Submitted:
08 June 2023
Posted:
08 June 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature review
| Researcher | Method | Model | Subject | A most important requirement for smart cities/studied factors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anand et al.[63] | A.H.P. Fuzzy AHP |
DEA: AR-CCR | importance of various criteria for sustainability in smart cities in India, study on sustainable indicators for designing smart cities | Economic prosperity is the most important output |
| Ozkaia and Erdin [64] | ANP (analytical network process) and TOPSIS technique | MCDM | Evaluation of smart and sustainable cities for 44 cases | Most important: Smart living Lowest important: Smart governance |
| Zapolskytė et al.[65] | rank correlation method | MCDA, A.H.P. | Criteria for the smart city mobility system’s evaluation | The following factors were studied: Motor travel and congestion reduction measures; pollution reduction measures; travel safety and accident reduction measures; traffic management tools and services; smart infrastructure measures. |
| Yadav et al. [66] | hybrid Interpretative Structural Modeling (ISM)-Best Worst Method (BWM) (ISM.) | creating a foundation for sustainable smart cities for developing nations like India | The development of sustainable resources, the development of smart buildings, the development of advanced research and development systems, and the development of intelligent transportation systems. | |
| Hajduk [67] | Ordering preferences according to how closely they resemble the ideal solution (TOPSIS) | MCDM | Finding the cities with the most potential for becoming smart cities by studying 66 cities: Multi-Criteria Analysis of Smart Cities on the Example of Polish Cities | The most crucial components of smart cities are urban resistance and transportation efficiency. |
| Ye et al. [74] | MCDM | MCDM for smart city ranking: a case study in China | Among the first-level indicators, digital infrastructure accounts for 46.92%, followed by the digital economy and smart life at 32.48% and 20.60%, respectively. |
|
| Shokouhi et al. [75] | Fuzzy TOPSIS technique | Evaluation of Smart City Criteria in Ahvaz City, Iran | It has been recognized that "stable economies and the ability to transform," "social and ethnic diversity," "crisis management and the ability to organize human resources," "local and regional accessibility," "sustainable resource management," and "individual safety" are all important factors in making a smart city. |
|
| Present study | improved Analytic Hierarchy Process (IAHP) | MCDM | smart transportation in modern urban in developing countries | Transportation companies, Quick and easy access, software development, Schools and universities, License from the Tourism Organization, Monthly payment for regular customers, Software development, and infrastructure |
3. Case study
3.1. Case study of Mashhad: A high potential city for localizing smart transportation system
| Population | 6,434,501 | millon |
|---|---|---|
| Visitor | 20 million | Every year |
| Density | 9,000 | per km2 |
| Area 351 km2 | Area 351 km2 | Area 351 km2 |
| Elevation | 1050 | m |
| Precipitation | 250 | millimeters |
| Climate | Steppe | climate |
| Coordinates | 36°18′N 59°36′E | - |
3.1.1. Transportation facilities for the public in mashhad
- ⮚
- LRT
- ⮚
- Bus
- ⮚
- Tax





3.2. Smart city and transportation
3.3. IoT business models
| Classification | Services and applications |
|---|---|
|
Advanced Passenger Information Systems (ATIS) |
Provide real-time traffic information |
| Navigation Guide / Navigation Systems | |
| Parking information | |
| Street weather systems | |
|
Advanced Transportation Management System (ATMs) |
Traffic Centers (TOCs) |
| Adaptive traffic control | |
| Dynamic message signs (or variable message signs) | |
| Measure the ramp | |
|
ITS Shipping Pricing Systems |
Electronic Telephone Collection (ETC.) |
| Canopy Pricing / Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) | |
| Express Cost (HOT.) | |
| Car Passenger Lines (Miles) Travel (VMT.) Expenses | |
| Variable parking costs | |
|
Advanced Public Transportation Systems (APTS) |
Real-time status information for the public transportation system (e.g., bus, subway, rail) |
| Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) | |
| Electronic rent payment (for example, smart cards) | |
