1. Introduction
NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is an evolutionary conserved redox-responsive protein that helps to protect cells and whole organisms from oxidative stress and injury [
1]. It is estimated Nrf2 regulates a network of hundreds of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory genes [
2]. The transcription factor Nrf2, a basic leucine zipper (bZIP) protein, contains 7 functional
NRF2-ECH homology (Neh) domains, known as Neh1-Neh7, with Neh2 considered the major regulatory domain. Neh2 locates at the N terminus of Nrf2 and interacts with a cytoplasmic Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1), a component of the Cullin-3-based E3 ubiquitin ligase complex. In unstressed cells, the Keap1 forms a complex in the cytoplasm with Nrf2 and binds to the ETGE and DLG motifs on the Neh2 domain of Nrf2, which brings Nrf2 into the Keap1-Cul3-E3-ubiquitin ligase complex. Oxidative stress or reactive electrophiles can induce conformational changes of this complex, and disrupt the Nrf2-Keap1 binding domain. [
3]. This complex dissociates and then free Nrf2 translocate to the nucleus and binds to the antioxidant responsive element (ARE) sequences of AOE genes to promote gene transcription [
4]. Using
Nrf2-knockout (
Nrf2 KO) murine models in different organ models and under different conditions of stimulation/stress, Nrf2 has been shown to regulate a variety of targets genes such as antioxidant genes, xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes, many of which have been traditionally classified as part of the phase II detoxification system, glutathione homeostasis, solute channels, proteome maintenance and innate immune responses [reviewed in [
2]. On the other hand, disruption of
Keap1 (KO mice) leads to enhanced nuclear accumulation of Nrf2 and elevated expression of Nrf2-regulated genes [
5].
In the respiratory system, the Nrf2 response has been shown among others to be critical for protection against pulmonary inflammation, asthma, hyperoxia and acute lung injury (reviewed in [
6,
7]). A decline in the Nrf2 pathway is associated with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)[
6] and in experimental animal models, Nrf2 has been shown to be involved in tissue protection against the development of fibrosis and collagen deposition [
8,
9]. In a mouse model of bleomycin (BLM)-induced lung fibrosis it was shown that compared to wild-type mice, Nrf2 knockout mice (KO) exhibited increased lung weight, inflammation, hydroxyproline content and fibrotic score [
10]. Treatment with sulforaphane (SFN), an Nrf2 activator, in a pulmonary fibrosis mouse models attenuated alveolitis, fibrosis, apoptosis and lung oxidative stress by increasing the expression of antioxidant enzymes, including NAPDH, Nqo1, Ho1, superoxide dismutase and catalase [
11]. Similar data have been reported in mouse models of radiation-induced lung injury [
12].
While some viral infections have been shown to activate Nrf2, among them hepatitis B and C viruses, human cytomegalovirus, Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpes virus, and Marburg virus [
13,
14,
15,
16,
17,
18], respiratory viruses, including RSV, hMPV, influenza, and SARS-CoV-2 are associated with a progressive reduction in Nrf2 cellular levels and subsequent inhibition of AOE expression [
7,
19,
20]. We have shown in previous studies that RSV infection in vitro and
in vivo, leads to a decrease in the expression of most antioxidants enzymes and is associated with a demise in Nrf2 nuclear expression [
19,
21]. Indeed, the Nrf2 pathway has been shown to play a protective role in the murine airways against RSV-induced acute lung injury and oxidative stress: more severe RSV disease, including higher peak viral titers, augmented inflammation, and enhanced disease were found in Nrf2 KO mice compared to Nrf2 competent mice [
22,
23]. Since these studies focused only on the acute manifestations of RSV infection, antiviral response, and airway inflammation, the role of Nrf2 in protecting from viral-mediated chronic airway disease, structural tissues alteration and features of airway fibrosis are not known. Thus, the current study was designed to investigate both aspects of early response to viral infection as well as progressive anatomical changes of the lung architecture using high-resolution micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) imaging in response to RSV infection in Nrf2 KO mice compared to Nrf2 competent WT mice. Changes in lung morphology/density were reconstructed in group of RSV-infected mice at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days based on micro-CT images. Overall, the results of this study demonstrate for the first time that Nrf2 plays a protective role in RSV-induced chronic lung alterations and identified micro-CT as a sensitive imaging tool to study lung structural changes using mouse models of respiratory viral infection.
