Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Overview of the Fabrication of Magnetic Hydrogel, Its Basic Characteristics, and Potential Uses in Biomedical Engineering

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

24 September 2025

Posted:

24 September 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Magnetic hydrogels are stimulus responsive hydrogels with rapid response when placed in a magnetic field. Their properties include those of conventional hydrogels such as biocompatibility, viscoelasticity, high content of water, with the addition of magnetic actuation, magnetothermal conductivity, and magnetic resonance conferred by the magnetic particles. Their use in the biomedical field is constantly growing with various applications such as drug delivery, hyperthermia treatment, theranostic, and tissue engineering. Since the research field of magnetic hydrogels is very dynamic, it is important to review the literature regularly to highlight the most recent insights of the field. In this review, we focused on the latest advances of magnetic hydrogels and give a large overview on their types, fabrication, properties, and applications in hyperthermia, drug delivery, wound healing, MRI, sensors, and tissue engineering (neural, cartilage, bone, and cardiac tissues). We concluded this review with challenges and future developments of magnetic hydrogels.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  
Subject: 
Engineering  -   Bioengineering

1. Introduction

The term ‘hydrogel’ first emerged in the academic literature as early as 1894 [1]. However, at that time it was used for colloidal gels synthesized from inorganic salts of specific metals. Subsequently, the terminology “hydrogel” has evolved to characterize a three-dimensional (3D) network of hydrophilic polymers and gums, developed through physical or chemical cross-linking methodologies, which swell in water but does not dissolve due to the entanglements of the polymer chains [2]. The swelling property of hydrogels is attributed to their very high thermodynamic activity toward the solvent used. For the past years, this swelling characteristic combined with the high versatility and the high tunability of the hydrogel’s properties have induced important research and developments of hydrogels, as well as to their exploitation [3]. A hydrogel has its network created through covalent bonds or noncovalent forces [4]. Noncovalent interactions are mostly under the form of physical entanglements, hydrogen bonds, van der Waal forces, and aromatic, electrostatic, and coordination bonding.
The classification of hydrogels is based on their ability to respond to external stimuli, and they are divided into two types: static and dynamic hydrogels [4]. Static hydrogels are cross-linked through rigid covalent bonds, and their physical and chemical characteristics are barely changed regardless of the surrounding environment [4]. On the contrary, dynamic hydrogels respond to a variety of external stimuli (e.g., pressure, strain, temperature, light, pH, ions, magnetic field), and can exhibit features like self-repairing, self-shaping or behavioral remodeling capacity [4]. Since these dynamic hydrogels demonstrate an immediate reaction to changes in their environment, they are also categorized as smart hydrogels [5]. Several investigations have been conducted on smart hydrogels regarding nanotechnology applications, drug delivery systems, and tissue engineering over the last decades [6]. However, the prolonged response latency and the inadequately regulated architectures of these stimuli-responsive biomaterials constitute the two primary limitations [6].
Recently, magnetically responsive hydrogels (MHs), classified as an innovative category of smart hydrogels, have been used within the biomedical domain to improve the biological functionalities of cells, tissues, or organs (Figure 1). This is due to their capacity to respond to an externally applied magnetic field, thereby facilitating structural functionalities that enable the remote modulation of the physical, biochemical, and mechanical properties of the microenvironment surrounding the cells, tissues, or organs [6,7,8]. Thus, researchers have noted that MHs can serve as superior drug delivery and site-specific carriers. For instance, Gao et al. have fabricated a MH with ferromagnetic vortex-domain iron oxide nanoring’s, which have superior heat induction than conventional super paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) under alternating magnetic field (AMF), and reported effective reduction of the local breast tumor recurrence size under AMF activation [9]. In another study, Manjua et al. developed a magnetic responsive polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) hydrogel that could controlled the adsorption and the release of protein via a cyclic ON/OFF magnetic field activation, and could be useful in tissue engineering, drug delivery, and biosensor systems [10]. Moreover, the use of a biocomposite of a self-healing chitosan-alginate hydrogel with magnetic gelatin microspheres loaded with the anticancer drug 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) showed efficient sustained drug delivery in vitro [11]. MHs have been investigated on various grounds evaluating their efficiency in remote-controlled drug and cell delivery [12], bioseparation [13], magnetic resonance imaging [14], adsorption/separation (like wastewater treatment) [15], and others medical and environmental applications [16]. Thus, to assess the efficiency of chemothermal synergistic therapy for bone tumor treatment based on AMF, Hu et al. fabricated injectable doxorubicin (DOX) encapsulated magnetic alginate hydrogel (DOX@MAH) [17]. Furthermore, Chen et al. conceived and engineered a biodegradable magnetic hydrogel robot (BMHR) which exhibits four stable operational modalities: Tumbling mode, precession mode, spinning-XY mode, and spinning-Z mode. Due to its ability of transitioning smoothly between the different motion modes, BMHR showed great adaptability in complex environment and remarkable efficiency in transporting intended cargo [18]. In another study, Zhang et al. developed a wireless and passive flexible magnetic strain sensor using gelatin methacrylate (GelMA)/Fe3O4 magnetic hydrogel. In this work, the authors provided a demonstration of how magnetic sensing can be used for biomechanical monitoring, and proposed ideas concerning feasible wireless and passive implantable devices [19]. Furthermore, to induce controlled floating cell aggregation Ishihara et al. fabricated cationic magnetic hydrogel microparticles that adsorbed to cells and assessed the effect of an external magnetic field on the cell clustering, and cellular function [20]. Singh et al. fabricated a dual-responsive MH nanocomposite with high pH sensitivity using acrylamide (AA) and vinyl sulfonic acid (VSA) monomers, which underwent polymerization via the Free Radical Polymerization technique. In this process, the monomers were blended in an optimal stoichiometric ratio, and subsequently, synthetized Fe3O4(OH)x nanoparticles were incorporated prior to the polymerization. The MH nanocomposite displayed swelling (pH 7)/deswelling (pH 4.1) behavior under pH variations [21]. In their study, Tang et al. fabricated a hybrid structure of elastomer and magnetic poly (N-isopropyl acrylamide) hydrogel to achieve different shape-morphing structures (2D, and 3D) and magnetic navigation under AMF [22].
MHs have emerged as highly promising materials due to their unique properties, such as rapid responsiveness to a magnetic field and the ability to be remotely controlled [23,24]. They overcome the limitations of conventional static hydrogels and enlarge the group of dynamic hydrogels adding new capacities and allowing new applications in targeted therapies, including hyperthermia, drug delivery, wound healing, MRI, sensors and tissue engineering [25,26]. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of recent advancements in magnetic-responsive hydrogels, focusing on current strategies for their fabrication and their latest biomedical applications such as drug delivery, hyperthermia treatment, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, wound repair, biosensing, and tissue engineering (neural, cartilage, bone, cardiac tissues). Finally, we discuss the existing challenges and future directions for the development of magnetic hydrogels.

2. Fabrication and Characteristics of MHs

2.1. Strategies for Fabrication of Magnetic Hydrogels with Homogeneous Structure

A MH comprises a polymer matrix in which the magnetic part is incorporated. Most commonly, superparamagnetic and biocompatible iron oxide-based magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) like maghemite (γ-Fe2O3), magnetite (Fe3O4), manganese ferrite (MnFe2O4), and cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) are introduced into the polymer matrix to synthesize MHs [27,28]. Magnetite, Fe3O4, is a Fe2+-defective spinel containing one type of Fe (II) site and two independent types of Fe(III) site, of which the former accounts for one third and the latter is taken two thirds. The phenomenon of intervalence charge transfer occurring between Fe2+ and Fe3+ results in absorption within both the ultraviolet-visible spectral domain and the infrared spectral domain, contributing to the manifestation of a black appearance [29].The factors that influence the properties of MHs are (i) the type of hydrogel used and the type of MNPs incorporated, (ii) size distribution and distribution pattern of MNPs in the hydrogel network, and (iii) concentration of hydrogel, MNPs and other components used [30]. The main fabrication methods of MHs include the in-situ precipitation technique, the blending approach, and the grafting strategy (Figure 2) [31].
In the blending method (Figure 2a), the hydrogels and the MNPs are prepared separately. The MNPs are often prepared using a precipitation method and they are instantly mixed with the solubilized hydrogel polymer. A sonication step is used to enhance the dispersion of MNPs in the polymer solution. Then, the polymer solution with the MNPs is crosslinked forming the MH. Due to the separate synthesis of MNPs, the method of preparation of MH provides a way to introduce MNPs with same size in the polymer solution. However, the obtaining of a homogenous distribution of MNPs in the hydrogels is not easy, since the MNPs may agglomerate or diffuse out of the hydrogels when the MHs are put in aqueous solution. In the in-situ precipitation technique (Figure 2b) the hydrogel network is formed first by crosslinking and serves as a chemical reactor in which an inorganic salt containing iron ions will react with precipitating agents such as NaOH or NH4OH, resulting in the formation of MNPs, as elucidated by Haas et al. [30], entrapped in the hydrogel. Thus, after the polymer solution is cross-linked and formed into a hydrogel, the hydrogel is immersed in a solution containing Fe 2+ / Fe 3+ ions, in this case the ions can penetrate the structure of the hydrogels and distribute into it. Then, the hydrogel containing Fe2+/Fe3+ ions are treated with alkali such as NaOH or NH4OH and the magnetite precipitates [30]. The in-situ precipitation technique allows the networks of hydrogels to have optimal distribution of Fe3O4 nanoparticles. However, this approach is only possible when the formed hydrogels have stable networks that are not affected or decomposed by the addition of alkali solutions during the MNP synthesis [32]. Furthermore, the encapsulation of cells during MH formation is not possible due to the use of alkali solutions. In the context of the blending and in situ precipitation methodologies, the occurrence of chemical interactions between the MNPs and the polymeric hydrogel matrix is precluded. Consequently, the distribution of MNPs within the hydrogels cannot be clearly defined. In contrast, in the grafting technique, the incorporation of MNPs is executed in a particularly unique manner, and covalent immobilization of MNPs within the hydrogel matrix is realized (Figure 2c). Likewise, analogous to the blending method, both hydrogels and MNPs are synthesized separately in the grafting approach. In the preparation of MNPs, the functional groups are incorporated into the surface of MNPs at the co-precipitation step and the stability of the MH network is attributed to the covalent bonds formed between the MNPs and the polymeric chains. Regarding the grafting methodology, it is observed that this approach is used less frequently with natural polymer, compared to the blending or in situ precipitation techniques, due to the insufficient availability of reactive sites on natural polymers for such grafting modifications [33].

