Bottazzi, P.; Winkler, M.S.; Boillat, S.; Diagne, A.; Maman Chabi Sika, M.; Kpangon, A.; Faye, S.; Speranza, C.I. Measuring Subjective Flood Resilience in Suburban Dakar: A Before–After Evaluation of the “Live with Water” Project. Sustainability2018, 10, 2135.
Bottazzi, P.; Winkler, M.S.; Boillat, S.; Diagne, A.; Maman Chabi Sika, M.; Kpangon, A.; Faye, S.; Speranza, C.I. Measuring Subjective Flood Resilience in Suburban Dakar: A Before–After Evaluation of the “Live with Water” Project. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2135.
Bottazzi, P.; Winkler, M.S.; Boillat, S.; Diagne, A.; Maman Chabi Sika, M.; Kpangon, A.; Faye, S.; Speranza, C.I. Measuring Subjective Flood Resilience in Suburban Dakar: A Before–After Evaluation of the “Live with Water” Project. Sustainability2018, 10, 2135.
Bottazzi, P.; Winkler, M.S.; Boillat, S.; Diagne, A.; Maman Chabi Sika, M.; Kpangon, A.; Faye, S.; Speranza, C.I. Measuring Subjective Flood Resilience in Suburban Dakar: A Before–After Evaluation of the “Live with Water” Project. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2135.
Abstract
In the last decade, sub-Saharan African countries have taken various measures to plan for and adapt to floods in order to reduce exposure and its impacts on human health, livelihoods and infrastructure. Measuring the effects of such initiatives on social resilience is challenging as it requires to combine multiple variables and indicators that embrace thematic, spatial and temporal dimensions inherent to the resilience thinking and concept. In this research, we apply a before-after-control-intervention (BACI) evaluation to empirically measure the impacts of the “Live with Water” (LWW) project on suburban households in Dakar, Senegal. We developed a resilience index that combines anticipatory, adaptive and absorptive capacity – considered as structural dimensions – with the concept of transformative capacity – considered as a temporal reconfiguration of the first three dimensions. Our finding let us estimate that the project increased the absorptive and the anticipatory capacities by 10.61% and 4.61%, respectively. However, adaptive capacity remained unchanged. This may be explained by the fact that the programme was more successful in building drainage and physical infrastructures, rather than improving multi-level organisations and strategies to cope with existing flood events. Further flood resilience program should better combine engineering approaches with institutional change and livelihood support to poor urban dwellers.
Social Sciences, Geography, Planning and Development
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
,
