Submitted:
21 January 2026
Posted:
22 January 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Modular Assembled Cable Bridge
2.1. Standardized Steel Truss
2.2. Prefabricated UHPC Unit for Cable Ducts
3. Design of the 36-m Span Modular Assembled Cable Bridge
3.1. Prefabricated Steel Truss Component
3.2. Prefabricated UHPC Unit
4. Modeling of FE Models
4.1. Material Properties and Element Types
4.2. Interaction and Boundary Condition
5. FE Analysis of the 36-m Span Modular Assembled Cable Bridge
5.1. FE Analysis Results of the 36-m Span Modular Assembled Cable Bridge
5.2. FE Parametric Analysis
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- YU S, ZHOU S, DAI Y, et al. Impacts of RPS and FIT on inter-regional power transmission line layout in China: Considerations of high renewable energy penetration. Energy Policy. 2023, 178: 113615. [CrossRef]
- THOMAS A, MISHRA U. A green energy circular system with carbon capturing and waste minimization in a smart grid power management. Energy Rep. 2022, 8: 14102–23. [CrossRef]
- YANG SX, ZHU CX, QIAO L, et al. Dynamic assessment of Energy Internet’s emission reduction effect -- a case study of Yanqing, Beijing. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 272: 122663. [CrossRef]
- FANG K, TANG Y, ZHANG Q, et al. Will China peak its energy-related carbon emissions by 2030? Lessons from 30 Chinese provinces. Appl. Energy. 2019, 255: 113852. [CrossRef]
- CHONG SH, AN JB, CHO GC. Full-scale test of Direct-buried Cable in Sand under Repetitive Loading. Transp. Geotech. 2022, 37: 100877. [CrossRef]
- WANG J, WAN L, CHEN K, et al. Experimental investigation on buried pipeline bending deformation monitoring using flexible piezoelectric sensing. Tunn. Undergr. Space Tech. 2026, 168: 107218. [CrossRef]
- LIU CB, WANG JY, CHEN Y, et al. Shear bearing capacity of concrete cable duct reinforced with GFRP bars. Acta Mater. Compos. Sin. 2018, 35 (12): 3331-3341. https://www.chndoi.org/Resolution/Handler?doi=10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20180206.001.
- XU D, LI Y, YANG X, et al. Enhancing resilience in urban utility tunnels power transmission systems: Analysing temperature distribution in near-wall cable fires for risk mitigation. Tunn. Undergr. Space Tech. 2024, 152: 105911. [CrossRef]
- ZHU JJ, WANG XL, LI XR, et al. Mechanical damage analysis of cable tunnels constructed by pipe jacking method in soft soil under local differential settlement. J. Nanjing Tech Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2025, 47(3): 279-287. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/32.1670.N.20250411.0940.002.
- WANG XL, ZHU JJ, YE MG, et al. Deflection analysis of cable tunnels due to underpass excavation in soft soils. J. Basic Sci. Eng. 2024, 32(04): 944-56. https://www.chndoi.org/Resolution/Handler?doi=10.16058/j.issn.1005-0930.2024.04.003.
- LIU J, MENG X, TIAN L, et al. Failure mechanisms and seismic fragility analysis of overhead transmission lines incorporating pile-soil-structure interaction. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2024, 160: 108201. [CrossRef]
- LV XF, MA XQ, ZHU CS. Research on equivalent bending stiffness of conductor near the tension section suspension point of overhead transmission lines. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2026, 254: 112617. [CrossRef]
- JU HT, ZHANG K, WANG XP, et al. Bending Test and FE Analysis of Novel Grouted Plug-in Connection for Prefabricated Assembled Raft Foundation. Buildings 2025, 15, 3931. [CrossRef]
- XU G, WANG XK, SHENG H, et al. Design and resistance performance of UHPC prefabricated cable trench. Bull. Chin. Ceram. Soc. 2022, 41(03): 844-52. https://www.chndoi.org/Resolution/Handler?doi=10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.20220112.007.
