Preprint
Article

Protective Effect of Amaranthus cruentus Seed Oil on the UVA Radiation-Induced Apoptosis in Human Skin Fibroblasts

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Submitted:

18 May 2023

Posted:

19 May 2023

You are already at the latest version

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Abstract
UVA radiation inducing oxidative stress is harmful for the skin cells. The most sensitive are dermal fibroblasts. Exposure of the cells to prolonged UVA radiation induces apoptosis. Although, skin cells have a number of defense mechanisms that protect them against UV-induced oxidative stress, they are insufficient during long-lasting UV exposure. Therefore, there is a need for effective skin protection compounds with cytoprotective and antioxidant properties. One of their sources is Amaranthus cruentus L. seed oil, rich in unsaturated fatty acids, squalene, vitamin E derivatives, and phytosterols. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether Amaranthus cruentus seed oil evokes protective effect on the apoptosis stimulated by UVA radiation in human skin fibroblasts. UVA radiation at an applied dose of 10 J/cm2 caused a significant reduction in the survival of human skin fibroblasts and directed them into apoptosis pathway. Increased expression of p53, caspase 3, and caspase 9 and PARP proteins in UVA-treated fibroblasts suggests the intrinsic mechanism of apoptosis. The application of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil at 0.1% and 0.15% concentrations to UVA-treated cells decreased the expression of these proteins, which was accompanied by increased cell survival. Similarly, the UVA-dependent decrease in expression of p-Akt and mTOR proteins was restored, under the effect of studied oil. The molecular mechanism of this phenomenon is related to the stimulation of antioxidant processes through activation of Nrf2. This suggests that Amaranthus cruentus seed oil stimulate the antioxidant system in fibroblast cells and prevent the effects of UVA-induced oxidative stress and may find application in pharmacy and cosmetology as a sun- protective substance.
Keywords: 
UVA radiation; oxidative stress; dermal fibroblasts; apoptosis; antioxidant; Amaranthus cruentus seed oil; sun-protective substance; pharmacy; cosmetology
Subject: 
Medicine and Pharmacology  -   Dermatology

1. Introduction

Sunlight is electromagnetic radiation, with a full range of wavelengths, from ultraviolet UV radiation (UVA, UVB and UVC in the range of 200 - 400 nm), through visible radiation (in the range of 400 - 800 nm) to infrared IR radiation (IRA, IRB and IRC in the range of 800 – 15.000 nm). Ultraviolet radiation has the most significant effect on the human body of all types of radiations. Seventy percent of UVB radiation that reaches the skin is absorbed by the stratum corneum, 20% goes to the spinosum and basal layer of the epidermis, and only 10% penetrates the papillary layer of the skin dermis [1]. UVA radiation is partially absorbed by the epidermis, but as much as 20-30% reaches the deep epidermal reticular layer of the dermis [2]. Unlike UVB radiation, UVA radiation, due to its high penetration properties, reaches deeper parts of the skin and affects dermal compartments. When exposed to UVA radiation at a dose of 25 J/cm², dermal fibroblasts located in the upper layer of the skin die within 48h of exposure through an apoptotic process. In contrast, the structure and organization of the epidermis did not change significantly. Studies confirm that dermal fibroblasts are more sensitive to UVA-induced oxidative stress than keratinocytes [3]. UV radiation generates free radicals that can result in cellular stress, DNA damage which leads to activation of the p53 suppressor protein. Activation of p53 protein in irradiated cells leads to the cell cycle arrest to allow repair of DNA damage. However, when the damage is extensive or repair is impossible, it induces apoptotic cell death via the intrinsic (mitochondrial) caspase-9 – dependent pathway of apoptosis. Activated caspase-9 then cleaves and activates effector caspases, such as caspase-3 and -7, which carry out apoptosis [4,5,6]. UV also negatively affects the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway, which is closely related to cell cycle arrest and the process of apoptosis. The AKT/mTOR signaling pathway can antagonize p53 activity in response to UV radiation. Shifting the balance between p53 activation and AKT/mTOR signaling may determine cell death or survival [5]. Due to permanent exposure to damaging UV radiation, the cells of the different layers of the skin - epidermal keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts - produce a number of protection mechanisms. They include high activity of repair and antioxidant enzymes, a large pool of non-enzymatic antioxidants and redox-sensitive transcription factors, including Nrf2, which is responsible for the expression of cytoprotective proteins [7]. These processes become depleted during prolonged UV exposure, therefore search for effective skin-protective compounds with cytoprotective and antioxidant properties are required. One of potential sources of such a compound are seed oils with free fatty acids, vitamins, sterols, carotenoids and phenols [4]. Such a good source is seed oil from Amaranthus cruentus L. Its cytoprotective and antioxidant potential is due to the presence of unsaturated fatty acids, among which linoleic acid, commonly used as an antioxidant, predominates. In addition, it also contains squalene, vitamin E and its derivatives such as γ, δ-tocotrienols, and phytosterols [8]. However, the effects of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil on UVA-treated cells is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the protective effect of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil on UVA-stimulated apoptosis in a cellular model of human skin fibroblasts.

