Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Discrimination of Beer Based on E-tongue and E-nose Combined with SVM: Comparison of Different Variable Selection Methods by PCA, GA-PLS and VIP

Version 1 : Received: 6 May 2017 / Approved: 8 May 2017 / Online: 8 May 2017 (08:57:56 CEST)

How to cite: Men, H.; Shi, Y.; Fu, S.; Jiao, Y.; Qiao, Y.; Liu, J. Discrimination of Beer Based on E-tongue and E-nose Combined with SVM: Comparison of Different Variable Selection Methods by PCA, GA-PLS and VIP. Preprints 2017, 2017050054 (doi: 10.20944/preprints201705.0054.v1). Men, H.; Shi, Y.; Fu, S.; Jiao, Y.; Qiao, Y.; Liu, J. Discrimination of Beer Based on E-tongue and E-nose Combined with SVM: Comparison of Different Variable Selection Methods by PCA, GA-PLS and VIP. Preprints 2017, 2017050054 (doi: 10.20944/preprints201705.0054.v1).

Abstract

Multi-sensor data fusion of E-tongue and E-nose can provide a more comprehensive and more accurate analysis results. However, it also brings some redundant information, it is a hot issue to reduce the feature dimension for pattern recognition. In this paper, the taste-olfactory data fusion based on E-tongue and E-nose combined with Support Vector Machine (SVM) was used to classify five different beers. First, the taste and olfactory feature information were obtained based on E-tongue and E-nose. Second, the original feature data of single system were fused, then Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was applied to extract principal components, Genetic Algorithm-Partial Least Squares (GA-PLS) was used to select the characteristic variables, 20 subsets were generated with those variables based on the best Variable Importance of Projection (VIP) score. Finally, the classification models based on SVM were established, also c and g of SVM were calculated by Grid Search (GS), Genetic Algorithm (GA), and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), the classification results of all subsets were obtained. The results showed that the classification accuracy using data fusion was much higher over single E-tongue and single E-nose, and the variable selection method by VIP had the best classification performance in #12 subset coupled with GA-SVM.

Subject Areas

E-tongue; E-nose; data fusion; variable selection; patter recognition; beer

Readers' Comments and Ratings (0)

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Rate this article
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0
Leave a public comment

×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.