| Car Integration (VII) and Car and Vehicle Integration (V2V) | Collision Avoidance System (CICAS) |
| Smart Compatibility (ISA.) | |
| Commercial car operations | Fleet management |
| Shipping management | |
| Theft recovery | The car is connected |
| Car sharing |

3.3.1. Uber: An IoT based business model

3.3.2. Business Model Canvas analysis
- A)
- Customer section
- B)
- Suggested value
- C)
- Distribution channel
- D)
- Communication with the customer
- E)
- revenue stream
- F)
- Main sources
- G)
- Main activities
- H)
- Key partners
- L)
- Cost structure
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Analysis of the proposed business model
| Criterion | Under the criteria | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| Customer section | Transportation companies |
Transport companies are one of the most important customers for smart Transportation |
| Commercial companies | Commercial companies can make an effective contribution to the development of the market and smart transportation customers | |
| Hotels | Hotels are an important destination for smart transportation due to many customers. | |
| schools | Schools, like hotels, play a key role in smart transportation. | |
| Suggested value | Quick and easy access | Fast and easy access is always one of the most important factors that intelligent transportation should have. |
| Ability to use a car for two customers with the same destination |
A similar value proposition has been implemented by the Tepsi team in Tehran. |
|
| Ability to track and inform the status and position of the shipment |
In situations where the freight transport system is used in intelligent transportation, it is possible to be able to track the status of the shipment. |
|
| Activity at any time |
Smart cities and smart transportation should be active and available at all Times |
|
| Main Activity | software development | Software development is one of the most important components of intelligent transportation |
| Attract motor courier and pickup |
Attract motor courier to increase customer and speed of work in intelli- gent transportation |
|
| Attract the driver of the minibus and van |
Attracting minibus and van drivers to increase customer and speed of work in intelligent transportation |
|
| Attract luxury cars for ceremonies |
Luxury cars have their customers, and attracting these cars is effective in increasing the customer in smart transportation | |
| Key partners | Hotels and government offices |
Hotels Government offices play a crucial role in smart transportation as a business partner due to a large number of staff. |
| Freight terminals |
Freight terminals, as business partners, play a crucial role in intelligent transportation due to a large number of means of transportation. |
|
| Luxury car rental companies |
Luxury car rental companies play a crucial role in smart transportation as a business partner. |
|
| Schools and universities | Schools and universities, as business partners, play a crucial role in intelligent transportation due to a large number of staff. | |
| Main source | Permission from Police |
Obtaining the necessary permits from government departments and police are very important |
| License from the Tourism Organization |
The Tourism Organization also has direct oversight of transportation and tourism, and obtaining a license is required |
|
| Income flow | Monthly payment for regular customers |
By signing a contract, regular customers can pay the desired amount on a the monthly basis to make it easier for them. |
| Freight with a commission of 90 for the driver and 10 for the company |
The company’s commission is determined according to similar companies | |
|
Cost structure Criterion |
Manpower | A significant portion of the costs are spent on manpower wages |
| Software development and infrastructure |
Software development and infrastructure cost a lot. |
3.1.1. Multi-criteria decision method (MCDM)
4.1.2. Improved A.H.P. Method
- Determining the set of criteria
- Advantages of the IAHP method
- Results and discussions
| Criteria | Code |
|---|---|
| Customer relationship | 1 |
| Suggested value | 2 |
| Main Activity | 3 |
| Key partners | 4 |
| Distribution channels | 5 |
| Main source | 6 |
| Income flow | 7 |
| Cost structure | 8 |
| Customer section | 9 |