2. Results and Discussion

The skin, being the largest organ of the human body, has the most direct contact with external factors, especially sunlight. Prolonged exposure to UV radiation causes photoaging, which is superimposed on aging caused by the passage of time (chronological aging). During skin exposure, UV energy is absorbed by endogenous cellular chromophores, with their excitation, which occurs in the presence of molecular oxygen, producing a number of oxidation products and reactive oxygen species (ROS). This leads to oxidative-reductive stress resulting inhibition of collagen synthesis, damage to DNA, proteins, lipids aberrations in biological membrane structures and regulation of fibroblast function [9].
Therefore, the effect of UVA radiation on the above processes was studied in human skin fibroblasts. The cells were exposed to UVA at different doses as shown in Figure 1A. It was found that fibroblast viability decreased with increasing UVA dose. Doses of 2 J/cm2 and 5 J/cm2 did not significantly affect the viability of the cells. Doses of 6 J/cm2 and 10 J/cm2 reduced fibroblast viability to about 78% and 54% of control value, respectively. Doses of 12 J/cm2, 15 J/cm2 and 20 J/cm2 reduced fibroblast viability to about 38%, 29%, and 6% of control value respectively. Based on the experiment, a dose of 10 J/cm2, contributing to about IC50 value of cell viability, was selected for further experiments.
The natural mechanisms that counteract the negative effects of ROS, include up-regulation of lipid synthesis, replenishing epidermal barrier components and regeneration of expended antioxidants. The external factors, including UV radiation deplete the components. For this reason, new substances of natural origin that exhibit such activity are being sought [7]. Amaranthus cruentus seed oil is characterized by the presence of linoleic acid, oleic acid, squalene and α-β-, γ- and δ-tocopherols. Linoleic acid, commonly used as an antioxidant, dominates. Squalene, present in the oil's composition, is found in the skin in sebum, and is also part of the epidermal barrier and protects the skin from various external factors, including UV radiation [10,11]. Due to its chemical composition, Amaranthus cruentus seed oil has cytoprotective and antioxidant potential, and has prospects for use as a substance for skin care against UV radiation [12]. We found that the effect of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil on cell viability varied depending on the concentration used. The application of low concentrations (0.05%, 0.1% and 0.15%) of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil had no significant effect on the viability of human skin fibroblasts. In contrast, the use of higher concentrations (0.2% and 0.25%) of this oil resulted in a decrease in cell viability to about 58% and 57% of the control value, respectively. The observed decrease in cell viability at high concentrations of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil was attributed to the physical effect of the oil itself on the cells, which led to their exclusion from further experiments (Figure 1B).
Studies by Ko et al [13] provided evidence that Amaranthus cruentus seed oil exhibited of both antioxidant and pro-oxidant effects in human lung fibroblasts. At low concentrations of the oil, fibroblasts were protected from oxidative stress, while incubation with high concentrations of the oil resulted in increase in intracellular ROS generation and cell damage. Our studies indicate a cytotoxic effect of UVA radiation on human skin fibroblasts and its involvement in the generation of significant amounts of ROS. Considering that ROS are suppressors of basic cellular functions as well as pro-apoptotic factors, we investigated the protective-antioxidant potential of Amaranthus cruentus seeds at selected concentrations in UVA-treated human skin fibroblast cells. The study indicated that UVA radiation generates significant amounts of ROS in the studied cells. Treatment with 0.05% concentration of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil reduced the formation of ROS, but not as significantly as at concentrations of 0.1% and 0.15% oil (Figure 2). Reduced ROS level in fibroblast exposed to UVA was also noted in the presence of other oils such as sea buckthorn seed oil. Treatment with sea buckthorn seed oil prevented UVA-induced redox imbalance in fibroblasts. It was found that incubation of fibroblasts with sea buckthorn oil caused a decrease in ROS generation by about 25% [7,14].
Based on the results obtained in MTT test, we observed that the survival rate of cells treated with UVA at a dose of 10 J/cm2 was decreased by 45%, and this was a statistically significant difference, compared to the control (p<0.05). Comparing the effect of UVA on cells in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil at 0.05%, 0.10%, and 0.15% concentrations we observed that the cell survival was 13%, 19%, and 23% higher, respectively, than in the UVA-treated group, and these effects were statistically significant (p<0.05). This data indicates antioxidant effect of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil at selected concentrations in UVA-treated fibroblasts (Figure 3, Table 1).
In MTT experiment, we found that UVA irradiation of human skin fibroblasts impairs their survival, while the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil reverses the cytotoxic effect of UVA radiation on this process. However, the mechanism of this effect is unknown. Cytometric assays for apoptosis and cell survival were performed using Nucleo-Counter® NC-3000TM imaging cytometer. The survival rate of fibroblast treated with Amaranthus cruentus seed oil, regardless of the concentration used, remained at 82 - 86%. In cells irradiated with UVA at a dose of 10 J/cm2, a negative effect of this radiation on fibroblast survival was noted, which was about 56% of control. Amaranthus cruentus seed oil at concentrations of 0.05%, 0.1% and 0.15% counteracted the toxic effect of UVA on the cells, whose survival rate was reduced, but to a lower level, to about 68%, 75% and 79% of the values obtained in the UVA treated group, respectively (Figure 4).