2.2. Strategies for Fabrication of Magnetic Hydrogels with Ordered Structure

Conventional MHs have homogeneous structures with homogeneous distribution of MNPs. However, this isotropy limits their applications with biological tissues which often have a hierarchical organization. Therefore, researchers also develop anisotropic MHs with MNPs orderly distributed in the hydrogels to enhance their functionalities and interactions with biological anisotropic tissues [7]. As shown in Figure 3, many techniques have been used to fabricate MHs with ordered structure among which 3D bioprinting, microfluidics, and magnetic-field-induced assembly. Over the years and based on the biomedical application required, different techniques were used to obtain hydrogels with different properties and characteristics [7,34].
The magnetic field induced assembly is an easy method to fabricate MHs with ordered structure. The magnetic NPs (ferromagnetic, paramagnetic, superparamagnetic) align along the magnetic field and form chain-like or column-like assembly inside the hydrogel due to the magnetic dipolar interactions, and the hydrogel once crosslinked (heat, light, UV, chemical) fixed the magnetic structure [35,36,37]. Interestingly, Fan et al. have shown that the use of a rotating magnetic field allowed the gathering of the Fe3O4 NPs in the shape of disks (from few micrometers to 23 Preprints 178019 i001) in a polyacrylamide hydrogel [38]. These MHs with oriented structure find applications in tissue engineering [39,40], drug delivery [41,42], hyperthermia [22,43] , and others (e.g., photonic, actuation).
The microfluidic is a powerful method for the generation of polymeric beads (using T junction, co-flows, or flow focusing devices), microgels, and MHs [44]. By precisely controlling the flow in the channel, the number, size, morphology, and structure of the microparticles can be defined and obtained. Thus, MHs with various shapes have been fabricated such as fiber-like, Janus beads, multi-compartment beads, and peanut-like [45,46] . Interestingly, recently more and more complex nano/micro-polymeric particles have been fabricated [47] among which magnetic spring microfibers [48], and magnetic structural color hydrogels for photonic crystal and biomimetic [49].
3D printing is an additive manufacturing technique which allows the fabrication layer-by-layer of complex 3D structures by precise deposition of a matrix under the control of a computer following a design made with a computer aided design (CAD) software. When cells are mixed with the matrix and printed, the technique is named 3D bioprinting [50,51,52]. 3D printing allows the rapid fabrication of MHs with ordered structures, complex geometries, different scales, and multiple materials [53]. Different printing techniques such as inkjet printing (IJP), two photon polymerization (TPP), and direct ink writing (DIW) have been used for the fabrication of MHs. An interesting example is given by Siminska-Stanny et al. who used inks with three different concentrations (0, 10, and 20%) of magnetic fillers and 4D printed by extrusion graded MHs that were further crosslinked with calcium ions solution [54].
Another method for preparing isotropic and anisotropic MHS is freeze-drying. The fabrication of freeze-dried MHS will depend on certain factors (e.g., the temperature, the freezing time, and the melting time) which will affect the physical properties of the hydrogel (e.g., the microstructure, the swelling capacity, and the degradation) [55]. For instance, we may obtain scaffolds with average pore size of 325 µm to 85 µm when the freezing temperature used is −10°C and obtain an average pore size of 85 µm when the freezing temperature used is −70°C. The phenomenon is likely to be caused by temperature leading to a larger ice crystal within the scaffold [56]. Moreover, the freeze-drying method is often used to introduce pores of different size in the hydrogel, which will enhance the diffusion rate of encapsulated active molecules within the scaffolds [57]. Freeze drying technique has been applied to the fabrication of MHS. Thus, Wu et al. fabricated anisotropic PVA hydrogels with carbonyl iron particles forming aligned chains in the hydrogel which improve the compression property and the magnetorheological effects [58]. Chen et al. designed innovative hydrogels for bladder cancer treatment by developing a targeted drug-delivery system. As illustrated in Figure 4 these hydrogels were enriched with catechol moieties to enhance adhesion properties. Additionally, iron tetraoxide nanoparticles (Fe₃O₄ NPs), commonly utilized in biomedical research, were incorporated to provide targeting capability. The hydrogels were synthesized through a simple and cost-effective process using readily available materials. Their micromorphology and potential crosslinking were thoroughly characterized. This novel self-adhesive targeted drug-deli- very hydrogel presents a promising approach to enhancing drug therapy efficiency for bladder cancer while reducing patient discomfort during treatment [59].
In electrospinning, the polymer is injected in a charged spinneret due to a high electrical potential (15-30 kV) applied between the spinneret and the metallic collector. When the electrical potential overcomes the surface tension, a polymeric jet is ejected from the spinneret and undergoes elongation and solvent evaporation forming a nanofiber [60,61,62]. The genesis of the nanofibers along with the specific nanofiber morphology will be determined by the polymeric concentration, the electrical conductivity, the viscosity, the molecular weight, the solvent volatility, and the structural composition of the polymer solution [63]. Electrospinning has important applications in tissue engineering, and drug delivery [64], and nanofibers with MHs have been fabricated. For example, Sousa et al. fabricated PCL/gelatin nanofibers incorporating SPIONs for neural tissue regeneration [65]. In skeletal muscle tissue engineering, anisotropic materials that replicate natural tissue architecture hold significant potential. Electrospun scaffolds designed to mimic the extracellular matrix’s fibrillar structure are frequently used. Silk fibroin (SF) has gained attention in tissue engineering due to its exceptional biocompatibility, mechanical resilience, and biodegradability. Thus, in their study, Yang et al. developed a simple yet effective approach to fabricate directional tissue scaffolds using SF. By integrating a magnetic field collection system and incorporating Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles into the spinning solution, they successfully generated well-aligned silk nanofiber scaffolds. These aligned fibers not only enhanced the scaffold orientation and mechanical strength but also demonstrated magnetic responsiveness. Furthermore, the aligned SF scaffolds facilitated mesenchymal stem cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation along the fiber direction. Myoblast C2C12 cells cultured on these scaffolds exhibited directional growth (Figure 5) [66].
The micropatterning technique can also be used to fabricate ordered magnetic hydrogel. Luo et al. introduced aligned nano-ferroferric oxide (Fe3O4) assemblies onto a micropatterned poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) hydrogel, creating micro-/nano-stripes. Further enhancement with a gold coating improved cellular adhesion, orientation, and organization within these structures, effectively limiting smooth muscle cell (SMC) adhesion to the Fe3O4-patterned channels while preventing excessive attachment to the thin PEG ridges. This structural design facilitated cytoskeletal alignment and actin filament elongation, promoting the organized formation of muscle bundles and encouraging SMCs to adopt synthetic phenotypes. Muscle patches derived from these micro-/nano-stripes were transplanted into a rat esophageal defect model (Figure 6) (i), where in vivo studies confirmed their high viability and effectiveness in accelerating esophageal tissue regeneration (ii). This approach offers a promising strategy for constructing muscle patches with precise alignment and enhanced muscle bundle formation, advancing the field of muscle tissue engineering [67].
Noh et al. explored the role of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in promoting pro-angiogenic responses during tissue repair. EPC transplantation has gained significant attention in wound healing applications, and an optimal scaffold design that supports cell retention and function is essential for effective in situ delivery. In this study, an alginate/poly-l-ornithine/gelatin (alginate-PLO-gelatin) hydrogel sheet with a groove pattern was developed as a cell delivery platform. The topographical modification of the hydrogel surface was designed to regulate cell proliferation, alignment, and elongation. The patterned substrate facilitated morphological changes in endothelial cells (Figure 7), strengthened cell–cell interactions, and stimulated the secretion of growth factors such as platelet-derived growth factor subunit BB (PDGF-BB). Additionally, MNPs were integrated into the patterned hydrogel sheet, enabling magnetic field-assisted transfer of cell-seeded hydrogels. This innovative approach resulted in improved wound healing through efficient EPC transplantation using an MNP-embedded patterned hydrogel sheet (MPS). Ultimately, EPC-seeded MPS enhanced vascularization and accelerated dermal wound repair [68].

2.3. Fundamental Characteristic of MHS

The most incorporated characteristic that differentiates a hydrogel from other liquid media (e.g., polymer melts or solutions, suspension, and films) is the achieved storage modulus (G’) and loss modulus (G’’) which define the elasticity and the viscoelasticity of the hydrogels respectively as depicted in Figure 8. For instance, the frequency that is obtained from the cross of the real part of the elastic modulus (G’) and the loss modulus (G”) is deemed as the gelation point of hydrogels [69].

2.3.1. Surface Properties

Surface chemistries of a material significantly account to its biocompatibility. The connection of a biological component (e.g., protein, cell, and tissue) to a hydrogel occurs on its surface which is deemed as the primary and initial surface. Therefore, the physicochemical characteristics of the hydrogel, as well as the surface features play a critical role in cell adhesion and proliferation. For example, some hyaluronic (HA) hydrogels may be of comparatively more crystalline and therefore more surface ordered while others are comparatively more amorphous. Similarly, their surfaces can be more rough or smooth. Moreover, hydrogels can also be more hydrophilic or hydrophobic. Thus, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) is an hydrophilic polymer while polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) or polyurethane (PU) are hydrophobic polymers [70]. In addition, the surface of the hydrogel may be electrically charged [71]. The hydrogel surface can also provide to cells motifs to adhesion or not. Thus, to improve the cell attachment on some hydrogels like PEG hydrogels functional groups (like Arg-Gly-Asp peptide) have been introduced onto their surfaces [72]. These different surface properties will determine the efficiency of the hydrogel surface for protein and cell adhesion, and later the cell organization and tissue formation [73,74].

2.3.2. Biocompatibility

Biocompatibility is broadly classified into two types namely, bulk biocompatibility and interfacial biocompatibility. The capacity of a material to apply load and influence the physiological and mechanical conditions of the systems it encapsulates is called bulk biocompatibility, or mechanical biocompatibility. Thus, parameters such as Young’s modulus, tensile strength, ductility, fatigue life, fretting fatigue life, wear properties, and functionalities correlate to mechanical biocompatibility [75]. In contrast, protein adsorption and cell adhesion are considered under interfacial biocompatibility and are important to understand the material’s interactions with the surrounding biological world. On the purpose of biomedical usage, biocompatibility seems to be more related with interfaced compatibility than compatibility in bulk [76,77]. Thus, the blood compatibility for example, means the ability of a material to be in a direct contact with the blood without inducing coagulation, thrombosis, and change in blood composition or blood function. Hydrogels that are in direct contact with blood should demonstrate a good blood biocompatibility, especially the hemostatic dressings [78,79]. Moreover, the histocompatibility of a material means that the material does not induce an immune response by interfering with the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). MHs are fabricated from natural (e.g., fibrin, chitosan, hyaluronic acid, and collagen) and synthetic biomaterials (e.g., PEG, PGA) used as a matrix for encapsulating the magnetic component and this matrix must be biocompatible as also its degradation byproducts (Figure 9) [80]. In addition, although the concentration of MNPs in most of the MHs is often less than 1% wt, the biosafety of MNPs is a consequence of the different MNPs released during MHs degradation. Especially, ferric MNPs at substantial concentrations may increase the generation of excess reactive oxygen species (ROS) [81]. In general, small MNPs (<10 nm) are rapidly removed through renal clearance whereas large MNPs (>200 nm) are sequestered by the spleen. A typical final biodistribution of MNPs is 80-90% in the liver, 5-8% in the spleen and 1-2% in bone marrow [82].

2.3.3. Diffusive Properties

Hydrogels are well known as drug delivery systems. This application based on the control of solute diffusion through the hydrogel matrix. Since solutes, gel polymers, and solvents are the factors that mainly influence the diffusion process, this process is affected by their mutual interactions. Swelling control leads to the drug release governed by diffusion and macromolecular relaxation which gives rise to zero-order circumstances of release [83]. Among the drug delivery systems, the diffusion-mediated hydrogel systems may be categorized as either reservoir type or matrix type. For the reservoir type systems, the drug is contained in a reservoir which has an aperture closed by a hydrogel membrane through which the drug diffuses [84]. In contrast, for the matrix type device, the drug is homogeneously mixed in the polymer and diffuses through the whole device.

2.3.4. Biodegradability

The polymeric chains of the hydrogels have some bonds that are labile and become broken in aqueous phase or in the presence of specific enzymes (e.g., metalloproteinases, collagenase, hyaluronidases) or by several internal and external stimuli, which results in their degradation. The level and velocity of hydrogels’ degradation in the process of tissue engineering are of special importance. As hydrogels are the scaffold for the growth of tissues, they, at some point, must be biodegradable [85]. Indeed, cells require space to grow, therefore ideally the hydrogel degradation must synchronously match the cell division during tissue repair. Thus, the hydrogel degradation time affects the engineering of tissue, which requires a certain time to be successful. Furthermore, in drug release studies, the degradation of the hydrogels also plays an active role in the drug release. This hydrogel degradation can be stimulated or slowed down depending on the surrounding conditions of use. It has been reported that through altering the gel content or by using a laser, the breaking down of the hydrogel might be controlled [86].

2.3.5. Stimuli Sensitivity

Smart hydrogels are hydrogels that shown physical and chemical change in response to outside conditions. Such stimuli include endogenous factors pertain to elements such as metal ions, enzymes, pH levels, antigens, among others, or exogenous factors such as temperature, irradiation, magnetic fields, electric fields, and other additional influences [87,88]. These smart hydrogels have broad applications in sensing, drug delivery, wound healing, shape memory, and tissue engineering. Furthermore, hydrogels that respond to multi-stimuli have also been developed [74].

2.4. Properties and Functionalities of Magnetic Hydrogels

The MHs possess several properties and functionalities such as the hydrogel mechanical properties, adsorption behavior, magnetocaloric effect, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), smart hydrogel response, and biocompatibility [89].

2.4.1. Mechanical Properties

The mechanical properties represent a collection of essential metrics, defined as the capacity of a material to endure various loads (such as tensile, compressive, torsional, impact, and cyclic loads, among others). Generally, the mechanical characteristics of hydrogels encompass strength, stiffness, toughness, and fatigue resistance, as illustrated in Figure 10, and these mechanical properties significantly influence both the functionality and longevity of hydrogels [90]. Currently, there are four primary approaches to enhance the mechanical properties of hydrogels:
(1)
The ‘‘sacrificial bond’’ is used to reduce the increasing energy in the hydrogels by dissipation which enhances the mechanical characteristics of the hydrogels. Different non-covalent bonds such as hydrogen bond self-assembly, complexation, supramolecular recognition, and hydrophobic association have been used in the design of high-strength hydrogels [90].
(2)
The “pulley effect” also helps to lower the internal stress in the crosslinking network and improve significantly the mechanical properties of hydrogels. Thus, topological hydrogel such as polyrotaxane is formed by many cyclic molecules threaded on a single polymer chain terminated by bulky end groups. Such hydrogel has high strength due to O ring-shaped crosslinking points that have high mobility along the polymer chain and equalize the tension in the hydrogel [91].
(3)
The reversible non covalent bonds can also give high strength to the hydrogels and a self-healing character by reform after breaking [92].
(4)
The hydrogels mechanical properties also change when NPs are incorporated into them. Several authors have incorporated nanofillers (e.g., MWCNTs, SWCNTs, GO, metal particles, Laponite, polymeric nanoparticles, clay) in the hydrogels to achieve better mechanical properties. These nanocomposite hydrogels are made through the process of radical polymerization of the monomer solution incorporating nanoparticles. Specifically, the reagents are adsorbed onto the surface of the nanoparticles then they start the process of polymerization. It was found that the capping of the polymer ends occurred on the nanoparticles with the formation of clay/brush particles when clay was used as a nanofiller and the interactions that occur were adsorption/desorption and were in no way covalent [93].

