Submitted:
22 July 2026
Posted:
22 July 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Additive Manufacturing of PEEK Substrates
2.2. CO₂ Plasma Treatment
2.3. GelMA Synthesis and Covalent Coating
2.4. Plasma Treatment Assessment Through Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared
2.5. Surface Wettability Modification Assessment Through Contact Angle
2.6. GelMA Coating Assessment
2.6.1. ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy
2.6.2. Evaluation of Deposited GelMA Mass Per Surface Area
2.6.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy
3. Results
3.1. Plasma Activation: Surface Chemistry and Wettability
3.2. Covalent GelMA Grafting

3.3. Evaluation of Deposited GelMA Mass Per Surface Area
3.4. Surface Morphology by SEM
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| PEEK | Polyetheretherketone |
| GelMA | Methacryloyl Gelatin |
| ATR-FTIR | Attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared |
| dH₂O | double-distilled water |
| FDM | Fused deposition modelling |
| PBS | Phosphate-buffered saline |
| NMR | Nuclear magnetic resonance |
| RGD | Arginine–glycine–aspartate |
| NHS | N-hydroxysuccinimide |
| EDC | 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide |
| MES | 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid |
| Irgacure 2959 | 2-Hydroxy-4′-(2-hydroxyethoxy)-2-methylpropiophenone |
| SEM | Scanning electron microscopy |
References
- Khayat, S.; Sada Urmeneta, Á.; González Moure, B.; Fernández Acosta, D.; Benito Anguita, M.; López López, A.; Verdaguer Martín, J.J.; Navarro Cuéllar, I.; Falahat, F.; Navarro Cuéllar, C. Reconstruction of Segmental Mandibular Defects with Double-Barrel Fibula Flap and Osseo-Integrated Implants: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tarsitano, A.; Battaglia, S.; Ricotta, F.; Bortolani, B.; Cercenelli, L.; Marcelli, E.; Cipriani, R.; Marchetti, C. Accuracy of CAD/CAM mandibular reconstruction: A three-dimensional, fully virtual outcome evaluation method. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 2018, 46, 1121–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gu, Y.; Ma, H.; Shujaat, S.; Orhan, K.; Coucke, W.; Amoli, M.S.; Bila, M.; Politis, C.; Jacobs, R. Donor- and recipient-site morbidity of vascularized fibular and iliac flaps for mandibular reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2021, 74, 1470–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goodson, A.M.; Kittur, M.A.; Evans, P.L.; Williams, E.M. Patient-specific, printed titanium implants for reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects: A systematic review of the evidence. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 2019, 47, 968–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Niinomi, M.; Nakai, M. Titanium-Based Biomaterials for Preventing Stress Shielding between Implant Devices and Bone. Int. J. Biomater. 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lommen, J.; Schorn, L.; Sproll, C.; Haussmann, J.; Kübler, N.R.; Budach, W.; Rana, M.; Tamaskovics, B. Reduction of CT Artifacts Using Polyetheretherketone (PEEK), Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK), Polyphenylsulfone (PPSU), and Polyethylene (PE) Reconstruction Plates in Oral Oncology. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2022, 80, 1272–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kurtz, S.M.; Devine, J.N. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 2007, 28, 4845–4869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Qin, L.; Yao, S.; Zhao, J.; Zhou, C.; Oates, T.W.; Weir, M.D.; Wu, J.; Xu, H.H.K. Review on Development and Dental Applications of Polyetheretherketone-Based Biomaterials and Restorations. Mater. 2021, 14, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dallal, S.; Eslami, B.; Tiari, S. Recent Advances in PEEK for Biomedical Applications: A Comprehensive Review of Material Properties, Processing, and Additive Manufacturing. Polym. 2025, 17, 1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghionea, I.G.; Tarba, C.I.; Cristache, M.A.; Cristache, C.M. Comparative Evaluation of Symmetrical Titanium and Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Hollow Structures for Mandibular Reconstruction: Strength, Geometry, and Biomechanical Performance. Symmetry 2025, 17, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghionea, I.G.; Tarba, C.I.; Cristache, C.M.; Filipov, I.; Beuran, I.A. A Comparative Finite Element Analysis of Titanium, Autogenous Bone, and Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)-Based Solutions for Mandibular Reconstruction. Mater. 2025, 18, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Manzoor, F.; Golbang, A.; Jindal, S.; Dixon, D.; McIlhagger, A.; Harkin-Jones, E.; Crawford, D.; Mancuso, E. 3D printed PEEK/HA composites for bone tissue engineering applications: Effect of material formulation on mechanical performance and bioactive potential. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2021, 121, 104601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ma, R.; Tang, T. Current Strategies to Improve the Bioactivity of PEEK. