Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Modeling Adverse Events Counts in the Bulgarian Pharmacovigilance Database

Version 1 : Received: 12 September 2023 / Approved: 13 September 2023 / Online: 13 September 2023 (07:51:40 CEST)

How to cite: Antonov, L.; Kirilov, B.; Dokova, K. Modeling Adverse Events Counts in the Bulgarian Pharmacovigilance Database. Preprints 2023, 2023090849. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202309.0849.v1 Antonov, L.; Kirilov, B.; Dokova, K. Modeling Adverse Events Counts in the Bulgarian Pharmacovigilance Database. Preprints 2023, 2023090849. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202309.0849.v1

Abstract

We tested the possibility of using “adverse events count” (AEC) as a drug-risk indicator and side-effect severity indicator. Data from 3938 adverse event (AE) reports for COVID-19 vaccines (Comirnaty, Moderna, Vaxzevria, and Janssen) and 6869 AE reports for other medicines were collected from the Bulgarian Drug Agency database (01.01.2018–31.03.2022). AEC was modeled with zero-adjusted negative binomial (ZANBI) and zero-adjusted Poisson inverse Gaussian (ZAPIG) regression models, which account for zero absence and overdispersion. The models’ fit was checked with residual diagnostic plots and parametric correspondence to normality. Explanatory variables were: age, sex, sequence number (order of submission), severity of AE, and vaccine type. Average AEC was higher in severe vs. non-severe AE, and in females vs. males; it decreased with age and was lower in Comirnaty than other vaccines. Variability of AEC for COVID-19 data decreased with sequence number in severe AE and increased in non-severe AE. Full ZANBI models had greater sensitivity than parametric ZANBI or ZAPIG models. Results showed correlation between AEC and AE severity, suggesting AEC as a simple and reliable measure of drug-risk and side-effect severity for clinicians and regulators, especially for COVID-19 vaccines.

Keywords

COVID-19 vaccines; SARS-CoV-2; vaccine safety; pharmacovigilance; vaccination campaigns; adverse event; negative binomial distribution; Poisson-inverse Gaussian distribution; model diagnostics; real-world data

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Medicine and Pharmacology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.