Preprint Brief Report Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Insufficient Sensitivity of RNA Dependent RNA Polymerase Gene of SARS-CoV-2 Viral Genome as Confirmatory Test using Korean COVID-19 Cases

Version 1 : Received: 27 February 2020 / Approved: 28 February 2020 / Online: 28 February 2020 (12:03:13 CET)

How to cite: Kim, S.; Kim, D.; Lee, B. Insufficient Sensitivity of RNA Dependent RNA Polymerase Gene of SARS-CoV-2 Viral Genome as Confirmatory Test using Korean COVID-19 Cases. Preprints 2020, 2020020424. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202002.0424.v1 Kim, S.; Kim, D.; Lee, B. Insufficient Sensitivity of RNA Dependent RNA Polymerase Gene of SARS-CoV-2 Viral Genome as Confirmatory Test using Korean COVID-19 Cases. Preprints 2020, 2020020424. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202002.0424.v1

Abstract

Since mid-December of 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been spreading from Wuhan, China. As of February 21, total 75,773 confirmed cases worldwide have spread to more than two dozen countries. Transmission of COVID-19 can occur early in the course of infection since SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in asymptomatic patients are similar to that in the symptomatic patients. Therefore, more sensitive diagnostic methods are needed to detect early phase of the infection to prevent secondary or tertiary spreads. Here, we compare the RT-PCR confirmatory test results using two different SARS-CoV-2 viral RNAs from two Korean COVID-19 confirmed cases.RT-PCR method targeting the RdRP gene, which was recommended by WHO guideline, was less sensitive than targeting N genes (as per CDC guideline). Because many countries follow the WHO guideline, our findings may contribute to the early diagnosis of COVID-19.

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2; Korean COVID-19; Wuhan Corona virus; real time PCR Ct Value; Sensitivity; False Negative

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Pathology and Pathobiology

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 8 March 2020
Commenter: sandeep
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Comment: Figure 1 is not given...
+ Respond to this comment
Comment 2
Received: 2 April 2020
Commenter: Nadia Touil
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Comment: The article adresses a very intesting issue with the actual diagnosis of COVID-19.
How can you explain the Following profiles: Cases with negative RdRp and positive E_targeting sarbecovirus gene?
Thank you
Nadia
+ Respond to this comment
Comment 3
Received: 28 April 2020
Commenter: Lee Smith
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Comment: Hi
Interesting article but figure 1 isn't in the pdf file. Could you supply a complete version?
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.