2.4.2. Adsorption

Due to their high-water absorption and swelling property, hydrogels have been widely used for example in food storage, and as protective for agriculture in areas affected by droughts. In addition, due to their high adsorption capacity, hydrogels have a great development prospect in the field of wastewater treatment [94]. The procedure of water purification (e.g., removal of heavy metals, pesticides, nitrates, antibiotics, and dyes) based on MH adsorption (e.g., hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, and electrostatic interactions) is described Figure 11. Thus, the fabricated MHs were incorporated into wastewater, and the mixture was subjected to end-over-end shaking to facilitate optimal adsorption of contaminants. Subsequently, the technique of magnetic separation was used to isolate the contaminated hydrogels from the purified water. Moreover, to regenerate the MHs for subsequent utilization, a regeneration solution was applied to eliminate the adsorbed contaminants from the hydrogel surface, followed by magnetic separation to recover the recycled adsorbent materials. Because MHs are cost-effective, repeatedly reusable, and highly efficient adsorbents, they are increasingly used in wastewater treatment processes.
In addition, due to the selectivity of the magnetic separation procedures in the recovery of desirable proteins from biological solutions, MH materials have generated lot of enthusiasm in the separation of proteins. Thus, Mahdavinia et al. developed a chitosan/PVA/magnetic laponite RD hydrogel for the adsorption of bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a protein model. Their study showed that the adsorption capacity for BSA increased with the increase of magnetic laponite RD beads in the hydrogel and that the maximum of BSA adsorption was 127. 3 mg·g−1 at pH 4.5 [95]. Moreover, it is also possible to apply the absorption capacity of MHs to enzyme immobilization [96].

2.4.3. Magnetocaloric Effects

The magnetocaloric effect (MCE) is the trend of a magnetic material to become hot or cool when placed in an AMF [97,98]. This phenomenon has important applications in medicine especially in tumor ablation, and in drug delivery systems. Thus, in nanomedicine many studies have used SPIONs for tumor ablation by increasing locally the heat after irradiation with near infrared light (NIR), electromagnetic or radio frequency waves. Moreover, these NPs can be functionalized to enhance their selectivity toward cancerous cells and for multitasking such as cell separation and imaging [99]. However, there are several issues related with the use of SPIONs for hyperthermal therapy, since they showed high clearance rate in vivo, low time resolution if used with AFM, and may require multiple injections. Moreover, when using MHs the hydrogel matrix with its internal three-dimensional interconnected structure with high water content ratio can be loaded with a drug and the magnetocaloric effect can be adjusted to maintain and regulate the release of one or several drugs [14]. Thus, MHs can combine hyperthermia therapy (with an effective therapeutic heat temperature usually around 42 °C) due to its magnetic component and drug delivery therapy with its hydrogel component. Advantageously, this combined strategy using nanoMHs allow reaching tumors located deep in the body like liver cancer or glioma. Incidentally, several in vitro cell studies have also identified that mild thermal stimulation might enhance the osteochondral regeneration [100]. Another application of the magnetocaloric effect is in stimuli responsive chromic materials in the field of display. Thus, Wang et al. have developed a magnetochromic photonic hydrogels that displays colorimetric responses (Figure 12) when placed in an AMF [101]. Thus, under magnetic field, Fe3O4@SiO2 colloids formed 1D magnetic chains in a thermosensitive copolymer of N-isopropylacrylamide (PNIPAM)/polyethylene diacrylate (PEGDA). This photonic structure was fixed with UV irradiation. Then placed in an AMF, the magnetocaloric effect of the aggregated magnetic chains cause change in the hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance of the hydrogel leading to a decrease in the inter-particle distance of the magnetic chains in the MHs which induced a shift in the diffraction wavelength toward the blue side of the spectrum (Figure 12).

2.4.4. Swelling Behavior

Hydrogels have swelling property in aqueous environment. This swelling is naturally occurring, compressible and dissipative, and the hydrogels can hold large amounts of aqueous fluids within their interconnected structure without chemical change. The swelling is mainly attributed to the rather low cross-linking density of the hydrogel network and the significant number of the hydrophilic functional groups (including amino, hydroxyl, and carboxyl) present on the macromolecular scaffolds. Thus, the hydrogel swelling increases when the hydrogel crosslink decreases, and this swelling can lead to categorize certain hydrogels as high swelling hydrogels (HSHs) with a swelling ratio > 150% [102]. These HSHs can be formed from natural polymers and synthetic polymers or from a mixture of both. The swelling capacity of a hydrogel is an important property in tissue engineering, and in drug delivery systems. However, a constant swelling or a low swelling may be required especially during the hydrogel degradation when the polymer chains become less entangled. To this end, non-swelling hydrogel (NHSs) with a swelling ratio of 0-150 % have been fabricated and are a specialized form of hydrogels that undergoes very little swelling in water [103]. Some common strategies among others for the fabrication of NSHs include the increase of the crosslinking density of the hydrogel which limits the intake of water molecules and improves the mechanical properties of the hydrogel, the modulation of the polymer/water ratio with the introduction of hydrophobic segments in the hydrophilic polymer chains, and the use of thermosensitive polymers with low critical solution temperature (LCST) that will shrink above LCST impairing the swelling [102,103].

2.4.5. Intelligent Response

As notified previously section 1.1, dynamic hydrogels respond to a variety of external stimuli (e.g., pressure, strain, temperature, light, pH, ions, magnetic field). Such hydrogels found applications in tissue engineering, soft actuation, and drug delivery [104]. Among various external stimuli applicable to stimuli-responsive materials, the magnetic field exhibits advantages such as immediacy, non-contact control, and compatibility with electronic devices. As a result, the development of new MHs have gained considerable momentum in recent years, as shown Figure 13 [105]. Over the past several decades, tissue engineering techniques have been used extensively in the repair and regeneration of diverse tissues, including retinas, ligaments, adipose tissue, and vascular structures. On one hand, magnetic hydrogels possess the capability for directional movement and can be directed into specific tissue-like microstructures (e.g., multilayers, aggregates) through the application of magnetic fields to facilitate tissue reconstruction [68]. Li et al. developed a new hydrogel actuator that was designed with the ability to release anticancer drugs through both NIR and electromagnetic actuation (EMA) and for the retrieval of the MNPs from the hydrogel microrobot. For movement in the three dimensions, the EMA system uses Helmholtz coils and Maxwell coils. The Helmholtz coil pair creates a constant magnetic field density while the Maxwell coil creates graded flux magnetic density. While the positioning of the microrobot to the required direction can be made by the Helmholtz coils the actual movement of the microrobot in the desired direction can be made along the Maxwell coils. Thus, through the EMA magnetic field the microrobot navigated to the targeted position at 600 Preprints 178019 i001/s. Following NIR irradiation, the hydrogel matrix underwent degradation resulting in the retention of drug-loaded particles and magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) at the tumor site. Ultimately, after 6 hours of treatment facilitated by EMA, the disintegrated MNPs were segregated from the targeted site, while the residual anticancer drug-loaded particles persisted in releasing the drug to exert therapeutic effects. This hydrogel actuator addresses the limitations associated with MNPs potential accumulation and toxicity, by eliminating MNPs while simultaneously preserving the benefits conferred by electromagnetic drive, including targeted delivery and drug release [106,107].

3. Biomedical Applications of MHs

The biomedical applications of polymeric materials can be performed with improved effectiveness with the incorporation of MNPs [108]. Indeed, the hydrogel part of MHs can be used for the diffusion of small molecules in and out of the gel matrix while the MNPs can react to a magnetic field passing through biological tissues and organs [109]. This fusion leads to a versatile material for several applications including the delivery of drugs, hyperthermia treatment, imaging, wound healing, biosensing and tissue engineering (Figure 14). In the following sections, we detail different applications of MHs.

3.1. MHs in Drug Delivery

Hydrogels are well known for their efficiency as drug carriers and drug delivery [110,111]. Especially, lot of developments for drug delivery are made in stimuli responsive hydrogels [112]. However, due to the nature of the stimuli (e.g., pH, light, ultrasound, near red radiation) the application of the hydrogel becomes specific to a biological tissue (Figure 15). Interestingly, this limitation of tissue specific stimuli can be overcome by using hydrogels loaded with nanoparticles which enhanced the responsiveness of the hydrogels [113]. Especially, hydrogels containing magnetic particles have been used in various applications and numerous reports have shown that drug delivery can be accomplished with MHs. For example, Ganguly et al. have enumerated works based on SPIONs-arrested hydrogel matrices as some of the promising materials in smart soft biomaterials. They reported on the fabrication of superparamagnetic amine functionalized maghemite nanoparticles (SPIONs) and about their encapsulation in a semi-IPN hydrogel of poly (acrylic acid-co-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) for drug release application. They showed that SPIONs acted as a mechanical reinforcing and as a rheological modifying agent of the hydrogels. Furthermore, they observed that two factors controlled the drug release behavior of the hydrogel which includes the changes in pH and in static magnetic fields. Especially, at low SPIONs concentration the drug release was mainly dependent of the pH, while at high SPIONs concentration (~1%) the drug release was mainly dependent of the magnetic field [42]. In another study, Lin et al. described a method to enhance the functionality of cellulose hydrogels for remote drug release application. They fabricated magnetic β-cyclodextrin (β-CD)/cellulose hydrogel beads with a one-step procedure. These hydrogels showed fast swelling and deswelling behavior and allowed modulated drug delivery in an external magnetic field (EMF). Furthermore, the presence of grafted β-CD enhanced the drug loading while the drug release dose and rate could be adjusted by turning the EMF on and off, and by varying the Fe3O4 nanoparticle concentration. In addition, cytotoxicity tests confirmed the non-toxicity of the material [114]. Furthermore, Ribeiro et al. fabricated an injectable xanthan gum hydrogel with Fe3O4-based MNPs. This composite hydrogel was designed to deliver drugs via hyperthermia and to be visualized with MRI. The hydrogel showed high loading efficiency with hydrophilic drug and MNPs. In addition, when a MH containing 10% MNPs was put under an AMF, the temperature increased to 60 °C showing good hyperthermia potential. Furthermore, the hydrogel shortened the water proton relaxation time suggesting its potential for application as a T2-MRI contrast agent at clinical field strength of 3 Tesla. Finally, the drug release was enhanced 3 times under magnetic field compared to no magnetic activation [115]. Moreover, Chen et al. fabricated a PVA hydrogel encapsulating Fe3O4 MNPs. When this hydrogel was subjected to on-off intervals of magnetic field, the pore size of the hydrogel decreased under the activation of the magnetic field and therefore less drug was released. The study showed that when the MH was injected in nude mice bearing hepatoma the gathered of the MNPs around the tumor combined with the effect of an extremely low-frequency altering electric magnetic field (ELFF) significantly inhibited the tumor cell proliferation compared to other mice groups, and prolonged their survival time [116]. Another feature of drug-loaded MHs is the ability of drug-controlled sites in living organisms after the introduction of the MHs into an external magnetic field [117]. Indeed, when the magnetic field is applied to media containing MHs, the spins rotate and reorient themselves. In addition, the hysteresis loop of the system changes and thus it is possible to remotely control the targeted delivery systems [118].

