Submitted:
25 February 2023
Posted:
27 February 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Remote sensing for built environment observation
3. Research aim
- a)
- Initial urban scale monitoring of built environment transformations, which natural or human activities may induce. Identifying changes in annotated assets of the built environment through a semi-automated workflow that enables comparing remote sensing data from different periods can provide the users with a quick way to link large-scale urban phenomena to onsite building observation studies and hypotheses.
- b)
- Climatic analysis of the site: a contextual survey of the conditions of the surrounding built environment of the heritage buildings under study through remote sensing. This study regards information about the local environment, climatic and topographic conditions of the area at the scale of the neighbourhood, and the assessment of change in environmental conditions in time.
- c)
- The survey stage, which includes a conservation state analysis based on non-destructive, diagnostic investigations on building structure and degradation (material, structural, morphological), looking at hygrothermal properties, decay phenomena and crack pattern analysis, and the identification of moisture presence, being documented and classified by possible cause, through visual means and textual interpretation.
- d)
- The next stage of the multi-scale advanced survey includes the direct study of the building: e.g., topometric and photographic survey, and analysis of formal, constructive, and material aspects, i.e., Terrestrial Laser Scanning and photogrammetric surveys of the building, in order to produce 3D point-cloud models to be used in the HBIM, and also to support the conservation state analysis with accurate information that is a prerequisite for any energy upgrade, or retrofit, intervention.
4. Objectives
- 1)
- As many studies have focused on change detection with a visual interpretation of the outputs, the proposed methodology addresses the need for combinational approaches by integrating robust supervised land cover classification procedures with the use of coherent log likelihood and image differencing change detection techniques. This combination transforms the results into meaningful insights into the urban landscape. To this end, the key advantages of using Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 images and performing and evaluating automatic, supervised and unsupervised machine learning algorithms are: time reduction, flexibility in data exploration with multiple solutions, and multilevel similarity modelling.
- 2)
- The analysis of open-access radar and optical products using freely available platforms such as SNAP, QGIS and Google Earth, encourages the usage of open data in the urban planning field.
5. Case study

6. Method: Remote Sensing Analysis at Neighbourhood Scale
6.1. Data Collection
| Date of dataset | Sensor | Product type | Sensor mode | Polarization | Orbit direction |
| 6 October 2016 | Sentinel-1A | GRD | IW | VV+VH | descending |
| 29 September 2022 | Sentinel-1A | GRD | IW | VV+VH | descending |

6.2. Sentinel-1 Images Pre-processing


6.3. Sentinel-2 Images Pre-processing

6.4. Landcover Classification
6.5. Change Detection
7. Results
7.1. Land Cover Analysis


| buildings | open/green spaces | water | |||||||
| RF-S1 | ML-S1 | RF-S2 | RF-S1 | ML-S1 | RF-S2 | RF-S1 | ML-S1 | RF-S2 | |
| accuracy | 0.794 | 0.845 | 0.940 | 0.692 | 0.744 | 0.925 | 0.819 | 0.881 | 0.980 |
| precision | 0.707 | 0.846 | 0.930 | 0.570 | 0.611 | 0.915 | 0.688 | 0.831 | 0.970 |
| correlation | 0.646 | 0.702 | 0.886 | 0.537 | 0.602 | 0.860 | 0.630 | 0.730 | 0.866 |
| error rate | 0.206 | 0.155 | 0.060 | 0.309 | 0.256 | 0.074 | 0.181 | 0.120 | 0.020 |
| True Positives | 727 | 695 | 947 | 572 | 782 | 919 | 520 | 572 | 154 |
| False Positives | 302 | 127 | 80 | 432 | 497 | 86 | 236 | 116 | 7 |
| True Negatives | 1487 | 1662 | 1113 | 1357 | 1292 | 1107 | 1764 | 1884 | 1993 |
| False Negatives | 273 | 305 | 52 | 428 | 218 | 80 | 269 | 217 | 38 |