The redox balance is essential for physiological function of the cell. Under physiological conditions, the cytosol has a highly reducing environment due to high level of reduced glutathione and a complex redox enzyme system that maintains glutathione in a reduced state. In most eukaryotic cells, cysteine thiols of proteins are the most sensitive to changes in the cellular redox state, and 98% of thiols remain in a reduced form. Oxidative stress contributes to non-selective and irreversible oxidation of protein thiols, glutathione depletion and cell death. Thus, the content of reduced thiols is indicator of ROS formation and apoptosis [13]. A study by Emonet et al [15] indicated that UVA sensitivity of human skin fibroblasts is associated with a decrease in their intracellular glutathione (GSH) level. In our studies we have found that Amaranthus cruentus seed oil alone caused a slight decrease in the level of reduced thiols, which remained at 78 - 88% of control. In contrast, in the UVA-irradiated cells, a negative effect of this radiation on the level of reduced thiols was noticed, which was about 62% of control. Comparing the effect of UVA on the cells cultured in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil at concentrations of 0.05%, 0.1% and 0.15%, the level of reduced thiols increased to about 79%, 85% and 87% of control respectively (Figure 5). This suggests that the tested oil has a protective effect on the UVA-induced disturbances in the oxidation-reduction balance in fibroblast.
Studies by Bernard et al [16] indicate that in contrast to UVB, UVA radiation at doses consistent with realistic sun exposure induces oxidative stress in cells. UVA produces singlet oxygen, which depolarizes mitochondrial membranes, and induces oxidative damage to DNA, inducing late apoptosis. In contrast, UVB causes only late apoptosis. Interestingly, exposure to UVA in vivo did not induce apoptosis in epidermal cells. These results were confirmed in reconstructed UVA-treated skin, in which apoptosis was observed in fibroblasts of the dermis, but not in epidermal keratinocytes [17]. Our study indicated that UVA radiation at a dose of 10 J/cm2 significantly reduced the survival rate and induced apoptosis of fibroblasts. Application of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil at concentrations of 0.1% and 0.15% significantly reduced these processes (Figure 5). We also demonstrated that the used dose of UVA radiation induced the intracellular apoptosis pathway, that was accompanied by a significant increase in the expression of the apoptosis-inducing factor p53 protein (Figure 6), as well as caspase-9 (Figure 7) and caspase-3 (Figure 8), which play a key role in this process. Treatment of the cells with selected concentrations of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil caused a decrease in the expression of these proteins, which are the markers of apoptosis. It suggests that UVA-dependent activation of apoptosis through the intrinsic pathway is inhibited by Amaranthus cruentus seed oil in fibroblasts.
To maintain the integrity of the skin barrier, cells respond to UV by engaging other mechanisms by which, they can survive under stress conditions. Among them is AKT/mTOR and p53 signaling as a potential regulator of life and death of irradiated cells [15]. Our study indicated a decrease in the expression of AKT and mTOR proteins under UVA radiation. The expression of p53 protein was significantly increased. Application of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil reversed the negative effects of UVA irradiation on this pathways. It showed the strongest effect at 0.1% and 0.15% (Figure 9 and Figure 10). The UVA-reduced expression of p-AKT and mTOR proteins was restored, and accompanied by increased cell survival and reduced p53 expression, suggesting pro-survival mechanism of tested oil.
The reactive oxygen species lead to the formation of oxidation-generated DNA damage, such as single-strand breaks. UVA-induced DNA damage also leads to the mutations of proto-oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, such as the previously described p53 [16]. Amaranthus cruentus seed evokes also protective effect on the process of DNA biosynthesis in UVA-treated fibroblasts. In the UVA-treated cell, DNA biosynthesis decreased by 45%, compared to the control group. In the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil at 0.05%, 0.10%, and 0.15% concentrations, DNA biosynthesis, was increased by 12%, 29%, and 31%, respectively despite the toxic effect of UVA, and this was statistically significant (p<0.05) (Figure 11, Table 2). Based on the obtained results, it can be assumed that the application of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil protects cellular DNA from the damaging effects of UVA radiation.
UV-induced DNA strand breaks initiate apoptosis. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) enzymes constitute a large family of 18 proteins. They represent enzymes that are activated immediately after DNA strand breaks, so the activity may be a marker of DNA damage [16,18]. We observed that UVA radiation, at the applied dose, increased the expression of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase protein (PARP). The use of 0.05% concentration of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil did not prevent increased PARP expression after UVA irradiation, while the use of this oil at 0.1% and 0.15% concentrations markedly reduced this process (Figure 12). It shows that PARP proteins are involved in the mechanism of apoptosis occurring as a result of this radiation. Therefore, reduction in PARP protein expression under the influence of the applied concentrations of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil indicates its protective effect against the damaging effects of UVA radiation on DNA.
In this report we provide evidence that UVA-treated fibroblasts impairs DNA biosynthesis and reduces survival through activation of apoptosis, while the addition of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil shows a protective effect on these processes. The molecular mechanism of this phenomenon is related to the activation of transcription factor Nrf2 [19]. Translocation of the Nrf2 into the cell nucleus under oxidative stress conditions activates the expression of numerous cytoprotective genes that enhance cell survival. These include detoxification and antioxidant enzymes [16]. In this study, we found increased expression of Nrf2 and its translocation to the nucleus in UVA-treated human skin fibroblasts, however, treatment with Amaranthus cruentus seed oil enhanced this expression (Figure 13). The above data suggest that the studied oil stimulate the antioxidant system in fibroblast and counteract the effects of UVA-induced oxidative stress through activation of the Nrf2-dependent pathways. Similar results were observed for sea buckthorn seed oil. Treatment of UV-irradiated skin cells with this oil promoted the antioxidant activity in the cells through Nrf2 activation [7].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

