Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

An Instrument to Measure Mental Health Professionals’ Beliefs and Attitudes Towards Service Users’ Rights

Version 1 : Received: 18 December 2018 / Approved: 20 December 2018 / Online: 20 December 2018 (10:11:52 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 16 January 2019 / Approved: 17 January 2019 / Online: 17 January 2019 (13:26:53 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Eiroa-Orosa, F.J.; Limiñana-Bravo, L. An Instrument to Measure Mental Health Professionals’ Beliefs and Attitudes towards Service Users’ Rights. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 244. Eiroa-Orosa, F.J.; Limiñana-Bravo, L. An Instrument to Measure Mental Health Professionals’ Beliefs and Attitudes towards Service Users’ Rights. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 244.

Abstract

We aimed at developing and validating a scale on the beliefs and attitudes of mental health professionals towards services users’ rights in order to provide a valid evaluation instrument for training activities with heterogeneous professional groups. Items were extracted from a review of previous instruments, as well as from several focus groups which have been conducted with different mental health stakeholders. The preliminary scale consisted of 44 items and was administered to 480 mental health professionals. After eliminating non-discriminant and low weighting items, a final scale of 25 items was obtained. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses produced a four-factor solution consisting of four dimensions; system criticism/justifying beliefs, freedom/coercion, empowerment/paternalism and tolerance/discrimination. The scale shows high concordance with our theoretical model as well as adequate parameters of explained variance, model fit and internal reliability.

Keywords

mental health services, attitudes; beliefs; coercion; paternalism; discrimination

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental Health

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.