Submitted:
02 August 2026
Posted:
04 August 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
- What are the main macroeconomic determinants of renewable energy consumption in the GCC?
- How do the results obtained from Random Forest compare with those from conventional econometric model?
- Have determinants of renewable energy consumption changed following the introduction of national energy transition strategies after 2015?
2. Literature Review and Theoretical Framework
2.1. Economic Growth and Renewable Energy
2.2. Trade Openness, Foreign Direct Investment, and Renewable Energy Consumption
2.3. Inflation and Macroeconomic Stability
2.4. Research and Development (R&D) Expenditure
2.5. The GCC Context and Research Gap
3. Data and Methodology
3.1. Data and Sources
| Variable | Symbol | Definition | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renewable Energy Consumption | Renewable | Renewable energy consumption (% of total final energy consumption) | WDI/IEA |
| GDP | gdp | Gross Domestic Product (constant USD) | WDI |
| Foreign Direct Investment | fdi | Net inflows of FDI (% of GDP) | WDI |
| Trade Openness | trade | Sum of exports and imports (% of GDP) | WDI |
| Inflation | inflation | Annual change in consumer prices (%) | WDI |
| R&D Expenditure | r_d | Research and development expenditure (% of GDP) | WDI |
| Institutional Quality | inst_quality | World Governance Indicators (composite) | WGI |
3.2. Theoretical Model Specification
3.3. Econometric Models
3.4. Machine Learning Model: Random Forest
3.5. Sub-Period Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Descriptive Statistics
4.2. Correlation Analysis
4.3. Trend Analysis
4.4. Regression Results
4.5. Robustness Checks: Panel Data Models
4.6. Diagnostic Tests
4.7. Sub-Period Analysis (Pre- and Post-2015)
4.8. Machine Learning Results

4.9. Scatter Plots and Country Comparisons
5. Discussion
5.1. The Dominant Role of R&D Expenditure
5.2. The Positive Impact of Trade Openness
5.3. The Exclusion of GDP, FDI, and Inflation from the Final Model
5.4. The Policy Shift: Pre- and Post-2015 Dynamics
5.5. Machine Learning Validation
5.6. Implications for Theory
6. Conclusions, Policy Implications, and Limitations and Future Research
6.1. Conclusions
- R&D expenditures and trade openness emerged as the two most important determinants of renewable energy consumption, explaining approximately 63% of the variation in the baseline model. This finding suggests that technological innovation plays a more prominent role than conventional macroeconomic factors in supporting the energy transition.
- The effects became significant only after 2015, coinciding with the implementation of major initiative such as Saudi Vision 2030 and the UAE Energy Strategy 2050. This highlights the importance of strong policy frameworks and institutional quality in accelerating the renewable energy transition.
- Traditional macroeconomic indicators, including GDP, FDI, and inflation, did not emerge as significant determinants. This reflects the unique structure of GCC economies, where hydrocarbon dependence weakens the relationship between economic growth and renewable energy development.
6.2. Policy Implications
6.3. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Acknowledgments
References
- Al-Sarihi, A.; Mansouri, N. Renewable Energy Development in the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: Status, Barriers, and Policy Options. Energies 2022, 15, 1923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almasri, R.A.; Narayan, S. A recent review of energy efficiency and renewable energy in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region. Int. J. Green Energy 2021, 5075, 1904941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, Z.; et al. Determinants of energy consumption in selected ASEAN countries: New evidence from panel ARDL and wavelet coherence approaches Determinants of energy consumption in selected ASEAN countries: New evidence from panel ARDL and wavelet coherence approaches. Cogent Econ. Financ. 2026, 14, 2610560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yakubu, I.N.; Kapusuzoglu, A.; Ceylan, N.B. Institutional quality, trade openness, and renewable energy consumption in the GCC countries. In Decision Making in Interdisciplinary Renewable Energy Projects: Navigating Energy Investments; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 25–37. [Google Scholar]
- Yousef, R.F.M. Macroeconomic Determinants of Renewable Energy Deployment: The Role of Inflation, Fiscal Policy, and Economic Volatility in MENA Countries (2000–2023). Energies 2026, 14, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faltsman, V. Issues of Balancing Economic Growth and the State of the Environment. Econ. Math. Methods 2023, 59, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ditta; Hashmi, M.S.; Anis, A.; Maqbool, M.S. The Impact of Labor, Capital, Energy and Income Growth Environmental Degradation in Selected Developed Countries. Pak. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2023, 11, 440–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dogru, T.; Bulut, U.; Koçak, E.; Işık, C.; Suess, C.; Sirakaya-Turk, E. The nexus between tourism, economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emissions: Contemporary evidence from OECD countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 40930–40948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Muchran, M.; Idrus, A.; Badruddin, S.; Tenreng, M.; Kanto, M. INFLUENCE OF THE RENEWABLE AND NON-RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSUMPTIONS AND REAL-INCOME ON ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION IN INDONESIA. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy 2020, 11, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibrahim, R.; Al-mulali, U.; Solarin, S.A.; Ajide, K.B.; Al-Faryan, M.A.S.; Mohammed, A.S. Probing environmental sustainability pathways in G7 economies: The role of energy transition, technological innovation, and demographic mobility. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2023, 30, 75694–75719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Qian, X.; Zhu, J. Decoding the Paradoxical Drivers of Renewable Energy Transition in Arab Countries. Sustainability 2026, 18, 2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bulatova; Zakharova, O.; Vyshniakov, O. THE MAIN FORCES DRIVING THE SPREAD OF HUMANITARIAN CRISES IN THE MODERN GLOBAL ECONOMY. In Proceedings of the Annual International Scientific Conference “Competitiveness and Innovation in the Knowledge Economy”, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova, 26–27 September 2025; Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:288160076.