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 5426–5445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gupta, G.; Bansal, S.; Upinder, S.; Kapila, S. Osseointegration: Biological Basis, Materials Science, and Clinical Perspectives in Dental Implantology. IJFMR-Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. 2025, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Najeeb, S.; Zafar, M.S.; Khurshid, Z.; Siddiqui, F. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sundriyal, P.; Sahu, M.; Prakash, O.; Bhattacharya, S. Long-term surface modification of PEEK polymer using plasma and PEG silane treatment. Surf. Interfaces 2021, 25, 101253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Luo, C.J.; Huang, J.; Edirisinghe, M. PEEK surface modification by fast ambient-temperature sulfonation for bone implant applications. J. R. Soc. Interface 2019, 16. [Google Scholar]
- Barkarmo, S.; Wennerberg, A.; Hoffman, M.; Kjellin, P.; Breding, K.; Handa, P.; Stenport, V. Nano-hydroxyapatite-coated PEEK implants: A pilot study in rabbit bone. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2013, 101A, 465–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mostafa, D.; Kassem, Y.M.; Omar, S.S.; Shalaby, Y. Nano-topographical surface engineering for enhancing bioactivity of PEEK implants (in vitro—histomorphometric study). Clin. Oral Investig. 2023, 27, 6789–6799. [Google Scholar]
- Mahjoubi, H.; Buck, E.; Manimunda, P.; Farivar, R.; Chromik, R.; Murshed, M.; Cerruti, M. Surface phosphonation enhances hydroxyapatite coating adhesion on polyetheretherketone and its osseointegration potential. Acta Biomater. 2017, 47, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Park, S.; Jung, T.G. Surface Modification of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Intervertebral Fusion Implant Using Polydopamine Coating for Improved Bioactivity. Bioeng. 2024, 11, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Y.; Chen, Z.; Lei, K.; Ding, J.; Yu, L. Surface modification of polyetheretherketone for boosted osseointegration: a review. Biomater. Transl. 2025, 6, 181–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cassari, L.; Balducci, C.; Messina, G.M.L.; Iucci, G.; Battocchio, C.; Bertelà, F.; Lucchetta, G.; Coward, T.; Di Silvio, L.; Marletta, G.; et al. Polyetheretherketone Double Functionalization with Bioactive Peptides Improves Human Osteoblast Response. Biomimetics 2024, 9, 767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Štefaníková, R.; Kretková, T.; Kuzminova, A.; Hanuš, J.; Vaidulych, M.; Kylián, O.; Biederman, H. Influence of atmospheric pressure dielectric barrier discharge on wettability and drying of poly(ether-ether-ketone) foils. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2018, 150, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liston, E.M.; Martinu, L.; Wertheimer, M.R. Plasma surface modification of polymers for improved adhesion: a critical review. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 1993, 7, 1091–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Primc, G. Strategies for Improved Wettability of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Polymers by Non-Equilibrium Plasma Treatment. Polymers . 2022, 14, 5319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Booth, J.P.; Mozetič, M.; Nikiforov, A.; Oehr, C. Foundations of plasma surface functionalization of polymers for industrial and biological applications. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2022, 31, 103001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, P.; Bennani, V.; Cooper, P.; Dias, G.; Ratnayake, J. Surface chemistry on PEEK surfaces: From enhanced biofunctionality to improved surface modifiability. Appl. Mater. Today 2024, 41, 102523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lou, J.; Meyer, C.; Chen, A.; Weitz, D.A.; Mooney, D.J. Immobilization of BMP-2 in porous hydrogels to spatially regulate osteogenesis. J. Control. Release 2025, 379, 944–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Procedure for Two-step Coupling of Proteins Using EDC and NHS or Sulfo-NHS. 2017. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahmad, A.; Iqbal, T.; Yasin, S.; Hanif, R.; Riaz, S.; Luckham, P.F. Stability of amorphous PEEK in organic solvents. J. Chem. Soc. Pak. 2018, 40, 810–818. [Google Scholar]
- Serafim, A.; Tucureanu, C.; Petre, D.G.; Dragusin, D.M.; Salageanu, A.; Van Vlierberghe, S.; Dubruel, P.; Stancu, I.C. One-pot synthesis of superabsorbent hybrid hydrogels based on methacrylamide gelatin and polyacrylamide. Effortless control of hydrogel properties through composition design. New J. Chem. 2014, 38, 3112–3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| Treatment condition | Contact angle (°) | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Pristine PEEK (control) | 78.32 ± 2.94 | Hydrophobic surface |
| CO₂ plasma, 60 s per side | 18.35 ± 2.01 | Marked increase in hydrophilicity |
| CO₂ plasma, 120 s per side | 6.61 ± 0.57 | Maximum hydrophilicity (optimal) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).