Submitted:
30 August 2023
Posted:
31 August 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Case Report
Recipient and Donor Background
Uterus Transplantation Surgery
Monitoring for Acute Cellular Rejection and Treatment of Rejection Episodes
Vaginal Stricture
In vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer
Overview: First Pregnancy
Overview: Second Pregnancy


Open History-Indicated Cerclage
Overview: Third Pregnancy
3. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| IVF | in vitro fertilization |
| UTx | uterus transplantation |
References
- Testa, G.; McKenna, G.J.; Gunby, R.T., Jr.; Anthony, T.; Koon, E.C.; Warren, A.M.; Putman, J.M.; Zhang, L.; dePrisco, G.; Mitchell, J.M.; et al. First live birth after uterus transplantation in the United States. Am. J. Transplant. 2018, 18, 1270–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Johannesson L, Richards E, Reddy V, Walter J, Olthoff K, Quintini C, Tzakis A, Latif N, Porrett P, O'Neill K, Testa G. The First 5 Years of Uterus Transplant in the US: A Report From the United States Uterus Transplant Consortium. JAMA Surg. 2022, 157, 790-797. PMID: 35793102; PMCID: PMC9260640. [CrossRef]
- Johannesson L, Testa G, Borries TM, Wall A, Ma TW, Eagle EA, Jain A, Taylor SD, dePrisco G, Gregg AR. Doppler Flow Indices and Prediction of Embryo Transfer Success and Pregnancy Outcome in Uterus Transplant Recipients. Am J Perinatol. 2023 Feb 15. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36608701. [CrossRef]
- Johannesson L, Testa G, Putman JM, McKenna GJ, Koon EC, York JR, Bayer J, Zhang L, Rubeo ZS, Gunby RT, Gregg AR. Twelve Live Births After Uterus Transplantation in the Dallas UtErus Transplant Study. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb 1;137(2):241-249. PMID: 33416285. [CrossRef]
- Brown, R.; Gagnon, R.; Delisle, M.F.; Gagnon, R.; Bujold, E.; Basso, M.; Bos, H.; Brown, R.; Cooper, S.; Crane, J.; et al.; Maternal Fetal Medicine Committee Cervical insufficiency and cervical cerclage. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2013, 35, 1115–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Drakeley, A.J.; Roberts, D.; Alfirevic, Z. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing pregnancy loss in women. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2003, 2003, CD003253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alfirevic, Z.; Stampalija, T.; Medley, N. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 6, CD008991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anthony, G.S.; Walker, R.G.; Cameron, A.D.; Price, J.L.; Walker, J.J.; Calder, A.A. Transabdominal cervico-isthmic cerclage in the management of cervical incompetence. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 1997, 72, 127–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gibb, D.M.; Salaria, D.A. Transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage in the management of recurrent second trimester miscarriage and preterm delivery. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1995, 102, 802–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thakur, M.; Mahajan, K. Cervical insufficiency. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Berghella, V.; Seibel-Seamon, J. Contemporary use of cervical cerclage. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007, 50, 468–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Skupski, D.W.; Lin, S.N.; Reiss, J.; Eglinton, G.S. Extremely short cervix in the second trimester: bed rest or modified Shirodkar cerclage? J. Perinat. Med. 2014, 42, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miller, E.S.; Grobman, W.A.; Fonseca, L.; Robinson, B.K. Indomethacin and antibiotics in examination-indicated cerclage: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014, 123, 1311–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hulshoff, C.C.; Bosgraaf, R.P.; Spaanderman, M.E.A.; Inthout, J.; Scholten, R.R.; Van Drongelen, J. The efficacy of emergency cervical cerclage in singleton and twin pregnancies: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM 2023, 5, 100971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Berghella, V.; Rafael, T.J.; Szychowski, J.M.; Rust, O.A.; Owen, J. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography in women with singleton gestations and previous preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011, 117, 663–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, Z.; Khan, R.; Wazir, A.K. Success rate of cervical cerclage in preventing preterm labour. J. Pregnancy Child Health 2015, 2, 176. [Google Scholar]
- Shennan, A.; Chandiramani, M.; Bennett, P.; David, A.L.; Girling, J.; Ridout, A.; Seed, P.T.; Simpson, N.; Thornton, S.; Tydeman, G.; et al. MAVRIC: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of transabdominal vs transvaginal cervical cerclage. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 222, 261.e1–261.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schaible, B.; Langhals, D.; Taylor, L.; Gold, J.; Seybold, D.; Calhoun, B.C. Residency experience with physical examination- and ultrasound-indicated cerclage: a single center retrospective study. Ochsner J. 2023, 23, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johannesson, L.; Testa, G.; Flyckt, R.; Farrell, R.; Quintini, C.; Wall, A.; O’Neill, K.; Tzakis, A.; Richards, E.G.; Gordon, S.M.; Porrett, P.M. Guidelines for standardized nomenclature and reporting in uterus transplantation: An opinion from the United States Uterus Transplant Consortium. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 3319–3325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McDonald, I.A. Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscarriage. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Emp. 1957, 64, 346–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Testa, G.; McKenna, G.J.; Bayer, J.; Wall, A.; Fernandez, H.; Martinez, E.; Gupta, A.; Ruiz, R.; Onaca, N.; Gunby, R.T.; et al. The evolution of transplantation from saving lives to fertility treatment: DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study). Ann. Surg. 2020, 272, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Agarwal, A.; Johannesson, L.; Findeis, S.K.; Punar, M.; Askar, M.; Ma, T.W.; Pinto, K.; Demetris, A.J.; Testa, G. Clinicopathological analysis of uterine allografts including proposed scoring of ischemia reperfusion injury and T-cell–mediated rejection—Dallas UtErus Transplant Study: a pilot study. Transplantation 2022, 106, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schulz, P.; Testa, G.; York, J.R.; Johannesson, L. Children after uterus transplantation: 2-year outcomes from the Dallas UtErus Transplant Study (DUETS). BJOG 2022, 129, 2117–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

| Embryo transfer |
Months after UTx |
Embryo implantation |
Pregnancy outcome |
Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.9 | Yes | Miscarriage at GA 17w0d | Failed ultrasound and exam-indicated McDonald cerclage |
| 2 | 15.4 | Yes | Miscarriage at GA 19w1d | Failed history-indicated McDonald cerclage and failed abdominal rescue cerclage |
| 24.8 | History-indicated open abdominal cerclage placed | |||
| 3 | 26.0 | No | ||
| 4 | 28.0 | No | ||
| 5 | 37.3 | Yes | Biochemical pregnancy | |
| 6 | 42.0 | Yes | Biochemical pregnancy | |
| 7 | 45.7 | Yes | Live birth at GA 37w6d | Pregnancy success |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).