Submitted:
02 August 2023
Posted:
07 August 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Conceptual Framework
2.1. Sustainability Transitions Theory (STT) in the start-ups business context
2.2. Strategic Niche Management (SNM) and the role of start-up business models in sustainable transitions
2.3. Transformative business model (TBM) for decarbonization
2.4. Role of advanced technologies (ATs) for transformative start-ups business models
2.5. The elements of sustainability that foster the development of sustainable businesses for start-ups
3. Methodology
3.1. Overview
3.2. Methodology of empirical analysis
3.3. Characterization of empirical analysis
3.4. Recruitment of interviews
3.5. Sample characterization of interviews
3.6. Questionnaire of interviews
3.7. Interview procedure
3.8. Grounded theory analysis
4. Results
4.1. Secondary data analysis
4.1.1. Prioritizing Production and Consumption in Sustainable Start-Ups: Trends and Challenges
4.2. Interviews results
4.2.1. Advanced technological resources, transformation of business model and sustainability transitions
4.2.2. Sustainable elements in the transformation of production and consumption
4.2.3. The influence of technology on business models and other insights
4.2.4. Start-ups and the new institutional arrangements

5. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Appendix A
| Organization | Type Organization | Organization size | Location | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start-ups | Incub/Acc | Other | Up to 9 |
10 to 49 |
50 to 99 | North | South | Center | Açores | Madeira | |
| Start-ups#1 | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Start-ups#2 | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Start-ups#3 | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Start-ups#4 | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Start-ups#5 | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Start-ups#6 | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Start-ups#7 | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Start-ups#8 | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Start-ups#9 | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Start-ups#10 | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Incubators/Acc. | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Government body | x | x | x | ||||||||
| 10 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| 83.3% | 8.3% | 8.3% | 58.3% | 33.3% | 8.33% | 66.7% | 0.00% | 33.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |
| Organization | Position | Age | Sexo | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEO | Director | Leader | Other | Up to 20 | 21 to 30 | 31 to 40 | 41 to 50 | Over 50 | Masc. | Fem. | |
| Start-ups#1 | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Start-ups#2 | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Start-ups#3 | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Start-ups#4 | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Start-ups#5 | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Start-ups#6 | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Start-ups#7 | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Start-ups#8 | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Start-ups#9 | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Start-ups#10 | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Incubators/Acc. | x | x | x | ||||||||
| Government body | X | x | x | ||||||||
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 4 | |
| 91.7% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.3% | 0.00% | 16.7% | 66.7% | 8.3% | 8.3% | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
Appendix B
![]() |
| By type of Business and sector | |||||
| Sectors/Kind of business | B2B | B2C | B2B2C | Others | Total |
| Consumer goods (CG) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Transport (TP) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Industry (ID) | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
| Service (SV) | 15 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 22 |
| Other (OT) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kind of corporation | Number | % | By founding year | Number | % | |
| Multinational Corporation (MC) | 2 | 5.9% | Y2014 | 5 | 5.5% | |
| National Corporation (NC) | 1 | 2.9% | Y2015 | 4 | 8.3% | |
| Start-up (ST) | 18 | 52.9% | Y2016 | 2 | 11.2% | |
| Scale-up (SU) | 4 | 11.8% | Y2017 | 2 | 13.9% | |
| Unicorn (UN) | 1 | 2.9% | Y2018 | 8 | 16.7% | |
| Spin-off (SO) | 7 | 20.6% | Y2019 | 5 | 22.2% | |
| Other (OT) | 1 | 2.9% | Y2020 | 8 | 22.2% | |
| Working sector | Number | % | By conception | Number | % | |
| Transport (TP) | 3 | 8.8% | Scholar | 14 | 42.0% | |
| Thermal comfort (TC) | 0 | 0.0% | Executive Business | 3 | 8.0% | |
| Consumer goods (CG) | 1 | 2.9% | Entrepreneur/liberal professional/self employed | 17 | 50.0% | |
| Industry (ID) | 8 | 23.5% | Current stage | |||
| Service (SV) | 22 | 64.7% | Beginner | 25 | 72.0% | |
| Other (OT) | 0 | 0.0% | Experienced | 9 | 28.0% |
References
- Creutzig, F., J. Roy, P. Devine-Wright, J. Díaz-José, F.W. Geels, A. Grubler, N. Maïzi, E. Masanet, Y. Mulugetta, C.D. Onyige, P.E. Perkins, A. Sanches-Pereira, E.U. Weber, 2022: Demand, services and social aspects of mitigation Supplementary Material. In IPCC, 2022: Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Change [P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade, A. Al Khourdajie, R. van Diemen, D. McCollum, M. Pathak, S. Some, P. Vyas, R. Fradera, M. Belkacemi, A. Hasija, G. Lisboa, S. Luz, J. Malley, (eds.)]. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/.