3.1.1. Plant Materials

Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO), used in this research is a validated, commercially available product (Szarłat M. and W. Lenkiewicz s.j. Zawady, Poland). It is an unrefined oil, produced by the cold pressing of the seeds. The Fatty Acid profile was: Palmitic Acid 17.5 - 19.2%, Oleic Acid 17.5 - 20.5%, Linoleic Acid 52 - 55%, Stearic Acid 4.5 - 5.5%, also Squalene: 6– 8%, Vitamin E: 8-10 mg/100 g.

3.2. Methods

3.2.1. Cell Lines and Culture

Human dermal fibroblasts were obtained from American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, USA, and maintained were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) PANTM BIOTECH, Germany, supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) Gibco, USA, 50 U/mL of Penicillin (Pen) Gibco, USA and 50 μg/mL of Streptomycin (Strep) Gibco, USA, and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2. The cells were grown on 100-mm dishes in 10 mL of complete medium. The cell culture medium was changed 2–3 times per week. For the experiments with the investigated oil, we used DMEM Eagle’s medium without FBS and Pen/Strep.

3.2.2. Cell Viability Test MTT

To evaluate the cytotoxicity of the UVA-radiation and Amaranthus cruentus seed oil on the fibroblasts cells, methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) salt was used, as described in the Carmichael method [20]. This method is based on the conversion of yellow tetrazolium bromide MTT solution to the purple formazan derivatives in the live cells, and this is due to the activity of the mitochondrial dehydrogenases. For this assay, the cells were cultured in 6-well plates, at a density of 0.3 × 106 cells/well. When the cells reached about 80% confluency, the culture media were removed. The samples were prepared in triplicate. The investigated Amaranthus cruentus seed oil were in the following concentrations: 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.15%, 0.2%, and 0.25%. After 30 minutes incubation, the cell culture media containing the studied oil were removed, and the plates were washed with PBS. Subsequently, the cells were exposed to UVA radiation using Bio-Link Crosslinker BLX 365; Vilber Lourmat, Germany at various doses, namely 2 J/cm2, 5 J/cm2, 6 J/cm2, 10 J/cm2, 12 J/cm2, 15 J/cm2, and 20 J/cm2 (365 nm) in 1 ml of cold PBS (4°C). After irradiation, PBS was exchanged for the fresh DMEM media. The cells were incubated for 24 h. After incubation, the cell culture media were removed, and the plates were washed twice with prewarmed PBS. Furthermore, the cells were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h, with MTT dissolved in PBS (0.5 mg/mL) in a volume of 1.0 mL per well. When the incubation step ended, the MTT was removed and the formazan derivatives were dissolved in the DMSO (1.0 mL per well). To quantify the formed formazan, the absorbance at 570 nm was measured using a spectrophotometer. The viability of the cells treated with the studied oil and UVA irradiation was calculated as a percent of the control value.

3.2.3. ROS Formation

The cells were cultured on black wells in a 96-well plate, at 0.01 × 104 cells/well. When the cells reached 70–80% confluency, the culture media were removed, the plate was washed with PBS, and 100 µL of medium containing the studied oil was added into the well. After 30 minutes, cells were washed with cold PBS (4°C) and exposed to UVA radiation (Bio-Link Crosslinker BLX 365; Vilber Lourmat, Germany) at a total dose of 10 J/cm2 (365 nm) in 0,1 ml of cold PBS (4°C). Next, PBS was replaced by DMEM. After 4 h of incubation, 0.5 µM of 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescin diacetate was added to the wells and incubated for 15 min at 37 °C in 5% CO2. After incubation, the culture media with DCFDA were removed and the cells were washed twice with prewarmed PBS. Then the wells were loaded with 100 µL of PBS. The cells were visualized with the BD Pathway 855 Bioimaging system in an environmental control chamber (37 °C in 5% CO2), and ex λ 488 nm, and em λ 521 nm. In its basic state, DCFDA is a nonfluorescent compound, and when oxidized by ROS to DCF it becomes highly fluorescent.