3.2. MHs in Hyperthermia

Over the past decades, cancer is the number one reason for incidence of death and daily the death toll is increasing. Cancer is usually treated using surgery and other forms of cancer therapy such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy. However, a less invasive therapy is hyperthermia which use the rise of temperature locally to destroy cancerous cells with a minimum impact on the surrounding normal cells [119]. In addition, it is possible to combine hyperthermia and drug delivery to obtain synergistic effects [120]. Recurrent problems in bone tumor therapy are tumor recurrence and metastases, and tumor localization which can be rather deep in the body. Recently, Hu et al. fabricated an injectable doxorubicin (DOX)-loaded magnetic alginate hydrogel (DOX@MAH) for bone tumor application. This hydrogel showed a high drug loading capacity and effective controlled release of DOX. Applied in vivo on tumor bearing mice, the injection of DOX@MAH showed efficient antitumor activity under AMF with the combination of hyperthermia and chemical therapy [17]. Similarly, to tackle melanoma and metastases with hyperthermia and drug therapy Sumitha et al. developed magnetic patches of chitosan-TEMPO oxidized nanocellulose film loaded with SPIONs and with DOX. These patches, containing uniform SPIONs were characterized and showed biodegradability, cytocompatibility, and higher hydrogel swollen ratio at tumor pH than at physiological pH. Moreover, the patches were superparamagnetic, with a saturation magnetization of 23.3 emu/g. The drug release study with an encapsulated dye used as a model drug showed that under an EMF of 50 mT more than 12% of the total dye loaded amount were released in 1 h, while without EMF a similar release level would have taken more than 24 h. The patches were also tested for hyperthermia activity, and it was observed that the patches under EMF were able to raise the temperature above 42°C in seven minutes. Furthermore, with a 50 Preprints 178019 i002g/mL DOX loaded patches, the viability of B16F10 murine melanoma cells was reduced of 79.55 % in five days [121]. Mild hyperthermia usually uses a thermal window of 41-46 °C. However, tumor cells under heat stress may activate autophagy process as a mechanism of defense and restoration that may result in some thermal resistance. To overcome this and to boost mild magnetic hyperthermia therapy (MHT) Wang et al. chose to fabricate a nitric oxide (NO) releasing MH because NO impairs the autophagy process. Thus, they developed an injectable hydrogel of thermosensitive poly(ethylene glycol)-polypeptide copolymers modified with NO groups on their side chains (Figure 16). They also synthesized ferrimagnetic Zno.5Fe2.5O4 MNPs (cubes, 70 nm) that are very popular for their ability to deliver high magnetic–thermal conversion and incorporated them directly within the hydrogel to form MNPs@NO-Gel. The MNPs@NO-Gel was tested in vivo in mice bearing CT-26 tumor cells (~100 mm3) who received three mild MHT treatment (20 min at 42.5 °, H 17.6 kA/m, f 282 kHz) at days 0, 2, and 4 after the injection of MNPs@NO-Gel. At day 14 mice were euthanized and tumor analyzed. The results showed that in the group of mice treated by MNPs@NO-Gel with MHT three times, the tumors were eliminated, and the survival of mice was 100% with no recurrence. Furthermore, the study globally showed that several sessions of MHT were possible after only one injection of gel due to the homogeneous distribution and strong adhesion of MNPs in the gel-phase. Moreover, nitric oxide (NO) was continuously released from NO-Gel and this release was boosted by MHT. The degradation of MNPs@NOGel in vivo was slow with 30% of MNPs@NO-Gel remaining after 35 days, whereas the dispersion of the released MNPs concentrated in the spleen. Due to the released of NO controlling the autophagy activity, there was suppression of the formation of autophagosomes and lysosomes during MHT, which boosted the efficiency of MHT [122]. In a recent study, Barra et al. assessed the performances of chitosan-based magnetic composite films in terms of film thickness, MNPs content, and heating efficiency. Especially, the spatiotemporal heating was evaluated with a thermal camera and heat map were generated. Furthermore, the polymeric films were used in MHT treatment under AMF (663 kHz, 12.8 kA/m) with MNT-1 human melanoma cells. The polymeric films of chitosan/glycerol/MNPs obtained with a casting method were very thin with thicknesses ranging from 34 Preprints 178019 i001 to 93 Preprints 178019 i001. The thermal efficiency of the films increases significantly when exposed to an AMF with a maximum of 82 °C recorded within 270 s. The temperature increased with the increase of the film thickness and the increase on MNPs content. Moreover, in the MHT treatment experiment with the 78 Preprints 178019 i001 film thickness (labelled 2.25 M-0.75G-T), the temperature reached 42 °C within 300 s, and after this temperature was maintained for 10 min, the viability of MNT-1 cells decreased drastically to 8% [123].

3.3. MHs in MRI

Molecular imaging in general and non-invasive imaging in particular is an advantage that might come with the best feedback for clinical diagnosis. With the advantages of safety, functional sequences, good contrast, and penetration depth, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most powerful detection methods in contemporary clinical diagnosis. However, in practical situation the relaxation time of different tissues or tumors are of the same magnitude which makes the diagnosis very complex. Hence contrast agents began to be developed to enhance the signal contrast to improve the image resolution. Due to their biocompatible and superparamagnetic properties, Fe3O4 based superparamagnetic contrast agents are used in cancer detections, monitoring of drug delivery, and labelling of steel stents. Thus, research on contrast agents is a dynamic field of research [124]. Yan, et al. studied the labelling of MSCs with SPIONs as a method of MRI tracking of transplanted cells in tissue repair research and clinical trial (Figure 17). Previously, the authors reported that the MSC labelling with clinically safe SPIONs (ferumoxytol) was possible by using only transfection reagents or magnetic field, which greatly limited their application in clinic. To overcome this problem, this new study showed that the magnetic labelling of MSC spheroids using ferumoxytol was done by encapsulating the ferumoxytol into the spheroids and by its binding with the ECM. The results showed strong MRI T2 signals of the labelled MSC spheroids and higher biosafety for the MSCs, demonstrating the potential application of this method in post-transplantation MRI in the clinic [125]. Recently, Mistral et al. studied the effects of a polymeric coating of chitosan (CS) on SPIONs for a use as MRI contrast agent. They used CS with same degree of polymerization DPw = 450) and with different degree of acetylation ( 1%, 14%, 34%). The synthesized SPIONs were spherical with a size of 5–10 nm and with a highly crystalline magnetite phase. The CS coating improved the biological properties of the SPIONs but the thickness of the coating decreased the magnetic property. The authors concluded that the best CS coating of SPIONs was for a thin shell (20%) of low degree of acetylation (1%), [126].

3.4. MHs in Wound Healing

The process of wound healing naturally occurs after injury and is usually divided in four stages, which overlap each other: These involve hemostasis, inflammation, cell proliferation as well as tissue remodeling. However, if the trauma is too important, for example in cases of excessive inflammation, burns, accident that leads to the loss of large area of skin tissue, infection, and diabetes – then the process of wound healing will be affected. Wound dressings can provide a barrier by simply covering the wound which prevents other irritating materials to enter in contact with the wound area, and they can in addition provide a morphogenic pattern where skin cells arrange themselves in a particular order. An ideal skin wound dressing should meet the following requirements: (1) The dressing cannot be toxic or cause inflammation; (2) the dressing provides good moisture retention and allows some absorption of wound exudate; (3) the dressing has sufficient physical and mechanical strength to ensure its integrity and avoid the intrusion of external bacteria caused by materials’ breakage; and (4) the dressing has appropriate surface microstructure and biochemical properties to promote cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation [127]. Various wound dressings formats include gauze, semipermeable membranes, semipermeable foams, hydrocolloids, and hydrogels [128]. Among them, hydrogels have emerged as the most promising candidates for wound dressings because of these three characteristics: good hydrophilicity, excellent biocompatibility as well as its 3D porous structure mimicking the ECM [129]. Recent developments occurred with the fabrication of hybrid hydrogels and smart hydrogels (like MHs), and their use in wound healing. These hydrogels consist of natural and/or synthetic polymers which can get some functions enhanced by the addition of active nanofillers [130]. Different approaches for the synthesis of antibacterial hydrogels have been reported by the incorporation of antibacterial agents (e.g., antibiotic, antibacterial drugs, and metal nanoparticles) in the hydrogel network through physical chemical crosslinking [131]. Thus, Yang et al. incorporated a thin shell of SiO2 onto the Fe3O4 nanoparticles to obtain Fe3O4 @SiO2 MNPs. These MNPs were then functionalized with a thin layer of MXene (Ti3C2) to produce (MNPs@MXene) with a high photothermal conversion efficiency (PTCOE). The MNPs@MXene were incorporated into thermo-sensitive PNIPAM/alginate composite hydrogel (Figure 18). Moreover, to impart antibacterial characteristic to the hydrogel, AgNPs were loaded into the hydrogel to form PNIPAM/alginate/MNPs@MXene/AgNPs. Thus, MNPs get heated up on exposure to NIR light or through magnetic stimulation from an AMF, and the hydrogel swells inducing a controlled release of the encapsulated AgNPs which provides a proper antibacterial response [132].
Pires et al., 2024 investigated the regulation of angiogenesis as a potential strategy for therapeutic applications in cancer treatment and wound healing (Figure 19). In this study, MSCs were cultured on magnetically responsive gelatin scaffolds, with and without heparin functionalization, and exposed to a static 0.08 T magnetic field (MF) to modulate cellular behavior. For the first time, the impact of heparin and MNPs distribution within gelatin scaffolds on hydrogel mechanical properties, MSC morphology, proliferation, and secretome profiling was analyzed. The results revealed that incorpora- ting MNPs and heparin influenced hydrogel swelling behavior and MSC proliferation rates. Additionally, MF provided a topographical stimulus, aligning MSCs and upregulating genes and proteins associated with angiogenesis. Interestingly, higher heparin concentrations (10 μg/cm³) restricted angiogenic factor diffusion into the culture medium. Ultimately, acellular heparinized hydrogels effectively retained angiogenic growth factors secreted by magnetically stimulated MSCs, leading to superior wound contraction (55.8% ± 0.4%) and cell migration (49.4% ± 0.4%) compared to non-heparinized hydrogels (35.2% ± 0.7% and 37.8% ± 0.7%, respectively). These findings suggest that heparinized MH hold significant potential for promoting angiogenesis and enhancing tissue regeneration in bone defects, skin wounds, and cardiovascular diseases [133].
Anisotropic Gel-ODex-MPG hydrogels, developed by Li X. et al. (Figure 20) integrating magnetoelectric nanosheets (Fe₃O₄-PDA-rGO) into gelatin-oxidized dextran under a magnetic field, exhibit multifunctionality for wound healing. These hydrogels possess anisotropic mechanical and conductive properties, along with strong photothermal antibacterial activity under near-infrared (808 nm) light. They not only accelerate healing of infected wounds but also monitor human motion, enabling real-time wound status assessment and rehabilitation training. Inspired by natural soft tissue structures, this study marks the first combination of anisotropic hydrogels with wearable sensors, offering a novel approach for simultaneous treatment and recovery monitoring in wound management and personalized healthcare applications [134].

3.5. MHs in Bio-Sensing

The creation of MHs has gradually accelerated because of their versatility in the field of sensing [135]. A sensor is composed of a recognition part which detects the targeted analyte, and of a transducer part which converts the detection event into a measurable signal [136,137,138]. Among sensors, biosensors are highly sensitive, rapid and accurate diagnostic tools for detecting biomarkers and pathogens with real-time monitoring enhancing the diagnosis of diseases [139]. Thus, Kim et al., fabricated a PGA–chitosan (CS) hydrogel nanoparticles for encapsulating both glucose oxidase (GOx) and MNPs in the hydrogel matrix for the detection of glucose. GOx and MNPs were mixed with the PGA solution, which was then added drop wise into the CS solution to form rapidly gelling hydrogel nanoparticles. In presence of glucose, the GOx converts the glucose into gluconolactone producing hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) which activates the peroxidase-like activity of MNPs to oxidize the chromogenic substrate 2,2 -azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) diammonium salt (ABTS) into a green-colored product. Using this approach, the glucose was found to be measurable in the linear range from 5 to 100 Preprints 178019 i002M with an LOD of 3 M, allowing to diagnose hyperglycemia in human blood. Furthermore, the sensor showed high stability and magnetic reusability [140]. In another study, Zhang et al. fabricated wireless and passive flexible strain sensor based on gelatin methacrylate (GelMA)/Fe3O4 as MH. These sensors have the advantages of real-time and continuous monitoring without the disadvantages of wires and power supplies. The sensor is compliant with ultrasoft mechanical behavior (Young’s modulus 1.2 kPa), possesses robust magnetic attributes (12.74 emu/g), good biocompatibility, long term stability (>20 days), can function for long hours in saline solution, and it is sensitive enough to detect small strains down to 50 μm. The study comprises a model on the appropriate positioning of the sensors and on its magnetic permeability and sensitivity. Moreover, cardiomyocytes were seeded on the strain sensor and the effects of the cell density, contractibility, and drugs were evaluated. This research showed the feasibility of using a magnetic-sensing approach for biomechanical measurements and highlights the developments of wireless and fully passive implantable devices [19]. Recently, Hosseini et al. fabricated a magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) sensor (Figure 21) for the enantiomeric detection of the essential amino acid L-Tryptophan (L-Trp). The sensor was developed utilizing oriented biochar derived from Loofah (LBC), Fe3O4, and molecularly imprinted polydopamine (MIPDA) embedded within xanthan gum (XG) hydrogel. The template (L-Trp) was removed by immersion in a solution of methanol/acetic acid (ratio 9:1) under sonication. To form the sensor, the prepared hydrogel (XG-LBC-Fe3O4/MIPDA) was then drop-cast on a screen-printed electrode (SPE). The synthesis of these components was validated through comprehensive physicochemical and electrochemical analyses. Several operational parameters, including pH, response time, sample loading volume, and the quantity of active materials to be incorporated were meticulously optimized. The SPE-XG-LBC-Fe3O4/MIPDA sensor showed a linear detection range of L-Trp from 1–6 μM and from 10-60 μM, with a LOD of 0.44 μM. Moreover, the electrochemical sensor exhibits good reproducibility and selectivity. In addition, the detections of L-Trp in milk, blood and urine samples were good with a relative standard deviation (RSD) ranging from 97% to 106%. The strategy provided in the development of the sensor is promising, convenience, and effective. It uses xanthan hydrogel for enhancing mass transfer and adhesion strength, Fe3O4 supported biochar for orientating magnetic field and accelerating mass transfer and sensitivity and polydopamine MIP for selectivity. This approach makes it easy to assess the L-Trp levels on-site which is quite useful in health assessment and early diagnosis associated with L-Trp [141].

