., Brouwer, I.A., 2019. Socio-demographic predictors of food waste behavior in Denmark and Spain. Sustain. 11, 1–14. [CrossRef]
- Hamilton, R.M.G., 1982. Methods and Factors That Affect the Measurement of Egg Shell Quality. Poult. Sci. 61, 2022–2039. [CrossRef]
- He, H., Reynolds, J.C., Zhou, Z., Wang, Y., Boland, J., 2019. Changes of waste generation in Australia : Insights from structural decomposition analysis. Waste Manag. 83, 142–150. [CrossRef]
- Herzberg, R., Schmidt, T.G., Schneider, F., 2020. Characteristics and determinants of domestic food waste: A representative diary study across Germany. Sustain. 12, 1–17. [CrossRef]
- HKMA, n.d. HKMA, n.d. Economic and Financial Environment. Hong Kong Monet. Auth. 47–57.
- Hockett, D. Hockett, D., Lober, D.J., Pilgrim, K., 1995. Determinants of Per Capita Municipal Solid Waste Generation in the Southeastern United States. J. Environ. Manage. 45, 205–217.
- Hopfenberg, R. Hopfenberg, R., Pimentel, D., 2001. Human Population Numnbers as a Function of Food Supply. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 3, 1–15.
- Hossain, M.U., Poon, C.S., Lo, I.M.C., Cheng, J.C.P., 2017. Sustainable strategies for the reduction of environmental impacts in the cement industry. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 120, 199–208.
- Hossain, M.U., Sohail, A., Ng, S.T., 2019. Developing a GHG-based methodological approach to support the sourcing of sustainable construction materials and products. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 145, 160–169. [CrossRef]
- Huang, Q., Chen, G., Wang, Y., Xu, L., Chen, W.-Q., 2020. Identifying the socioeconomic drivers of solid waste recycling in China for the period 2005–2017. Sci. Total Environ. 138137. [CrossRef]
- Jeswani, H.K., Figueroa-Torres, G., Azapagic, A., 2021. The extent of food waste generation in the UK and its environmental impacts. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 26, 532–547. [CrossRef]
- Kamaruddin, S., Goh, W.I., Jhatial, A.A., Lakhiar, M.T., 2018. Chemical and Fresh State Properties of Foamed Concrete Incorporating Palm Oil Fuel Ash and Eggshell Ash as Cement Replacement. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 7, 350. [CrossRef]
- King’ori, A.M., 2011. A Review of the uses of poultry eggshells and shell membranes. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 10, 908–912. [CrossRef]
- Ko, P.S., Poon, C.S., 2009. Domestic waste management and recovery in Hong Kong. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 11, 104–109. [CrossRef]
- Kristl, M., Jurak, S., Brus, M., Sem, V., Kristl, J., 2019. Evaluation of calcium carbonate in eggshells using thermal analysis. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 138, 2751–2758. [CrossRef]
- Ling, T.C., Poon, C.S., Wong, H.W., 2013. Management and recycling of waste glass in concrete products: Current situations in Hong Kong. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 70, 25–31. [CrossRef]
- Mak, T.M.W., Xiong, X., Tsang, D.C.W., Yu, I.K.M., Poon, C.S., 2020. Sustainable food waste management towards circular bioeconomy: Policy review, limitations and opportunities. Bioresour. Technol. 297, 122497. [CrossRef]
- Matschei, T., Lothenbach, B., Glasser, F.P., 2007. Thermodynamic properties of Portland cement hydrates in the system CaO–Al2O3–SiO2–CaSO4–CaCO3–H2O. 37, 1379–1410. [CrossRef]
- Meyers, W., Kalaitzandonakes, N., 2012. World population growth and food supply, in: Popp, J., Matlock, M., Kemper, N., Jahn, M. (Eds.), The Role of Biotechnology in a Sustainable Food Supply. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–16.
- Noufal, M., Yuanyuan, L., Maalla, Z., Adipah, S., 2020. Determinants of Household Solid Waste Generation and Composition in Homs City, Syria. J. Environ. Public Health. 2020, 1–15. [CrossRef]
- OEC, Trade Balance of Eggs in Hong Kong [WWW Document]. Obs. Econ. Complex. 2021. Available online: https://oec.world/en/profile/bilateral-product/eggs/reporter/hkg?yearExportSelector=exportYear1. (accessed on 28 June 2023).
- Ofuyatan, O.M., Adeniyi, A.G., Ijie, D., Ighalo, J.O., Oluwafemi, J., 2020. Development of high-performance self compacting concrete using eggshell powder and blast furnace slag as partial cement replacement. Constr. Build. Mater. 256, 119403. [CrossRef]
- P. Hunton, 2005. Research on eggshell structure and quality : An Historical Review. Brazilian J. Poult. Sci. 7, 67–71.