3.2.4. Cytometric Assay for Apoptosis

The cells were cultured in 6-well plates at an initial density of 0.3 × 106 cells/well. When the cells reached about 70–80% confluency, the culture media were removed. The wells were washed with PBS, and for the 30 min fresh DMEM media containing the studied an Amaranthus cruentus seed oil were added, next cells were exposed on UVA irradiation in cold PBS. Then fresh DMEM media were added into the wells. After 24 h of incubation, the cells (including floating cells) were collected by trypsinization to 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes. The cells were centrifuged at 800× g for 5 min. The supernatant was removed, and the cell pellet was resuspended in 100 μL Annexin V binding buffer, and then 2 μL Annexin V-CF488A conjugate was added. In the next step 2 μL Hoechst 33342 (final concentration: 10 μg/mL) was added and the suspension was gently mixed by pipetting. After that, incubation of the cells at 37 °C for 15 min using a heating block was performed. Next, the stained cells were centrifuged at 400× g for 5 min. at room temperature, and the supernatant was removed. As the last step, the cell pellet was resuspended in 100 μL annexin V binding buffer supplemented with 10 µg/mL PI and then immediately analyzed in the NC-Slide A2 using NucleoCounter NC-3000TM (ChemoMetec, Denmark). Cells with low fluorescence intensities of PI (PI negative) and low fluorescence intensities of Annexin V represented living cells with high viability. The cells with high fluorescence intensities of PI (PI positive) and low fluorescence intensities of Annexin V represented early apoptotic cells. The cells with high fluorescence intensities of PI (PI positive) and high fluorescence intensities of Annexin V represented late apoptotic/dead cells.

3.2.5. Free Thiol Groups Assay

The free thiol groups were measured using NucleoCounter NC-3000TM (ChemoMetec, Denmark). For this assay, the cells were cultured in 6-well plates. When the cells reached 90% of confluency, an Amaranthus cruentus seed oil and UVA irradiation assay was performed (as described in 3.2.2 section). After 24h incubation, the cells were collected by trypsinization to 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes. The cells were centrifuged at 1600 × g for 10 min. The supernatant was removed and the cell pellet was resuspended in 190 µL of PBS, and 10 µL of Solution 5 (Acridine Orange, Propidium Iodide, and VB-48) was added. The cell suspension with staining dyes at 10 µL per each chamber of 8-well NC-Slide A8TM, and analyzed using the Vitality Protocol (VitaBright-48TM protocol). Cells with low fluorescence intensities of PI (PI negative), and high fluorescence intensities of VB-48, represent living cells with high viability. The cells with high fluorescence intensities of PI (PI positive) represent dead cells.

3.2.6. DNA Biosynthesis Assay

The DNA biosynthesis was determined using radioactive [methyl-3H] thymidine incorporation into DNA. For this assay, the cells were cultured in 6-well plates. When the cells reached 90% of confluency, an Amaranthus cruentus seed oil and UVA irradiation assay was performed (as described in 3.2.2 section). Straight after irradiation, a 10 µl of 0.5 μCi/ml [methyl-3H]thymidine was added to each well and then incubated for 24 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. The samples were prepared in triplicates. The radioactivity of the samples was measured using the Tri-Carb 2810 TR Scintillation Analyzer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). To calculate the DNA biosynthesis, the dpm parameter value - radioactivity thymidine incorporated into the DNA values of the treated cells were compared to those of the control group.

3.2.7. Western-Immunoblot Analysis

For the analysis of the protein expression by Western blotting, the cells were cultured in 100 mm plates, at about 2.0 × 106 cells, and when they reached about 70–80% confluency, the culture medium was removed, and the cells were treated an Amaranthus cruentus seed oil and UVA irradiation (as described in 3.2.2 Section). After 24 h of incubation, the culture media were removed, and the cells were harvested using a cell lysis buffer supplemented with a protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail. The protein concentrations of the samples were determined by the Lowry method [21]. Then, the proteins were separated using the SDS-PAGE method described by Laemmli [22]. After this step, the gels were washed in cold Towbin buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, 20% (v/v) methanol, 0.025–0.1% SDS, pH 8.3). The proteins in the gels were transferred onto the 0.2-µm nitrocellulose membranes by Trans-Blot (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). The transfer conditions were 200 mA, 3 h in freshly prepared Towbin buffer, and the temperature was maintained around 4–8 °C. The blocking of the membranes was performed by 5% NFDM for 1 h at RT. When the blocking was complete, the membranes were washed three times with 20 mL of TBS-T (20 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween® 20). After the washing step, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The concentration of the primary antibodies was 1:1000. Furthermore, the membranes were washed three times with 20 mL of TBS-T, and a secondary antibody conjugated with HRP solutions (1:3000) in 5% NFDM was used for 1 hour at RT. Then the membranes were washed 3 times with 20 mL of TBS-T and visualized using BioSpectrum Imaging System UVP (Ultra-Violet Products Ltd, Cambridge, UK).

3.2.8. Immunofluorescence Staining and Confocal Microscopy

The cells were cultured on a black 96-well plate. When the cells reached 80% of confluency, an Amaranthus cruentus seed oil was added and UVA irradiation was performed (as described in 3.2.2 Section). After 24h, the culture media were removed, and the cells were fixed with a 3.7% formaldehyde solution at room temperature for 10 min. Then, the plate was washed once with 100 µL/well of PBS. Later, the permeabilization, with a 0.1% Triton X-100 solution, 10 min step was performed. After the permeabilization, the plate was washed twice with PBS, and 3% FBS was used as a blocking agent at room temperature for 30 min. After the FBS removal, 50 µL of the primary antibody (1:50), diluted in 3% FBS, was added, and the plate was incubated for 1h at room temperature. After incubation, the primary antibody plate was washed three times with PBS. Then, 50 µL per well of the secondary antibody (dilution 1:1000) was added for the next 1h. During this step, the plate was covered from the light. When the secondary antibody solution was removed, the plate was washed 3 times with PBS, and the wells were filled with 100 µL of PBS containing 2 µg/mL of Hoechst 33342 for the nuclei staining. The plate was visualized using a confocal laser scanning microscope BD Pathway 855 (Bioimager, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) supported with AttoVision software.