4. Other Applications of MHs in Tissue Engineering

4.1. Applications of MHs in Neural Tissue Engineering

Neural tissue is responsible for the conduction of nerve impulse. Neurons are the main component of the neural tissue and are located in the central nervous system (CNS) and in the spinal cord. They are excitable cells sending and receiving signals through action potentials. They have a cell body (or soma) and elongated projections such as axon which ends at presynaptic terminal containing boutons, and dendrites which formed variable branching. There are different types of neurons which are often classified into sensory neurons (carry information toward the CNS or spinal cord), interneurons (relay information within the CNS or spinal cord), and motor neurons (send information out of the CNS or spinal cord) [142]. The neural tissue is among the most tender tissues in the whole human body with elastic modulus well below 1 kPa [143].
Neural injuries are still difficult to treat. However, one approach in neural tissue engineering is the development of nerve guidance conduits using biomaterials which provide a suitable environment for neuron survival and axon extension [144]. Among these biomaterials the use of hydrogels is particularly adapted due to their low Young’s modulus. Moreover, the use of smart materials such as MH is also well developed. Thus, Antman-Passig and Shefi fabricated an injectable anisotropic MH of collagen for neural tissue engineering. They dispersed magnetite and maghemite MNPs within the collagen solution and used a weak magnetic field (25.5 mT) during the gelling process to aggregate the MNPs into string-like clusters aligned with the orientation of the magnetic field within the hydrogels. These physical cues promoted the elongation of collagen fibrils during gelation and the alignment of neurites from encapsulated primary neurons by contact guidance. Furthermore, when PC12 cells (pre-neural cells) were encapsulated into the MH collagen gel under magnetic field and their differentiation was stimulated with nerve growth factor (NGF) the neurites branching tree was significantly oriented [39]. In addition, Tay et al. examine the effects of magnetomechanical modulation on primary dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons using magnetic microparticles (MMPs) incorporated in high molecular weight hyaluronic acid hydrogels. This MH was meticulously engineered to emulate the extracellular matrix (ECM) of the spinal cord with a storage modulus of 0.14 kPa. The MH promoted the survival and the healthy outgrowth of DRG neurons enhancing the expression of both excitatory and inhibitory ion channels, as observed under confocal microscopy. In this study, the authors used a 2 T permanent magnet to subject the MH to magnetic stimulations. The results showed that short-term or “acute” stimulation favored the expression of endogenous mechanosensitive ion channel (PIEZO2) allowing the entry of calcium while long-term, ‘chronic’ application of the stimuli was associated with a decrease expression level of this channel. This study provides evidence that these hydrogels can be used as a research tool for understanding the impact of magnetomechanical stimulation but may also hold great promise in developing new therapies for reducing mechanosensitive channels expression, well known to cause chronic pain [145]. Moreover, a contemporary investigation has revealed that, through a microscale continuous projection printing technique, a biomimetic spinal cord structure was successfully fabricated; this hydrogel, infused with neural progenitor cells, effectively facilitated axon regeneration within a complete spinal cord injury model in vivo, thereby presenting a promising strategy for the design of magnetically responsive hydrogels intended for neural tissue engineering [146]. In another study, Lacko et al. described a magnetic templating technique to fabricate aligned tubular structures within a hydrogel by using dissolvable magnetic alginate microparticles (MAMs) to form columns under a magnetic field. After removal of these sacrificial MAMs the scaffolds contain aligned tubular microarchitecture, which is useful for cell remodelling across different applications. Thus, to mimic the native nerve basal lamina microarchitecture they used a templated MH made of glycidyl methacrylate, hyaluronic acid and collagen I. The characterization of this templated MH included assessments of particle alignment and micro-porosity. The removal efficiency of the iron oxide nanoparticles (used at 5 mg/mL) was 97%, whereas the compressive mechanical properties were within the range of peripheral nerve tissue with 0. 93 kPa (rat sciatic nerve tissue 1. 29 kPa). A preliminary in-vivo study for 4 weeks in rats with 10 mm sciatic nerve defect showed that the templated MH guided the cellular migration and could aid in peripheral nerve regeneration inducing moderate improvements in remodelling index and axon density compared with non-templated controls [147]. In addition, Li et al. fabricated an electrospun of poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) fibers containing Fe3O4 MNPs and cut them by cryo-cutting to obtain magnetic short fibers (MSFs). Then, these MSFs were incorporated into a composite hydrogel of sodium alginate (SA)/carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCS)/multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). Under an EMF, the MSFs in the hydrogel aligned and gave rise to a magnetic and conductive composite hydrogel MSFs/MWCNTs/SA/CMCS with an oriented morphology. The results showed that MWCNTs improved the electrical and mechanical characteristics of the hydrogel. Furthermore, the alignment of the MSFs in the hydrogel increased its mechanical strength by many folds. In addition, this anisotropic composite hydrogel with magnetic sensitivity and electrical conductivity significantly enhanced the cell viability and proliferation of primary cortical neurons compared to individual magnetic or conductive hydrogels, whereas providing synergistic effects of electrical and magnetic stimulations to support neurite outgrowth [148]. In another study, Han et al. developed an anisotropic topological chitosan@Artemisia sphaerocephala (CS@AS) scaffold (Figure 22) containing Fe3O4 MNPs modified with dopamine (DFe3O4, 2 mg/mL) for long distance peripheral nerve regeneration. The results showed that the anisotropic topological scaffolds, in conjunction with non-invasive wireless magnetic stimulation under an exogenous static magnetic field (SMF), can collaboratively regulate the morphological alterations, proliferation, and directional growth of Schwann cells. In vivo experiments on a rat model of sciatic nerve defect (10 mm) and rabbit model of sciatic nerve defect (35 mm) for 2 and 8 weeks further corroborated that the magnetic CS@AS nerve conduit significantly enhanced the functional repair and reconstruction of long-distance injured sciatic nerves under SMF to a level comparable to that of autograft transplantation. Furthermore, it was established that the scaffolds stimulated the magnetic induction receptors, increased the gene expression for proliferation, migration, and myelin formation, helped to maintain the balance of intracellular calcium concentration and improved the cGMP-PKG, VEGF, MAP Kinase, and TNF signalling [149].

4.2. Applications of MHs in Cartilage Tissue Engineering

Magnetic nanoparticles and MHs are known as prospective materials in the field of cartilage tissue engineering due to their effects on the stem cells’ behavior and chondrocytes’ response. Another factor that makes MHs favored is the opportunity to deliver drugs, such as growth factors, in a targeted and controlled manner to the area of chondral lesions [150]. Thus, Z. Chen et al. designed a composite hydrogel system with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)-labeled cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) and silk fibroin (SF) to monitor in real time by MRI the degradation of the hydrogel and the cartilage regeneration. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) were loaded in the hydrogel and the chondrogenesis was evaluated in vitro whereas the cartilage regeneration was evaluated in vivo on a rabbit cartilage defect model. The results showed that USPIO provided good MR contrast enhancement allowing the monitoring of the hydrogel degradation. Furthermore, BMSCs proliferated and differentiated well into chondrocytes in the hydrogel. Moreover, the in vivo experiment showed that a smooth neocartilage was observed in the group BMSCs-hydrogel at 12 weeks post-operation. Based on these results, the role of the USPIO-labeled CNC/SF hydrogel represents a novel strategy in the field of cartilage tissue engineering. This system is promising for enhancing the repair and regeneration of cartilage, as it promotes chondrogenesis and provides a non-invasive method for monitoring hydrogel degradation [151]. Similarly in another study, Yang et al. grafted KGN onto the surface of USPIO nanoparticles which formed a nanocarrier system capable of releasing KGN in a slow and controlled fashion at the cartilage repair site. To enhance the efficacy of cartilage repair, USPIO-KGN nanocarrier was encapsulated within a cellulose nanocrystal/dextran hydrogel, serving both as a delivery vehicle for USPIO-KGN and as a scaffold to foster cartilage regeneration. Both in vitro, and in vivo study on a defect rabbit model showed that this methodology provides a sustained release of KGN which promoted the differentiation of BMSCs into chondrocytes. Furthermore, the use of USPIO allowed the non-invasive MRI monitoring of the hydrogel degradation and the neocartilage generation in vivo consistently with histological analysis [152]. Moreover, Zlonick et al. developed a magneto-patterning technique to position objects (like MSCs, polystyrene beads, PLGA microcapsules) in a hydrogel precursor solution (1% w/v methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MeHA) with gadodiamide (Gd, 0.2 M) and a photoinitiator (0.5% w/v lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate (LAP)). After exposure to a magnetic field (permanent magnet 13200 Gauss) for 2, 5, or 10 min the hydrogel was crosslinked under UV (365 nm, 10 mW/cm2, 9 min) to fix the objects. Then, the gel was washed to remove the Gd and used for analysis or put in culture medium for cell culture. The results showed that small objects (radius ≤ 1 Preprints 178019 i001) do not move while larger objects (5-15 Preprints 178019 i001) ascended toward the surface of the hydrogel solution. The technique was used for cartilage regeneration by patterning magnetically MSCs with 5 min exposure to the magnet, and then the cells were cultured for 3 to 6 weeks in chondrogenic medium. The analysis showed a cellular gradient (from top to bottom), and the formation of cartilaginous matrix with a gradient of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) [153]. In another study, Huang et al. studied the combined effect of hydrogel material with pulse electromagnetic fields (PEMFs). Figure 23 showed that PEMFs promoted the repair of defective articular cartilage. Thus, they fabricated a gelatin/Preprints 178019 i002-cyclodextrin (Preprints 178019 i002-CD)/Fe3O4 MNPs hydrogel and its characterization revealed good mechanical properties (compressive modulus 2.79 MPa) with microporous surface and unevenness that promotes cell adhesion and growth. The result of infrared spectroscopy analysis revealed that the MNPs were uniformly dispersed into the hydrogel, which had reasonably good super paramagnetic characteristics. In addition, when bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) were cultured on the hydrogel and PEMFs were applied, the expression of cartilage specific gene markers (COL1, COL2, and Aggrecan) were significantly enhanced and BMSCs differentiated into chondrocytes. The hydrogel was also tested in vivo in a knee-defect rabbit model for 8 and 12 weeks. Four groups were tested: group A (gelatin/Preprints 178019 i002-CD)/Fe3O4 with BMSCs and PEMFs), group B (gelatin/Preprints 178019 i002-CD)/Fe3O4 with BMSCs), group C (gelatin/Preprints 178019 i002-CD)/Fe3O4), and group D (no treatment). The results showed that group A has the best cartilage repair at 8 weeks and at 12 weeks the defect was completely filled with new cartilage and restored. In group B, the defect was restored with new cartilage at 50% and 70% at week 8 and week 12, respectively. Therefore, PEMFs combined with MHs promote cartilage repair. In group C, the regenerated tissue was fibrous with a gap between the new tissue and the host at week 8 while at week 12 the regenerated tissue was mainly fibrous hyperproliferative tissue with only few cartilage tissue. In group D, there were cavities and fibrous tissue at week 8, while at week 12 there was only inflammatory tissue [100]. Furthermore, Choi et al. fabricated a ferrogel of oxidized hyaluronate (OHA)/glycol chitosan (GC)/adipic acid dihydrazide (ADH)/SPIONs with 3D printing. Mouse teratocarcinoma ATDC5 cells were encapsulated in the ferrogel for chondrocytes differentiation and a magnetic field was applied. The results showed that the application of this magnetic stimulation enhances the expression level of gene SOX-9 and COL-2 proving that the ferrogel has potential for cartilage tissue engineering [154].