- Pocol, C.B., Pinoteau, M., Amuza, A., Burlea-Schiopoiu, A., Glogovețan, A.I., 2020. Food waste behavior among romanian consumers: A cluster analysis. Sustain. 12, 1–17. [CrossRef]
- Przezbórska-Skobiej, L, Wiza, P.L., 2021. Food waste in households in poland—attitudes of young and older consumers towards the phenomenon of food waste as demonstrated by students and lecturers of puls. Sustain. 13. [CrossRef]
- Quina, M.J., Soares, M.A.R., Quinta-Ferreira, R., 2017. Applications of industrial eggshell as a valuable anthropogenic resource. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 123, 176–186. [CrossRef]
- Robert, J.R., 2004. Factors Affecting Egg Internal Quality and Egg Shell Quality in Laying Hens. J. Poult. Sci. 41, 161–177. [CrossRef]
- Rosegrant, M.W., Ringler, C., 2000. Asian economic crisis and the long-term global food situation. Food Policy 25, 243–254.
- Shekhawat, P., Sharma, G., Singh, R.M., 2019. Strength behavior of alkaline activated eggshell powder and flyash geopolymer cured at ambient temperature. Constr. Build. Mater. 223, 1112–1122. [CrossRef]
- Skordili, S., 2013. Economic Crisis as a Catalyst for Food Planning in Athens Economic Crisis as a Catalyst for Food Planning in Athens. Int. Plan. Stud. 37–41. [CrossRef]
- Soukiazis, E., Proença, S., 2020. The determinants of waste generation and recycling performance across the Portuguese municipalities – A simultaneous equation approach. Waste Manag. 114, 321–330. [CrossRef]
- Studdert, L.J., Frongillo, E.A., Valois, P., 2001. Household Food Insecurity Was Prevalent in Java during Indonesia ’ s Economic Crisis 1. Am. Soc. Nutr. Sci. 2685–2691.
- Suk, Y.O., Park, C., 2001. Effect of breed and age of hens on the yolk to albumen ratio in two different genetic stocks. Poult. Sci. 80, 855–858. [CrossRef]
- Suttibak, S., Nitivattananon, V., 2008. Assessment of factors influencing the performance of solid waste recycling programs. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 53, 45–56. [CrossRef]
- Troschinetz, A.M., Mihelcic, J.R., 2009. Sustainable recycling of municipal solid waste in developing countries. Waste Manag. 29, 915–923. [CrossRef]
- Ummartyotin, S., Manuspiya, H., 2018. A critical review of eggshell waste: An effective source of hydroxyapatite as photocatalyst. J. Met. Mater. Miner. 28, 124–135. [CrossRef]
- van der Ploeg, J.D., 2020. From biomedical to politico-economic crisis: the food system in times of Covid-19. J. Peasant Stud. 47, 944–972. [CrossRef]
- Vlčková, J, Tůmová, E., Ketta, M., Englmaierová, M., Chodová, D., 2018. Effect of housing system and age of laying hens on eggshell quality, microbial contamination, and penetration of microorganisms into eggs. . Czech J. Anim. Sci. 63, 51–60. [CrossRef]
- Wan, C., Qiping, G., Choi, S., 2018. Differential public support for waste management policy : The case of Hong Kong. J. Clean. Prod. 175, 477–488. [CrossRef]
- Wan, C., Shen, G.Q., Choi, S., 2017. A review on political factors influencing public support for urban environmental policy. Environ. Sci. Policy. 75, 70–80. [CrossRef]
- Wan, C., Shen, G.Q., Yu, A., 2015. Key determinants of willingness to support policy measures on recycling : A case study in Hong Kong. Environ. Sci. Policy. 54, 409–418. [CrossRef]
- Wang, H., Liu, X., Wang, N., Zhang, K., Wang, F., Zhang, S., Wang, R., Zheng, P., Matsushita, M., 2020. Key factors influencing public awareness of household solid waste recycling in urban areas of China: A case study. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 158, 104813. [CrossRef]
- Wang, K., Lu, J., Liu, H., 2021. Influential factors affecting the generation of kitchen solid waste in Shanghai, China. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 71, 501–514. [CrossRef]
- Wolford, J.H., Tanaka, K., 1970. Factors Influencing Egg Shell Quality - A Review. Worlds. Poult. Sci. J. [CrossRef]
- World Bank, GNI per capita, Atlas method (current US$) - Hong Kong SAR, China [WWW Document]. World Bank Natl. accounts data, OECD Natl. Accounts data files. 2023. Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GNP.PCAP.CD?locations=HK (accessed on 14 July 2023).
- Yang, H.M., Wang, Z.Y., Lu, J., 2009. Study on the relationship between eggshell colors and egg quality as well as shell ultrastructure in Yangzhou chicken. African J. Biotechnol. 8, 2898–2902.
- Yerramala, A., 2014. Properties of concrete with eggshell powder as cement replacement. Indian Concr. J. 88, 94–102.
- Zambrano-monserrate, M.A., Ruano, M.A., Ormeño-candelario, V., 2021. Determinants of municipal solid waste : a global analysis by countries ’ income level. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J., Cheng, J.C.P., Lo, I.M.C., 2014. Life cycle carbon footprint measurement of Portland cement and ready mix concrete for a city with local scarcity of resources like Hong Kong. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 19, 745–757. [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y., 2021. Factors affecting household solid waste generation and management in Sri Lanka : an empirical study. Environ. Monit. Assess. [CrossRef]









Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).