4. Conclusions

UVA radiation at an applied dose of 10 J/cm2 down-regulated expression of p-AKT, mTOR and up-regulated expression of p53, caspase-3, caspase-9 and PARP causing a significant reduction in the survival of human skin fibroblast and inducing apoptosis. The application of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil at 0.1% and 0.15% concentrations to UVA-treated fibroblasts reduced the expression of these apoptosis markers (p53, caspase-3, caspase-9 and PARP) and restored the expression of p-Akt and mTOR proteins. The molecular mechanism of this phenomenon is related to the stimulation of antioxidant processes through activation of Nrf2. This suggests that Amaranthus cruentus seed oil stimulate the antioxidant system in fibroblast cells and prevent the effects of UVA-induced oxidative stress and may find wide application in pharmacy and cosmetology as a sun- protective substance.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org, Not applicable.

Author Contributions

The authors made substantial contributions to the manuscript as follows: conception and design of the study, K.W., and A.S.; performance of experiments and tests, K.W, M.C., and A.S; analysis and interpretation of data, K.W., and A.S.; drafting of the article K.W. and A.S.; final approval of the version to be submitted, A.S and J.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the UMB grant number: SUB/2/DN/22/001/2214.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yaar, M.; Gilchrest, B. A. Photoageing: Mechanism, Prevention and Therapy. Br. J. Dermatol. 2007, 157, 874–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lavker, R. M.; Gerberick, G. F.; Veres, D.; Irwin, C. J.; Kaidbey, K. H. Cumulative Effects from Repeated Exposures to Suberythemal Doses of UVB and UVA in Human Skin. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1995, 32, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Battie, C.; Jitsukawa, S.; Bernerd, F.; Del Bino, S.; Marionnet, C.; Verschoore, M. New Insights in Photoaging, UVA Induced Damage and Skin Types. Exp. Dermatol. 2014, 23, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Obeng, E. Apoptosis (Programmed Cell Death) and Its Signals - A Review. Braz. J. Biol. 2021, 81, 1133–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Strozyk, E.; Kulms, D. The Role of AKT/MTOR Pathway in Stress Response to UV-Irradiation: Implication in Skin Carcinogenesis by Regulation of Apoptosis, Autophagy and Senescence. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 15260–15285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, Q.; Zhang, H.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Zhang, D.; Yu, H. Metformin Attenuates UVA-Induced Skin Photoaging by Suppressing Mitophagy and the PI3K/AKT/MTOR Pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gęgotek, A.; Jastrząb, A.; Jarocka-Karpowicz, I.; Muszyńska, M.; Skrzydlewska, E. The Effect of Sea Buckthorn (Hippophae Rhamnoides L.) Seed Oil on UV-Induced Changes in Lipid Metabolism of Human Skin Cells. Antioxidants 2018, 7, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wolosik, K.; Markowska, A. Amaranthus Cruentus Taxonomy, Botanical Description, and Review of Its Seed Chemical Composition. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2019, 14, 1934578X1984414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rittie, L.; Fisher, G. J. Natural and Sun-Induced Aging of Human Skin. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2015, 5, a015370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huang, Z.-R.; Lin, Y.-K.; Fang, J.-Y. Biological and Pharmacological Activities of Squalene and Related Compounds: Potential Uses in Cosmetic Dermatology. Molecules 2009, 14, 540–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wołosik, K.; Knaś, M.; Zalewska, A.; Niczyporuk, M.; Przystupa, A. W. The Importance and Perspective of Plant-Based Squalene in Cosmetology. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2013, 64, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Wolosik, K.; Zareba, I.; Surazynski, A.; Markowska, A. The Possible Pre -and Post -UVA Radiation Protective Effect of Amaranth Oil on Human Skin Fibroblast Cells. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2017, 13, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ko, S. Redox Modulation by Amaranth Oil in Human Lung Fibroblasts. Nat. Prod. Chem. Res. 2014, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Manku, M. S.; Horrobin, D. F.; Morse, N. L.; Wright, S.; Burton, J. L. Essential Fatty Acids in the Plasma Phospholipids of Patients with Atopic Eczema. Br. J. Dermatol. 1984, 110, 643–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Emonet, N.; Leccia, M. T.; Favier, A.; Beani, J. C.; Richard, M. J. Thiols and Selenium: Protective Effect on Human Skin Fibroblasts Exposed to UVA Radiation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 1997, 40, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bernerd, F.; Passeron, T.; Castiel, I.; Marionnet, C. The Damaging Effects of Long UVA (UVA1) Rays: A Major Challenge to Preserve Skin Health and Integrity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Baba, S. P.; Bhatnagar, A. Role of Thiols in Oxidative Stress. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 2018, 7, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Dantzer, F.; Amé, J.; Schreiber, V.; Nakamura, J.; Ménissier-de Murcia, J.; De Murcia, G. Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase–1 Activation During DNA Damage and Repair. In Methods in Enzymology; Elsevier, 2006; Vol. 409, pp 493–510. [CrossRef]
