Submitted:
30 May 2023
Posted:
01 June 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Purpose
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Experimental Design
3.1.1. We evaluated the health-care, long-term care, and community resources required by patients with oral cancer. We held a focus group with medical center, medical care, social welfare, and long-term care experts (including nurses, case managers, nutritionists, medical social workers, consulting psychologists, therapists, and volunteers) who are engaged in oral cancer care in Taichung City.
- (1)
- What care problems do patients with oral cancer encounter after they are discharged?
- (2)
- What questions do patients with oral cancer and their family members have?
- (3)
- In your opinion, what health-care information or community resources should we provide for patients with oral cancer?
- (4)
- In your opinion, how can tumor care be integrated into a long-term care system and be made more convenient and consistent?
3.1.2. We then explored the effects of using LINE Official Account on the quality and quantity of care information, health consultation, and patients’ participation rate.
- (1)
- Patients: The inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) having a diagnosis of oral cancer for longer than 6 months regardless of hospitalization or being an outpatient who met the criteria of the International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification, Ninth Edition (ICD-9-CM) disease classification codes 140.0–149.9, (b) older than 20 years, and (c) having a primary caregiver with access to a smartphone.
- (2)
- Research Design: An experimental design was adopted. The patients provided basic data (demographics, disease attributes, and therapeutic history) and data on symptom distress, quality of life, and health-care needs by completing a questionnaire; this was done after case collection and before grouping. The patients were randomly divided into two groups by using a computer-generated simple random number table. A total of 55 patients were in the experimental group, and 45 patients were in the control group. In the experimental group, LINE Official Account was used by the patients to receive self-care information, timely notifications, and one-on-one health-care consultations. By contrast, the control group followed standard health-care practices. In the second and third measurements (Months 3 and 5 after case collection, respectively), the patients answered the same questionnaire as they completed in the first measurement.
- (3)
-
Pretest and Posttest Instruments: The scales used to gather data from the patients were as follows:
- ➢
- Symptom Distress Scale (SDS): The SDS covers 22 symptom distresses that are common in patients with cancer; a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 is used for scoring. The lowest score is 22, and the highest is 110; the higher the score, the more severe the symptom distress. The internal reliability (Cronbach's α value) of the SDS is 0.87, and its content validity index (CVI) is 0.92, thus indicating favorable reliability and validity.
- ➢
- Health-care demand scale: To evaluate the health-care needs of patients with cancer, a questionnaire was developed that contains 20 items (13), including items on health-related needs at the physiological, psychological, and social levels. The questionnaire was based on clinical experience and the patient need assessment tool. A Likert scale from 1 to 5 was used for scoring. The reliability of this scale (Cronbach's α) was 0.82, whereas the CVI was 0.85–0.95 after expert evaluation.
- ➢
- European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30: The Chinese version of this scale has been issued to and is suitable for all patients with cancer. The scale contains 30 items in 15 dimensions: five functional dimensions (body, role, cognitive, emotional, and societal functions), three symptom dimensions (fatigue, pain, and vomiting), one question regarding general health and quality of life, and six single items (each symptom is used as a dimension). Regarding scoring, items 29 and 30 were scored 1–7 (seven levels), whereas the other items were scored in four levels; the higher the score for the five functional dimensions, the higher the quality of life. However, the higher the score for the symptom dimensions, the poorer the quality of life. The score for each dimension and total score were calculated using the formula proposed by Hinz et al. (2012). After the calculations, the score was 0–100, and the total quality of life score of the Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 was calculated as follows: first, the scores for the nine symptoms (fatigue, nausea, vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, anorexia, constipation, diarrhea, and economic hardship) were calculated until the score was valid; then, the average value of the total scores was determined from the 15 dimensions; the higher the total quality of life score, the higher the quality of life.
- (4)
- LINE Official Account Content
3.2. The expert opinions of the focus group and the common distresses and needs of patients after they are discharged are shown in Table 1.
3.3. The long-term care resources required by patients with oral cancer after they are discharged include the following: language and swallowing training; subsidy and disability certificate applications; nutrition supplements, cooking, and healthy food; control of fatigue, pain, and insomnia; oral cleaning and tumor wound care; patient support groups; and psychological consultations. Home care nurses cannot monitor patients every day, and clinics and support centers cannot always accept patients or may be incapable of providing nursing. Care for patients with oral cancer is currently in dire need of long-term investment in resources, particularly for tumor wound care at the end of oral cancer.
