Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Negative mpMRI Rules Out Extra-Prostatic Extension in Prostate Cancer Before Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Version 1 : Received: 3 January 2022 / Approved: 6 January 2022 / Online: 6 January 2022 (10:05:55 CET)

How to cite: Dinneen, E.; Allen, C.; Strange, T.; Heffernan-Ho, D.; Banjeglav, J.; Lindsay, J.; Mulligan, J.; Briggs, T.; Nathan, S.; Sridhar, A.; Grierson, J.; Haider, A.; Panayi, C.; Patel, D.; Freemna, A.; Aning, J.; Persad, R.; Ahmad, I.; Dutto, L.; Oakley, N.; Ambrosi, A.; Parry, T.; Kasivisvanathan, V.; Giganti, F.; Shaw, G.; Punwani, S. Negative mpMRI Rules Out Extra-Prostatic Extension in Prostate Cancer Before Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Preprints 2022, 2022010060 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202201.0060.v1). Dinneen, E.; Allen, C.; Strange, T.; Heffernan-Ho, D.; Banjeglav, J.; Lindsay, J.; Mulligan, J.; Briggs, T.; Nathan, S.; Sridhar, A.; Grierson, J.; Haider, A.; Panayi, C.; Patel, D.; Freemna, A.; Aning, J.; Persad, R.; Ahmad, I.; Dutto, L.; Oakley, N.; Ambrosi, A.; Parry, T.; Kasivisvanathan, V.; Giganti, F.; Shaw, G.; Punwani, S. Negative mpMRI Rules Out Extra-Prostatic Extension in Prostate Cancer Before Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Preprints 2022, 2022010060 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202201.0060.v1).

Abstract

The accuracy of multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) in pre-operative staging of prostate cancer (PCa) remains controversial. Objective: To evaluate the ability of mpMRI to accurately predict PCa extra-prostatic extension (EPE) on a side-specific basis using a risk-stratified 5-point Likert scale. This study also aimed to assess the influence of mpMRI scan quality on diagnostic accuracy. Patients and Methods: We included 124 men who underwent robot-assisted RP (RARP) as part of the NeuroSAFE PROOF study at our centre. Three radiologists retrospectively reviewed mpMRI blinded to RP pathology and assigned a Likert score (1-5) for EPE on each side of the prostate. Each scan was also ascribed a Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score for assessing the quality of the mpMRI scan, where 1 represents poorest and 5 represents best diagnostic quality. Outcome measurements and statistical analyses: Diagnostic performance is presented for binary classification of EPE including 95% confidence intervals and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: A total of 231 lobes from 121 men (mean age 56.9 years) were evaluated. 39 men (32.2%), or 43 lobes (18.6%) had EPE. Likert score ≥3 had sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), NPV, PPV of 90.4%, 52.3%, 96%, 29.9%, respectively, and AUC was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.77-0.86). AUC was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.37-0.9), 0.77 (0.71-0.84) and 0.92 (0.88-0.96) for biparametric scans, PI-QUAL 1-3 and PI-QUAL 4-5 scans, respectively. Conclusions: MRI can be used effectively by genitourinary radiologists to rule out EPE and help inform surgical planning for men undergoing RARP. EPE prediction was more reliable when the MRI scan was a) multi-parametric and b) of a higher image quality according to the PI-QUAL scoring system.

Keywords

extra-prostatic extension; magnetic resonance imaging; radical prostatectomy; nerve-sparing; prostate cancer; staging; diagnostic accuracy

Subject

MEDICINE & PHARMACOLOGY, Urology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.