4. Discussion
Our studies using a Nrf2 KO mouse model on a BALB/c background show that Nrf2 plays an important role in both early (hrs and days) cellular, inflammatory and antiviral responses as well as prolonged (up to 4 weeks) alterations of lung tissue. Increased numbers of neutrophils and lymphocytes were identified in BALF one day after viral inoculation in Nrf2 KO compared to control WT mice, as we previously reported in Nrf2 KO mice on a BL6 background [
23]. Similar to the other Nrf2 KO models, we found also increased viral load in the lung compared to Nrf2 competent controls [
22,
23]. Using protein arrays and focused mRNA analysis of cytokines/chemokines genes we have expanded our understanding of the Nrf2-regulated innate immune response beyond the AOE gene network, which is triggered by RSV infection of the lung. We found several cytokines and chemokines, both at the protein and mRNA level that were induced at higher level in RSV-infected Nrf2 KO mice compared to WT mice. These results extend our previous observations in a BL6 Nrf2 KO mouse model [
23] and confirm that Nrf2 plays a central role in modulation of antiviral and inflammatory gene response to RSV. Interestingly, we found that the most upregulated gene in infected Nrf2 KO mice compared to infected WT was
ccl20 (
Table 1). CCl20 and its receptor, CCR6, control migration of dendritic cells and Th17 CD4
+ T cells to site of infection and inflammation [
34,
35]. In the context of RSV infection, it was reported that antibody neutralization of CCL20 protein or using mice deficient in CCR6 results in decreased lung pathology and more efficient viral clearance [
36]. Our results herein and previous work from us and others have shown that increased lung pathology and viral replication ar99e features of the lack of Nrf2 in mouse models [
23,
37]. Whether CCL20-CCR6 axis plays a role in the features of lung pathology and viral replication observed in Nrf-2 KO mice remains to be determined (see below).
Various mechanisms may explain how Nrf2 deficiency leads to increased expression of several cytokines and chemokines (
Figure 2 and
Table 1). Nrf2 for example inhibits the NF-κB transcription factor, which plays a key role in regulating the expression of several RSV-induced genes in the lung. In previous studies, we have directly shown greater nuclear translocation of RelA in the lung in absence of Nrf2 [
23]. Another mechanism could be that
Nrf2 suppresses macrophage inflammatory responses by blocking specific inflammatory cytokine production. In this regard, we have found that alveolar macrophages (AM) depletion from mouse lung prior to RSV inoculation, leads to the disruption of key inflammatory mediators, including IL-6, TNF-α and IFNs-α/β production [
38]. There is further evidence that Nrf2 interferes with the induction of IL-6 and IL-1β genes in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulated macrophages, by binding in the proximity of their promotor region, blocking the recruitment of RNA polymerase II [
39]. Moreover, the data showing that in absence of Nrf2 RSV-infected mice had greater levels if type I IFN in the BALF (
Figure 1) confirms our previous observations [
23]. Indeed, Nrf2 has been shown to function as a negative regulator of the adaptor molecule STING upstream of the signaling cascade that leads to IFN and antiviral gene expression in response to viral infection [
40,
41]. Removing Nrf2 would then result in a more robust IFN /antiviral gene response to viruses. However, not surprisingly based on complex interaction between type I interferon and RSV, increased peak RSV titers in the lung of Nrf2 KO mice occurred despite elevated levels of INF-α/β compared to WT mice.
