Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Flexibility Versus Certainty in Planning: A Critical Review of Cross-Boundary Spatial Planning Systems and Practices

Version 1 : Received: 27 June 2021 / Approved: 28 June 2021 / Online: 28 June 2021 (14:51:05 CEST)

How to cite: Das, A.; Shahriyar Parvez, M. Flexibility Versus Certainty in Planning: A Critical Review of Cross-Boundary Spatial Planning Systems and Practices. Preprints 2021, 2021060671 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202106.0671.v1). Das, A.; Shahriyar Parvez, M. Flexibility Versus Certainty in Planning: A Critical Review of Cross-Boundary Spatial Planning Systems and Practices. Preprints 2021, 2021060671 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202106.0671.v1).

Abstract

This research has critically argued that a vigilant combination of flexibility and certainty in spatial planning can bring about the most optimum planning outcomes. Therefore, to reproachfully evaluate the core argument, this research has tried to empirically respond to the research question of which balance of government intervention and market freedom produces the optimal economic, social and spatial outcomes. This research question has been further translated into an associated central hypothesis i.e., a hybrid planning system with an optimal balance between discretionary and regulatory planning approach can bring about the desired economic, social, and spatial outcomes.

Subject Areas

Cross-Boundary Spatial Planning Systems and Practices

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.