Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Kozak Similarity Score Algorithm Identifies Alternative Translation Initiation Codons Implicated in Cancers

Version 1 : Received: 23 August 2022 / Approved: 24 August 2022 / Online: 24 August 2022 (05:30:03 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Gleason, A.C.; Ghadge, G.; Sonobe, Y.; Roos, R.P. Kozak Similarity Score Algorithm Identifies Alternative Translation Initiation Codons Implicated in Cancers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10564. Gleason, A.C.; Ghadge, G.; Sonobe, Y.; Roos, R.P. Kozak Similarity Score Algorithm Identifies Alternative Translation Initiation Codons Implicated in Cancers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10564.

Abstract

Ribosome profiling and mass spectroscopy have identified canonical and noncanonical translation initiation codons (TICs) that are upstream of the main translation initiation site and used to translate oncogenic proteins. Here, we use a Kozak Similarity Score algorithm to find that nearly all of these TICs have flanking nucleotides closely matching the Kozak sequence. Remarkably, the nucleotides flanking alternative noncanonical TICs are frequently closer to the Kozak sequence than the nucleotides flanking TICs used to translate the gene’s main protein. Of note, the 5’ untranslated region (5‘UTR) of cancer-associated genes with an upstream TIC tend to be significantly longer than the same region in genes not associated with cancer. The presence of a longer than typical 5’UTR increases the likelihood of ribosome binding to upstream noncanonical TICs, and may be a distinguishing feature of a number of genes overexpressed in cancer. Noncanonical TICs that are located in the 5’UTR, although thought disadvantageous and suppressed by evolution, may translate oncogenic proteins because of their flanking nucleotides

Keywords

translation initiation; canonical and noncanonical translation initiation codons; protein translation; oncogene; oncogenesis; tumorigenesis; cancer

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.