- J. D. Sachs, G. Schmidt-Traub, M. Mazzucato, D. Messner, N. Nakicenovic, and J. Rockström, “Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals,” Nat Sustain, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 805–814, 2019. [CrossRef]
- S. Evans et al., “Business model innovation for sustainability: Towards a unified perspective for creation of sustainable business models,” Bus Strategy Environ, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 597–608, 2017. [CrossRef]
- F. Lüdeke-Freund, “Towards a conceptual framework of’business models for sustainability’,” Knowledge collaboration & learning for sustainable innovation, R. Wever, J. Quist, A. Tukker, J. Woudstra, F. Boons, N. Beute, eds., Delft, pp. 25–29, 2010.
- WEF, “SDG 07- Affordable And Clean Energy: These are the winners of the New Champions Awards 2021,” World Economic Forum, Jul. 21, 2021.
- J. Köhler et al., “An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions,” Environ Innov Soc Transit, vol. 31, pp. 1–32, 2019. [CrossRef]
- J. Schot and F. W. Geels, “Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy,” Technol Anal Strateg Manag, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 537–554, 2008. [CrossRef]
- S. Kavadias, K. Ladas, and C. Loch, “The transformative business model,” Harv Bus Rev, vol. 94, no. 10, pp. 91–98, 2016.
- B. Wagner and G. Svensson, “A framework to navigate sustainability in business networks: The transformative business sustainability (TBS) model,” European Business Review, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 340–367, 2014. [CrossRef]
- B. Brenner, “Transformative sustainable business models in the light of the digital imperative—A global business economics perspective,” Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 12, p. 4428, 2018. [CrossRef]
- E. Costa, P. Wells, L. Wang, and G. Costa, “The electric vehicle and renewable energy: Changes in boundary conditions that enhance business model innovations,” J Clean Prod, vol. 333, p. 130034, 2022. [CrossRef]
- E. Costa, A. Horta, A. Correia, J. Seixas, G. Costa, and D. Sperling, “Diffusion of electric vehicles in Brazil from the stakeholders’ perspective,” Int J Sustain Transp, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 865–878, 2021. [CrossRef]
- Cambridge, “Cambridge business English dictionary,”. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/, Jan. 27, 2023.
