Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

CDS Rate Construction Methods by Machine Learning Techniques

Version 1 : Received: 20 May 2017 / Approved: 22 May 2017 / Online: 22 May 2017 (08:21:59 CEST)

How to cite: Brummelhuis, R.; Luo, Z. CDS Rate Construction Methods by Machine Learning Techniques. Preprints 2017, 2017050162. Brummelhuis, R.; Luo, Z. CDS Rate Construction Methods by Machine Learning Techniques. Preprints 2017, 2017050162.


Regulators require financial institutions to estimate counterparty default risks from liquid CDS quotes for the valuation and risk management of OTC derivatives. However, the vast majority of counterparties do not have liquid CDS quotes and need proxy CDS rates. Existing methods cannot account for counterparty-specific default risks; we propose to construct proxy CDS rates by associating to illiquid counterparty liquid CDS Proxy based on Machine Learning Techniques. After testing 156 classifiers from 8 most popular classifier families, we found that some classifiers achieve highly satisfactory accuracy rates. Furthermore, we have rank-ordered the performances and investigated performance variations amongst and within the 8 classifier families. This paper is, to the best of our knowledge, the first systematic study of CDS Proxy construction by Machine Learning techniques, and the first systematic classifier comparison study based entirely on financial market data. Its findings both confirm and contrast existing classifier performance literature. Given the typically highly correlated nature of financial data, we investigated the impact of correlation on classifier performance. The techniques used in this paper should be of interest for financial institutions seeking a CDS Proxy method, and can serve for proxy construction for other financial variables. Some directions for future research are indicated.


machine learning; Counterparty Credit Risk; CDS Proxy construction; classification


Computer Science and Mathematics, Information Systems

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0

Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.