Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Chebfun Solutions to a Class of 1D Singular and Nonlinear Boundary Value Problems

Version 1 : Received: 8 June 2022 / Approved: 16 June 2022 / Online: 16 June 2022 (02:53:41 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Gheorghiu, C.-I. Chebfun Solutions to a Class of 1D Singular and Nonlinear Boundary Value Problems. Computation 2022, 10, 116. Gheorghiu, C.-I. Chebfun Solutions to a Class of 1D Singular and Nonlinear Boundary Value Problems. Computation 2022, 10, 116.

Abstract

The Chebyshev collocation method (ChC) implemented as Chebfun is used in order to solve a class of second order one-dimensional singular and genuinely nonlinear boundary value problems. Efforts to solve these problems with conventional ChC have generally failed, and the outcomes obtained by finite differences or finite elements are seldom satisfactory. We try to fix this situation using the new Chebfun programming environment. However, for toughest problems we have to loosen the default Chebfun tolerance in Newton's solver as the ChC runs into trouble with ill-conditioning of the spectral differentiation matrices. Although in such cases the convergence is not quadratic the Newton updates decrease monotonically. This fact, along with the decreasing behaviour of Chebyshev coefficients of solutions, suggests that the outcomes are trustworthy, i.e., the collocation method has exponential (geometric) rate of convergence or at least an algebraic rate. We consider first a set of problems that have exact solutions or prime integrals and then another set of benchmark problems that do not possess these properties. Actually, for each test problem carried out we have determined how Chebfun solution converges, its length, the accuracy of the Newton method and especially how well the numerical results overlap with the analytical ones (existence and uniqueness).

Keywords

Chebfun; differential equation; non-linearity; singularity; convergence; Bernstein growth; improper integrals; boundary layer

Subject

Computer Science and Mathematics, Computational Mathematics

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.