Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Biodiversity and Economy but Not Social Factors Predict Human Population Dynamics in South Africa

Version 1 : Received: 28 May 2022 / Approved: 1 June 2022 / Online: 1 June 2022 (09:55:14 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Phogole, B.; Yessoufou, K. Biodiversity and Economy but Not Social Factors Predict Human Population Dynamics in South Africa. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8668. Phogole, B.; Yessoufou, K. Biodiversity and Economy but Not Social Factors Predict Human Population Dynamics in South Africa. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8668.

Abstract

The ongoing exponential growth of human population poses a risk to sustainable development goals (SDGs). Unless we understand the drivers of this growth and inform policy development accordingly, SDGs would remain a dream. One of the old theories of population growth known as the Malthusian theory predicts that resource availability drives population growth to a certain time when population growth outrun resource availability, leading to all sort of crises known as Malthusian crisis. Although the link between economic growth and population has been widely investigated while testing the theory, little is known about environmental and social factors po-tentially driving population growth. Here, because of various crises of our time recalling the Malthusian crisis, we revisited the theory by fitting structural equation models to environmental, social and economic data collected over 30-year period in South Africa. None of the social varia-bles tested predicts population growth. Instead, we found that biodiversity (species protection index) correlates positively with population growth. Biodiversity provides various resources through ecosystem goods and services to human, thus supporting population growth as pre-dicted in the Malthusian theory. However, we also found that this population growth may lead to conservation conflict as we found that biodiversity habitat (wetland area) correlates negatively with population growth, thus raising the compromising effect of population growth on life on earth. What’s more, we found a significant link between economic growth measured as GDP and population growth, further supporting the Malthusian prediction. Overall, our study re-affirms the value of biodiversity to human and suggests that the Malthusian theory should continuously be tested with predictors other than economic.

Keywords

Malthusian theory; Population growth; Species protection index; Sustainability; Wetland area size

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.