Preprint Article Version 2 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

ROSA and RULA Methods: A case study on a Hospital

Version 1 : Received: 26 January 2023 / Approved: 28 January 2023 / Online: 28 January 2023 (03:48:41 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 28 January 2023 / Approved: 30 January 2023 / Online: 30 January 2023 (02:59:36 CET)

How to cite: Xavier Terra, S.; Schramm Tonetto, M.; Dos Santos Franz, L.A.; Gonçalves Amaral, F. ROSA and RULA Methods: A case study on a Hospital. Preprints 2023, 2023010514. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202301.0514.v2 Xavier Terra, S.; Schramm Tonetto, M.; Dos Santos Franz, L.A.; Gonçalves Amaral, F. ROSA and RULA Methods: A case study on a Hospital. Preprints 2023, 2023010514. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202301.0514.v2

Abstract

The adoption of harmful postures due to a sedentary lifestyle, which involves long periods at work in offices, is a factor that exacerbates musculoskeletal risks. To examine these risks, there are numerous postures analysis methods, such as Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) and Rapid Office Strain Assessment (ROSA). RULA is a consolidated method to evaluate the exposure of individual workers to ergonomic risk factors associated with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. In turn, ROSA is a more recent method that quantifies exposure to risk factors in an office work environment. This research aims to identify whether there is harmony between these two methods, ROSA and RULA. Through applied research, from a qualitative perspective, the scientific procedures adopted were direct observation and ROSA and RULA postural assessment instruments. The study was conducted in the radiology service and focused on the outpatient reception workstation. Results indicated that further investigation must occur to make working conditions changes as soon as possible and that both methods are harmonic. As contributions of the analysis, we have discussed the working conditions and suggested improvements to reduce the risks of musculoskeletal morbidity symptoms. We recommend future studies aimed at measuring the levels of complementarity between these methods by quantitative approaches.

Keywords

ROSA; RULA; WMSD; office; biomechanical risks

Subject

Public Health and Healthcare, Other

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 30 January 2023
Commenter: Stela Terra
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: Formatting adjustments for Figures 11 and 12.
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.