- Alam, M.S.; Adebayo, T.S.; Said, R.R.; Alam, N.; Magazzino, C.; Khan, U. Asymmetric impacts of natural gas consumption on renewable energy and economic growth in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Energy Environ. 2022, 35, 1359–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belaîd, F.; Sarihi, A.A. Saudi Arabia’s Energy Transition in a Post-Paris Agreement Era: An Analysis with a Multi-level Perspective Approach. Res. Int. Bus. Financ. 2023, 67, 102086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yakubu, N.; Kapusuzoglu, A.; Ceylan, N.B. Navigating the Energy Transition: How R&D Investment and Governance Quality Drive Clean Energy in the MENA Region. In Decision Making in Interdisciplinary Renewable Energy Projects: Navigating Energy Investments; Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., Deveci, M., Eds.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Transitions, E.; Times, I.N.; Disruption, O.F. OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2023; OECD: Paris, France, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Li, W.; Qiao, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, Y. Energy consumption, pollution haven hypothesis, and environmental Kuznets curve: Examining the environment–economy link in belt and road initiative countries. Energy 2021, 239, 122559. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, H.; Wang, X.; Bao, G.; Xiao, H. Heterogeneous Spatial Effects of FDI on CO2 Emissions in China. Earth’s Futur. 2022, 10, e2021EF002331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekwueme, D.C. Pathway to Oman’s environmental sustainability: Does trade openness and foreign direct investment matter? Arab Gulf J. Sci. Res. 2026, 44, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pasqualino, R.; et al. Modelling induced innovation for the low-carbon energy transition: A menu of options. Environ. Res. Lett. 2024, 19, 73004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bindi, G. Technological Innovation and the Environment: An Analysis Based on Patent Counts. 2019. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:208332842.
- Derouez, F.M. Technological Advancements and Economic Growth as Key Drivers of Renewable Energy Production in Saudi Arabia: An ARDL and VECM Analysis. Energies 2025, 18, 2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alzahrani, F. Building A Sustainable Green Economy in Saudi Arabia: Green Energy and Workforce Development, 2026.
- Jaboob, M. Financing green energy transition for sustainable environment in GCC countries: The pathway for attaining SDGs 7 and 13. Int. J. Energy Sect. Manag. 2026, 20, 691–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharaf, M.F.; Shahen, A.M. Rethinking Growth in the Gulf: The Role of Renewable Energy, Electricity Use, and Economic Openness in Oil-Rich Economies. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asna, M.; Deb, S. Re-Envisioning Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure and Sustainable Energy Transitions in the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries. Energies 2026, 19, 1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaabouni; Abid, I. Key drivers of energy consumption in the gulf cooperation council countries: A panel analysis. Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res. 2025, 15, 21627–21632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le Gallo, M.-A.; Sénégas. On the proper computation of the Hausman test statistic in standard linear panel data models: Some clarifications and new results. Econometrics 2023, 11, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamza, R.K.; Husain, W.J. Robust Methods for Detecting and Correcting Autocorrelation in Financial Time Series Modeling. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 2025, 15, 1623–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scornet, E.; Hooker, G. Theory of random forests. Annu. Rev. Stat. Its Appl. 2026, 13, 99–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alharbi, T.; Iqbal, S. Towards a Greener Future: Machine Learning Applications in Solar Irradiance Forecasting for Renewable Energy Planning in Saudi Arabia. J. Eng. Comput. Sci. 2023, 15, 39–57. [Google Scholar]