4.3. Applications of MHs in Bone Tissue Engineering

Bones are the hard tissues which forms the skeletal system of the vertebrates and contain the bone marrow. The ECM of bones is a complex nanocomposite material with periodic hydroxyapatite nanocrystals disordered along collagen fibers which form hierarchically structured composites from the nano- to macro- levels [155]. The bone cells (e.g., osteoblasts, osteoclasts, osteocytes) are embedded between the collagen fibers and regulate the bone turnover (bone growth, bone resorption) along with external stimuli. Conveniently, bones are divided into two types: The cortical bone and the trabecular bone. Cortical bones are dense with low porosity (< 20 %) and are composed of cylindrical structures called osteons or Haversian systems which are cylinders enclosing a Chandler’s indexer blood vessel surrounded by concentric rings of bone matrix. Trabecular bone or cancellous bones are porous and spongy (> 90% porosity), in form of plates referred to as trabeculae and have large surface [156].
Magnetic materials (MNPs, MHs) have been used with magnetic field for the benefits of bone tissue engineering applications. Thus, Arjmand et al. showed that the osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) cultured on a PCL scaffold improved in presence of PEMF [157]. It is known that the magnetic stimuli acting at the interfacial level trigger sensitive receptors on the cell membrane leading to an increase in metabolic activity. In a recent study Xu et al. fabricated composite scaffolds of PLA, PCL and Fe3O4 nanoparticles by microinjection molding technique. Depending on their magnetite weight ratio (7/3/0,1,2,3) these scaffold PLA/PCL/Fe3O4 were named PL-0, PLF-1, PLF-2 and PLF-3. These scaffolds showed excellent physicochemical properties and biocompatibility. Furthermore, the PLA/PCL/Fe3O4 scaffolds accelerated the adhesion and proliferation of bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) under relatively weak magnetic field (25–30 mT). Thus, the BMSC proliferation on scaffolds PL-0, PLF-1, PLF-2 and PLF-3 were characterized for five consecutive days with various static magnetic fields (SMFs) applied. The results showed that the increase in Fe3O4 in the scaffold structure enhanced the cellular response and that this goes in synch with the assay of cytotoxicity (Figure 24 a, Figure 24 e). However, with L-Mag (25-30 mT), the PLF scaffolds had a positive effect on the cell proliferation while with H-Mag (92-102 mT) the PLF scaffolds had a negative effect on the cell proliferation (Figure 24 a) which was in consistence with the quantitative analysis of live/dead staining (Figure 24e, f). The amounts of cells grown on the PLF scaffolds in the magnetic culture groups compared to the NC group (<0.05 mT, earth magnetic field) were significantly enhanced at day 3 and day 5 of culture (Figure 24a), excepted for the PL-0 scaffold on day 3 of culture (Figure 24a) [158]. In another study, Babakhani et al. (2024) developed a nanocomposite scaffold made of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)-chitosan (CS), modified clay (C30B) with graphene oxide (GO), and hydroxyapatite (HAp) to improve the mechanical characteristics of the hydrogel. Different scaffolds were investigated using FT-IR, XRD, SEM, TGA, swelling rate, degradation tests, and evaluation of biological and mechanical properties. The analysis proved that the addition of 2% of clay modified graphene oxide with magnetite C30B/GO/Fe3O4 enhanced the compressive strength of the polymeric material (PVA/CS) by 23 times. In addition, the combination of HAp and modified clay increased the mineralization levels on the surface of the scaffold. Thus, the prepared nanocomposite scaffold had a compressive strength of 9. 31 MPa, a porosity of 75%, and a pore size of about 50 nm, like a cancellous bone. The swelling behavior was in accordance with the desired characteristics for bone scaffolds with a swelling amount of 1790%. The cytotoxicity studies showed that all prepared scaffolds were biocompatible with good cell viability. The study concluded that PVA/CS/C30B/GO/Fe3O4 had good mechanical properties and can be used in bone tissue engineering [159].

4.4. Application of MHs in Cardiac Tissue Engineering

Cardiac tissue engineering requires the use of matrices that mimic physical, spatial and electrical signals seen in natural ECM [160] . Consequently, the scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering should mimic the native cardiac tissue elasticity, direct the alignment and elongation of cardiomyocytes, and have some electrical conductance to favor their contraction [161]. To this end, conductive polymers such as polyaniline [60,162] or polypyrrole [163] as well as the incorporation of noble metals [164] or carbon nanotubes (CNTs, MWNTs) or carbon-based particles [36,37,61,165] have been used to improve the polymer conductivities and applied for skeletal muscle and cardiac muscle tissue engineering. Of the latter, the rod-shape morphology of carbon nanotubes for cardiac tissue engineering application makes it especially suited. Such types of CNTs have been used to generate well-defined faceted substrates with abundant porosity, which enabled the alignment of the cells and the ECM deposition alongside the fabricated features to replicate the organization of cardiac native tissues [166,167].
Similarly, Bonfrate et al. used an external magnetostatics fields derived from two parallel magnets or current wires to micropattern paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (MNPs) in a collagen matrices used as a scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering. By using an external magnetostatics fields derived from two parallel magnet or current wires it was possible to micropattern the MNPs in the collagen matrices and to increase the electrical conductivity of the designed scaffolds [168]. In another study, a bilayer of PEGDA with different molecular weights were self-assembled in 2D, functionalized with commercially available MNPs, and used for cardiac and muscle tissue engineering. The study showed that the PEGDA layers with defined thickness, stiffness and swelling could rolled to form a 3D tube loaded with cardiomyocytes under a 150 mT magnetic field [169]. Furthermore, Liu et al. fabricated injectable magnetically responsive cryogels based on GelMA and methacrylate elastin containing CNTs and Mn3O4 MNPs for the potential use in cardiac tissue engineering and evaluated them under compression test and shape memory test [170]. In addition, Han et al. loaded cardiomyocytes H9C2 with SPIONs which significantly enhanced their expression of connexin 43 (Cx43) which is a gap junction protein. Then, they used these H9C2-SPIONs to prime MSCs in coculture via active cellular crosstalk which induced MSCs with cardiac repair-favorable paracrine profile enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs in the frame of myocardial infarction [171]. Kankala et al. wrote a review on the nanosize components involved in cardiac tissue repair and on nanomaterials that are used to mimic these features. Thus, nanoparticles have been used alone or loaded into hydrogels or other biomimetic constructs to impart the structural and electrical reorganization of native cardiac tissue to achieve better regenerative outcomes [172]. In another study, SPIONs (1 wt%) modified with casein were incorporated into electrospun silk fibroin nanofibers to enhance the mechanical properties and surface characteristics of the scaffolds. The characterization of the fabricated SF nanofibers containing SPIONs was done using SEM, TEM, water contact angle and tensile tests. The nanofibrous scaffold was used as a substrate for culturing mouse embryonic cardiac cells (ECC) and the results showed that ECCs had better attachment, elongation, alignment and density, on SF-SPIONs-casein compared to SF only. Moreover, the immunostaining analysis at day 7 of culture showed an enhanced expression of mature cardiac markers such as Preprints 178019 i002-MHC, and c-TnT in ECCs cultured on SF-SPIONs-casein compared to those cultured on SF nanofibrous scaffolds. In addition, real-time PCR analysis indicated the upregulation of functional genes involved in cardiac muscularity including GATA-4, cardiac troponin, Nkx 2. 5 and Preprints 178019 i002-MHC for ECCs cultured on SF/SPION-casein scaffolds compared to ECCs cultured on SF scaffolds only [173]. Therefore, nanoparticles are important components for cardiac tissue engineering and that there have been many advancements on the use of MNPs both for diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular diseases as shown in Figure 25. Especially, iron oxide based MNPs have been described in detail as nanosized agents with superparamagnetic properties used for therapy in the frame of cardiac vascular diseases and also used for imaging and the visualization of plaques, thrombus, drug delivery, new reendothelialization of stents, and blood vessel regeneration [174].
In the following, we give a table (Table 1) showing different MHs used in tissue engineering applications

5. Conclusions

As we have seen in this review, MHs are compose of a hydrogel matrix with encapsulated magnetic particles. Therefore, they have the properties of hydrogels with the additional properties of magnetic particles. Hydrogels are used in a wide variety of biomedical applications and are one of the major biomaterials used due to their viscoelastic property that mimic natural tissues and their biocompatibility. Magnetic particles are nano-, micro-, millimeter size particles of different compositions including iron oxide, nickel, and cobalt that are sensitive to magnetic fields. They bring to the hydrogel property of actuation, speed, and to be controlled remotely. Their use in isotropic and anisotropic MHs fabrication have induced the development of different methods of fabrication, whereas these MHs began to be involved in a growing number of varied applications. As shown in this review, we have highlighted a large number of these applications in the biomedical field such as hyperthermia, drug delivery, wound healing, MRI, detection with sensors, and tissue engineering (neural, cartilage, bone, cardiac tissues). The use of MHs in these different domains has generated major developments and the research field with MHs is very dynamic.
However, although MH developments are already significant several aspects needed to be further explored before their use in clinic or their commercialization. Thus, the toxicity of MNPs is an important topic and has been evaluated. The results showed that their toxicity depends on their size, with bigger toxicity for bigger particle size. Therefore, the use of magnetic nanoparticles is favorable and easily excreted from the body. However, biological tissues have different sensitivities to chemicals and materials and therefore the MNPs toxicity should be evaluated following their targeted application, and with potential long-term application. The concentration of MNPs used in MHs is usually relatively low and the use of higher concentrations may be explored. Likewise, the use of other materials with strong magnetic response may be explored for improved functionalities, improved control over the engineered tissue construct, and to decrease the amplitude of the magnetic field required for the manipulation of MHs. Otherwise, different improvements are required depending on the targeted application. For example, for hyperthermia improvements can be made to obtain more heat with more precise location to enhance the efficacy of the treatment. In drug delivery with MHs accurate controlled release is needed and the new development trend is toward pulsatile drug release. For medical imaging, MRI with contrast agents is very efficient for providing deep penetration and clarity. However, the slow acquisition time has been a major drawback that became overcome with more recent apparatus including deep learning image reconstruction, super resolution algorithms, and the use of parallel imaging, multi-slice imaging, and compressed sensing. However, implementing these accelerated MRI protocols in clinics enhance the cost and the task of specialists. In tissue engineering more improvements are possible for the fabrication of efficient MHs that combine controlled magnetic properties with required mechanical properties and biological performance. The design of MHs with precise anisotropic magnetic patterns is not straightforward. Furthermore, the development of magnetically graded hydrogels may be interesting.
Nowadays with the technological advances, the use of additive manufacturing techniques such as direct ink writing (DIW), stereolithography, 3D printing boosts the development of new MHs allowing higher complex structure formation, fabrication of MHs with multi-materials, patient specific tailoring, automation, and reduced fabrication time. New trend for the development of MHs is also in the integration of multi-stimuli with the magnetic actuation. Furthermore, the development of magnetic micro/nanorobots that can be remotely activated is another axis of MH development. Moreover, with the development of artificial intelligence further advances in MH fabrication are possible. The diversity of application of MHs is already important, the cross-disciplinary cooperation among different fields (e.g., material science, advance manufacturing, biomedical engineering) will further enhance their developments.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (Grant Numbers 24KK0203, 25H01351; 23K26514), and the Cooperative Research Project of Research Center for Biomedical Engineering at Institute of Science Tokyo, Japan.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviation

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AA acrylamide
AMF alternating magnetic field
CNS central nervous system
CS chitosan
DOX doxorubicin
EPC(s) endothelial progenitor cell(s)
ECM extracellular matrix
GelMA gelatin methacrylate
GOx glucose oxidase
LCST low critical solution temperature
MH(s) magnetic hydrogel(s)
MHT magnetic hyperthermia therapy
MNPs magnetic nanoparticles
MRI magnetic resonance imaging
MSC(s) mesenchymal stem cell(s)
MWCNTs multi-walled carbon nanotubes
PCL polycaprolactone
PEG poly(ethylene glycol)
PGA poly(glycolic acid)
PLGA poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid
PNIPAM poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)
PVA polyvinyl alcohol
SF silk fibroin
SMC(s) smooth muscle cell(s)
SPIONs superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles
SWCNTs single-walled carbon nanotubes
VSA vinyl sulfonic acid

