Preprint Article Version 2 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

A Qualitative Assessment Among Personnel Working In Community-Led Development Programme Settings Regarding Sexualized Substance Use

Version 1 : Received: 12 September 2022 / Approved: 13 September 2022 / Online: 13 September 2022 (10:44:54 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 11 October 2022 / Approved: 12 October 2022 / Online: 12 October 2022 (14:57:14 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Marik, B.; Mahajan, N.; Sarkar, R.; Mitra, R.; Dua, R.; Aggarwal, S. A Qualitative Assessment among Personnel Working in Community-Led Development Program Settings Regarding Sexualized Substance Use. Brain Sci.2022, 12, 1590. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12111590 Marik, B.; Mahajan, N.; Sarkar, R.; Mitra, R.; Dua, R.; Aggarwal, S. A Qualitative Assessment among Personnel Working in Community-Led Development Program Settings Regarding Sexualized Substance Use. Brain Sci.2022, 12, 1590. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12111590

Abstract

Background: Sexualized substance use (SSU) is the practice of psychotropic substance usage, before or during sexual intercourse in order to increase sexual pleasure and arousal. It has a strong association with sexually transmitted infections (STIs). The present study aimed to assess the knowledge gaps regarding SSUs among the community health mobilizers by interviewing them regarding their knowledge, attitudes, and practices through qualitative approach. Methodology: In-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted with a total of nineteen community health mobilizers engaged in counselling of sexualized substance users. A semi-structured open-ended questionnaire with socio-demographic information and probes related to SSU was administered. Informed consent was taken from each participant prior to data collection. Results: Gender-wise distribution indicated that 47% of the community mobilizers are men, followed by transgender persons (32%), and women (21%). Responses of participants highlighted that alcohol consumption was the most observed form of SSU. The findings indicated that drug administration through injection was most common, followed by sniffing and swallowing. Sources of drug pro-curement enlisted by participants included peddlers, peer groups, sexual parties, medical and liquor stores. Only 63% of participants had fair knowledge about STIs such as HIV, viral hepatitis, syphilis, and gonorrhoea. All were familiar with the administration of naloxone injections and the locations of nearby hospitals where patients could be transported in the event of an overdose. Conclusions: The in-depth interviews among the study participants reflected substantial know-ledge gaps related to various areas associated with SSU, which highlights the need for periodic workshops and training for upgradation of existing knowledge and practices among community health mobilizers. This will help to broaden their knowledge of different types of SSUs, the latest substances of abuse, the diseases caused by high-risk sexual practices, and additional health and psychological issues associated with SSUs, which would ultimately help in better counseling and management of sexualized substance users. It may also play a crucial role in the strengthening of capacity-building systems and engagements at the community level. This study may be used as formative research by researchers and policy makers to develop study protocols for multi-centric community-based studies among community health mobilizers and sexualized substance users across the country for further validation and exploration.

Keywords

sexually transmitted infection (STI); HIV; viral hepatitis; transgender persons; in-depth interviews (IDIs); formative research

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Neuroscience and Neurology

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 12 October 2022
Commenter: Binata Marik
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: -
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.