D’Urso, P.R.; Arcidiacono, C.; Cascone, G. Assessment of a Low-Cost Portable Device for Gas Concentration Monitoring in Livestock Housing. Agronomy2023, 13, 5.
D’Urso, P.R.; Arcidiacono, C.; Cascone, G. Assessment of a Low-Cost Portable Device for Gas Concentration Monitoring in Livestock Housing. Agronomy 2023, 13, 5.
D’Urso, P.R.; Arcidiacono, C.; Cascone, G. Assessment of a Low-Cost Portable Device for Gas Concentration Monitoring in Livestock Housing. Agronomy2023, 13, 5.
D’Urso, P.R.; Arcidiacono, C.; Cascone, G. Assessment of a Low-Cost Portable Device for Gas Concentration Monitoring in Livestock Housing. Agronomy 2023, 13, 5.
Abstract
The increasing regulatory pressure to monitor and reduce GHG emissions and air pollutants requires cost-effective methods for their surveillance. The most common technique used for scientific investigations on gas concentration monitoring in barns are accurate but expensive and with a complex maintenance. This research study analysed the potential use of a low-cost portable measurement devices for the measurement of ammonia (NH3) and carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations in an open dairy barn. A comparison between gas concentrations acquired at different heights from the floor by using portable devices and those acquired by a photoacoustic infrared multigas spectroscope (i.e., reference measurement) in the same sampling locations was carried out to determine the precision of the low-cost portable devices. The performance of low-cost portable devices was statistically analysed by the application of the one-way analysis of variance, correlation analysis and regression analysis. The results showed a significant difference between gas concentration values at various heights from the floor for both NH3 and CO2. The correlations between concentrations acquired by the low-cost portable device and the INNOVA were statistically significant (r=0.83; P<0.001) for gas concentrations monitored at 0.4 m from the floor. Compared with the reference measurement device, the low-cost devices were effective in the monitoring of NH3 concentrations at 0.40 m from the floor though it underestimated them in the barn at increasing of the height from the floor, whereas the device was not adequate for CO2 concentrations. In detail, the relative measurement error of the low-cost devices compared to INNOVA was reduced close to the floor during NH3 concentration measurements. Within these limitations, this device could be useful for monitoring NH3 concentration in the barn and to assess variation in NH3 concentrations mainly related to the animal occupied zone. Further efforts are needed in this field of research to identify low-cost device that could simplify emission estimation from open dairy barns.
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