| No. | work experience | Job Category | Educational certificate | age | gender |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | Urban Management | Bachelor | 50 | Man |
| 2 | 9 | architecture | Bachelor | 53 | Man |
| 3 | 20 | IT management | Diploma | 43 | Man |
| 4 | 19 | architecture | Master’s | 51 | Man |
| 5 | 19 | Green space expert | Bachelor | 45 | Man |
| 6 | 19 | architecture | Bachelor | 39 | Female |
| 7 | 19 | Urban Management | PHD | 42 | Man |
| 8 | 19 | Urban Management | Bachelor | 40 | Man |
| 9 | 19 | architecture | Bachelor | 42 | Man |
| 10 | 18 | IT management | Bachelor | 45 | Man |
| 11 | 16 | architecture | Bachelor | 35 | Female |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1.619 | 3.57 | 3.4 | 3.66 | 2.83 | 6.75 | 5.23 | 1.23 |
| 2 | 0.617665 | 1 | 2 | 2.66 | 4.75 | 2 | 3.5 | 6 | 6 |
| 3 | 0.280112 | 0.5 | 1 | 4.66 | 2.6 | 4.25 | 6.8 | 5.23 | 1.92 |
| 4 | 0.294118 | 0.37594 | 0.214592 | 1 | 3.8 | 2.06 | 3.4 | 1.28 | 1.33 |
| 5 | 0.273224 | 0.210526 | 0.384615 | 0.263158 | 1 | 2.66 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 2.33 |
| 6 | 0.353357 | 0.442478 | 0.235294 | 0.485437 | 0.37594 | 1 | 3.28 | 1.33 | 1.26 |
| 7 | 0.148148 | 0.285714 | 0.147059 | 0.294118 | 0.4 | 0.304878 | 1 | 1.375 | 2.66 |
| 8 | 0.191205 | 0.16 | 0.191205 | 0.78125 | 0.322581 | 0.75188 | 0.727273 | 1 | 3.66 |
| 9 | 0.813008 | 0.166667 | 0.520833 | 0.75188 | 0.429185 | 0.793651 | 0.37594 | 0.326158 | 1 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | weight | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.251836 | 0.340103 | 0.432015 | 0.237831 | 0.211101 | 0.167353 | 0.238236 | 0.208191 | 0.059146 | 0.238424 |
| 2 | 0.15555 | 0.21007 | 0.242025 | 0.186068 | 0.273969 | 0.133645 | 0.12353 | 0.248794 | 0.288517 | 0.206908 |
| 3 | 0.070542 | 0.105035 | 0.121013 | 0.325969 | 0.149962 | 0.251325 | 0.240001 | 0.208191 | 0.092325 | 0.173818 |
| 4 | 0.074069 | 0.078974 | 0.025968 | 0.06995 | 0.219175 | 0.121818 | 0.120001 | 0.050953 | 0.063955 | 0.091652 |
| 5 | 0.068808 | 0.044225 | 0.046543 | 0.018408 | 0.057678 | 0.1573 | 0.088236 | 0.123402 | 0.112041 | 0.079627 |
| 6 | 0.088988 | 0.092951 | 0.028474 | 0.033957 | 0.021683 | 0.059135 | 0.115765 | 0.052943 | 0.060589 | 0.061609 |
| 7 | 0.037309 | 0.06002 | 0.017796 | 0.020574 | 0.023071 | 0.018029 | 0.035294 | 0.054735 | 0.127909 | 0.04386 |
| 8 | 0.048152 | 0.033611 | 0.023138 | 0.054649 | 0.018606 | 0.044463 | 0.025669 | 0.039807 | 0.147432 | 0.048392 |
| 9 | 0.204745 | 0.035012 | 0.063027 | 0.052594 | 0.024754 | 0.046933 | 0.013269 | 0.012983 | 0.048086 | 0.055711 |
| incompatibility rate | 0.0614 | |||||||||
- Customer section
- Communication with clients
- Distribution channels
- Revenue flow
5.1 Suggested Value and Discussions
- Key resources
- Human resources
- Physical resources
- Key activities
- Key partners
- Cost structure
| Criterion | Under the criteria | Weight | Incompatibility rate |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Customer section |
Transportation companies | 0.437257 |
0.0674 |
| Commercial companies | 0.299587 | ||
| Hotels | 0.15754 | ||
| Schools | 0.105616 | ||
|
Suggested value |
Quick and easy access | 0.368421 |
0.0146 |
| Ability to use a car for two customers with the same Destination |
0.105263 | ||
| Ability to track and inform the status and position of the shipment |
0.263158 | ||
| Activity at any time | 0.263158 | ||
|
Main Activity |
software development |
0.347826 |
0.0632 |
| Attract motor courier and pickup | 0.217391 | ||
| Attract the driver of the minibus and van | 0.130435 | ||
| Attract luxury cars for ceremonies | 0.304348 | ||
|
Key partners |
Hotels and government offices | 0.117647 |
0.0514 |
| Freight terminals | 0.176471 | ||
| Luxury car rental companies | 0.294118 | ||
| Schools and universities | 0.411765 | ||
| main source | Permission from Police | 0.466667 | 0.0248 |
| License from the Tourism Organization | 0.533333 | ||
|
Income flow |
The monthly payment for regular customers | 0.75 |
0.0179 |
| Freight with a commission of 90 for the driver and 10 for the company |
0.25 | ||
| Cost structure | Manpower | 0.4 | 0.0421 |
| Software development and infrastructure | 0.6 |
6. Conclusions
- –
- For smart transportation, demand management methods and redesigning streets cross sections are used to change priorities (from private cars to public transport and active modes).
