Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Prevalence and Impact of Nutritional Risk and Malnutrition in Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology Patients: A Prospective, Observational, Multicenter and Exploratory Study

Version 1 : Received: 27 June 2023 / Approved: 27 June 2023 / Online: 27 June 2023 (14:58:11 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Durán Poveda, M.; Suárez-de-la-Rica, A.; Cancer Minchot, E.; Ocón Bretón, J.; Sánchez Pernaute, A.; Rodríguez Caravaca, G. The Prevalence and Impact of Nutritional Risk and Malnutrition in Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology Patients: A Prospective, Observational, Multicenter, and Exploratory Study. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3283. Durán Poveda, M.; Suárez-de-la-Rica, A.; Cancer Minchot, E.; Ocón Bretón, J.; Sánchez Pernaute, A.; Rodríguez Caravaca, G. The Prevalence and Impact of Nutritional Risk and Malnutrition in Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology Patients: A Prospective, Observational, Multicenter, and Exploratory Study. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3283.

Abstract

A prospective, observational, multicenter, and exploratory study was conducted in 469 gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing elective surgery. The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria were used to assess nutritional risk. On admission, 17.9% and 21.1% of patients were at moderate (MUST score 1) and severe (MUST score ≥ 2) nutritional risk, respectively. GLIM criteria used in patients with MUST score ≥ 2 showed moderate malnutrition in 35.3% of patients and severe in 64.6%. Forty-seven percent of patients with MUST score ≥ 2 on admission had the same score at discharge, and 20.7% with MUST score 0 had moderate/severe risk at discharge. Small bowel, esophageal and gastric cancer, and diabetes were predictors of malnutrition on admission. Complications were significantly higher among patients with MUST score 1 or ≥ 2 either on admission (p = 0.001) or at discharge (p < 0.0001). In patients who received nutritional therapy (n = 231), 43% continued to have moderate/severe nutritional risk on discharge, and 54% of those with MUST ≥ 2 on admission maintained this score at discharge. In gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing elective surgery, there is an urgent need for improving nutritional risk screening before and after surgery, as well as improving nutritional therapy during hospitalization

Keywords

malnutrition; digestive surgery; oncology; gastrointestinal malignancies; prevalence

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Oncology and Oncogenics

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.