Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Confidence Intervals and Regions for Proportions Under Various Three-Endmember Linear Mixture Models

Version 1 : Received: 23 January 2023 / Approved: 24 January 2023 / Online: 24 January 2023 (05:56:10 CET)

How to cite: Berman, M. Confidence Intervals and Regions for Proportions Under Various Three-Endmember Linear Mixture Models. Preprints 2023, 2023010423. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202301.0423.v1 Berman, M. Confidence Intervals and Regions for Proportions Under Various Three-Endmember Linear Mixture Models. Preprints 2023, 2023010423. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202301.0423.v1

Abstract

Many papers in recent years have been devoted to estimating the per pixel proportions of three broad classes of materials (e.g. photosynthetic vegetation, non-photosynthetic vegetation and bare soil) using data from multispectral sensors. Many of these papers use estimation methods based on the linear mixture model. Very few of these papers assess the accuracy of their estimators. I show how to produce confidence intervals (CIs) and joint confidence regions (JCRs) for the proportions associated with various linear mixture models. There are two main models, both of which assume that the coefficients in the model are non-negative. The first model assumes that the coefficients sum to 1. The second does not, but uses rescaling of the estimated coefficients to produce estimated proportions. Three variants of these two models are also analysed. JCRs are shown to be particularly informative, because they are typically better at localising the information than CIs are. The methodology is illustrated using examples from Landsat Thematic Mapper data at 1169 locations across Australia, each of which has associated field observations. There is also discussion about the extent to which the methodology can be extended to hyperspectral data.

Keywords

proportion estimation; linear mixture model; confidence interval; confidence region; photosynthetic vegetation; non-photosynthetic vegetation; soil; Landsat Thematic Mapper

Subject

Computer Science and Mathematics, Probability and Statistics

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.