Version 1
: Received: 28 July 2022 / Approved: 28 July 2022 / Online: 28 July 2022 (06:27:31 CEST)
How to cite:
Penchev, V. Gentzen’s “Cut Rule” and Quantum Measurement in Terms of Hilbert Arithmetic. Metaphor and Understanding Modeled Formally. Preprints2022, 2022070429. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202207.0429.v1
Penchev, V. Gentzen’s “Cut Rule” and Quantum Measurement in Terms of Hilbert Arithmetic. Metaphor and Understanding Modeled Formally. Preprints 2022, 2022070429. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202207.0429.v1
Penchev, V. Gentzen’s “Cut Rule” and Quantum Measurement in Terms of Hilbert Arithmetic. Metaphor and Understanding Modeled Formally. Preprints2022, 2022070429. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202207.0429.v1
APA Style
Penchev, V. (2022). Gentzen’s “Cut Rule” and Quantum Measurement in Terms of Hilbert Arithmetic. Metaphor and Understanding Modeled Formally. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202207.0429.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
Penchev, V. 2022 "Gentzen’s “Cut Rule” and Quantum Measurement in Terms of Hilbert Arithmetic. Metaphor and Understanding Modeled Formally" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202207.0429.v1
Abstract
Hilbert arithmetic in a wide sense, including Hilbert arithmetic in a narrow sense consisting by two dual and anti-isometric Peano arithmetics, on the one hand, and the qubit Hilbert space (originating for the standard separable complex Hilbert space of quantum mechanics), on the other hand, allows for an arithmetic version of Gentzen’s cut elimination and quantum measurement to be described uniformy as two processes occurring accordingly in those two branches. A philosophical reflection also justifying that unity by quantum neo-Pythagoreanism links it to the opposition of propositional logic, to which Gentzen’s cut rule refers immediately, on the one hand, and the linguistic and mathematical theory of metaphor therefore sharing the same structure borrowed from Hilbert arithmetic in a wide sense. An example by hermeneutical circle modeled as a dual pair of a syllogism (accomplishable also by a Turing machine) and a relevant metaphor (being a formal and logical mistake and thus fundamentally inaccessible to any Turing machine) visualizes human understanding corresponding also to Gentzen’s cut elimination and the Gödel dichotomy about the relation of arithmetic to set theory: either incompleteness or contradiction. The metaphor as the complementing “half” of any understanding of hermeneutical circle is what allows for that Gödel-like incompleteness to be overcome in human thought.
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