- ZHANG YF, TAN CJ, ZHAO H, et al. Experimental and numerical study of shear-lag effect on low-ribbed steel-UHPC composite structure. Structures 2022, 46: 395–407. [CrossRef]
- WANG CS, ZHANG WT, LI HT, et al. Shear lag effect of twin I-shaped composite girders in cable-stayed bridges. Thin-Walled Struct. 2022, 180: 109822. [CrossRef]
- CHEN Y, DONG J, XU T, et al. The shear-lag effect of composite box girder bridges with corrugated steel webs and trusses. Eng. Struct. 2019, 181: 617-28. [CrossRef]
- XIONG F, ZHANG D, RAN M, et al. Seismic performance of bolt-connected fully assembled concrete modular construction by full-scale shaking table test. Eng. Struct. 2025, 343: 121026. [CrossRef]
- XIONG F, ZHENG CY, LIU Y, et al. Deflection function of a novel bolt-connected precast concrete floor. Eng. Struct. 2025, 323: 119250. [CrossRef]
- XIONG F, WANG YH, WANG ZQ, et al. Seismic performance of coupled precast concrete wall panels connected by novel vertical bolted joints. Structures 2024, 70: 107654. [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China. Code for Design of Composite Structures GB 50017-2017; China Architecture & Building Press Beijing: Beijing, China, 2017.
- HE SH, ZHOU DF, BAI BS, et al. Experimental study on shear performance of prefabricated HSS-UHPC composite beam with perfobond strip connectors. Eng. Struct. 2025, 324: 119318. [CrossRef]
- TAN XY, FANG Z, YIN YB, et al. Shear behavior of low-profile perfobond strip connectors for steel–thin UHPC composite deck structures. Eng. Struct. 2025, 322: 119204. [CrossRef]
- SU J, CHEN JT, FANG Z, et al. Flexural performance and capacity calculation of unreinforced UHPC slabs. J. Hunan Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 2023, 50(05): 29-42. https://www.chndoi.org/Resolution/Handler?doi=10.16339/j.cnki.hdxbzkb.2023053.
- FAKEH M, JAWDHARI A, FAM A. Recommended concrete damage plasticity parameters and constitutive models for UHPC in ABAQUS. Eng. Struct. 2025, 333: 120154. [CrossRef]
- ZHOU HT, WANG ZZ, ZHANG SP, et al. Influence of accordion effect on fire resistance of prestressed steel-concrete composite beams with corrugated webs. J. Build. Struct. 2022, 43(08): 174-84+208. https://www.chndoi.org/Resolution/Handler?doi=10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2020.0534.
- OLLGAARD, J. G. Shear strength of stud connectors in lightweight and normal weight concrete, AISC Eng’g Jr., April 1971 (71-10), 1971. [CrossRef]
- ZHOU YJ, YANG X, ZOU WW, et al. Experimental testing and machine learning to predict the load-slip behavior of stud con-nectors in steel-UHPC composite structures. Eng. Struct. 2025, 335: 120418. [CrossRef]


























| Member type | Material | Yield strength | Tensile strength | Plastic strain |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chord | Q345 | 345 | 470 | 0.061 |
| Reinforcement | HRB400 | 400 | 600 | 0.097 |
| Material | Cubic strength | Tensile strength | Flexural strength | Young’s modulus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UHPC | 122 | 8 | 24 | 44.2×103 |
| Dilation angle ψ | Eccentricity e | σbo/σco | K | Viscosity parameter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55 | 0.1 | 2 | 0.667 | 0.005 |
| Loads | Load distribution | Load region | Load value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cable bridge gravity | Uniform | Whole model | 9800 mm/s2 |
