Preprint Concept Paper Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Science-Driven Societal Transformation, Part I: Worldview

Version 1 : Received: 5 August 2020 / Approved: 6 August 2020 / Online: 6 August 2020 (10:48:10 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Boik, J.C. Science-Driven Societal Transformation, Part I: Worldview. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6881. Boik, J.C. Science-Driven Societal Transformation, Part I: Worldview. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6881.


Humanity faces serious social and environmental problems, including climate change and biodiversity loss. Risks are increasing and conditions deteriorating. Increasingly, scientists, global policy experts, and the general public conclude that incremental approaches are insufficient and transformative change is needed across all sectors of society. However, the meaning of transformation is still unsettled in the literature, as is the proper role of science in fostering it. This paper is the first in a three-part series that adds to the discussion by proposing a novel science-driven research-and-development program aimed at societal transformation. More than a proposal, it offers a perspective and conceptual framework from which societal transformation might be approached and understood. While acknowledging the necessity of reform to existing societal systems (e.g., governance, economic, and financial systems), the focus of the series is on transformation understood as systems change or systems migration—the de novo development of and migration to new societal systems. The series provides definitions, aims, reasoning, worldview, and a theory of change, and discusses fitness metrics and design principles for new systems. This first paper proposes a worldview built using ideas from evolutionary biology, complex systems science, cognitive sciences, and information theory that is intended to serve as the foundation for the R&D program.


societal transformation; systems change; sustainability; complex systems; societal cognition; climate change; biodiversity loss; active inference; free energy principle; self-organized criticality; SAILS)


Social Sciences, Sociology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0

Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.