7.2. Change Detection







8. Discussion

9. Conclusions

Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Boulanger, S.O.M. The Roadmap to Smart Cities: A Bibliometric Literature Review on Smart Cities’ Trends before and after the COVID-19 Pandemic. Energies 2022, 15, 9326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yarashynskaya, A.; Prus, P. Smart Energy for a Smart City: A Review of Polish Urban Development Plans. Energies 2022, 15, 8676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adibhesami, M.A.; Karimi, H.; Sharifi, A.; Sepehri, B.; Bazazzadeh, H.; Berardi, U. Optimization of Urban-Scale Sustainable Energy Strategies to Improve Citizens’ Health. Energies 2023, 16, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rong, T.; Zhang, P.; Jing, W.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Yang, D.; Yang, J.; Chang, H.; Ge, L. Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Their Driving Forces of Land Use Change Based on Economic Contributive Coefficient (ECC) and Ecological Support Coefficient (ESC) in the Lower Yellow River Region (1995–2018). Energies 2020, 13, 2600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jadraque Gago, E.; Etxebarria Berrizbeitia, S.; Pacheco Torres, R.; Muneer, T. Effect of Land Use/Cover Changes on Urban Cool Island Phenomenon in Seville, Spain. Energies 2020, 13, 3040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Weng, Q.; Tang, L.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, X.; Bilal, M. Automatic mapping of urban green spaces using a geospatial neural network. GISci. Remote Sens. 2021, 58, 624–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verde, N.; Patias, P.; Mallinis, G. A Cloud-Based Mapping Approach Using Deep Learning and Very-High Spatial Resolution Earth Observation Data to Facilitate the SDG 11.7.1 Indicator Computation. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Yang, M.; Chen, J.; Hou, J.; Deng, M. Line-constrained shape feature for building change detection in VHR remote sensing imagery. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2018, 7, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, L.; Li, P.; Yan, X. Deep Learning-Based Building Extraction from Remote Sensing Images: A Comprehensive Review. Energies 2021, 14, 7982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Wang, C.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, B.; Wu, F. Urban building change detection in SAR images using combined differential image and residual u-net network. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papadomanolaki, M.; Verma, M.S.; Vakalopoulou, S.G.; Karantzalos, K. “Detecting Urban Changeswith Recurrent Neural Networks from Multitemporal Sentinel-2 Data”. In Proceedings of the International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS); 2019; pp. 214–217. [Google Scholar]
- SNAP—ESA Sentinel Application Platform v9.0.0. Available online: https://step.esa.int (accessed on 2 February 2023).
- Radutu, A.; Sandru, M.I.V.; Nedelcu, I.; Poenaru, V.D. Change Detection trends in urban areas with remote sensing and socio-economic diagnosis in Bucharest city. In Proceedings of the International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM, Sofia, Bulgaria; 2021; Volume 21. [Google Scholar]
- Sundaram, S.; Yarrakula, K. Multi-temporal analysis ofSentinel-1 SAR data for urban flood inundation mapping—Casestudy of Chennai Metropolitan City. Indian J. Ecol. 2017, 44, 564–568. [Google Scholar]
- Simeone, D.; Rotilio, M.; Cucchiella, F. Construction Work and Utilities in Historic Centers: Strategies for a Transition towards Fuel-Free Construction Sites. Energies 2023, 16, 700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chahardowli, M.; Sajadzadeh, H.; Aram, F.; Mosavi, A. Survey of Sustainable Regeneration of Historic and Cultural Cores of Cities. Energies 2020, 13, 2708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agapiou, A. Estimating Proportion of Vegetation Cover at the Vicinity of Archaeological Sites Using Sentinel-1 and -2 Data, Supplemented by Crowdsourced OpenStreetMap Geodata. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OpenStreetMap Service. Available online: https://www.openstreetmap.org/ (accessed on 2 February 2023).
- Faizan, M. Radarsat-2 Data Processing Using SNAP Software (2020). Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352934165_Radarsat-2_data_processing_using_SNAP_software (accessed on 2 February 2023).
- Jiang, W.; Yu, A.; Dong, Z.; Wang, Q. Comparison and analysis of geometric correction. Sensors 2016, 16, 973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Santoso, A.W.; Bayuaji, L.; Sze, L.T.; Lateh, H.; Zain, J.M. Comparison of various speckle noise reduction filters on synthetic aperture radar image. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 2016, 11, 8760–8767. [Google Scholar]
- Raiyani, K.; Gonçalves, T.; Rato, L.; Salgueiro, P.; Marques da Silva, J.R. Sentinel-2 Image Scene Classification: A Comparison between Sen2Cor and a Machine Learning Approach. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richards, J.A. Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1999; 240p. [Google Scholar]
- Breiman, L. Random Forests. Mach. Learn. 2001, 45, 5–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- QGIS Development Team. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. Available online: http://qgis.osgeo.org (accessed on 2 February 2023).
- Singh, A. Change detection in the tropical forest environment of north eastern India using Landsat. In Remote Sensing and Tropical Land Management; Eden, M.J., Parry, J.T., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1986; pp. 237–254. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, D.; Mausel, P.; Brondizio, E.; Moran, E. Change detection techniques. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2004, 25, 2365–2401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Close, O.; Petit, S.; Beaumont, B.; Hallot, E. Evaluating 1. The Potentiality of Sentinel-2 for Change Detection Analysis Associated to LULUCF in Wallonia, Belgium. Land 2021, 10, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishna, K.; Narasimha Murty, M. Genetic K-means algorithm. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 1999, 29, 433–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Agapiou, A.; Lysandrou, V.; Hadjimitsis, D. Analysing the thermal conditions of historic buildings in Cyprus using archive Landsat satellite data and Google Earth Engine big data cloud platform, ΙΜΕΚO. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Metrology for Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, Virtual, 22–24 October 2020. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).