3.4. We constructed an oral cancer health-care information app (Table 2). The app notified the patients in the experimental group and provided one-on-one chatting.
| No. | Sub. No | Contents |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Welcome to the general catalogue of [Taichung Veterans General Hospital Dental Patients Association] | |
| 1 | Watch [Our Good Friends]—integrate cancer resources | |
| 2 | Watch [Oral Cancer and Face Injury]—Sunshine Social Welfare Foundation | |
| 2.1 | Sunshine Social Welfare Foundation service origin | |
| 2.2 | Understanding oral cancer | |
| 2.3 | Treatment of oral cancer | |
| 2.4 | Care and rehabilitation of oral cancer | |
| 2.5 | Prognosis and tracking of oral cancer | |
| 2.6 | Psychological adjustment and support for oral cancer | |
| 2.7 | Social resources network for oral cancer | |
| 2.8 | Common Q&As | |
| 3 | Watch [Difficulty speaking and swallowing?] | |
| 3.1 | Japazi–Swallowing Healthy Exercise—national language | |
| 3.2 | Japazi–Swallowing Healthy Exercise—Taiwanese | |
| 4 | Watch [Dining is Most Important]−nutrition, please click on the following figure | |
| 4.1 | Nutritional recipe model (including liquid diet) | |
| 4.2 | Sunshine Social Welfare Foundation Gourmet recipes (participation) | |
| 4.3 | Sunshine Social Welfare Foundation Gourmet recipes (appraisal) | |
| 4.4 | Your recipe nutritional recipes | |
| 4.5 | Nutrient formula instruction | |
| 4.6 | Diet myths Q&A | |
| 5 | Watch [What to do if you can’t work after falling ill?] | |
| 6 | Watch [Video show], please click on the following figure and select | |
| 6.1 | Sunshine Social Welfare Foundation Knight Dream—true journey | |
| 6.2 | 300 km Prayer Road—full edition | |
| 6.3 | Areca catechu under the sun | |
| 6.4 | Disease information | |
| 6.5 | Taichung Veterans General Hospital Hospice Care Advocacy Film | |
| 6.6 | Sunshine Social Welfare Foundation Film: Red Alert | |
| 6.7 | Lost smile | |
| 7 | If you need to contact us, click on the following figure and select | |
| 7.1 | Taichung Veterans General Hospital Dental Patients Advisory Network | |
| 7.2 | Contact a case management nurse | |
| 7.3 | Night and holidays emergency consultation line | |
| 8 | Watch [Oral patients association course & sharing], … | |
| 8.1 | Comfortable nursing—oral care | |
| 8.2 | Psychological adjustment for oral cancer | |
| 8.3 | Feed you—nutrition | |
| 8.4 | Patient sharing—Mr. Fu | |
| 8.5 | Patient sharing—Mr. Pan |
3.5. Ethical Considerations: Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Taichung Veterans Hospital in Taichung, Taiwan (CF16030A). The patients provided informed consent before data were collected. The same LINE Official Account program was administered to the patients in the control group 5 months after the completion of data collection
3.6. Data analysis: Microsoft Excel was used to enter and manipulate data. SPSS 18.0 was employed to conduct differential analysis on the data, and the GEE was used to conduct repeated-measurement analysis.
4. Results
4.1. Basic Data of Patients
4.2. Questions, Treatment Suggestions, and Tracking Results of the One-on-One LINE Official Account Consultation System
4.3. Effects of Timely Notifications from LINE Official Account on Support Group Participation
4.4. Changes in Symptom Distress, Quality of Life, and Health-Care Needs
4.5. Satisfaction with Disease Care Information Provided Over LINE Official Account
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- An “Oncology Management Five-Part Care Mode Concept Map” (Figure 2) should be constructed that consists of the patient, family, team, community, and course, with patients at the center and case managers as their counterparts.
- Oral-cancer-related care information should be provided to promote patient participation in self-care, provide cross-team care, and give patients crucial information after they are discharged.
- A one-on-one consultation system without pressure or time constraints should be offered.
- A self-evaluation system should be constructed in which patients can evaluate their condition and upload data; a nurse will then review the patient data and provide guidance.
- Family members should be allowed to log on, leave messages, learn about patient care, ease the burden on family members, and provide family members with an outlet to express emotions and seek care resources.