- –
- Maintaining the quality of the intelligent transportation systems and making them more attractive to the private sector
- –
- Information services for intelligent public transportation that are accurate and reliable
- –
- Benefit from increased integration of public intelligent transportation and bike travel in the city.
- –
- Balance efforts on different aspects of intelligent transportation.
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Availability of data and material
References
- Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., ... & Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 481-518.
- Ahvenniemi, H., Huovila, A., Pinto-Seppä, I., & Airaksinen, M. (2017). What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities?. Cities, 60, 234-245. [CrossRef]
- Zanella, A., Bui, N., Castellani, A., Vangelista, L., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Internet of things for smart cities. IEEE Internet of Things journal, 1(1), 22-32.
- Mehmood, Y., Ahmad, F., Yaqoob, I., Adnane, A., Imran, M., & Guizani, S. (2017). Internet-of-things-based smart cities: Recent advances and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(9), 16-24. [CrossRef]
- Mohanty, S. P., Choppali, U., & Kougianos, E. (2016). Everything you wanted to know about smart cities: The internet of things is the backbone. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 5(3), 60-70. [CrossRef]
- Talari, S., Shafie-Khah, M., Siano, P., Loia, V., Tommasetti, A., & Catalão, J. P. (2017). A review of smart cities based on the internet of things concept. Energies, 10(4), 421.
- Perera, C., Zaslavsky, A., Christen, P., & Georgakopoulos, D. (2014). Sensing as a service model for smart cities supported by internet of things. Transactions on emerging telecommunications technologies, 25(1), 81-93. [CrossRef]
- Harmon, R. R., Castro-Leon, E. G., & Bhide, S. (2015, August). Smart cities and the Internet of Things. In 2015 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET) (pp. 485-494). IEEE.
- Alavi, A. H., Jiao, P., Buttlar, W. G., & Lajnef, N. (2018). Internet of Things-enabled smart cities: State-of-the-art and future trends. Measurement, 129, 589-606. [CrossRef]
- Qian, Y., Wu, D., Bao, W., & Lorenz, P. (2019). The internet of things for smart cities: Technologies and applications. IEEE Network, 33(2), 4-5. [CrossRef]
- Shokouhi, M. A., Naghibirokni, S. N., Alizadeh, H., & Ahmadi, A. (2016). Evaluation of smart city criteria in ahvaz city, Iran. Iran University of Science & Technology, 26(2), 141-149.
- Zantalis, F., Koulouras, G., Karabetsos, S., & Kandris, D. (2019). A review of machine learning and IoT in smart transportation. Future Internet, 11(4), 94. [CrossRef]
- Kelley, S. B., Lane, B. W., Stanley, B. W., Kane, K., Nielsen, E., & Strachan, S. (2020). Smart transportation for all? A typology of recent US smart transportation projects in midsized cities. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110(2), 547-558. [CrossRef]
- Jan, B., Farman, H., Khan, M., Talha, M., & Din, I. U. (2019). Designing a smart transportation system: An internet of things and big data approach. IEEE Wireless Communications, 26(4), 73-79. [CrossRef]
- Rathore, M. M., Ahmad, A., Paul, A., & Jeon, G. (2015, November). Efficient graph-oriented smart transportation using internet of things generated big data. In 2015 11th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS) (pp. 512-519). IEEE.