- C. Loebbecke and A. Picot, “Reflections on societal and business model transformation arising from digitization and big data analytics: A research agenda,” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 149–157, 2015. [CrossRef]
- J. Markard, R. Raven, and B. Truffer, “Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects,” Res Policy, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 955–967, 2012. [CrossRef]
- P. Ghisellini, C. Cialani, and S. Ulgiati, “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems,” J Clean Prod, vol. 114, pp. 11–32, 2016. [CrossRef]
- M. J. Bitner, S. W. Brown, M. Goul, and S. Urban, “Services science journey: foundations, progress, and challenges,” Service science, management and engineering education for the 21st century, pp. 227–233, 2008. [CrossRef]
- J. Linåker, H. Munir, K. Wnuk, and C.-E. Mols, “Motivating the contributions: An open innovation perspective on what to share as open source software,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 135, pp. 17–36, 2018. [CrossRef]
- J. Grainger-Brown and S. Malekpour, “Implementing the sustainable development goals: A review of strategic tools and frameworks available to organisations,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 1381, 2019. [CrossRef]
- R. Ziegler, C. Poirier, M. Lacasse, and E. Murray, “Circular Economy and Cooperatives—An Exploratory Survey,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 2530, 2023. [CrossRef]
- A. Di Vaio, R. Palladino, R. Hassan, and O. Escobar, “Artificial intelligence and business models in the sustainable development goals perspective: A systematic literature review,” J Bus Res, vol. 121, pp. 283–314, 2020. [CrossRef]
- S. Tiba, F. J. van Rijnsoever, and M. P. Hekkert, “Sustainability startups and where to find them: Investigating the share of sustainability startups across entrepreneurial ecosystems and the causal drivers of differences,” J Clean Prod, vol. 306, p. 127054, 2021. [CrossRef]
- C. Sousa and E. Costa, “Types of Policies for the Joint Diffusion of Electric Vehicles with Renewable Energies and Their Use Worldwide,” Energies (Basel), vol. 15, no. 20, p. 7585, 2022. [CrossRef]
- H. Guyader and L. Piscicelli, “Business model diversification in the sharing economy: The case of GoMore,” J Clean Prod, vol. 215, pp. 1059–1069, 2019. [CrossRef]
- V. Corvello, A. Steiber, and S. Alänge, “Antecedents, processes and outcomes of collaboration between corporates and start-ups,” Review of Managerial Science, pp. 1–26, 2021. [CrossRef]
- P. Wells, “Business Model Innovation at the Interface Between Global Production Systems and Local Demand,” Contemporary Operations and Logistics: Achieving Excellence in Turbulent Times, pp. 45–60, 2019. [CrossRef]
- N. Roome and C. Louche, “Journeying toward business models for sustainability: A conceptual model found inside the black box of organisational transformation,” Organ Environ, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 11–35, 2016. [CrossRef]
- N. M. P. Bocken, S. W. Short, P. Rana, and S. Evans, “A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes,” J Clean Prod, vol. 65, pp. 42–56, 2014. [CrossRef]
- M. Geissdoerfer, D. Vladimirova, and S. Evans, “Sustainable business model innovation: A review,” J Clean Prod, vol. 198, pp. 401–416, 2018. [CrossRef]
- K. S. R. Warner and M. Wäger, “Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal,” Long Range Plann, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 326–349, 2019. [CrossRef]
- J. Zysman and A. Newman, How revolutionary was the digital revolution?: national responses, market transitions, and global technology. Stanford University Press, 2006. [CrossRef]
- V. Jafari-Sadeghi, A. Garcia-Perez, E. Candelo, and J. Couturier, “Exploring the impact of digital transformation on technology entrepreneurship and technological market expansion: The role of technology readiness, exploration and exploitation,” J Bus Res, vol. 124, pp. 100–111, 2021. [CrossRef]
- S. Nambisan, M. Wright, and M. Feldman, “The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes,” Res Policy, vol. 48, no. 8, p. 103773, 2019. [CrossRef]
- S. Denicolai, A. Zucchella, and G. Magnani, “Internationalization, digitalization, and sustainability: Are SMEs ready? A survey on synergies and substituting effects among growth paths,” Technol Forecast Soc Change, vol. 166, p. 120650, 2021. [CrossRef]
- C. M. Christensen, The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press, 2013.
- P. C. Verhoef et al., “Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda,” J Bus Res, vol. 122, pp. 889–901, 2021. [CrossRef]
- J. Aspara, J.-A. Lamberg, A. Laukia, and H. Tikkanen, “Corporate business model transformation and inter-organizational cognition: The case of Nokia,” Long Range Plann, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 459–474, 2013. [CrossRef]
- J. Aspara, J. Lamberg, A. Laukia, and H. Tikkanen, “Strategic management of business model transformation: lessons from Nokia,” Management Decision, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 622–647, 2011. [CrossRef]
- R. Biloslavo, C. Bagnoli, M. Massaro, and A. Cosentino, “Business model transformation toward sustainability: the impact of legitimation,” Management Decision, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 1643–1662, 2020. [CrossRef]
- P. Di Muro and J. R. Turner, “Entrepreneurial opportunity pursuit through business model transformation: a project perspective,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 968–979, 2018. [CrossRef]
- J. Frankenfield, “Artificial Intelligence: What It Is and How It Is Used,” Investopedia, Jul. 21, 2023.