References

  1. Aswathy, S. H.; Narendrakumar, U.; Manjubala, I. Commercial hydrogels for biomedical applications. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03719. [CrossRef]
  2. Lee, S. C.; Kwon, I. K.; Park, K. Hydrogels for delivery of bioactive agents: A historical perspective. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2013, 65, 17-20. [CrossRef]
  3. Chirani Naziha; Yahia L’Hocine ; Gritsch Lukas; Motta Federico Leonardo; Chirani Soumia; Silvia, F. History and applications of hydrogels. J. Biomed. Sci. 2015, 4, 13. [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, D. Recent advances in hydrogels. Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 1987-1989. [CrossRef]
  5. Badeau, B. A.; DeForest, C. A. Programming stimuli-responsive behavior into biomaterials. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2019, 21, 241-265. [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, Z.; Liu, J.; Cui, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Tang, P. Recent advances on magnetic sensitive hydrogels in tissue engineering. Front. Chem. 2020, 8,00124. [CrossRef]
  7. Xue, L.; Sun, J. Magnetic hydrogels with ordered structure for biomedical applications. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 1040492. [CrossRef]
  8. Frachini, E. C. G.; Petri, D. F. S. Magneto-responsive hydrogels: Preparation, characterization, biotechnological and environmental applications. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2019, 30, 2010–2028. [CrossRef]
  9. Gao, F.; Xie, W.; Miao, Y.; Wang, D.; Guo, Z.; Ghosal, A.; Li, Y.; Wei, Y.; Feng, S.-S.; Zhao, L.; et al. Magnetic hydrogel with optimally adaptive functions for breast cancer recurrence prevention. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2019, 8, 1900203. [CrossRef]
  10. Manjua, A. C.; Alves, V. D.; Crespo, J. G.; Portugal, C. A. M. Magnetic responsive PVA hydrogels for remote modulation of protein sorption. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 21239-21249. [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, X.; Fan, M.; Tan, H.; Ren, B.; Yuan, G.; Jia, Y.; Li, J.; Xiong, D.; Xing, X.; Niu, X.; et al. Magnetic and self-healing chitosan-alginate hydrogel encapsulated gelatin microspheres via covalent cross-linking for drug delivery. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 101, 619-629. [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, H.; Qin, Z.; Zhao, J.; He, Y.; Ren, E.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, G.; Mao, C.; Zheng, L. Cartilage-targeting and dual MMP-13/pH responsive theranostic nanoprobes for osteoarthritis imaging and precision therapy. Biomaterials 2019, 225, 119520. [CrossRef]
  13. Munaweera, I.; Aliev, A.; Balkus, K. J., Jr. Electrospun cellulose acetate-garnet nanocomposite magnetic fibers for bioseparations. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 244-251. [CrossRef]
  14. Wu, H.; Song, L.; Chen, L.; Huang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zang, F.; An, Y.; Lyu, H.; Ma, M.; Chen, J.; et al. Injectable thermosensitive magnetic nanoemulsion hydrogel for multimodal-imaging-guided accurate thermoablative cancer therapy. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 16175-16182. [CrossRef]
  15. Guo, Y.; Bae, J.; Fang, Z.; Li, P.; Zhao, F.; Yu, G. Hydrogels and hydrogel-derived materials for energy and water sustainability. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 7642-7707. [CrossRef]
  16. Jayakumar, A.; Jose, V. K.; Lee, J.-M. Hydrogels for medical and environmental applications. Small Methods 2020, 4, 1900735. [CrossRef]
  17. Hu, P.; Lu, J.; Li, C.; He, Z.; Wang, X.; Pan, Y.; Zhao, L. Injectable magnetic hydrogel filler for synergistic bone tumor hyperthermia chemotherapy. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2024, 7, 1569-1578. [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, X.; Tian, C.; Zhang, H.; Xie, H. Biodegradable magnetic hydrogel robot with multimodal locomotion for targeted cargo delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 28922-28932. [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, Q.; Yang, G.; Xue, L.; Dong, G.; Su, W.; Cui, M. j.; Wang, Z. g.; Liu, M.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, X. Ultrasoft and biocompatible magnetic-hydrogel-based strain sensors for wireless passive biomechanical monitoring. ACS nano 2022, 16 (12), 21555-21564.
  20. Ishihara, K.; Narita, Y.; Teramura, Y.; Fukazawa, K. Preparation of magnetic hydrogel microparticles with cationic surfaces and their cell-assembling performance. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 7, 5107-5117. [CrossRef]
  21. Singh, R.; Pal, D.; Chattopadhyay, S. Target-specific superparamagnetic hydrogel with excellent pH sensitivity and reversibility: A promising platform for biomedical applications. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 21768-21780. [CrossRef]
  22. Tang, J.; Yin, Q.; Qiao, Y.; Wang, T. Shape morphing of hydrogels in alternating magnetic field. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 21194-21200. [CrossRef]
  23. Liao, J.; Huang, H. Review on magnetic natural polymer constructed hydrogels as vehicles for drug delivery. Biomacromolecules 2020, 21, 2574-2594. [CrossRef]
  24. Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Chen, C.; Cheng, Y. Magnetic-responsive hydrogels: From strategic design to biomedical applications. J. Control. Release 2021, 335, 541-556. [CrossRef]
  25. Phalake, S. S.; Somvanshi, S. B.; Tofail, S. A. M.; Thorat, N. D.; Khot, V. M. Functionalized manganese iron oxide nanoparticles: a dual potential magneto-chemotherapeutic cargo in a 3D breast cancer model. Nanoscale 2023, 15, 15686-15699. [CrossRef]
  26. Esmaeili, J.; Barati, A.; Ai, J.; Nooshabadi, V. T.; Mirzaei, Z. Employing hydrogels in tissue engineering approaches to boost conventional cancer-based research and therapies. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 10646-10669. [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Z.-Q.; Song, S.-C. Thermosensitive/superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle-loaded nanocapsule hydrogels for multiple cancer hyperthermia. Biomaterials 2016, 106, 13-23. [CrossRef]
  28. Rose, J. C.; Cámara-Torres, M.; Rahimi, K.; Köhler, J.; Möller, M.; De Laporte, L. Nerve cells decide to orient inside an injectable hydrogel with minimal structural guidance. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 3782-3791. [CrossRef]
  29. Barrow, M.; Taylor, A.; Fuentes-Caparrós, A. M.; Sharkey, J.; Daniels, L. M.; Mandal, P.; Park, B. K.; Murray, P.; Rosseinsky, M. J.; Adams, D. J. SPIONs for cell labelling and tracking using MRI: magnetite or maghemite? Biomater. Sci. 2018, 6, 101-106. [CrossRef]
  30. Haas, W.; Zrinyi, M.; Kilian, H. G.; Heise, B. Structural analysis of anisometric colloidal iron(III)-hydroxide particles and particle-aggregates incorporated in poly(vinyl-acetate) networks. Colloid and Polymer Science 1993, 271, 1024-1034. [CrossRef]
  31. Fiejdasz, S.; Gilarska, A.; Horak, W.; Radziszewska, A.; Strączek, T.; Szuwarzyński, M.; Nowakowska, M.; Kapusta, C. Structurally stable hybrid magnetic materials based on natural polymers – preparation and characterization. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 15, 3149-3160. [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, Y.; Li, B.; Zhou, Y.; Jia, D. In situ mineralization of magnetite nanoparticles in chitosan hydrogel. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2009, 4, 1041. [CrossRef]
  33. Li, Y.; Huang, G.; Zhang, X.; Li, B.; Chen, Y.; Lu, T.; Lu, T. J.; Xu, F. Magnetic hydrogels and their potential biomedical applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 660-672. [CrossRef]
  34. Cao, H.; Duan, L.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, J.; Zhang, K. Current hydrogel advances in physicochemical and biological response-driven biomedical application diversity. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 426. [CrossRef]
  35. Shi, W.; Huang, J.; Fang, R.; Liu, M. Imparting functionality to the hydrogel by magnetic-field-induced nano-assembly and macro-response. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 5177-5194. [CrossRef]
  36. Ramón-Azcón, J.; Ahadian, S.; Estili, M.; Liang, X.; Ostrovidov, S.; Kaji, H.; Shiku, H.; Ramalingam, M.; Nakajima, K.; Sakka, Y.; et al. Dielectrophoretically aligned carbon nanotubes to control electrical and mechanical properties of hydrogels to fabricate contractile muscle myofibers. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 4028-4034. [CrossRef]
  37. Ahadian, S.; Ramón-Azcón, J.; Estili, M.; Liang, X.; Ostrovidov, S.; Shiku, H.; Ramalingam, M.; Nakajima, K.; Sakka, Y.; Bae, H.; et al. Hybrid hydrogels containing vertically aligned carbon nanotubes with anisotropic electrical conductivity for muscle myofiber fabrication. Sci Rep. 2014, 4, 4271. [CrossRef]
  38. Fan, F.; Sun, J.; Chen, B.; Li, Y.; Hu, K.; Wang, P.; Ma, M.; Gu, N. Rotating magnetic field-controlled fabrication of magnetic hydrogel with spatially disk-like microstructures. Sci. China Mater. 2018, 61, 1112-1122. [CrossRef]
  39. Antman-Passig, M.; Shefi, O. Remote magnetic orientation of 3D collagen hydrogels for directed neuronal regeneration. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 2567-2573. [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, S.; Wang, Z.; Shen, Z.; Zhang, M.; Jin, D.; Zheng, K.; Liu, X.; Chai, M.; Wang, Z.; Chi, A.; et al. Magnetic soft microrobots for erectile dysfunction therapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2024, 121, e2407809121. [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, T.-Y.; Chan, T.-Y.; Wang, K.-S.; Tsou, H.-M. Influence of magnetic nanoparticle arrangement in ferrogels for tunable biomolecule diffusion. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 90098-90102. [CrossRef]
  42. Ganguly, S.; Das, P.; Srinivasan, S.; Rajabzadeh, A. R.; Tang, X. S.; Margel, S. Superparamagnetic Amine-Functionalized Maghemite Nanoparticles as a Thixotropy Promoter for Hydrogels and Magnetic Field-Driven Diffusion-Controlled Drug Release. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2024, 7 (5), 5272-5286. [CrossRef]
  43. Ganguly, S.; Margel, S. 3D printed magnetic polymer composite hydrogels for hyperthermia and magnetic field driven structural manipulation. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2022, 131, 101574. [CrossRef]
  44. Tumarkin, E.; Kumacheva, E. Microfluidic generation of microgels from synthetic and natural polymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 2161-2168. [CrossRef]
  45. Thomas, R. G.; Unnithan, A. R.; Moon, M. J.; Surendran, S. P.; Batgerel, T.; Park, C. H.; Kim, C. S.; Jeong, Y. Y. Electromagnetic manipulation enabled calcium alginate Janus microsphere for targeted delivery of mesenchymal stem cells. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 110, 465-471. [CrossRef]
  46. Wu, Z.; Yu, Y.; Zou, M.; Liu, Y.; Bian, F.; Zhao, Y. Peanut-inspired anisotropic microparticles from microfluidics. Compos. Commun. 2018, 10, 129-135. [CrossRef]
  47. Cai, L.; Bian, F.; Chen, H.; Guo, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y. Anisotropic microparticles from microfluidics. Chem 2021, 7, 93-136. [CrossRef]
  48. Yu, Y.; Guo, J.; Wang, Y.; Shao, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y. Bioinspired helical micromotors as dynamic cell microcarriers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 16097-16103. [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, Z.; Valenzuela, C.; Xue, P.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wang, L.; Xu, X. Magnetic structural color hydrogels for patterned photonic crystals and dynamic camouflage. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2022, 4, 3618-3626. [CrossRef]
  50. Ostrovidov, S.; Ramalingam, M.; Bae, H.; Orive, G.; Fujie, T.; Shi, X.; Kaji, H. Bioprinting and biomaterials for dental alveolar tissue regeneration. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol 2023, 11, 991821. [CrossRef]
  51. Ostrovidov, S.; Murugan, R.; Hojae, B.; Gorka, O.; Toshinori, F.; Xuetao, S.; and Kaji, H. Latest developments in engineered skeletal muscle tissues for drug discovery and development. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 2023, 18, 47-63. [CrossRef]
  52. Ostrovidov, S.; Salehi, S.; Costantini, M.; Suthiwanich, K.; Ebrahimi, M.; Sadeghian, R. B.; Fujie, T.; Shi, X.; Cannata, S.; Gargioli, C.; et al. 3D Bioprinting in skeletal muscle tissue engineering. Small 2019, 15, 1805530. [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, C.; Li, X.; Jiang, L.; Tang, D.; Xu, H.; Zhao, P.; Fu, J.; Zhou, Q.; Chen, Y. 3D Printing of functional magnetic materials: From design to applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2102777. [CrossRef]
  54. Simińska-Stanny, J.; Nizioł, M.; Szymczyk-Ziółkowska, P.; Brożyna, M.; Junka, A.; Shavandi, A.; Podstawczyk, D. 4D printing of patterned multimaterial magnetic hydrogel actuators. Addit. Manuf. 2022, 49, 102506. [CrossRef]