The role of Nrf2 in replication of RNA viruses in the lung has been confirmed in this study with Nrf2 KO mice on a BALB/c background (
Figure 1C,D). Similar to our findings in this work, adult Nrf2 KO mice on ICR background [
22] or older mice on a BL6 background were shown to have increased RSV and hMPV peak replication and shedding [
23]. We also found increased SARS-CoV-2 replication in BALB/c Nrf2 KO mice compared to WT controls [
20]. We have proposed several different possibilities to explain such findings of increased viral replication in the lung of Nrf2 KO mice , including; 1) a relative defect in the antioxidant defense system and enhanced oxidative response in absence of Nrf2 , supported by evidence that exogenous treatment of cells or mice with antioxidant enzymes or synthetic compounds with antioxidant activity reduces the replication/viral load [
42,
43,
44]; 2) Nrf2 has been shown to alter T helper cell 1/Th2 balance and the oxidative stress might lead to loss of naïve T cells and decrease in Th1-mediated immunity [
45]. In addition, as mentioned previously, we found that CCL20 is strongly upregulated in infected Nrf2 KO mice, potentially affecting antiviral response and leading to increased RSV replication [
36]; 3) we have discovered antiviral properties of the cellular endogenous H
2S pathway [
26] and a relationship between Nrf2 and the H
2S-generating enzymes, as suggested by the significant reduction in expression of CSE, CBS, and 3-MST which we observed in RSV-infected Nrf2 KO mice [
23].
In addition to altered early inflammatory responses and innate antiviral immunity genetic deficiency of Nrf2 was associated with more severe and long-lasting lung damage and fibrosis in RSV infected mice. These lung pathological alterations were identified using highly sensitive imaging technology along with morphologic and quantitative analysis that were used for the first time in our study of experimental RSV infection. Specifically, micro-CT histogram-based analysis, total lung volume and density changes of the lung were used in our study. The histogram-based analysis showed that in RSV infected Nrf2 KO mice, all three time points (7, 14, and 28 pi) produced plots which were shifted rightward towards the denser region with an increase in the number of pixels compared to their PBS control and compared to WT infected animals (
Figure 4A). In the case of RSV infected WT mice, this changes in the density profiles were shifted to the denser region only at days 7 and 14 post-infection when compared with their PBS control. Similarly, while RSV infected WT mice showed an increase in poorly aerated lung tissue at 7 and 14 days after infection, infected Nrf2 KO mice had a significantly higher percent of poorly aerated tissue as early as day 7 pi compared to Nrf2 competent WT controls. This indicator of lung disease was still altered at later time points (day 14 and 28) in Nrf2 KO mice only (
Figure 4B). Using other micro-CT-derived parameters to follow longitudinally the different groups of mice, we found that both RSV infected Nrf2 KO and WT mice had significantly higher total lung volume with respect to their control mice as early day 7 pi and up to day 28. Moreover, RSV-infection resulted in a significantly increase of mean lung density at all time points of observation, only in Nrf2 KO mice. In agreement with micro-CT data, MT staining of lung sections at day 28 pi showed increased deposition of collagen only in RSV infected Nrf2 KO.
Several considerations should be taken into account in interpreting these data. First, evidence that RSV experimental infection alone in adult mice leads to airway fibrosis/remodeling has not been previously demonstrated. Using a neonatal model of infection followed by reinfection one month later, Kimura et al. found that these mice developed peribronchial and perivascular inflammation and fibrosis one week after reinfection, compared with the sham-infected control mice [
46]. In studies by Kellar et. al. juvenile C57BL6 mice (3-week-old) but not adult mice (8-week-old) exhibited a distinct myeloid recruitment pattern in response to RSV infection, αSma expression (indicative of myofibroblast activity) and increased hyaluronan deposition in the lung parenchyma (72h post-infection). As noted, both these studies had a short period from infection to collection of the lung and therefore it is not possible to conclude that the observed features of fibrosis were indeed sustained. Nonetheless, our micro-CT studies in BALB/c WT mice support the findings that lung density and volume is increased at least up to 14 days after infection. Second consideration is that studies showing a more robust lung fibrosis in experimental RSV infection have been performed using a co-exposure model with an allergen or a profibrotic agent. Indeed, histological analyses of MT stained lung sections from 3-wk old mice exposed to ovalbumin and then RSV displayed collagen deposition, which is indicative of airway remodeling [
47]. Wang et al. demonstrated that RSV administration resulted in increased collagen type-1 deposition in the lung tissues of an animal model bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis [
48]. In very elegant studies, Tian et al. repetitively administration (15 times) of the Toll like receptor 3 (TLR3) agonist poly(I:C) to adult BAL/c mice resulted in enhanced fibrosis observed by micro-CT as in our study and by immunohistochemistry [
49].