- Small-scale, multifunctional, long-term stations should be established and nursing functions at health centers should be expanded to care for oral cancer wounds and patients with terminal illness.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Jameel M, Shahla B, Kedar K, Christine HC. Recent advances and future directions in clinical management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancers (2021) 13:338. [CrossRef]
- Ian K, Roeline WP, Bart PMS, Annemieke K, Bregje D, Onwuteaka P. Spiritual care at the end of life in the primary care setting: experiences from spiritual caregivers- a mixed methods study. BMC Palliat Care (2019) 18. [CrossRef]
- Anne-Marie K, Gilmour J, Wissen K. Nurses’ experiences caring for patients surgically treated for oral cavity cancer. nursing Praxis in New Zealand (2018) 34:7-19. [CrossRef]
- Dawson C, Al-Qamachi L, Martin T. Speech and swallowing outcomes following oral cavity reconstruction. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2017) 25:200-204. [CrossRef]
- Lian SY, Chang TT, Wu WW, Wang TJ. Caring for patients with oral cancer in Taiwan: the challenges faced by family caregivers. Eur J Cancer Care (2019) 28:e12891. [CrossRef]
- Chang PH, Chang CH, Chuo YH, Lin CC, Lai HC, Chiang PJ, Cheng CS, Huang PC. Effectiveness of an integrated cancer care program on symptom distress and health care needs of initial operative patients with oral cancer. J VGH Nurs (2017) 34:227-38. [CrossRef]
- Koh J, Walsh P, D'Costa I, Bhatti O. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma survivorship care. Royal Aust College Gen Pract (2019) 48:846-48. [CrossRef]
- Caitlin G, Breukink SO, Claessens D, Slok AHM, Kimman ML. Patient- reported outcome measures in oncology: a qualitative study of the healthcare professional’s perspective. Support Care Cancer (2021) 29:5253-5361. [CrossRef]
- Joo JY, Liu MF. Effectiveness of Nurse- led Management in cancer care: systematic review. Clin Nurs Res (2019) 28:968-991. [CrossRef]
- Yin YN, Wang Y, Jiang NJ, Long DR. Can case management improve cancer patients quality of life? A systematic review following PRISMA. Medicine (2020) 99:e22448. [CrossRef]
- Constanza SH, Enric JS, Antoni MR, Albert ED, José LL. Time-to-treatment in oral cancer: Causes and implications for survival. Cancers (2021) 13:1321. [CrossRef]
- Teng EF, Chang YY, Chang PH, Chuo YH, Tsai YJ, Hsu CY, Shen CC, Chang CH. Using social software to improve quality of life of patients of oral cancer. J VGH Nurs (2018) 35:223-233. [CrossRef]
- Coyle N, Goldstein ML, Passik S, Fishman B, Portenoy R. Development and validation of a patient needs assessment tool (PNAT) for oncology clinicians. Cancer Nurs (1996) 19:81-92. [CrossRef]
- LINE Official Account Official website. (2016). http://at.line.me/tw/ (Accessed August 15, 2022).
- Xu JY, Qiu LL, Hsu CY, Wu YW, Lin HH, Chen CC, Chen MS. Adoption, Acceptability, and Effectiveness of new communication app (LINE Official Account) for post-discharge patients with cardiovascular diseases: a pilot study in a medical center. J Healthc Manag (2017) 18:292-314. [CrossRef]


| Focus group participants | Patient need and distress | Suggestions |
|---|---|---|
| Medical center Oral cancer care team | Patients have difficulty swallowing and speaking | 1. Provide a health education list regarding oral movement and swallowing skills. 2. Provide referral services. 3. Document the experiences of patients with oral cancer. 4. Encourage patients to find and take part in support group activities. |
| The oral mucosa is broken, and food intake is reduced after electrotherapy | 1. Remind patients about the application of glutamine. 2. Referral care nurses should provide health education for oral care. 3. Provide nutrition information. 4. Provide mouthwash information. |
|
| Patients are unaware of whether they meet the criteria to apply for a disability certificate | During a follow-up visit, patients should ask their physician whether they meet the criteria for somatopsychic disturbance. |
|
| Long-term care professionals | Patients require oral care and wound care | 1. Cleaning for patients. 2. Suggest using alcohol-free mouthwash properly. 3. Use propolis mouthwash, which has a bactericidal effect and may thus promote wound healing. |