- M. Fontes, N. Bento, and A. D. Andersen, “Unleashing the industrial transformative capacity of innovations,” Environ Innov Soc Transit, vol. 40, pp. 207–221, 2021. [CrossRef]
- N. et al. Mittal, “Fueling the AI transformation: Four key actions powering widespread value from AI, right now,” UK, Jul. 2023.
- N. Bento and M. Fontes, “Spatial diffusion and the formation of a technological innovation system in the receiving country: The case of wind energy in Portugal,” Environ Innov Soc Transit, vol. 15, pp. 158–179, 2015. [CrossRef]
- P. C. Reinecke, J. A. Küberling-Jost, T. Wrona, and A. K. Zapf, “Towards a dynamic value network perspective of sustainable business models: the example of RECUP,” Journal of Business Economics, pp. 1–31, 2023. [CrossRef]
- A. Dale, S. Arber, M. Procter, and L. Unwin Hyman, “DESK RESEARCH,” Market Research in Practice: A Guide to the Basics, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 223, 2004.
- S. Blank and B. Dorf, The startup owner’s manual: The step-by-step guide for building a great company. John Wiley & Sons, 2020.
- M. Lewrick and R. Raeside, “Transformation and change process in innovation models: start-up and mature companies,” International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 515–534, 2010. [CrossRef]
- Startuphub, “Instrumentos para empreendedores, mapa de ecossistema, Start-up Portugal,” startuphub, Jan. 21, 2022.
- K. Hockerts and N. Weaver, “Towards a theory of sustainable product service systems—what are the dependent and independent variables of S-PSS,” in Proceedings of the INSEADCMER research workshop “Sustainable product service systems—key definitions and concepts, 2002.
- E. Calderon-Monge, I. Pastor-Sanz, and F. J. S. Garcia, “Analysis of sustainable consumer behavior as a business opportunity,” J Bus Res, vol. 120, pp. 74–81, 2020. [CrossRef]
- S. Cadez, A. Czerny, and P. Letmathe, “Stakeholder pressures and corporate climate change mitigation strategies,” Bus Strategy Environ, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2019. [CrossRef]
- C. Criscuolo, P. N. Gal, and C. Menon, “Do micro start-ups fuel job creation? Cross-country evidence from the DynEmp Express database,” Small Business Economics, vol. 48, pp. 393–412, 2017. [CrossRef]
- S. Hirst and K. Kastiel, “Corporate governance by index exclusion,” BUL Rev., vol. 99, p. 1229, 2019.
- M. W. Wallin, “The bibliometric structure of spin-off literature,” Innovation, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 162–177, 2012. [CrossRef]
- A. Rehman, H. Ma, M. Ahmad, C. Işık, and I. Ozturk, “Estimating interlinks of carbon emissions from transportation, industrialization, and solid/liquid fuels with economic progress: evidence from Pakistan,” International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1981–1996, 2023. [CrossRef]
- N. Caperello, K. S. Kurani, and J. TyreeHageman, “Do You Mind if I Plug-in My Car? How etiquette shapes PEV drivers’ vehicle charging behavior,” Transp Res Part A Policy Pract, vol. 54, pp. 155–163, 2013. [CrossRef]
- M.. Hansen and B. Hauge, “Scripting, control, and privacy in domestic smart grid technologies: Insights from a Danish pilot study,” Energy Res Soc Sci, vol. 25, pp. 112–123, 2017. [CrossRef]
- E. Costa, A. Paiva, J. Seixas, G. Costa, P. Baptista, and B. Ó. Gallachóir, “Spatial planning of electric vehicle infrastructure for Belo Horizonte, Brazil,” J Adv Transp, vol. 2018, pp. 1–16, 2018. [CrossRef]
- J. Tijmstra, M. Bolsinova, and M. Jeon, “General mixture item response models with different item response structures: Exposition with an application to Likert scales,” Behav Res Methods, vol. 50, pp. 2325–2344, 2018. [CrossRef]
- B. Glaser and A. Strauss, Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge, 2017. [CrossRef]
- J. M. Corbin and A. Strauss, “Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria,” Qual Sociol, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 3–21, 1990. [CrossRef]
- B. W. Lai et al., “Critical factors influencing the decision to enroll in a physical activity intervention among a predominant group of adults with spinal cord injury: a grounded theory study,” Spinal Cord, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 17–25, 2021. [CrossRef]
