Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Induction and Epistemological Naturalism

Version 1 : Received: 8 June 2018 / Approved: 8 June 2018 / Online: 8 June 2018 (16:24:17 CEST)

How to cite: Johansson, L. Induction and Epistemological Naturalism. Preprints 2018, 2018060143 (doi: 10.20944/preprints201806.0143.v1). Johansson, L. Induction and Epistemological Naturalism. Preprints 2018, 2018060143 (doi: 10.20944/preprints201806.0143.v1).

Abstract

Epistemological naturalism dismisses the notion that epistemology is a basis for the
empirical sciences. In particular, it rejects the demand for a general justification of induction. Making
inductive generalisations is a basic habit among humans. There is no such thing as a logic of inductive
inference. The role of induction in science is heuristic; it is our way of inventing new theoretical
predicates and developing theories. We discover new laws by applying inductive thinking; but this is
not any kind of inference which can be evaluated as more or less rational.

Subject Areas

induction; naturalism; evidence and justification; epistemic norms; induction and concept formation; induction and discovery of laws

Readers' Comments and Ratings (0)

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Rate this article
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0
Leave a public comment

×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.