Preprint Article Version 2 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

On the Quark Scaling Theorem and the Polarisable Dipole of the Quark in a Scalar Field

Version 1 : Received: 22 June 2020 / Approved: 24 June 2020 / Online: 24 June 2020 (18:01:22 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 4 January 2021 / Approved: 5 January 2021 / Online: 5 January 2021 (11:44:14 CET)
Version 3 : Received: 16 December 2021 / Approved: 17 December 2021 / Online: 17 December 2021 (08:22:50 CET)
Version 4 : Received: 11 May 2022 / Approved: 12 May 2022 / Online: 12 May 2022 (06:20:43 CEST)

How to cite: Roza, E. On the Quark Scaling Theorem and the Polarisable Dipole of the Quark in a Scalar Field. Preprints 2020, 2020060304. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202006.0304.v2 Roza, E. On the Quark Scaling Theorem and the Polarisable Dipole of the Quark in a Scalar Field. Preprints 2020, 2020060304. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202006.0304.v2

Abstract

In this article the possible impact on the present state of particle physics theory is discussed of two unrecognized theoretical elements. These elements are the awareness that (a) the quark is a Dirac particle with a polarisable dipole moment in a scalar field and that (b) Dirac’s wave equation for fermions, if derived from Einstein’s geodesic equation, reveals a scaling theorem for quarks. It is shown that recognition of these elements proves by theory quite some relationships that are up to now only empirically assessed, such as for instance, the mass relationships between the elementary quarks, the relationship between the bare mass and the constituent mass of quarks, the mass spectrum of hadrons and the mass values of the Z boson and the Higgs boson.

Keywords

polarisable Dirac dipole; quark scaling; hadron mass spectrum; Z boson; Higgs boson

Subject

Physical Sciences, Acoustics

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 5 January 2021
Commenter: Engel Roza
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: substantially revised
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.