Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

The Polynomial t2(4x − n)2 − 2ntx Does Not Always Admits a Perfect Square

Submitted:

31 December 2025

Posted:

31 December 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
In this article we show that the polynomial \( t^2(4x - n)^2 - 2ntx \) does not always admits a perfect square with \( n\geq 2 \) and \( (x,t)\in \mathbb{(N^*)^2} \). We prove this when \( n=3 \) and we show by contradiction that one of x or t (in the expression \( t^2(4x - 3)^2 - 6tx \)) isn't an integer.
Keywords: 
;  ;  

1. Introduction

In his article : Partial Resolution of the Erdős-Straus, Sierpiński, and Generalized Erdős-Straus Conjectures Using New Analytical Formulas, in the page 13, Philemon Urbain MBALLA pose the following question: how can we prove that the polynomial t 2 ( 4 x − n ) 2 − 2 n t x or 4 t 2 ( 4 x − n ) 2 − 8 n t x always admits a perfect square for all n ∈ N , with n ≥ 2 ?

2. Definitions

Definition: we mean by a positive integer a natural number strictly greater than 1.

3. Principal Resulte

Théorème .The polynomial t 2 ( 4 x − n ) 2 − 2 n t x does not always admits a perfect square with n ≥ 2 and x , t positive integers.
Proof. 
For n = 3 , the polynomial t 2 ( 4 x − n ) 2 − 2 n t x become:
t 2 ( 4 x − 3 ) 2 − 6 t x
We need to have a positive integer m such that : t 2 ( 4 x − 3 ) 2 − 6 t x = m 2
In this expression if we show that x or t isn’t a postive integer then the theorem 3.1 is proved.
We have: t 2 ( 4 x − 3 ) 2 − 6 t x = m 2 ⇔ t 2 ( 4 x − 3 ) 2 − m 2 = 6 t x
⇔ ( t ( 4 x − 3 ) − m ) ( t ( 4 x − 3 ) + m ) = 6 t x
The two expression t ( 4 x − 3 ) − m and t ( 4 x − 3 ) + m have the same parity because it deffirencies by 2m, or the parity of it’s product is even(because it’s product is 6tx) then t ( 4 x − 3 ) − m and t ( 4 x − 3 ) + m are both even.
Let: t ( 4 x − 3 ) − m = 2 r then: 2 r + m = t ( 4 x − 3 ) and r ( r + m ) = 3 x t
So: x = 3 r ( r + m ) 4 r ( r + m ) − 6 r + 3 m
Remark: We need to find ( r , m ) positive integeres such that x also a positive integer. Now We define the function: x : t − > x ( t ) with t = r + m (then: t ≥ r + 1 because m ≥ 1 )
So: x ( t ) = 3 r t t ( 4 r + 3 ) − 9 r Or x ≥ 0 , the denominator is positive, we studie x as a function of t with fixed r.
Proof that x : t − > x ( t ) is strictly decreasing:
If we calcule the derivative of x we find:
x ′ ( t ) = − 27 r 2 ( t ( 4 r + 3 ) − 9 r ) 2
Then x ′ ( t ) < 0 for all t > 9 r 4 r + 3 , then x is strictly decreasing for all t ≥ r + 1 .
And the maximum of the function x is atteint in the limit of left so when t = r + 1 Then x ( t = r + 1 ) = 3 r ( r + 1 ) 4 r 2 − 2 r + 3 this value of x does not atteint 1: x ( t = r + 1 ) = 3 r ( r + 1 ) 4 r 2 − 2 r + 3 < 1 for all r ≥ 5 ,
We will prove it by studiyng the function g ( r ) = 3 r ( r + 1 ) 4 r 2 − 2 r + 3 for all r ≥ 5
The derivative of g is: g ′ ( r ) = 9 ( − 2 r 2 + 2 r + 1 ) ( 4 r 2 − 2 r + 3 ) this function is negative for all r ≥ 1 + 3 2 , So g atteint its maximum on the extrem of left mean on r = 5
g ( 5 ) = 0.967 < 1 mean x ( r + 1 ) < 1 for all r ≥ 5