| Cable gravity | Uniform | The inner bottom surface of the UHPC cable duct | 0.01 N/mm2 |
| Cover plate gravity | Uniform | The top surface of the UHPC cable duct | 0.015 N/mm2 |
| Wind load | Uniform | The outer front surface of the UHPC cable duct | 0.0005 N/mm2 |
| Wind load | Line | The front surface of the steel truss | 0.04 N/mm |
| Construction load | Uniform | The top surface of the UHPC cable duct | 0.002 N/mm2 |
| Dust load | Uniform | The top surface of the UHPC cable duct | 0.0005 N/mm2 |
| Snow load | Uniform | The top surface of the UHPC cable duct | 0.0003 N/mm2 |
| Lifting load | Uniform | Whole model | 10780 mm/s2 |
| Maintenance load | Uniform | The top surface of the UHPC cable duct | 0.002 N/mm2 |
|
Load type |
Dead load | Live load | |||||||
| Cable bridge gravity | Cable gravity | Cover plate gravity | Wind load | Construction load | Dust load |
Snow load | Lifting load | Maintenance load | |
| Case 1 | √ | √ | |||||||
| Case 2 | √ | √ | |||||||
| Case 3 | √ | √ | √ | ||||||
| Case 4 | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||||
| Case 5 | √ | √ | √ | ||||||
| Case 6 | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||||
| Case 7 | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||||
| Case 8 | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||||
| Case 9 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
| Note: Partial factors for dead and live loads are respectively 1.3 and 1.5; Combination factor is 1.0 for live loads for conservative reasons. | |||||||||
| Load cases | Max. principal stress in concrete/MPa | Min. principal stress in concrete/MPa | Max. mises stress in steel truss/MPa | Max. VD/mm | Max. HD/mm | LS/mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1 | 6.8 | 9.7 | 163.6 | 110.0 | 1.3 | 7.8 |
| Case 2 | 3.7 | 6.0 | 81.3 | 45.6 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Case 3 | 8.1 | 11.9 | 206.0 | 141.4 | 1.2 | 10.5 |
| Case 4 | 8.3 | 13.3 | 234.9 | 163.2 | 1.1 | 12.4 |
| Case 5 | 8.3 | 13.1 | 230.5 | 159.9 | 1.1 | 12.1 |
| Case 6 | 8.3 | 13.9 | 233.8 | 159.9 | 5.1 | 12.1 |
| Case 7 | 8.3 | 13.3 | 234.9 | 163.2 | 1.1 | 12.4 |
| Case 8 | 8.3 | 13.1 | 231.6 | 160.7 | 1.1 | 12.2 |
| Case 9 | 8.3 | 14.0 | 235.6 | 161.3 | 5.1 | 12.2 |
| Model number | Cross-sectional dimensions of the central diagonal webs /mm | Cross-sectional dimensions of the end diagonal webs /mm | Mass /t |
Load cases | Max. principal stress in concrete /MPa |
Min. principal stress in concrete /MPa |
Max. mises stress in steel truss /MPa | Max. VD /mm | Max. HD /mm | LS /mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M36-1 | 80×80×3 | 80×80×6 | 19.48 | Case 7 | 8.3 | 13.3 | 234.9 | 163.2 | 1.1 | 12.4 |
| Case 9 | 8.3 | 14.0 | 235.6 | 161.3 | 5.1 | 12.2 | ||||
| M36-2 | 60×60×3 | 80×80×5 | 18.97 | Case 7 | 8.3 | 13.6 | 230.0 | 168.0 | 1.2 | 12.5 |
| Case 9 | 8.3 | 14.4 | 230.5 | 166.0 | 5.3 | 12.4 | ||||
| M36-3 | 60×60×4 | 80×80×5 | 19.39 | Case 7 | 8.3 | 13.3 | 234.4 | 164.5 | 1.1 | 12.5 |
| Case 9 | 8.3 | 14.1 | 235.1 | 162.6 | 5.1 | 12.3 | ||||
| M36-4 | 80×80×3 | 80×80×5 | 18.23 | Case 7 | 8.3 | 13.3 | 234.9 | 163.9 | 1.1 | 12.4 |
| Case 9 | 8.3 | 14.0 | 235.6 | 162.0 | 5.1 | 12.3 | ||||
| M30-1 | 80×80×3 | 80×80×6 | 16.2 | Case 7 | 8.2 | 10.2 | 159.0 | 80.2 | 0.8 | 4.1 |
| Case 9 | 8.2 | 10.7 | 159.3 | 79.1 | 2.6 | 4.1 | ||||
| Note: M36-1 model is the initial FE model of the 36-m assemble cable bridge. | ||||||||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).