- Cramer, J., & Krueger, A. B. (2016). Disruptive change in the taxi business: The case of Uber. American Economic Review, 106(5), 177-82.
- Azgomi, H. F., & Jamshidi, M. (2018, November). A brief survey on smart community and smart transportation. In 2018 IEEE 30th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) (pp. 932-939). IEEE.
- Karami, Z., & Kashef, R. (2020). Smart transportation planning: Data, models, and algorithms. Transportation Engineering, 2, 100013. [CrossRef]
- Zichichi, M., Ferretti, S., & D’Angelo, G. (2020, January). A distributed ledger based infrastructure for smart transportation system and social good. In 2020 IEEE 17th Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
- Babar, M., & Arif, F. (2019). Real-time data processing scheme using big data analytics in internet of things based smart transportation environment. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10(10), 4167-4177. [CrossRef]
- Lingli, J. (2015, December). Smart city, smart transportation: recommendations of the logistics platform construction. In 2015 International Conference on Intelligent Transportation, Big Data and Smart City (pp. 729-732). IEEE.
- Bacciu, D., Carta, A., Gnesi, S., & Semini, L. (2017). An experience in using machine learning for short-term predictions in smart transportation systems. Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming, 87, 52-66. [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y., Ram, S., Currim, F., Dantas, E., & Sabóia, L. A. (2016, September). A big data approach for smart transportation management on bus network. In 2016 IEEE international smart cities conference (ISC2) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
- Singh, D., Singh, M., Singh, I., & Lee, H. J. (2015, July). Secure and reliable cloud networks for smart transportation services. In 2015 17th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT) (pp. 358-362). IEEE.
- Balbin, P. P. F., Barker, J. C., Leung, C. K., Tran, M., Wall, R. P., & Cuzzocrea, A. (2020). Predictive analytics on open big data for supporting smart transportation services. Procedia computer science, 176, 3009-3018. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A., Rajalakshmi, K., Jain, S., Nayyar, A., & Abouhawwash, M. (2020). A novel heuristic simulation-optimization method for critical infrastructure in smart transportation systems. International Journal of Communication Systems, 33(11), e4397. [CrossRef]
- Shukla, S. N., & Champaneria, T. A. (2017, February). Survey of various data collection ways for smart transportation domain of smart city. In 2017 international conference on i-smac (iot in social, mobile, analytics and cloud)(i-smac) (pp. 681-685). IEEE.
- Howard, A. J., Lee, T., Mahar, S., Intrevado, P., & Woodbridge, D. M. K. (2018, June). Distributed data analytics framework for smart transportation. In 2018 IEEE 20th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE 16th International Conference on Smart City; IEEE 4th International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS) (pp. 1374-1380). IEEE.
- Zhang, Y., Zhang, G., Fierro, R., & Yang, Y. (2018). Force-driven traffic simulation for a future connected autonomous vehicle-enabled smart transportation system. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 19(7), 2221-2233. [CrossRef]
- Dabiri, S., & Heaslip, K. (2018). Transport-domain applications of widely used data sources in the smart transportation: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.10902.
- An, C., & Wu, C. (2020). Traffic big data assisted V2X communications toward smart transportation. Wireless Networks, 26(3), 1601-1610. [CrossRef]
- Ayoub, W., Ellatif Samhat, A., Mroue, M., Joumaa, H., Nouvel, F., & Prévotet, J. C. (2020). Technology selection for iot-based smart transportation systems. In Vehicular ad-hoc networks for smart cities (pp. 19-29). Springer, Singapore.
- Oswald, K. F. (2016). A brief history of smart transportation infrastructure. Transfers, 6(3), 123-129. [CrossRef]
- Xu, H., Lin, J., & Yu, W. (2017). Smart transportation systems: architecture, enabling technologies, and open issues. In Secure and Trustworthy Transportation Cyber-Physical Systems (pp. 23-49). Springer, Singapore.
- Nikabadi, M. S., & Razavian, S. B. (2020). A hesitant fuzzy model for ranking maintenance strategies in small and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 29(4), 558-592. [CrossRef]
- Younesi Heravi, M., Yeganeh, A., & Razavian, S. B. (2022). Using fuzzy approach in determining critical parameters for optimum safety functions in mega projects (case study: Iran’s construction industry). In Frontiers in Nature-Inspired Industrial Optimization (pp. 183-200). Springer, Singapore.
