Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Urban Regeneration Strategies for the Open Urban Spaces's Project. Experimentation and Innovation in Rome for A New Urban Welfare

Version 1 : Received: 7 November 2022 / Approved: 9 November 2022 / Online: 9 November 2022 (02:15:59 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Mariano, C.; Gràvalos Lacambra, I.; Di Monte, P. Open Urban Space Regeneration Strategies Based on Urban Welfare: A Project and Experiment in the San Lorenzo District in Rome, Italy. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16487. Mariano, C.; Gràvalos Lacambra, I.; Di Monte, P. Open Urban Space Regeneration Strategies Based on Urban Welfare: A Project and Experiment in the San Lorenzo District in Rome, Italy. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16487.

Abstract

The paper proposes, through an experimental method, a conceptualisation of theoretical-methodological and practical guidelines for the project on the system of collective open spaces, residual areas, abandoned areas that characterise the contemporary city, both in the urban contexts of the historical city, and in the more marginal areas of the modern suburbs. This methodology was experimented on an historical neighbourhood in Rome (San Lorenzo discrict) starting from the results of some researches conducted in collaboration between Sapienza University of Rome and the Escuela de Architettura, Universidad San Jorge and some design experiments conducted by Gràvalosdimonte design studio. This methodology and experimentation combines the theme of the inter-scalarity of the project (territorial, urban and local scale) with the themes of the flexibility and proximity of functions with respect to local instances and contingencies caused by the pandemic situation and by the sustainability perspectives, with particular reference to the need for urban health, the dialectic between public and private space in the perspective of the notion of common good, the bottom-up project for the construction of proximity spaces and plurality in the decision-making process.

Keywords

public space; sharing and inclusiveness; quality; urban regeneration; temporary uses

Subject

Arts and Humanities, Architecture

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.