So x is not an integer for all value r ≥ 5 .
Remaine the cases when r = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 :
For every value of r we solve the equation x = k ∈ Z + with t ≥ r + 1 this is equivalent to:
t = 9 k r k ( 4 r + 3 ) − 3 r , we need to have t positive integer and t ≥ r + 1 :
For r = 1 , t = 9 k 7 k − 3 any k ≥ 1 integer does not give t ≥ 2
Consider: f ( x ) = 9 x 7 x − 3 , the derivative of f is: f ′ ( x ) = − 27 ( 7 x − 3 ) 2 < 0 for all x > 3 7 , so f is strictly decreasing for all x ≥ 1
Then the maximum of f is atteint in the limit of left when x = 1 then f ( 1 ) = 9 4 = 2.25 and when x → + ∞ then f ( x ) → 9 7 ≈ 1.2857
Since 9 4 = 2.25 and the next integer less than 2.25 is 2, and 2 > 9 7 , we need to check for f ( x ) = 2 :
When f ( x ) = 2 then x = 6 5 ∉ N
So no integer k ≥ 1 gives t = 9 k 7 k − 3 integer and t ≥ 2
For r = 2 , t = 18 k 11 k − 6 any k ≥ 1 integer does not give t ≥ 3
Consider: f ( x ) = 18 x 11 x − 6 , the derivative of f is: f ′ ( x ) = − 108 ( 11 x − 6 ) 2 < 0 , so f is strictly decreasing for all x ≥ 1
Then the maximum of f is atteint in the limit of left when x = 1 then f ( 1 ) = 18 5 = 3.6 and when x → + ∞ then f ( x ) → 18 11 ≈ 1.636
Possible integer values of f ( x ) are 3 and 2 because 3 < 3.6 and 2 > 18 11
We study just the value of x when f ( x ) = 3 (beacuse t ≥ 3 ) then x = 6 5 ∉ N
So no integer k ≥ 1 gives t = 18 k 11 k − 6 integer and t ≥ 3
For r = 3 , t = 27 k 15 k − 9 any k ≥ 1 integer does not give t ≥ 4
Consider: f ( x ) = 27 x 15 x − 9 = 9 x 5 x − 3 , the derivative of f is: f ′ ( x ) = − 27 ( 5 x − 3 ) 2 < 0 , so f is strictly decreasing for all x ≥ 1
Then the maximum of f is atteint in the limit of left when x = 1 then f ( 1 ) = 9 2 = 4.5 and when x → + ∞ then f ( x ) → 9 5 = 1.8
Possible integer values of f ( x ) are 4 and 3 because 4 < 4.5 and 3 > 1.8
We study just the value of x when f ( x ) = 4 (beacuse t ≥ 4 ) then x = 12 11 ∉ N
So no integer k ≥ 1 gives t = 27 k 15 k − 9 integer and t ≥ 4
For r = 4 , t = 36 k 19 k − 12 any k ≥ 1 integer does not give t ≥ 5
Consider: f ( x ) = 36 x 19 x − 12 , the derivative of f is: f ′ ( x ) = − 432 ( 19 x − 12 ) 2 < 0 , so f is strictly decreasing for all x ≥ 1
Then the maximum of f is atteint in the limit of left when x = 1 then f ( 1 ) = 36 7 ≈ 5.142857 and when x → + ∞ then f ( x ) → 36 19 ≈ 1.8947
Possible integer values of f ( x ) are 5 and 4 because 5 < 5.142857 and 4 > 1.8947
We study just the value of x when f ( x ) = 5 (beacuse t ≥ 5 ) then x = 60 59 ∉ N
So no integer k ≥ 1 gives t = 36 k 19 k − 12 integer and t ≥ 5
So no couple ( r , m ) of positive integers give x as a positive integer.
So no couple (x,t) of positive integers exists such that t 2 ( 4 x − 3 ) 2 − 6 t x to be a perfect square. □

4. Conclusions

We have prove that the polynomial t 2 ( 4 x − n ) 2 − 2 n t x does not always admits a perfect square with n ≥ 2 and x , t positive integers.

References

  1. Philemon Urbain MBALLA, Partial Resolution of the Erdős-Straus, Sierpiński, and Generalized Erdős-Straus Conjectures Using New Analytical Formulas, article.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.