Third consideration is the role that Nrf2 plays in protecting the airways from a viral-mediated injury that can progresses towards chronic aspects of tissue remodeling. Our data herein are the first to demonstrate that Nrf2 deficiency is clearly associated with enhanced chronic lung disease following a single acute viral infection. In previous work Cho et al. showed that RSV-induced exacerbation of collagen accumulation, were heightened in young adult Nrf2 KO mice that were exposed to hyperoxia as neonates [
9]. The mechanism(s) of airway injury and lung fibrosis and the protective function of Nrf2 have been extensively studied in cellular and animal models [reviewed in [
7,
50]. Redox equilibrium, which is critically controlled by Nrf2 is central to several important processes in the lung and therefore an imbalance of oxidant and antioxidants as consequence of RSV infection can trigger signaling pathways, transcription factors, immune responses, growth factors etc., involved in progression of collagen deposition and remodeling, all of which further exacerbated by Nrf2 deficiency. We have previously shown that RSV infection activates a redox-sensitive signaling pathway leading that controls cytokine and chemokine gene expression and virus induced lung inflammation and damage [
51,
52,
53]. Moreover, we have shown that RSV infection induced a significant
decrease in the levels of
AOEs and
activity in epithelial cells [
21], in the lung of infected mice and in children naturally infected with this respiratory virus [
19]. As such, antioxidant treatment of RSV-infected mice protected mice from clinical disease and improved lung function [
42,
51]. These studies in mice have been mostly limited to the first week post viral infection and have shown an overall replenishment of the AOE expression in the lung as the infection is terminated [
19]. This may explain our findings herein with mostly a peak of lung alterations by micro-CT around 14 days in WT mice. On the other hand, under conditions of Nrf2 genetic deficiency and steady impaired AOE activity, RSV infection induced a grater and prolonged lung damage with fibrosis. The relevance of these experimental observations for natural acquired RSV infections in children and their potential to trigger long-term consequences such as airway remodeling will need further investigations. It is conceivable that genetic and environmental cofactors affecting the redox balance in the lung may play a critical role not only in severity of acute disease but also in chronic lung evolution of RSV infections. These may include for example genetic polymorphisms in the Nrf2 and/or AOE pathway [
54] or in innate inflammatory pathways triggered by RSV [
49,
55,
56], or exposure to prooxidant agents such as tobacco smoke if the form of secondhand exposure [
57].
Figure 1.
Disease and lung viral replication in the absence of Nrf2. (A) Body weight and (B) illness scores. Data are shown as percent change of body weight relative to the starting weight on day 0 (mean ± SEM). Arrows represent the day of peak weight loss day for RSV/WT (black arrow, day 6 pi) and RSV/Nrf2 KO (gray arrow, day 7 pi). At day 5 pi, lungs were isolated from infected mice and viral load was determined by qRT-PCR (C) and plaque assays (D). Data represent the mean ± SEM (n = 3-5 mice/group). *p<0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. RSV/WT at day 5 post-infection. n.d.= not detected.
Figure 1.
Disease and lung viral replication in the absence of Nrf2. (A) Body weight and (B) illness scores. Data are shown as percent change of body weight relative to the starting weight on day 0 (mean ± SEM). Arrows represent the day of peak weight loss day for RSV/WT (black arrow, day 6 pi) and RSV/Nrf2 KO (gray arrow, day 7 pi). At day 5 pi, lungs were isolated from infected mice and viral load was determined by qRT-PCR (C) and plaque assays (D). Data represent the mean ± SEM (n = 3-5 mice/group). *p<0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. RSV/WT at day 5 post-infection. n.d.= not detected.
