Submitted:
11 May 2026
Posted:
12 May 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
Ethical Approval and Animal Welfare
Animals and Study Design
Surgery preparation and pre-screening
Electrode Implantation
Follow up and final control
Histological treatment
Outcome MeasuresAcoustic Reflex
Electromyography (EMG)
Signal Processing
3. Results
3.1. Animals
3.2. Reflexes Detection
3.3. Histology
3.4. Adverse Events
4. Discussion
Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| CI | cochlea implant |
| DH | drilled hole |
| EABR | electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses |
| ECAP | electrically evoked compound action potentials |
| EMG | electromyography |
| eSRT | electrically-evoked stapedius reflex thresholds |
| FN | facial nerve |
| HM | handle of the malleus |
| I | incus |
| MCL | maximum comfortable loudness level |
| MP | mastoid process |
| NRT | neural response telemetry |
| OEC | outer ear channel |
| PM | promontory |
| RW | round window |
| SM | stapedius muscle |
| SPL | sound pressure level |
| SRT | stapedius reflex treshold |
| ST | stapes |
| TM | tympanic membrane |
| TMA | area of the temporalis muscle |
| UKJ | University Hospital Jena |
| VO | vestibular organ |
References
- Jerger, J.; Oliver, T.A.; Chmiel, R.A. Prediction of dynamic range from stapedius reflex in cochlear implant patients. Ear Hear 1988, 9(1), 4–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stephan, K.; Welzl-Müller, K.; Stiglbrunner, H. Stapedius reflex threshold in cochlear implant patients. Audiology 1988, 27(4), 227–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shallop, J.K. Objective measurements and the audiological management of cochlear implant patients. Adv. Otorhinolaryngol. 1997, 53, 85–111. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Polak, M. Further prospective findings with compound action potentials from Nucleus 24 cochlear implants. Hear Res. 2004, 188(1-2), 104–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, D.M. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies. Acta Otolaryngol. 2005, 125(7), 732–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polak, M. Objective methods in postlingually and prelingually deafened adults for programming cochlear implants: ESR and NRT. Cochlear Implant. Int. 2006, 7(3), 125–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiao, X.F. Postoperative objective detecting techniques for cochlear implant children with inner ear malformation. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2017, 102, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franke-Trieger, A. Stapedius reflex thresholds obtained in a free sound field as an indicator for over- and understimulation in cochlear implant listeners. Int. J. Audiol. 2023, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alberti, P.W. The diagnostic role of stapedius reflex estimations. Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am. 1978, 11(2), 251–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Polak, M.; Hodges, A.; Balkany, T. ECAP, ESR and subjective levels for two different nucleus 24 electrode arrays. Otol. Neurotol. 2005, 26(4), 639–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wolfe, J.; Kasulis, H. Relationships among objective measures and speech perception in adult users of the HiResolution Bionic Ear. Cochlear Implant. Int. 2008, 9(2), 70–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caner, G. Optimizing fitting in children using objective measures such as neural response imaging and electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold. Otol. Neurotol. 2007, 28(5), 637–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raghunandhan, S. A clinical study of electrophysiological correlates of behavioural comfort levels in cochlear implantees. Cochlear Implant. Int. 2014, 15(3), 145–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chai, B. Patient and device factors contributing to electrically-evoked stapedial reflex thresholds in cochlear implanted adults. Audiol. Neurootol. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bresnihan, M. Measurement of comfort levels by means of electrical stapedial reflex in children. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg. 2001, 127(8), 963–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stephan, K.; Welzl-Müller, K.; Stiglbrunner, H. Dynamic range of the contralateral stapedius reflex in cochlear implant patients. Scand. Audiol. 1990, 19(2), 111–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hodges, A.V. Using electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds to fit the CLARION cochlear implant. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 1999, 177, 64–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrade, K.C. The importance of electrically evoked stapedial reflex in cochlear implant. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 2014, 80(1), 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Asal, S.; Sobhy, O.A.; Nooman, M. The relationship between the electrical stapedial muscle reflex threshold and electrical and behavioral measures in cochlear implant patients. Egypt. J. Otolaryngol. 2016, 32(1), 49–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, N. Objective and subjective evaluations of the Nurotron Venus cochlear implant system via animal experiments and clinical trials. Acta Otolaryngol. 2016, 136(1), 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Andrade, K.C.L. The Value of Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex in Determining the Maximum Comfort Level of a Cochlear Implant. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 2018, 29(4), 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kosaner, J. Comparing eSRT and eCAP measurements in pediatric MED-EL cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implant. Int. 2018, 19(3), 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Franke-Trieger, A. Stapedius reflex evoked in free sound field in cochlear implant users compared to normal-hearing listeners. Int. J. Audiol. 2021, 60(9), 695–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holder, J.T. Cochlear Implant Upper Stimulation Levels: eSRT vs. Loudness Scaling. Otol. Neurotol. 2023, 44(9), e667–e672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clement, R.S.; Carter, P.M.; Kipke, D.R. Measuring the electrical stapedius reflex with stapedius muscle electromyogram recordings. Ann. BioMed Eng. 2002, 30(2), 169–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Battmer, R.D.; Laszig, R.; Lehnhardt, E. Electrically elicited stapedius reflex in cochlear implant patients. Ear Hear 1990, 11(5), 370–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pau, H.W. Electromyographical recording of the electrically elicited stapedius reflex via a bipolar hook electrode. Otol. Neurotol. 