- Haupt, S.E.; et al. Combining artificial intelligence with physics-based methods for probabilistic renewable energy forecasting. Energies 2020, 13, 1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yessengeldina; Taizhanova, Z.; Kuttybayeva, N.; Iskakova, D.; Khalbayev, Y. Government Project Offices and the Effectiveness of Government Programs: An Empirical Analysis Based on Panel Data. Economies 2026, 14, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alghamdi, N.; James, P.; Bahaj, A. Vision and reality: An assessment of Saudi Arabia’s in-country capacity to deliver on its solar ambitions. Sustainability 2025, 17, 5721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ben-Salha, O.; Louail, B.; Riache, S.; Soltani, H.; Choukaier, D. Asymmetric environmental effects of policy uncertainty in the GCC: Evidence from MMQR, bootstrap and Bayesian quantile regressions. Int. J. Islam. Middle East. Financ. Manag. 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Impact of Industrial Policy on the Growth of Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises in Uttar Pradesh. Int. J. Res. Eng. Appl. Manag. 2020, 6, 307–312. [CrossRef]
- AL-Ghamdi, A.; Alhazmi, Y.A. Optimal emission plan for independent power producers using generation mix to meet Saudi Arabia environmental goals. Period. Eng. Nat. Sci. 2024, 12, 146–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abo-Khalil, G. Towards Sustainable AI-Driven Renewable Energy Systems through Integration of Forecasting, Grid Economics and Lifecycle Assessment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Technol. 2026, 2, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| Country | Renewable Energy Targets | Key Policy Framework |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 27.3 GW by 2024; 58.7 GW by 2030 | Saudi Vision 2030 |
| UAE | 44% clean energy power capacity by 2050 | UAE Energy Strategy 2050 |
| Qatar | 20% by 2030 | Qatar National Vision 2030 |
| Kuwait | 15% by 2030 | Kuwait Vision 2035 |
| Oman | 16% of electricity generation by 2025 | Oman Vision 2040 |
| Bahrain | 5% by 2030 | Bahrain Vision 2030 |
| Variable | Mean | SD | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renewable (%) | 0.071 | 0.186 | 0 | 1 |
| GDP (current USD) | 2.18 × 1011 | 2.58 × 1011 | 8.98 × 109 | 1.24 × 1012 |
| FDI (% of GDP) | 2.466 | 3.1 | −2.76 | 15.751 |
| Trade (% of GDP) | 107.33 | 133.48 | 47.533 | 199.045 |
| Inflation (%) | 2.879 | 3.685 | −4.863 | 15.05 |
| R&D (% of GDP) | 0.366 | 0.34 | 0.042 | 1.495 |
| Institutional Quality | 0.452 | 0.312 | −0.214 | 0.891 |
| Renewable | GDP | FDI | Trade | Inflation | R&D | Inst. Quality | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renewable | 1 | 0.251 | 0.231 | 0.489 | −0.037 | 0.734 | 0.412 |
| GDP | 0.251 | 1 | −0.146 | 0.831 | −0.016 | 0.541 | 0.623 |
| FDI | 0.231 | −0.146 | 1 | 0.468 | 0.084 | 0.064 | 0.189 |
| Trade | 0.489 | 0.831 | 0.468 | 1 | −0.031 | 0.26 | 0.445 |
| Inflation | −0.037 | −0.016 | 0.084 | −0.031 | 1 | 0.021 | −0.089 |
| R&D | 0.734 | 0.541 | 0.064 | 0.26 | 0.021 | 1 | 0.578 |
| Inst. Quality | 0.412 | 0.623 | 0.189 | 0.445 | −0.089 | 0.578 | 1 |
| Variable | Coefficient | Std. Error | t-Statistic | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | −0.2494 | 0.0311 | −8.003 | <0.001 *** |
| Trade Openness | 0.0018 | 0.0003 | 6.191 | <0.001 *** |
| R&D Expenditure | 0.3547 | 0.0282 | 12.595 | <0.001 *** |
| FE | RE | |
|---|---|---|
| Trade Openness | 0.0024 (0.0006) *** | 0.0022 (0.0005) *** |
| R&D Expenditure | 0.3706 (0.0416) *** | 0.3701 (0.0375) *** |
| Institutional Quality | 0.0189 (0.0112) * | 0.0201 (0.0108) * |
| R2 | 0.535 | 0.557 |
| Adjusted R2 | 0.509 | 0.542 |
| Observations | 150 | 150 |
| Number of Countries | 6 | 6 |
| Hausman Test | χ2 = 1.45, p = 0.563 |
| 2000–2014 | 2015–2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| Trade Openness | −0.0001 (0.0002) | 0.0034 (0.0020) * |
| R&D Expenditure | 0.0008 (0.0140) | 0.7141 (0.1416) *** |
| Institutional Quality | −0.0123 (0.0156) | 0.0421 (0.0189) ** |
| R2 | 0.012 | 0.532 |
| Adjusted R2 | −0.067 | 0.461 |
| Observations | 90 | 60 |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| RMSE (Test Set) | 0.0321 |
| R2 (Test Set) | 0.4247 |
| MAE (Test Set) | 0.0258 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).