Figure 2.
BALF cells and cytokines after RSV infection in the absence of Nrf2. (A) Total cells, and macrophages, neutrophils, and lymphocytes numbers in BALF of WT and Nrf2 KO mice (day 1 pi). Levels of cytokines (B), chemokines (C), and for type I IFN (D) in BAL expressed as pg/ml. Data represent the mean ± SEM (n = 4 mice/group). *p<0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p<0.001 vs. WT/RSV, at day 1 post-infection.
Figure 2.
BALF cells and cytokines after RSV infection in the absence of Nrf2. (A) Total cells, and macrophages, neutrophils, and lymphocytes numbers in BALF of WT and Nrf2 KO mice (day 1 pi). Levels of cytokines (B), chemokines (C), and for type I IFN (D) in BAL expressed as pg/ml. Data represent the mean ± SEM (n = 4 mice/group). *p<0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p<0.001 vs. WT/RSV, at day 1 post-infection.
Figure 3.
Longitudinal in vivo lung micro-CT images after RSV infection. Nrf2 KO and WT female mice were inoculated i.n. with RSV at dose 5x106 PFU or PBS. (A) Lung micro-CT images of a representative PBS, and two RSV-infected WT mice (left panel) and two Nrf2 KO mice (right panel) take at the indicated time points after infection. Multiplanar views (axial, dorsal, sagittal) at the level of T6 thoracic vertebrae. Micro-CT images shown for PBS mice only at day 7 after infection. (B) Representative 3D reconstructions of PBS and RSV-infected WT and Nrf2 KO mice from the images obtained in vivo (Hounsfield Units (HU) HU: [− 1,000, -400]). n=3-5 mice/group.
Figure 3.
Longitudinal in vivo lung micro-CT images after RSV infection. Nrf2 KO and WT female mice were inoculated i.n. with RSV at dose 5x106 PFU or PBS. (A) Lung micro-CT images of a representative PBS, and two RSV-infected WT mice (left panel) and two Nrf2 KO mice (right panel) take at the indicated time points after infection. Multiplanar views (axial, dorsal, sagittal) at the level of T6 thoracic vertebrae. Micro-CT images shown for PBS mice only at day 7 after infection. (B) Representative 3D reconstructions of PBS and RSV-infected WT and Nrf2 KO mice from the images obtained in vivo (Hounsfield Units (HU) HU: [− 1,000, -400]). n=3-5 mice/group.
Figure 4.
Quantitative analysis of lung micro-CT imaging. (A) CT histograms of lungs over time. Mean frequency histogram of the number of pixels having a particular Hounsfield unit (HU). The extracted data are from the whole lung segmentation for each timepoint per animal/group. Changes in frequency numbers in the lung between RSV-infected Nrf2 KO and WT mice and compared with PBS controls (red quadrant). HU values on the x-axis, frequency on the y-axis (B) Lung aeration degrees expressed as percentage of normo- and poorly-aerated tissues at 7, 14, 21, 28 days for RSV-infected Nrf2 KO and WT animals. Data for PBS Nrf2 KO and WT inoculated mice are shown at day 7 only. Normally-aerated ([−900, −400] HU) and poorly-aerated ([−399, 100] HU) regions. Increase in total lung volume (C) and average lung density (D) in RSV-infected Nrf2 KO and WT mice vs. PBS controls. All data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n=3-5 mice/group). *p<0.05, WT/RSV vs. WT/PBS, Nrf2 KO/RSV vs. Nrf2 KO/PBS at day 7 p.i.; **p<0.01 WT/RSV vs. WT/PBS, Nrf2 KO/RSV vs. Nrf2 KO/PBS at days 14, 21, and 28 p.i. WT/RSV vs. Nrf2 KO/RSV at days 14 and 28 post-infection.
Figure 4.