  19. Ryšavá, A.; Vostálová, J.; Rajnochová Svobodová, A. Effect of Ultraviolet Radiation on the Nrf2 Signaling Pathway in Skin Cells. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2021, 97, 1383–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Carmichael, J.; DeGraff, W. G.; Gazdar, A. F.; Minna, J. D.; Mitchell, J. B. Evaluation of a Tetrazolium-Based Semiautomated Colorimetric Assay: Assessment of Chemosensitivity Testing. Cancer Res. 1987, 47, 936–942. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lowry, O. H.; Rosebrough, N. J.; Farr, A. L.; Randall, R. J. Protein Measurement with the Folin Phenol Reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Laemmli, U. K. Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970, 227, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Cell viability (A) under different doses of UVA radiation, (B) in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil at concentrations of 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.15%, 0.2%, and 0.25% of human skin fibroblasts. The mean values ± standard error (SEM) from the 3 experiments, performed in triplicates, are presented at * p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Cell viability (A) under different doses of UVA radiation, (B) in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil at concentrations of 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.15%, 0.2%, and 0.25% of human skin fibroblasts. The mean values ± standard error (SEM) from the 3 experiments, performed in triplicates, are presented at * p < 0.05.
Preprints 74037 g001
Figure 2. Fluorescence analysis of reactive oxygen species generation in fibroblast cells in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1% and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated (UVA -) and UVA-treated (UVA +) cells. Red fluorescence intensity represents amount of generated ROS. The images were obtained at a 20x magnification.
Figure 2. Fluorescence analysis of reactive oxygen species generation in fibroblast cells in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1% and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated (UVA -) and UVA-treated (UVA +) cells. Red fluorescence intensity represents amount of generated ROS. The images were obtained at a 20x magnification.
Preprints 74037 g002
Figure 3. Cell viability in fibroblast treated with Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated and UVA-treated (+ UVA) cells. The mean values ± standard error (SEM) from the experiments, performed in triplicates. (*statistically significant difference p < 0.05 compared to control).
Figure 3. Cell viability in fibroblast treated with Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated and UVA-treated (+ UVA) cells. The mean values ± standard error (SEM) from the experiments, performed in triplicates. (*statistically significant difference p < 0.05 compared to control).
Preprints 74037 g003
Figure 4. Cytometric assay of apoptosis in fibroblast cells in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated (UVA -) and UVA-treated (UVA +) cells. The cells were stained with fluorescent dyes using Propidium Iodide and Annexin V.
Figure 4. Cytometric assay of apoptosis in fibroblast cells in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated (UVA -) and UVA-treated (UVA +) cells. The cells were stained with fluorescent dyes using Propidium Iodide and Annexin V.
Preprints 74037 g004
Figure 5. Cytometric assay of reduced thiols level in fibroblast cells in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated (UVA -) and UVA-treated (UVA +) cells. The cells were stained with fluorescent dyes Propidium Iodide and VB-48TM.
Figure 5. Cytometric assay of reduced thiols level in fibroblast cells in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated (UVA -) and UVA-treated (UVA +) cells. The cells were stained with fluorescent dyes Propidium Iodide and VB-48TM.
Preprints 74037 g005
Figure 6. Immunofluorescence staining of p53 expression in fibroblast in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated (UVA -) and UVA-treated (UVA +) cells. Blue staining indicates the nuclei, and red staining represents p53 expression. The images were obtained at a 20x magnification.
Figure 6. Immunofluorescence staining of p53 expression in fibroblast in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated (UVA -) and UVA-treated (UVA +) cells. Blue staining indicates the nuclei, and red staining represents p53 expression. The images were obtained at a 20x magnification.
Preprints 74037 g006
Figure 7. Immunofluorescence staining of caspase-3 expression in fibroblast cells in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated (UVA -) and UVA-treated (UVA +) cells. Blue staining indicates the nuclei, and red staining represents caspase 3 expression. The images were obtained at 20x magnification.
Figure 7. Immunofluorescence staining of caspase-3 expression in fibroblast cells in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated (UVA -) and UVA-treated (UVA +) cells. Blue staining indicates the nuclei, and red staining represents caspase 3 expression. The images were obtained at 20x magnification.
Preprints 74037 g007
Figure 8. Western blot for caspase-9 expression in fibroblast in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated and UVA-treated (+ UVA) cells.
Figure 8. Western blot for caspase-9 expression in fibroblast in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated and UVA-treated (+ UVA) cells.
Preprints 74037 g008
Figure 9. Immunofluorescence staining of p-Akt protein expression in fibroblast cells in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated (UVA -) and UVA-treated (UVA +) cells. Blue staining indicates the nuclei, and red staining represents p-Akt protein expression.
Figure 9. Immunofluorescence staining of p-Akt protein expression in fibroblast cells in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated (UVA -) and UVA-treated (UVA +) cells. Blue staining indicates the nuclei, and red staining represents p-Akt protein expression.