| Patients require pain control | Understand the situation of patients using acesodyne. | |
| Patients have a nutrition demand | Refer to a dietitian. | |
| Patients have a rehabilitation demand | Refer to the Sunshine Social Welfare Foundation to teach patients about mouth-opening exercises, improving shoulder and neck stiffness, and swallowing training. |
|
| Social welfare professionals | Patients have nutrition intake and financial problems | Provide a nutrition program support plan for patients. |
| Patients require oral cleaning and education on nutrition and health | Provide home care service plan tracking and home rehabilitation. | |
| Patients require mood adjustment | 1. Hold group activities for patients. 2. Invite the volunteer team comprising those who previously had oral cancer to share and visit. 3. Encourage other patients through group interactions. |
| Total (N=100) | CP (n=45) |
EG (n=55) |
p value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | n | % | n | % | |||||
| Paticipants | 0.021* | |||||||||
| NO | 89 | (89.0%) | 44 | (97.8%) | 45 | (82%) | ||||
| YES | 11 | (11.0%) | 1 | (2.2%) | 10 | (18%) | ||||
| Total | Function | Symptom | Quality of life over 7 days |
|||||||||||||
| Variable | Coefficient (B) | SE | p value | Coefficient (B) | SE | p value | Coefficient (B) | SE | p value | Coefficient (B) | SE | p value | ||||
| Interception | 81.46 | 2.25 | 87.52 | 2.07 | 88.44 | 1.97 | 68.41 | 3.31 | ||||||||
| Group | ||||||||||||||||
| CG | ref. | ref. | ref. | ref. | ||||||||||||
| EG | 0.42 | 2.95 | .887 | 0.97 | 2.73 | .721 | -0.40 | 2.68 | .882 | 0.68 | 4.24 | .873 | ||||
| Test | ||||||||||||||||
| First | ref. | ref. | ref. | ref. | ||||||||||||
| Second | -8.54 | 2.07 | <.001** | -0.73 | 1.49 | .624 | 0.18 | 1.59 | .908 | -25.06 | 4.75 | <.001** | ||||
| Third | 0.87 | 1.73 | .615 | 1.94 | 1.61 | .227 | 1.88 | 1.79 | .296 | -1.20 | 2.78 | .667 | ||||
| GP*Second | 3.77 | 2.92 | .196 | -1.33 | 2.43 | .583 | -1.53 | 2.35 | .513 | 14.19 | 6.24 | .023* | ||||
| GP*Third | -1.06 | 2.46 | .666 | -4.13 | 2.35 | .079 | -1.11 | 2.34 | .637 | 2.05 | 4.08 | .615 | ||||
| Questions | N | n | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Are you satisfied with the provision of disease care information? Very dissatisfied Dissatisfied Tolerable Satisfied Very satisfied |
46 |
1 0 5 25 15 |
2.2 0.0 10.9 54.3 32.6 |
| 2 | Do you consume the information provided by the LINE Official Account of Taichung Veterans General Hospital Dental Patients Association? Yes No |
47 |
42 5 |
89.4 10.6 |
| 3 | At what frequency do you consume information from the LINE Official Account of Taichung Veterans General Hospital Dental Patients Association? Every day Every week Every month When I receive information When I inquire about problems |
43 |
10 6 2 25 0 |
23.3 14.0 4.7 58.1 0.0 |
| 4 | Does the information provided by the LINE Official Account of Taichung Veterans General Hospital Dental Patients Association meet your needs? Not at all Sometimes Yes |
47 |
1 39 7 |
2.1 83.0 14.9 |
| 5 | Are you satisfied with the information provided by the LINE Official Account of Taichung Veterans General Hospital Dental Patients Association? Very dissatisfied Dissatisfied Satisfied Very satisfied |
47 |
1 1 32 13 |
2.1 2.1 68.1 27.7 |
| 6 | Are you satisfied with the consultation mode when you encounter problems at home? Very dissatisfied Dissatisfied Tolerable Satisfied Very satisfied |
47 |
0 15 29 3 |
0.0 31.9 61.7 6.4 |
| 7 | Are you ever unsure who to ask when you encounter a problem? Yes No |
47 |
15 32 |
31.9 68.1 |
| 8 | Have you ever asked questions using the LINE Official Account of Taichung Veterans General Hospital Dental Patients Advisory Network? Yes No |
47 |
9 38 |
19.1 80.9 |
| 9 | Are you satisfied with answers given through consultations on the LINE Official Account of Taichung Veterans General Hospital Dental Patients Advisory Network? Very dissatisfied Dissatisfied Satisfied Very satisfied |
9 |
0 1 6 2 |
0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 |
| 10 | What is your opinion of the help given by the LINE Official Account of Taichung Veterans General Hospital Dental Patients Advisory Network? Very unhelpful Unhelpful Helpful Very helpful |
47 |
0 2 37 8 |
0.0 4.3 78.7 17.0 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).