Quantitative analysis of lung micro-CT imaging. (A) CT histograms of lungs over time. Mean frequency histogram of the number of pixels having a particular Hounsfield unit (HU). The extracted data are from the whole lung segmentation for each timepoint per animal/group. Changes in frequency numbers in the lung between RSV-infected Nrf2 KO and WT mice and compared with PBS controls (red quadrant). HU values on the x-axis, frequency on the y-axis (B) Lung aeration degrees expressed as percentage of normo- and poorly-aerated tissues at 7, 14, 21, 28 days for RSV-infected Nrf2 KO and WT animals. Data for PBS Nrf2 KO and WT inoculated mice are shown at day 7 only. Normally-aerated ([−900, −400] HU) and poorly-aerated ([−399, 100] HU) regions. Increase in total lung volume (C) and average lung density (D) in RSV-infected Nrf2 KO and WT mice vs. PBS controls. All data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n=3-5 mice/group). *p<0.05, WT/RSV vs. WT/PBS, Nrf2 KO/RSV vs. Nrf2 KO/PBS at day 7 p.i.; **p<0.01 WT/RSV vs. WT/PBS, Nrf2 KO/RSV vs. Nrf2 KO/PBS at days 14, 21, and 28 p.i. WT/RSV vs. Nrf2 KO/RSV at days 14 and 28 post-infection.
Figure 5.
Masson‘s trichrome staining for collagen in lung sections. (A) Representative images of Masson trichrome-stained lung sections of PBS-treated (top) and RSV-infected (bottom) WT and Nrf2 KO mice at day 28 p.i. Scale bars, 200 μm at x 2.5 magnification. (B) Collagen content percentage. The percentage of stained area was assessed with Visiopharm® Software (Version 2022.01). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n=3-5 mice/group). *p<0.05.
Figure 5.
Masson‘s trichrome staining for collagen in lung sections. (A) Representative images of Masson trichrome-stained lung sections of PBS-treated (top) and RSV-infected (bottom) WT and Nrf2 KO mice at day 28 p.i. Scale bars, 200 μm at x 2.5 magnification. (B) Collagen content percentage. The percentage of stained area was assessed with Visiopharm® Software (Version 2022.01). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n=3-5 mice/group). *p<0.05.
Table 1.
Inflammatory cytokine ligand and receptor gene expression increased in the lung following RSV infection of wild-type WT and Nrf2 KO mice.
Table 1.
Inflammatory cytokine ligand and receptor gene expression increased in the lung following RSV infection of wild-type WT and Nrf2 KO mice.
Genotype |
Gene Symbol |
Gene name |
WT |
|
Nrf2 KO |
*FC |
*FC |
|
|
5.69 |
5.68 |
B2m |
Beta-2 microglobulin |
6.92 |
3.55 |
Ccl1 |
Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 1 |
2.17 |
2.70 |
Ccl11 |
Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 11 |
21.15 |
52.90 |
Ccl12 |
Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 12 |
2.77 |
2.65 |
Ccl17 |
Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 17 |
5.74 |
5.98 |
Ccl19 |
Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 19 |
193.79 |
664.12 |
Ccl2 |
Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 |
7.62 |
112.99 |
Ccl20 |
Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 20 |
5.84 |
1.84 |
Ccl22 |
Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 22 |
172.11 |
445.40 |
Ccl3 |
Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3 |
282.90 |
977.64 |
Ccl4 |
Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 4 |
7.48 |
13.70 |
Ccl5 |
Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5 |
97.70 |
311.62 |
Ccl7 |
Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 7 |
9.50 |
12.49 |
Ccr1 |
Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 1 |