Preprints 74037 g009
Figure 10. Immunofluorescence staining of mTOR protein expression in fibroblast cells in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated (UVA -) and UVA-treated (UVA +) cells. Blue staining indicates the nuclei, and red staining represents mTOR protein expression. The images were obtained at 20x magnification.
Figure 10. Immunofluorescence staining of mTOR protein expression in fibroblast cells in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated (UVA -) and UVA-treated (UVA +) cells. Blue staining indicates the nuclei, and red staining represents mTOR protein expression. The images were obtained at 20x magnification.
Preprints 74037 g010
Figure 11. DNA biosynthesis in the fibroblast cells in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated and UVA-treated (UVA +) cells. The mean values ± standard error (SEM) from the experiments, performed in triplicates. (*statistically significant difference p < 0.05 compared to control).
Figure 11. DNA biosynthesis in the fibroblast cells in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated and UVA-treated (UVA +) cells. The mean values ± standard error (SEM) from the experiments, performed in triplicates. (*statistically significant difference p < 0.05 compared to control).
Preprints 74037 g011
Figure 12. Immunofluorescence staining of PARP protein expression in fibroblast cells in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated (UVA -) and UVA-treated (UVA +) cells. Blue staining indicates the nuclei, and red staining represents PARP protein expression. The images were obtained at 20x magnification.
Figure 12. Immunofluorescence staining of PARP protein expression in fibroblast cells in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated (UVA -) and UVA-treated (UVA +) cells. Blue staining indicates the nuclei, and red staining represents PARP protein expression. The images were obtained at 20x magnification.
Preprints 74037 g012
Figure 13. Immunofluorescence staining of Nrf2 protein expression in fibroblast cells in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1% and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated (UVA -) and UVA-treated (UVA +) cells. Blue staining indicates the nuclei, and red staining represents Nrf2 protein expression. The images were obtained at 20x magnification.
Figure 13. Immunofluorescence staining of Nrf2 protein expression in fibroblast cells in the presence of Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1% and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated (UVA -) and UVA-treated (UVA +) cells. Blue staining indicates the nuclei, and red staining represents Nrf2 protein expression. The images were obtained at 20x magnification.
Preprints 74037 g013
Table 1. The MTT test cell viability in fibroblast treated with Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated and UVA-treated (+ UVA) cells. The mean values, standard deviation (SD), standard error (SEM), and median (Me) from the 3 experiments. *statistically significant differences vs. control group, p < 0.05; **statistically significant differences vs. UVA only treated group.
Table 1. The MTT test cell viability in fibroblast treated with Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) at concentrations 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% in non-UVA-treated and UVA-treated (+ UVA) cells. The mean values, standard deviation (SD), standard error (SEM), and median (Me) from the 3 experiments. *statistically significant differences vs. control group, p < 0.05; **statistically significant differences vs. UVA only treated group.
Non - UVA treaded cells
I II III mean value % value SD SEM Me
Control 0,794 0,789 0,74 0,774 100 0,029838 0,023 0,789
AmO 0,05% 0,74 0,685 0,542 0,655 84,711 0,102207 0,076 0,685
AmO 0,1% 0,78 0,76 0,709 0,749 96,856 0,036611 0,027 0,76
AmO 0,15% 0,804 0,731 0,721 0,752 97,157 0,04531 0,035 0,731
UVA - treatedcells
UVA (+) 0,449 0,413 0,425 0,429 55,426* 0,01833 0,013 0,425
AmO 0,05% 0,564 0,496 0,51 0,523 67,614* 0,035907 0,027 0,51
AmO 0,1% 0,461 0,636 0,625 0,574 74,160*/** 0,098015 0,075 0,625
AmO 0,15% 0,51 0,672 0,554 0,578 74,763*/** 0,083769 0,062 0,554
Table 2. The dpm values - radioactive [methyl-3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA assay results in the presence of 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) in non-UVA-treated and UVA-treated cells. The mean values from the 3 experiments. *statistically significant differences vs. control group, p < 0.05.
Table 2. The dpm values - radioactive [methyl-3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA assay results in the presence of 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.15% Amaranthus cruentus seed oil (AmO) in non-UVA-treated and UVA-treated cells. The mean values from the 3 experiments. *statistically significant differences vs. control group, p < 0.05.
non UVA treaded cells
I II III I II III I II III mean value % value
Control 4411 4316 4363 3991 3556 3639 4039 4058 4049 4046,8 100
AmO 0,05% 3951 3740 3709 3513 3556 3534 3977 3895 3936 3756,7 92,85
AmO 0,1% 3808 3564 3532 3862 4265 3910 3688 4064 3710 3822,5 94,47
AmO 0,15% 4000 4278 4292 3816 3622 3719 3732 4142 4098 3966,5 98,03
UVA treatedcells
UVA (+) 1937 1833 1944 2616 2253 2326 2371 2301 2336 2213 54,69*
AmO 0,05% 2838 2828 2833 2838 2826 2832 2542 2525 2533 2732,7 67,54*
AmO 0,1% 3421 3501 3461 3228 3214 3221 3622 3425 3462 3395 83,91*
AmO 0,15% 3359 3342 3350 3950 4038 3994 3241 3175 3208 3517,4 86,93*
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.

Altmetrics

Downloads

143

Views

109

Comments

0

Subscription

Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.

Email

Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated