Submitted:
01 June 2023
Posted:
01 June 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Dynamic Point Cloud Sequence
2.1. Dynamic Point Cloud
2.2. Dynamic Point Cloud Capture
2.3. 3D Pose Estimation
3. Temporal Prediction of Dynamic Point Cloud
3.1. Prediction and Reconstruction
3.2. Point Cloud Quantization
3.3. Skeleton Motion Estimation
3.4. Deformation of 3D Point Cloud
3.5. Residual Point Cloud
4. Experimental Result
4.1. Experimental Environment
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Pavez, E.; Chou, P.A.; De Queiroz, R.L.; Ortega, A. Dynamic polygon clouds: representation and compression for VR/AR. APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing 2018, 7, e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kammerl, J.; Blodow, N.; Rusu, R.B.; Gedikli, S.; Beetz, M.; Steinbach, E. Real-time compression of point cloud streams. 2012 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, 2012, pp. 778–785.
- Schwarz, S.; Preda, M.; Baroncini, V.; Budagavi, M.; Cesar, P.; Chou, P.A.; Cohen, R.A.; Krivokuća, M.; Lasserre, S.; Li, Z.; others. Emerging MPEG standards for point cloud compression. IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems 2018, 9, 133–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Briceno, H.M.; Sander, P.V.; McMillan, L.; Gortler, S.; Hoppe, H. Geometry videos: a new representation for 3D animations. Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics symposium on Computer animation, 2003, pp. 136–146.
- Collet, A.; Chuang, M.; Sweeney, P.; Gillett, D.; Evseev, D.; Calabrese, D.; Hoppe, H.; Kirk, A.; Sullivan, S. High-quality streamable free-viewpoint video. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) 2015, 34, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackins, C.L.; Tanimoto, S.L. Oct-trees and their use in representing three-dimensional objects. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 1980, 14, 249–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meagher, D. Geometric modeling using octree encoding. Computer graphics and image processing 1982, 19, 129–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schnabel, R.; Klein, R. Octree-based Point-Cloud Compression. PBG@ SIGGRAPH 2006, 3. [Google Scholar]
- Pathak, K.; Birk, A.; Poppinga, J.; Schwertfeger, S. 3D forward sensor modeling and application to occupancy grid based sensor fusion. 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 2007, pp. 2059–2064.
- Rusu, R.B.; Cousins, S. 3d is here: Point cloud library (pcl). 2011 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, 2011, pp. 1–4.
- Mekuria, R.; Blom, K.; Cesar, P. Design, implementation, and evaluation of a point cloud codec for tele-immersive video. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 2016, 27, 828–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thanou, D.; Chou, P.A.; Frossard, P. Graph-based compression of dynamic 3D point cloud sequences. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2016, 25, 1765–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, K.J.; Park, B.S.; Kim, J.K.; Kim, D.W.; Seo, Y.H. Holographic augmented reality based on three-dimensional volumetric imaging for a photorealistic scene. Optics Express 2020, 28, 35972–35985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, S. Convergence rate of optimization algorithms for a non-strictly convex function. Institute of Control Robotics and Systems, 2019; 349–350. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, K.J.; Park, B.S.; Kim, D.W.; Kwon, S.C.; Seo, Y.H. Real-time 3D Volumetric Model Generation using Multiview RGB-D Camera. Journal of broadcast engineering 2020, 25, 439–448. [Google Scholar]
- Shlens, J. A tutorial on principal component analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.1100, arXiv:1404.1100 2014.
- Barequet, G.; Har-Peled, S. Efficiently approximating the minimum-volume bounding box of a point set in three dimensions. Journal of Algorithms 2001, 38, 91–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, Z.; Simon, T.; Wei, S.E.; Sheikh, Y. Realtime multi-person 2d pose estimation using part affinity fields. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2017, pp. 7291–7299.
- Pan, H.; Huo, H.; Cui, G.; Chen, S. Modeling for deformable body and motion analysis: A review. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2013, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwolek, B.; Rymut, B. Reconstruction of 3D human motion in real-time using particle swarm optimization with GPU-accelerated fitness function. Journal of Real-Time Image Processing 2020, 17, 821–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazhdan, M.; Hoppe, H. Screened poisson surface reconstruction. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) 2013, 32, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bang, S.; Lee, S.H. Computation of skinning weight using spline interface. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2018 Posters; 2018; pp. 1–2.
- Cushman, R. Open source rigging in Blender: A modular approach. PhD thesis, Clemson University, 2011.

















| Item | Frame | Key frame | Non-Key Frame | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original | Number of Point Cloud | 348,597 | 341,334 | 100.00% |
| Data size (KB) | 17,699 | 16,427 | 100.00% | |
| Residual | Number of Point Cloud | 348,597 | 26,473 | 7.76% |
| Data size (KB) | 17,699 | 1,061 | 6.46% | |
| Residual with Deformation | Number of Point Cloud | 348,597 | 2,190 | 0.64% |
| Data size (KB) | 6,923 | 35 | 0.01% |
| Frame | t+1 | t+2 | t+3 | t+4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean Distance (m) | 0.004571 | 0.006422 | 0.009824 | 0.014579 |
| Standard Deviation (m) | 0.002758 | 0.00506 | 0.007838 | 0.009799 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).