- Yeganeh, A., Younesi Heravi, M., Razavian, S. B., Behzadian, K., & Shariatmadar, H. (2021). Applying a new systematic fuzzy FMEA technique for risk management in light steel frame systems. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 1-22. [CrossRef]
- Bagheri, R., Borouji, Z., Razavian, S. B., Keshvari, M. M., Sharifi, F., & Sharifi, S. (2021). Implementation of MCDM-Based Integrated Approach to Identifying the Uncertainty Factors on the Constructional Project. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021. [CrossRef]
- Shafiei Nikabadi, M., & Razaviyan, S. B. (2018). Identification and ranking of effective indicators on the loyalty of the charities in Iranian charities using Fuzzy Delphi and Structural Interpretative Equation. Quarterly Journal of Socio-Cultural Development Studies, 6(3), 59-79.
- Carter, M., & Carter, C. (2020). The Creative Business Model Canvas. Social Enterprise Journal. [CrossRef]
- Aranda-Usón, A., Portillo-Tarragona, P., Marín-Vinuesa, L. M. & Scarpellini, S. Financial resources for the circular economy: A perspective from businesses. Sustainability (Switzerland) 11, (2019). [CrossRef]
- Stone, R. J. Human Resource Management : Personnel Human Resource Management. Harvard Business Review 13, 6–21 (2019).
- Molina-Azorin, J. F., López-Gamero, M. D., Tarí, J. J., Pereira-Moliner, J. & Pertusa-Ortega, E. M. Environmental management, human resource management and green human resource management: A literature review. Administrative Sciences 11, (2021). [CrossRef]
- Ahammad, M. F., Glaister, K. W. & Gomes, E. Strategic agility and human resource management. Human Resource Management Review 30, (2020). [CrossRef]
- Jha, S. B., Babiceanu, R. F. & Seker, R. Formal modeling of cyber-physical resource scheduling in IIoT cloud environments. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 31, 1149–1164 (2020). [CrossRef]
- Santos, F. M. (2012). A Positive Theory of Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1413-4. [CrossRef]
- Veleva, V. & Bodkin, G. Corporate-entrepreneur collaborations to advance a circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production 188, 20–37 (2018). [CrossRef]
- .Österblom, H., Jouffray, J. B., Folke, C. & Rockström, J. Emergence of a global science–business initiative for ocean stewardship. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114, 9038–9043 (2017).
- Indrawan, M. I., Nasution, M. D. T. P., Adil, E. & Rossanty, Y. A Business Model Canvas: Traditional Restaurant “Melayu” in North Sumatra, Indonesia. Business Management and Strategy 7, 102 (2016).
- Sparviero, S. The Case for a Socially Oriented Business Model Canvas: The Social Enterprise Model Canvas. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 10, 232–251 (2019). [CrossRef]
- Joyce, A. & Paquin, R. L. The triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design more sustainable business models. Journal of Cleaner Production 135, 1474–1486 (2016). [CrossRef]
- Kumar, M. A Study on Cooperative Banks in Himachal Pradesh with Special References to Lending Practices. International Journal of Research in Advent Technology 7, 15–24 (2019). [CrossRef]
- Stefanelli, V., Boscia, V. & Toma, P. Does knowledge translation drive spin-offs away from the “valley of death”? A nonparametric analysis to support a banking perspective. Management Decision 58, 1985–2009 (2020). [CrossRef]
- Mărăcine, V., Voican, O. & Scarlat, E. The Digital Transformation and Disruption in Banks’ Business Models under the Impact of FinTech and BigTech. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence 14, 294–305 (2020). [CrossRef]
- Cornée, S., Kalmi, P. & Szafarz, A. The Business Model of Social Banks. Kyklos 73, 196–226 (2020). [CrossRef]
- Köhler, M. Which banks are more risky? The impact of business models on bank stability. Journal of Financial Stability 16, 195– 212 (2015). [CrossRef]
