Preprint Article Version 3 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Oscillating Universe with a Quantized Black Hole

Version 1 : Received: 2 January 2021 / Approved: 4 January 2021 / Online: 4 January 2021 (11:30:23 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 13 January 2021 / Approved: 15 January 2021 / Online: 15 January 2021 (09:47:00 CET)
Version 3 : Received: 10 November 2023 / Approved: 13 November 2023 / Online: 15 November 2023 (09:05:38 CET)

How to cite: Kulas, S. Oscillating Universe with a Quantized Black Hole. Preprints 2021, 2021010017. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202101.0017.v3 Kulas, S. Oscillating Universe with a Quantized Black Hole. Preprints 2021, 2021010017. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202101.0017.v3

Abstract

In cosmology dark energy and dark matter are included in the ΛCDM model, but they are still completely unknown. Because in black holes Lorentz invariance seems not to be applicable for curved space-time, we introduce a model for a reduced speed of light in black holes due to quantum gravity effects and the Heisenberg uncertainty relation. Then black holes are a source for a scalar field with dark energy characteristics. This model has no information paradox for black holes because particles / radiation entering the black hole are redshifted in their wavelength that far that the wavelength has the size of the Schwarzschild radius and thus they are in some way "frozen" in the black hole. We show that the scalar field also has characteristics of dark matter shortly after Planck time, when we use a Big Bounce model. This model also presents an alternative to cosmological inflation with the possibility to solve the flatness and horizon problem and the problem of density fluctuations.

Keywords

Oscillating universe; big bang; big bounce; Hubble constant; dark energy; dark matter; inflation; vacuum energy density; Casimir effect

Subject

Physical Sciences, Astronomy and Astrophysics

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 15 November 2023
Commenter: Sascha Kulas
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: A complete revision. A fundamental connection in the old versions was wrong.
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.