Article
Version 1
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Bluer Than Blue: Exit from Policy Support for Clean Marine Energy
Version 1
: Received: 17 July 2023 / Approved: 17 July 2023 / Online: 18 July 2023 (13:49:31 CEST)
A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.
Roeben, V.; Macatangay, R.E. Bluer Than Blue: Exit from Policy Support for Clean Marine Energy. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14629. Roeben, V.; Macatangay, R.E. Bluer Than Blue: Exit from Policy Support for Clean Marine Energy. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14629.
Abstract
The amendment or removal of superfluous government support policies is typically difficult, yet in the ever more important debate on low-carbon (i.e. clean) marine energy policy under the international law of climate action, the law of the sea, and international investment protection, there are additional dimensions of legal or economic peril. Coastal states enact policies subsidising clean energy investments, such as offshore wind energy generation, in their exclusive economic zones or continental shelves. Investors are attracted to the prospect that policies granting subsidies for ostensibly new industries are sufficiently durable. Are such subsidy policies salient or stale? In principle, the purpose of regulatory policy is the promotion of social welfare, and hence there is an optimal incidence, magnitude, and duration of the subsidy, in essence, an ideal strategy for starting, altering, or exiting such policy. We aim to introduce the concept of optimisation to the design and implementation of regulatory policy in this context. Our contribution is to offer three maxims of optimal clean marine energy law and policy: the efficiency and equity of alternative regulatory arrangements; the continuous optimisation of such arrangements; and the recognition of linguistic entanglements in the law. We test these maxims against the case of clean marine energy policy on offshore wind energy generation. One legal implication for international investment protection is that coastal states should establish a policy exit clause in their investment contracts. Our analysis of policy optimisation is generalisable across policies supporting the transition to sustainable energy forms.
Keywords
policy exit; international law of climate action, law of the sea; international investment protection; linguistic entanglements in the law; off-shore wind energy
Subject
Social Sciences, Law
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (0)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
