Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Rural Areas and Well-Being: Empirical Models and Policies

Version 1 : Received: 10 November 2022 / Approved: 11 November 2022 / Online: 11 November 2022 (02:06:31 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Marino, D.; Tebala, D. Rural Areas and Well-Being in EU Countries + UK: A Taxonomy and a Cluster Analysis. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15213. Marino, D.; Tebala, D. Rural Areas and Well-Being in EU Countries + UK: A Taxonomy and a Cluster Analysis. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15213.

Abstract

Predominantly rural areas make up half of Europe and account for about 20 per cent of the population. Yet most of them are among the least privileged regions in the European Union, with a GDP per capita significantly below the European average and with an average population age higher than in urban areas, although this gap will only slowly begin to narrow in the next decade. Together with a lack of connectivity, inadequate infrastructure, lack of diversified job opportunities and limited access to services, this makes rural areas a less attractive place to live and work. At the same time, however, rural areas actively participate in the EU's green and digital transition. Achieving the EU's digital goals for 2030 can offer more opportunities for the sustainable development of rural areas in areas other than agriculture, livestock and forestry, opening up new perspectives for the growth of manufacturing and, even more, service industries, and contributing to a better geographical distribution of services and industries. In this context, the objective of this work is the construction of a synthetic index of the welfare of European nations, through the Wroclaw taxonomic method and through the use of logit models, for the identification of best practices of local realities and the interpretation in a more im-mediated way of the fair and sustainable welfare of each European nation at a rural level

Keywords

Fair and sustainable well-being; rural area; complementarities; policies multidimensionality; terri-torial differentials

Subject

Business, Economics and Management, Economics

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.