Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Machine Learning and Internet of Medical Things for Handling COVID-19: Meta-Analysis

Version 1 : Received: 4 February 2022 / Approved: 7 February 2022 / Online: 7 February 2022 (11:59:05 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 18 April 2022 / Approved: 19 April 2022 / Online: 19 April 2022 (08:21:00 CEST)

How to cite: Band, S.; Ardabili, S.; Yarahmadi, A.; Pahlevanzadeh, B.; Kausar Kiani, A.; Beheshti, A.; Alinejad Rokny, H.; Dehzangi, I.; Mosavi, A. Machine Learning and Internet of Medical Things for Handling COVID-19: Meta-Analysis. Preprints 2022, 2022020083. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202202.0083.v1 Band, S.; Ardabili, S.; Yarahmadi, A.; Pahlevanzadeh, B.; Kausar Kiani, A.; Beheshti, A.; Alinejad Rokny, H.; Dehzangi, I.; Mosavi, A. Machine Learning and Internet of Medical Things for Handling COVID-19: Meta-Analysis. Preprints 2022, 2022020083. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202202.0083.v1

Abstract

Early diagnosis, prioritization, screening, clustering and tracking of COVID-19 patients, and production of drugs and vaccines are some of the applications that have made it necessary to use a new style of technology to involve, to manage and deal with this epidemic. Strategies backed by artificial intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) have been undeniable to understand how the virus works and try to prevent it from spreading. Accordingly, the main aim of this survey article is to highlight the methods of ML, IoT and the integration of IoT and ML-based techniques in the applications related to COVID-19 from the diagnosis of the disease to the prediction of its outbreak. According to the main findings, IoT provided a prompt and efficient approach of following the disease spread. Most of the studies developed by ML-based techniques for handling COVID-19 based dataset provided performance criteria. The most popular performance criteria, is related to accuracy factor. It can be employed for comparing the ML-based methods with different datasets. According to the results, CNN with SVM classifier, Genetic CNN and pre-trained CNN followed by ResNet, provided highest accuracy values. On the other hand, the lowest accuracy was related to single CNN followed by XGboost and KNN methods.

Keywords

Machine Learning; COVID-19; Internet of Things (IoT); Deep Learning; Big Data

Subject

Computer Science and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.