- Fernandez-Antolin, M. M., Del-Río, J. M., Del Ama Gonzalo, F. & Gonzalez-Lezcano, R. A. The relationship between the use of building performance simulation tools by recent graduate architects and the deficiencies in architectural education. Energies 13, (2020). [CrossRef]
- Radionova, N., Breus, S., Denysenko, M., Khaustova, Ye. & Matiukh, A. CRITERIAL APPROACH TO ANALYSIS OF THE COST MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF BUSINESS STRUCTURES. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice 1, 190–202 (2021). [CrossRef]
- Schröder, M., Falk, B. & Schmitt, R. Evaluation of cost structures of additive manufacturing processes using a new business model. in Procedia CIRP 30, 311–316 (Elsevier B.V., 2015). [CrossRef]
- .Fontanesi, J. M., Flesher, D. S., De Guire, M., Lieberthal, A. & Holcomb, K. The cost of doing business: Cost structure of electronic immunization registries. Health Services Research 37, 1291–1307 (2002). [CrossRef]
- Hassan, R. J., Zeebaree, S. R., Ameen, S. Y., Kak, S. F., Sadeeq, M. A., Ageed, Z. S., ... & Salih, A. A. (2021). State of art survey for iot effects on smart city technology: challenges, opportunities, and solutions. Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science, 22, 32-48. [CrossRef]
- Gavrilović, N., & Mishra, A. (2021). Software architecture of the internet of things (IoT) for smart city, healthcare and agriculture: analysis and improvement directions. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 12(1), 1315-1336. [CrossRef]
- Anand, A., Rufuss, D. D. W., Rajkumar, V., & Suganthi, L. (2017). Evaluation of sustainability indicators in smart cities for India using MCDM approach. Energy Procedia, 141, 211-215. [CrossRef]
- Ozkaya, G., & Erdin, C. (2020). Evaluation of smart and sustainable cities through a hybrid MCDM approach based on ANP and TOPSIS technique. Heliyon, 6(10), e05052. [CrossRef]
- Zapolskytė, S., Burinskienė, M., & Trepanier, M. (2020). Evaluation criteria of smart city mobility system using MCDM method. The Baltic journal of road and bridge engineering, 15(4), 196-224. [CrossRef]
- Yadav, G., Mangla, S. K., Luthra, S., & Rai, D. P. (2019). Developing a sustainable smart city framework for developing economies: An Indian context. Sustainable Cities and Society, 47, 101462. [CrossRef]
- Hajduk, S. (2021). Multi-Criteria Analysis of Smart Cities on the Example of the Polish Cities. Resources, 10(5), 44. [CrossRef]
- Yenkar, P. P., & Sawarkar, S. D. (2022). A novel ensemble approach based on MCC and MCDM methods for prioritizing tweets mentioning urban issues in smart city. Kybernetes. [CrossRef]
- Saaty, T. L. (1988). What is the analytic hierarchy process? In Mathematical models for decision support (pp. 109-121). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
- Li, F., Phoon, K. K., Du, X., & Zhang, M. (2013). Improved AHP method and its application in risk identification. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(3), 312-320. [CrossRef]
- Gonella, F. (2019). The smart narrative of a smart city. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 1, 9. [CrossRef]
- An, S., Kim, S., & Kim, S. (2020). Necessity of the Needs Map in the Service Design for Smart Cities. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 202.
- Foley, R. W., Nadjari, S., Eshirow, J., Adekunle, R., & Codjoe, P. (2022). Towards Digital Segregation? Problematizing the Haves and Have Nots in the Smart City. Front. Sustain. Cities, 4, 706670. [CrossRef]
- Ye, F., Chen, Y., Li, L., Li, Y., & Yin, Y. (2022). Multi-criteria decision-making models for smart city ranking: Evidence from the Pearl River Delta region, China. Cities, 128, 103793. [CrossRef]
- Shokouhi, M. A., Naghibirokni, S. N., Alizadeh, H., & Ahmadi, A. (2016). Evaluation of smart city criteria in ahvaz city, Iran. Iran University of Science & Technology, 26(2), 141-149.
- Dashkevych, O., & Portnov, B. A. (2022). Criteria for Smart City Identification: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 14(8), 4448. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).