2009, 30(1), 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almqvist, B.; Harris, S.; Shallop, J.K. Objective intraoperative method to record averaged electromyographic stapedius muscle reflexes in cochlear implant patients. Audiology 2000, 39(3), 146–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zarowski, A. Intraoperative recordings of electromyogenic responses from the human stapedius muscle. Hear Res. 2021, 408, 108290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mair, M.M. Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process. J. Vis. Exp. 2024, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaerenberg, B. Cochlear implant programming: a global survey on the state of the art. ScientificWorldJournal 2014, 501738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spivak, L.G.; Chute, P.M. The relationship between electrical acoustic reflex thresholds and behavioral comfort levels in children and adult cochlear implant patients. Ear Hear 1994, 15(2), 184–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Den Abbeele, T. Multicentre investigation on electrically evoked compound action potential and stapedius reflex: how do these objective measures relate to implant programming parameters? Cochlear Implant. Int. 2012, 13(1), 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allum, J.H.; Greisiger, R.; Probst, R. Relationship of intraoperative electrically evoked stapedius reflex thresholds to maximum comfortable loudness levels of children with cochlear implants. Int. J. Audiol. 2002, 41(2), 93–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gordon, K.A.; Papsin, B.C.; Harrison, R.V. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children. Ear Hear 2004, 25(5), 447–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munro, K.J.; Turtle, C.; Schaette, R. Plasticity and modified loudness following short-term unilateral deprivation: evidence of multiple gain mechanisms within the auditory system. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2014, 135(1), 315–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Telmesani, L.M.; Said, N.M. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2016, 82, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brotherton, H. Using acoustic reflex threshold, auditory brainstem response and loudness judgments to investigate changes in neural gain following acute unilateral deprivation in normal hearing adults. Hear Res. 2017, 345, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tyagi, Y.; Chatterjee, I. The effect of cochlear implant age and duration of intervention on ESRT in children with cochlear implant. Cochlear Implant. Int. 2023, 24(4), 224–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Walkowiak, A. The Relationship Between the Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Threshold and Stimulus Burst Duration in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users: Preliminary Data. Otol. Neurotol. 2025, 46(1), e21–e27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muigg, F. Longitudinal changes in electrical stapedius reflex thresholds (eSRT) in children with cochlear implants. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pitt, C. The Long-Term Stability of the Electrical Stapedial Reflex Threshold. Otol. Neurotol. 2021, 42(1), 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çiprut, A.; Adıgül, Ç. The Relationship between Electrical Stapedius Reflex Thresholds and Behaviorally Most Comfortable Levels in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users. J. Int. Adv. Otol. 2020, 16(1), 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wasowski, A. Influence of non-optimal levels of electrical stimulation in cochlear implantees on hearing benefits. Cochlear Implant. Int. 2010, 11 Suppl 1, 485–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gurr, A. [The temporal bone of lamb and pig as an alternative in ENT-education]. Laryngorhinootologie 2010, 89(1), 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arnold, D. Accessing the Stapedius Muscle Via Novel Surgical Retrofacial Approach: A Cadaveric Feasibility Study. Otol. Neurotol. 2022, 43(2), e174–e180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guntinas-Lichius, O. Accessing the stapedius muscle via novel surgical retrofacial approach during cochlear implantation surgery: Intraoperative results on feasibility and safety. PLoS ONE 2022, 17(8), e0272943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walkowiak, A. Evoked stapedius reflex and compound action potential thresholds versus most comfortable loudness level: assessment of their relation for charge-based fitting strategies in implant users. ORL J. Otorhinolaryngol. Relat. Spec. 2011, 73(4), 189–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Espina González, C. Variation of electrical impedance over 5 years post-implantation and relationship with the maximum comfort level (MCL) in adults with cochlear implants. Acta Otorrinolaringol. Esp. (Engl Ed) 2024, 75(1), 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soncini, A. Early fitting in cochlear implant surgery: preliminary results. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2024, 281(1), 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stephan, K.; Welzl-Müller, K. Post-operative stapedius reflex tests with simultaneous loudness scaling in patients supplied with cochlear implants. Audiology 2000, 39(1), 13–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rönnblom, A. Unique fiber phenotype composition and metabolic properties of the stapedius and tensor tympani muscles in the human middle ear. J. Anat. 2023, 243(1), 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walluks, K. Long-term stimulation by implanted pacemaker enables non-atrophic treatment of bilateral vocal fold paresis in a human-like animal model. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14(1), 10440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liuzzi, F.J.; Tedeschi, B. Peripheral nerve regeneration. Neurosurg. Clin. N Am. 1991, 2(1), 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cancalon, P.F. Survival and subsequent regeneration of olfactory neurons after a distal axonal lesion. J. Neurocytol. 1987, 16(6), 829–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bissinger, U. Influence of volatile and intravenous anesthetics on the threshold of the acoustically evoked stapedius reflex. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2000, 257(7), 349–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





![]() |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