- D. M. Gligor, C. L. Esmark, and I. Gölgeci, “Building international business theory: A grounded theory approach,” J Int Bus Stud, vol. 47, pp. 93–111, 2016. [CrossRef]





| Definition | Cor | Tec | Dig |
| “Digital transformation has been defined as the use of new digital technologies, such as mobile, artificial intelligence, cloud, blockchain, and the Internet of things (IoT) technologies, to enable major business improvements to augment customer experience, streamline operations, or create new business models.”[30] |
√ |
||
| “The technological revolution that includes digitization, artificial intelligence, big data, internet of things transforms and changes the character of products, processes, markets and competition across the economy”.[14,31] |
√ |
√ |
|
| “...Digital transformation signifies the transformational or disruptive implications of digital technologies for businesses and society. Digital transformation is a concept not limited to particularly innovative businesses, digital start-ups, or high-tech giants. It is a process that embraces companies of all sizes, operating in the most diverse industries, as well as their stakeholders.”[32,33] |
√ |
√ |
|
| “Artificial intelligence (AI) can replace humans and explain what is important to consider in making the transformation to the digital organization... the increased implementation of electronic services and automation coupled with the general transformation.”[33] |
√ |
||
| “Digital transformation is a central driver towards innovation and business renewal, especially for established small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) in the contemporary economy.”[34] |
√ |
||
| “…a new technology or business model that disrupts existing markets and creates new ones”. Technology is enabling new business models in the education industry, and how these models are creating new opportunities for learning and growth.” [35] |
√ |
√ |
|
| “...a change in how a firm employs digital technologies, to develop a new digital business model that helps to create and appropriate more value for the firm.”[36] |
√ |
||
| “…business model transformation is straightforward: it is a change in the perceived logic of how value is created by the corporation, when it comes to the value-creating links among the corporation’s portfolio of businesses, from one point of time to another.”[37] |
√ |
||
| “A business model transformation is triggered by market process signals cognized as radical by both unit and corporate level managers.”[38] | √ | ||
| “BM transformation includes a complete rethinking of organization’s BM elements, resulting into a radically new value proposition.”[39] | √ | ||
| “...generating and transforming business models to pursue opportunities - that we have regarded as temporary, unique and driving beneficial change - through timely and uncertain business model transformations, where business model is described as a combination of Priorities and Capabilities.”[40] |
√ |
| Sustainable elements | Business | Sector | Profile | Root | Evolution |
Sustainable Transition |
Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SE CE SDGs |
B2C B2B B2G B2B2C D2C B2R |
Transport (TP) Building (BL) Consumer goods (CG) Industries (ID) Services (SV) Other (OT) |
Limited (LT) Corporation (A.S) Sole proprietorship (SP) |
Laboratories (LB) Company (OG) Self-employed (SE) |
Active (AC) Sold (SD) Closed (CL) |
Improving Shifting Avoiding |
Beginner (BG) Senior (SR) |
|
Techno elements |
|||||||
| AI ML IOT |
|||||||
| Type of organization | Region | Org. size | Title | Gender | Age |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start-up | Center | Small | CEO | Male | Senior |
| Start-up | Center | Large | CEO | Male | Middle age |
| Start-up | North | Small | CEO | Female | Middle age |
| Start-up | North | Medium | CEO | Male | Middle age |
| Start-up | North | Small | CEO | Female | Middle age |
| Start-up | North | Small | CEO | Male | Junior |
| Start-up | North | Small | CEO | Male | Middle age |
| Start-up | North | Small | CEO | Male | Middle age |
| Start-up | Center | Small | CEO | Male | Junior |
| Start-up | North | Medium | CEO | Male | Middle age |
| Incubators/Accelerators | North | Medium | CEO | Female | Middle age |
| Other supporting entities | Center | Medium | Other | Female | Middle age |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
