Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Clinical Methods to Assess and Profile Shoulder Strength in Competitive Surfers

Version 1 : Received: 3 May 2018 / Approved: 3 May 2018 / Online: 3 May 2018 (13:04:08 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Furness, J.; Schram, B.; Cottman-Fields, T.; Solia, B.; Secomb, J. Profiling Shoulder Strength in Competitive Surfers. Sports 2018, 6, 52. Furness, J.; Schram, B.; Cottman-Fields, T.; Solia, B.; Secomb, J. Profiling Shoulder Strength in Competitive Surfers. Sports 2018, 6, 52.

Abstract

The shoulder region has the highest incidence of acute injuries in the sport of surfing. Little is known about the strength profile at the shoulder in a surfing cohort. The primary aim of this study was to establish the reliability of a rotator cuff strength testing procedure for surfers with a secondary aim of providing a profile of internal (IR) and external rotation (ER) strength in a competitive surfing cohort. Shoulder IR and ER isometric strength was measured using a hand-held dynamometer in 13 competitive surfers. Intra-class coefficient values ranged from 0.97 to 0.98 for intra rater reliability and were lower for inter rater reliability ranging from 0.80 to 0.91. Normalised force (N/Kg) for IR strength was significantly greater than ER strength bilaterally (dominant, p= 0.007, non-dominant, p<0.001). No significant differences (p< 0.79) were found in IR strength (N/Kg) between the dominant and non-dominant arms. ER strength (N/Kg) was significantly weaker on the non-dominant arm compared with the dominant arm (p<0.02). The non-dominant arm ER to IR ratio (0.82 ± 0.15) was significantly (p=0.025) lower than the dominant (0.88 ± 0.14) The current procedure is reliable with the same clinician, results indicate musculature asymmetry specific to the external rotators.

Keywords

surfing; rotator cuff; shoulder; strength ratio; profiling; assessment

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.