Working Paper Article Version 2 This version is not peer-reviewed

Tools for a Circular Economy: Assessing Waste Taxation in a CGE Multi-Pollutant Framework

Version 1 : Received: 29 August 2018 / Approved: 29 August 2018 / Online: 29 August 2018 (13:48:37 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 24 November 2020 / Approved: 25 November 2020 / Online: 25 November 2020 (14:43:55 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Journal reference: Waste Management 2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.12.016


Economic theory states that incineration and landfill taxation can effectively diminish the environmental impacts of pollution and resource use by reducing their associated pollutants while stimulating the reuse and recycling of materials, and therefore, fostering a circular economy. The aim of this research is to assess the economic and environmental effects of these taxes in Spain under different scenarios with a detailed dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model, as there are no studies analyzing this in detail. We focus on the economic impact on GDP and sectorial production and the environmental impact on different categories: global warming potential, marine eutrophication potential, photochemical ozone formation potential, particulate matter, human toxicity (cancer and noncancer), ecotoxicity, and depletion of fossil resources. We find in all scenarios that these taxes have a limited economic impact while reducing all of the environmental impact categories analyzed. The study reinforces the theory that policy makers need to impose taxes on landfill and incineration to reinforce the circularity of the economy and reduce environmental burdens, but also demonstrates that they can improve their design without additional costs.


Environmental taxes; computable general equilibrium; environmental impacts; waste



Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 25 November 2020
Commenter: Jaume Freire-González
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: Updated version of the manuscipt
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0

Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.

We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.