Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

EEG in Neurorehabilitation can have Several Uses other than BCI: Biomarkers to Predict/Monitor Recovery

Version 1 : Received: 16 November 2022 / Approved: 24 November 2022 / Online: 24 November 2022 (02:08:43 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Tsiamalou, A.; Dardiotis, E.; Paterakis, K.; Fotakopoulos, G.; Liampas, I.; Sgantzos, M.; Siokas, V.; Brotis, A.G. EEG in Neurorehabilitation: A Bibliometric Analysis and Content Review. Neurol. Int. 2022, 14, 1046-1061. Tsiamalou, A.; Dardiotis, E.; Paterakis, K.; Fotakopoulos, G.; Liampas, I.; Sgantzos, M.; Siokas, V.; Brotis, A.G. EEG in Neurorehabilitation: A Bibliometric Analysis and Content Review. Neurol. Int. 2022, 14, 1046-1061.

Abstract

Background: There is an increasing interest in the role of EEG in neurorehabilitation. We primarily aimed to identify the knowledge base through highly influential studies. Our secondary aims were to imprint the relevant thematic hotspots, research trends, and social networks within the scientific community. Methods: We performed an electronic search in Scopus looking for studies reporting on rehabilitation in patients with neurological disabilities. The most influential papers outlined the knowledge base, while a word co-occurrence analysis imprinted the research hotspots. Likewise, co-citation analyses highlighted collaboration networks between Universities, authors, and countries. The results were presented in summary tables, burst detection plots, and geospatial maps. Finally, a content review based on the top-20 most cited articles completed our study. Results: Our current bibliometric study was based on 874 records from 420 sources. There was a vivid research interest in EEG use for neurorehabilitation, with an annual growth rate as high as 14.3%. The most influential paper was the study titled "Brain-computer interfaces, a review" by Nicolas-Alfonso LF and Gomez-Gill J, with 997 citations, followed by "Brain-computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation" by Daly J. and Wolpaw JR (708 citations). The USA, Italy, and Germany were among the most productive countries. The research hotspots shifted with time from the use of “functional magnetic imaging” to EEG-based “brain-machine interface”, “motor imagery”, and “deep learning”. Conclusions: EEG constitutes the most significant input in brain-computer interfaces (BCI) and can be successfully used in the neurorehabilitation of patients with stroke, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and traumatic brain and spinal injury. EEG-based BCI facilitates training, communication, and control of wheelchair and exoskeletons. However, research is limited to specific scientific groups from developed countries. Evidence is expected to change with the broader availability of BCI and improvement in EEG filtering algorithms.

Keywords

EEG; stroke; traumatic brain injury; neurorehabilitation; brain-machine interface

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Neuroscience and Neurology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.