Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Job and the Bible’s Theo-Political Divide

Version 1 : Received: 3 December 2018 / Approved: 5 December 2018 / Online: 5 December 2018 (04:09:59 CET)

How to cite: Fisch, M. Job and the Bible’s Theo-Political Divide. Preprints 2018, 2018120060 Fisch, M. Job and the Bible’s Theo-Political Divide. Preprints 2018, 2018120060


The book of Job presents a unique and detailed contrastive study of two fundamental and fundamentally opposed religious personae: Job, on the one hand, and the collective image of his friends on the other. It is a normative dispute about the religion’s most basic norm of disposition. How is one to respond to inexplicable disaster when one believes one is blameless? What is the religiously appropriate response to catastrophe? To confront God’s judgment as did Job, or to submissively surrender to it, as his four friends insist he should? Is one supposed to question divine justice when deemed to be wanting, as did Job, or to suppress any thought to the contrary and deem it to be just, come what may? Rather than expound (once again) upon the theological implications of the Job dispute, this paper focuses on its theological-political dimensions, and its looming and vivid, yet largely overlooked presence in the Hebrew Bible’s master narrative; and more specifically, on the marked, if inevitable antinomian nature of the Jobian side to the divide.

Subject Areas

religious confrontation; religious submission; Biblical political theology

Readers' Comments and Ratings (0)

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Rate this article
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0
Leave a public comment

Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.