PreprintArticleVersion 5Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Stability Analysis of Nontrivial Stationary Solution and Constant Equilibrium Point of Reaction-Diffusion Neural Networks with Time Delays under Dirichlet Zero Boundary Value
Version 1
: Received: 15 April 2020 / Approved: 16 April 2020 / Online: 16 April 2020 (13:33:43 CEST)
Version 2
: Received: 13 August 2020 / Approved: 20 August 2020 / Online: 20 August 2020 (04:13:36 CEST)
Version 3
: Received: 21 August 2020 / Approved: 22 August 2020 / Online: 22 August 2020 (09:55:22 CEST)
Version 4
: Received: 29 August 2020 / Approved: 31 August 2020 / Online: 31 August 2020 (08:26:12 CEST)
Version 5
: Received: 8 September 2020 / Approved: 11 September 2020 / Online: 11 September 2020 (08:27:42 CEST)
Version 6
: Received: 1 October 2020 / Approved: 2 October 2020 / Online: 2 October 2020 (13:57:27 CEST)
How to cite:
Rao, R. Stability Analysis of Nontrivial Stationary Solution and Constant Equilibrium Point of Reaction-Diffusion Neural Networks with Time Delays under Dirichlet Zero Boundary Value. Preprints.org2020, 2020040277. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202004.0277.v5
Rao, R. Stability Analysis of Nontrivial Stationary Solution and Constant Equilibrium Point of Reaction-Diffusion Neural Networks with Time Delays under Dirichlet Zero Boundary Value. Preprints.org 2020, 2020040277. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202004.0277.v5
Cite as:
Rao, R. Stability Analysis of Nontrivial Stationary Solution and Constant Equilibrium Point of Reaction-Diffusion Neural Networks with Time Delays under Dirichlet Zero Boundary Value. Preprints.org2020, 2020040277. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202004.0277.v5
Rao, R. Stability Analysis of Nontrivial Stationary Solution and Constant Equilibrium Point of Reaction-Diffusion Neural Networks with Time Delays under Dirichlet Zero Boundary Value. Preprints.org 2020, 2020040277. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202004.0277.v5
Abstract
In this paper, Lyapunov-Razumikhin technique, design of state-dependent switching laws, a fixed point theorem and variational methods are employed to derive the existence and the unique existence results of (globally) exponentially stable positive stationary solution of delayed reaction-diffusion cell neural networks under Dirichlet zero boundary value, including the global stability criteria \textbf{in the classical meaning}. Next, sufficient conditions are proposed to guarantee the global stability invariance of ordinary differential systems under the influence of diffusions. New theorems show that the diffusion is a double-edged sword in judging the stability of diffusion systems. Besides, an example is constructed to illuminate that any non-zero constant equilibrium point must be not in the phase plane of dynamic system under Dirichlet zero boundary value, or it must lead to a contradiction. Next, under Lipschitz assumptions on active function, another example is designed to prove that the small diffusion effect will cause the essential change of the phase plane structure of the dynamic behavior of the delayed neural networks via a Saddle point theorem. Finally, a numerical example illustrates the feasibility of the proposed methods.
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received:
11 September 2020
Commenter:
Ruofeng Rao
Commenter's Conflict of Interests:
Author
Comment:
I add the following "Problem 4" to the final section of my manuscript "Stability analysis of nontrivial stationary solution and constant equilibrium point of reaction-diffusion neural networks with time delays under Dirichlet zero boundary value" (Preprints2020, 2020040277 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202004.0277.v4)).
Problem 4. In Corollary 3.4 (Global Stability Invariance), u∗of Conclusion (1) becomes u∗(x) of Conclusion (2) due to the small diffusion (the diffusion coefficients {ri} ). Now I wonder whether for any given ε > 0, there exits a corresponding number δε> 0 such that ∥u∗(x) − u∗∥ < ε or supx∈Ω|u∗(x) − u∗| < ε if max i|ri| < δε. On the other hand, u∗(x) is dependent on {ri}. Now I wonder whether u∗(x) is a continuous dependence on max i|ri| or {ri}.
Commenter: Ruofeng Rao
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Problem 4. In Corollary 3.4 (Global Stability Invariance), u∗of Conclusion (1) becomes u∗(x) of Conclusion (2)
due to the small diffusion (the diffusion coefficients {ri} ). Now I wonder whether for any given ε > 0, there exits a corresponding number δε> 0 such that ∥u∗(x) − u∗∥ < ε or supx∈Ω|u∗(x) − u∗| < ε
if max i|ri| < δε. On the other hand, u∗(x) is dependent on {ri}. Now I wonder whether u∗(x) is a continuous dependence on max i|ri| or {ri}.