2.20 |
1.75 |
Ccr2 |
Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 2 |
5.53 |
7.15 |
Ccr5 |
Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 5 |
11.93 |
11.42 |
Csf1 |
Colony stimulating factor 1 (macrophage) |
15.95 |
14.83 |
Csf2 |
Colony stimulating factor 2 (macrophage) |
166.25 |
384.91 |
Csf3 |
Colony stimulating factor 3 (macrophage) |
21.35 |
86.81 |
Cxcl1 |
Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 |
1862.03 |
3375.38 |
Cxcl10 |
Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 10 |
16.79 |
28.27 |
Cxcl13 |
Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 13 |
1532.46 |
1648.33 |
Cxcl9 |
Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 9 |
6.07 |
7.29 |
Cxcr2 |
Chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 2 |
2.65 |
3.23 |
Fasl |
Fas ligand (TNF superfamily, member 6) |
10.66 |
12.69 |
Ifng |
Interferon gamma |
6.69 |
8.00 |
Il15 |
Interleukin 15 |
16.87 |
37.80 |
Il1a |
Interleukin 1 alpha |
16.44 |
61.88 |
Il1b |
Interleukin 1 beta |
43.84 |
151.66 |
Il1rn |
Interleukin 1 receptor antagonist |
62.00 |
78.08 |
Il27 |
Interleukin 27 |
2.72 |
2.16 |
Il2rg |
Interleukin 2 receptor, gamma chain |
5.22 |
5.53 |
Il10ra |
Interleukin 10 receptor, alpha |
1.84 |
1.78 |
Il10rb |
Interleukin 10 receptor, beta |
3.59 |
2.86 |
Lta |
Lymphotoxin A |
6.51 |
6.55 |
Nampt |
Nicotinamide phosphoribosyl transferase |
8.75 |
33.94 |
Osm |
Oncostatin M |
15.49 |
40.16 |
Tnf |
Tumor necrosis factor |
2.27 |
1.95 |
Tnfrsf11b |
Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 11b (osteoprotegerin) |
2.97 |
n.s. |
Ccr8 |
Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 8 |
3.21 |
n.s |
Il17f |
Interleukin 17f |
2.16 |
n.s. |
Il2rb |
Interleukin 2 receptor, beta |
3.15 |
n.s. |
Tnfsf10 |
Tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 10 |
3.08 |
n.s. |
Tnfsf4 |
Tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 4 |
n.s. |
3.62 |
Ccl8 |
Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 8 |
n.s. |
13.1 |
Cxcl5 |
Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 5 |
n.s. |
2.5 |
Il11 |
Interleukin 11 |
n.s. |
7.88 |
Il13 |
Interleukin 13 |
Table 2.
Inflammatory cytokine ligand and receptor gene expression decreased in the lung following RSV infection of wild-type WT and Nrf2 KO mice.
Table 2.
Inflammatory cytokine ligand and receptor gene expression decreased in the lung following RSV infection of wild-type WT and Nrf2 KO mice.
Genotype |
Gene Symbol |
Gene name |
WT |
|
Nrf2 KO |
*FC |
*FC |
|
|
-1.90 |
-2.57 |
Ccl6 |
Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 6 |
-2.37 |
-7.01 |
Ccr3 |
Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 3 |
-1.67 |
-2.54 |
Cxcl12 |
Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 12 |
-7.26 |
-3.55 |
Cxcl15 |
Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 15 |
-2.71 |
-14.30 |
IL5ra |
Interleukin 5 receptor, alpha |
-3.75 |
-4.38 |
Il16 |
Interleukin 16 |
-7.72 |
-2.56 |
Spp1 |
Secreted phosphoprotein 1 |
-3.68 |
n.s. |
Ccr6 |
Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 6 |
-2.01 |
n.s. |
Ccr10 |
Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 10 |
-4.24 |
n.s. |
Il17b |
Interleukin 17B |
-3.81 |
n.s. |
Tnfsf11 |
Tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 11 |
-1.73 |
n.s. |
Il33 |
Interleukin 33 |
n.s. |
-3.14 |
Cx3cl1 |
Chemokine (C-X3-C motif) ligand 1 |
n.s. |
-5.01 |
Il5 |
Interleukin 5 |
n.s. |
-2.19 |
IL4 |
Interleukin 4 |
n.s. |
-3 |
Bmp2 |
Bone morphogenetic protein 2 |
n.s. |
-1.62 |
Vegfa |
Vascular endothelial growth factor A |