PreprintReviewVersion 1Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Effectiveness of a Standardized Nursing Process Using NANDA International, Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcome Classification Terminologies: A Systematic Review
Rodríguez-Suárez, C.-A.; González-de la Torre, H.; Hernández-De Luis, M.-N.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, D.-Á.; Martínez-Alberto, C.-E.; Brito-Brito, P.-R. Effectiveness of a Standardized Nursing Process Using NANDA International, Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcome Classification Terminologies: A Systematic Review. Healthcare2023, 11, 2449.
Rodríguez-Suárez, C.-A.; González-de la Torre, H.; Hernández-De Luis, M.-N.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, D.-Á.; Martínez-Alberto, C.-E.; Brito-Brito, P.-R. Effectiveness of a Standardized Nursing Process Using NANDA International, Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcome Classification Terminologies: A Systematic Review. Healthcare 2023, 11, 2449.
Rodríguez-Suárez, C.-A.; González-de la Torre, H.; Hernández-De Luis, M.-N.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, D.-Á.; Martínez-Alberto, C.-E.; Brito-Brito, P.-R. Effectiveness of a Standardized Nursing Process Using NANDA International, Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcome Classification Terminologies: A Systematic Review. Healthcare2023, 11, 2449.
Rodríguez-Suárez, C.-A.; González-de la Torre, H.; Hernández-De Luis, M.-N.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, D.-Á.; Martínez-Alberto, C.-E.; Brito-Brito, P.-R. Effectiveness of a Standardized Nursing Process Using NANDA International, Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcome Classification Terminologies: A Systematic Review. Healthcare 2023, 11, 2449.
Abstract
The nursing process in clinical practice can be assessed using standardized language systems. The purpose is to find evidence on the effectiveness of the nursing process with standardized terminology using NANDA International, Nursing Interventions Classification, and Nursing Outcome Classification improving diag-nostic accuracy, nursing interventions, health outcomes, and people’s satisfaction. A systematic review was carried out in Medline and PreMedline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI and Scielo and LILACS including randomized clinical trials, quasi-experimental, cohort and case-control studies. Selection and critical appraisal were conducted by two independent reviewers. The certainty of the evidence was assessed with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Methodology. 17 studies were included with variability in the level and certainty of evidence. According to outcomes, 6 evaluated improvements in diagnostic accuracy and 11 evaluated improvements in individual health outcomes. No studies evaluated improvements in intervention efficacy or population satisfaction. There is a need to increase studies with rigorous methodologies that address diagnostic accuracy and indi-viduals’ health outcomes using NANDA International, Nursing Interventions Classification, and Nursing Outcome Classification; as well as implementing studies that evaluate the use of these terminologies for improvements in the efficacy of nurses' interventions and population satisfaction with the nursing process.
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