  55. Grenier, J.; Duval, H.; Barou, F.; Lv, P.; David, B.; Letourneur, D. Mechanisms of pore formation in hydrogel scaffolds textured by freeze-drying. Acta Biomater. 2019, 94, 195-203. [CrossRef]
  56. Haugh, M. G.; Murphy, C. M.; O’Brien, F. J. Novel Freeze-drying methods to produce a range of collagen–glycosaminoglycan scaffolds with tailored mean pore sizes. Tissue Eng. Part C: Methods 2009, 16, 887-894. [CrossRef]
  57. Rouhollahi, A.; Ilegbusi, O.; Florczyk, S.; Xu, K.; Foroosh, H. Effect of mold geometry on pore size in freeze-cast chitosan-alginate scaffolds for tissue engineering. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2020, 48, 1090-1102. [CrossRef]
  58. Wu, J.; Gong, X.; Fan, Y.; Xia, H. Physically crosslinked poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels with magnetic field controlled modulus. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 6205-6212. [CrossRef]
  59. Chen, L.; Deng, X.; Tian, L.; Xie, J.; Xiang, Y.; Liang, X.; Jiang, L.; Jiang, L. Preparation and properties of chitosan/dialdehyde sodium alginate/dopamine magnetic drug-delivery hydrogels. Colloids Surf. A: Phys. Eng. Asp. 2024, 680, 132739. [CrossRef]
  60. Ostrovidov, S.; Ebrahimi, M.; Bae, H.; Nguyen, H. K.; Salehi, S.; Kim, S. B.; Kumatani, A.; Matsue, T.; Shi, X.; Nakajima, K.; et al. Gelatin–polyaniline composite nanofibers enhanced excitation–contraction coupling system maturation in myotubes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 42444-42458. [CrossRef]
  61. Ostrovidov, S.; Shi, X.; Zhang, L.; Liang, X.; Kim, S. B.; Fujie, T.; Ramalingam, M.; Chen, M.; Nakajima, K.; Al-Hazmi, F.; et al. Myotube formation on gelatin nanofibers – Multi-walled carbon nanotubes hybrid scaffolds. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 6268-6277. [CrossRef]
  62. Eom, S.; Park, S. M.; Hong, H.; Kwon, J.; Oh, S.-R.; Kim, J.; Kim, D. S. Hydrogel-assisted electrospinning for fabrication of a 3D complex tailored nanofiber macrostructure. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 51212-51224. [CrossRef]
  63. Xue, J.; Wu, T.; Dai, Y.; Xia, Y. Electrospinning and electrospun nanofibers: Methods, materials, and applications. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 5298-5415. [CrossRef]
  64. Zhang, M.; Xu, S.; Wang, R.; Che, Y.; Han, C.; Feng, W.; Wang, C.; Zhao, W. Electrospun nanofiber/hydrogel composite materials and their tissue engineering applications. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2023, 162, 157-178. [CrossRef]
  65. Sousa, J. P. M.; Monteiro, C. F.; Deus, I. A.; Completo, A.; Stratakis, E.; Mano, J. F.; Marques, P. A. A. P. Magnetoresponsive anisotropic fiber-integrating hydrogels for neural tissue regeneration. Small Struct. 2024, 5, 2400213. [CrossRef]
  66. Yang, M.; Cheng, Q.; Zhou, G.; Wei, T.; Zhong, S.; Lu, L.; Yan, C.; Wang, Y.; Fang, M.; Yang, M.; et al. Electrospinning aligned SF/magnetic nanoparticles-blend nanofiber scaffolds for inducing skeletal myoblast alignment and differentiation. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2024, 7, 7710-7718. [CrossRef]
  67. Luo, Y.; Chen, Y.; Gu, Z.; Ni, R.; Feng, P.; Hu, Z.; Song, L.; Shen, X.; Gu, C.; Li, J.; et al. Engineered muscle from micro-channeled PEG scaffold with magnetic Fe3O4 fixation towards accelerating esophageal muscle repair. Mater. Today Bio 2023, 23, 100853. [CrossRef]
  68. Noh, M.; Choi, Y. H.; An, Y.-H.; Tahk, D.; Cho, S.; Yoon, J. W.; Jeon, N. L.; Park, T. H.; Kim, J.; Hwang, N. S. Magnetic nanoparticle-embedded hydrogel sheet with a groove pattern for wound healing application. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 5, 3909-3921. [CrossRef]
  69. Sahiner, N.; Singh, M.; De Kee, D.; John, V. T.; McPherson, G. L. Rheological characterization of a charged cationic hydrogel network across the gelation boundary. Polymer 2006, 47, 1124-1131. [CrossRef]
  70. Shi, X.; Ostrovidov, S.; Shu, Y.; Liang, X.; Nakajima, K.; Wu, H.; Khademhosseini, A. Microfluidic generation of polydopamine gradients on hydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 2014, 30, 832-838. [CrossRef]
  71. He, J.; Burgess, D. J. Chapter 5 - Impact of biomaterials’ physical properties on cellular and molecular responses. In Handbook of Biomaterials Biocompatibility, Mozafari, M. Ed.; Woodhead Publishing, Sawston UK, 2020; pp 69-84.
  72. Kim, D.-N.; Park, J.; Koh, W.-G. Control of cell adhesion on poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel surfaces using photochemical modification and micropatterning techniques. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2009, 15, 124-128. [CrossRef]
  73. Cui, L.; Yao, Y.; Yim, E. K. F. The effects of surface topography modification on hydrogel properties. APL Bioeng. 2021, 5, 031509. [CrossRef]
  74. Mantha, S.; Pillai, S.; Khayambashi, P.; Upadhyay, A.; Zhang, Y.; Tao, O.; Pham, H. M.; Tran, S. D. Smart hydrogels in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Materials, 2019, 12, 3323. [CrossRef]
  75. Niinomi, M. Mechanical biocompatibilities of titanium alloys for biomedical applications. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2008, 1, 30-42. [CrossRef]
  76. Crippa, F.; Moore, T. L.; Mortato, M.; Geers, C.; Haeni, L.; Hirt, A. M.; Rothen-Rutishauser, B.; Petri-Fink, A. Dynamic and biocompatible thermo-responsive magnetic hydrogels that respond to an alternating magnetic field. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2017, 427, 212-219. [CrossRef]
  77. Lan, W.; Xu, M.; Qin, M.; Cheng, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Huang, D.; Wei, X.; Guo, Y.; Chen, W. Physicochemical properties and biocompatibility of the bi-layer polyvinyl alcohol-based hydrogel for osteochondral tissue engineering. Mater. Des. 2021, 204, 109652. [CrossRef]
  78. Hong, Y.; Zhou, F.; Hua, Y.; Zhang, X.; Ni, C.; Pan, D.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, D.; Yang, L.; Lin, Q.; et al. A strongly adhesive hemostatic hydrogel for the repair of arterial and heart bleeds. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2060. [CrossRef]
  79. Shi, Z.; Lan, G.; Hu, E.; Lu, F.; Qian, P.; Liu, J.; Dai, F.; Xie, R. Targeted delivery of hemostats to complex bleeding wounds with magnetic guidance for instant hemostasis. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 427, 130916. [CrossRef]
  80. Xie, W.; Gao, Q.; Guo, Z.; Wang, D.; Gao, F.; Wang, X.; Wei, Y.; Zhao, L. Injectable and self-healing thermosensitive magnetic hydrogel for asynchronous control release of doxorubicin and docetaxel to treat triple-negative breast cancer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 33660-33673. [CrossRef]
  81. Sharifi, S.; Behzadi, S.; Laurent, S.; Forrest, M. L.; Stroeve, P.; Mahmoudi, M. Toxicity of nanomaterials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2323-2343.
  82. Liu, G.; Gao, J.; Ai, H.; Chen, X. Applications and potential toxicity of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Small 2013, 9, 1533-1545. [CrossRef]
  83. Axpe, E.; Chan, D.; Offeddu, G. S.; Chang, Y.; Merida, D.; Hernandez, H. L.; Appel, E. A. A multiscale model for solute diffusion in hydrogels. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 6889-6897. [CrossRef]
  84. Nicolella, P.; Koziol, M. F.; Löser, L.; Saalwächter, K.; Ahmadi, M.; Seiffert, S. Defect-controlled softness, diffusive permeability, and mesh-topology of metallo-supramolecular hydrogels. Soft Matter 2022, 18, 1071-1081. [CrossRef]
  85. Vinchhi, P.; Rawal, S. U.; Patel, M. M. Chapter 19 - Biodegradable hydrogels. In Drug Delivery Devices and Therapeutic Systems, Chappel, E. Ed.; Academic Press, Cambridge MA, 2021; pp 395-419.
  86. Zong, H.; Wang, B.; Li, G.; Yan, S.; Zhang, K.; Shou, Y.; Yin, J. Biodegradable high-strength hydrogels with injectable performance based on poly(l-glutamic acid) and gellan gum. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 6, 4702-4713. [CrossRef]
  87. Vázquez-González, M.; Willner, I. Stimuli-responsive biomolecule-based hydrogels and their applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 15342-15377. [CrossRef]
  88. Li, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Li, T.; Zhang, J.; Tian, H. Stimuli-responsive hydrogels: Fabrication and biomedical applications. VIEW 2022, 3, 20200112. [CrossRef]
  89. Gang, F.; Jiang, L.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Sun, X. Multi-functional magnetic hydrogel: Design strategies and applications. Nano Sel. 2021, 2, 2291-2307. [CrossRef]
  90. Chen, F.; Chen, Q.; Zhu, L.; Tang, Z.; Li, Q.; Qin, G.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, B.; Zheng, J. General strategy to fabricate strong and tough low-molecular-weight gelator-based supramolecular hydrogels with double network structure. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 1743-1754. [CrossRef]
  91. Bin Imran, A.; Esaki, K.; Gotoh, H.; Seki, T.; Ito, K.; Sakai, Y.; Takeoka, Y. Extremely stretchable thermosensitive hydrogels by introducing slide-ring polyrotaxane cross-linkers and ionic groups into the polymer network. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5124. [CrossRef]
  92. Wang, X.-H.; Song, F.; Qian, D.; He, Y.-D.; Nie, W.-C.; Wang, X.-L.; Wang, Y.-Z. Strong and tough fully physically crosslinked double network hydrogels with tunable mechanics and high self-healing performance. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 349, 588-594. [CrossRef]
  93. Haraguchi, K. Synthesis and properties of soft nanocomposite materials with novel organic/inorganic network structures. Polym. J. 2011, 43, 223-241. [CrossRef]
  94. Ispas, G.-M.; Porav, S.; Gligor, D.; Turcu, R.; Crăciunescu, I. Magnetic hydrogel composites based on cross-linked poly (acrylic acid) used as a recyclable adsorbent system for nitrates. Water Environ. J. 2020, 34, 916-928. [CrossRef]
  95. Mahdavinia, G. R.; Soleymani, M.; Etemadi, H.; Sabzi, M.; Atlasi, Z. Model protein BSA adsorption onto novel magnetic chitosan/PVA/laponite RD hydrogel nanocomposite beads. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 107, 719-729. [CrossRef]
  96. Song, J.; He, W.; Shen, H.; Zhou, Z.; Li, M.; Su, P.; Yang, Y. Self-assembly of a magnetic DNA hydrogel as a new biomaterial for enzyme encapsulation with enhanced activity and stability. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 2449-2452. [CrossRef]
  97. Hu, K.; Sun, J.; Guo, Z.; Wang, P.; Chen, Q.; Ma, M.; Gu, N. A novel magnetic hydrogel with aligned magnetic colloidal assemblies showing controllable enhancement of magnetothermal effect in the presence of alternating magnetic field. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 2507-2514. [CrossRef]
  98. Ram, N. R.; Prakash, M.; Naresh, U.; Kumar, N. S.; Sarmash, T. S.; Subbarao, T.; Kumar, R. J.; Kumar, G. R.; Naidu, K. C. B. Review on magnetocaloric effect and materials. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2018, 31, 1971-1979. [CrossRef]
  99. Ashikbayeva, Z.; Tosi, D.; Balmassov, D.; Schena, E.; Saccomandi, P.; Inglezakis, V. Application of nanoparticles and nanomaterials in thermal ablation therapy of cancer. Nanomaterials, 2019, 9, 1195. [CrossRef]
  100. Huang, J.; Jia, Z.; Liang, Y.; Huang, Z.; Rong, Z.; Xiong, J.; Wang, D. Pulse electromagnetic fields enhance the repair of rabbit articular cartilage defects with magnetic nano-hydrogel. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 541-550. [CrossRef]
  101. Wang, W.; Fan, X.; Li, F.; Qiu, J.; Umair, M. M.; Ren, W.; Ju, B.; Zhang, S.; Tang, B. Magnetochromic photonic hydrogel for an alternating magnetic field-responsive color display. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018, 6, 1701093. [CrossRef]
  102. Feng, W.; Wang, Z. Tailoring the swelling-shrinkable behavior of hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, 2303326. [CrossRef]
  103. Kamata, H.; Kushiro, K.; Takai, M.; Chung, U.-i.; Sakai, T. Non-osmotic hydrogels: A rational strategy for safely degradable hydrogels. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 9282-9286. [CrossRef]
  104. Bordbar-Khiabani, A.; Gasik, M. Smart hydrogels for advanced drug delivery systems. Int. J. Mol. Sci 2022, 23, 3665. [CrossRef]
  105. Rashidzadeh, B.; Shokri, E.; Mahdavinia, G. R.; Moradi, R.; Mohamadi-Aghdam, S.; Abdi, S. Preparation and characterization of antibacterial magnetic-/pH-sensitive alginate/Ag/Fe3O4 hydrogel beads for controlled drug release. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 154, 134-141. [CrossRef]
  106. Li, H.; Go, G.; Ko, S. Y.; Park, J.-O.; Park, S. Magnetic actuated pH-responsive hydrogel-based soft micro-robot for targeted drug delivery. Smart Mater. Struct. 2016, 25, 027001. [CrossRef]
  107. Kim, D.-i.; Lee, H.; Kwon, S.-h.; Choi, H.; Park, S. Magnetic nano-particles retrievable biodegradable hydrogel microrobot. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 2019, 289, 65-77. [CrossRef]
  108. Shibaev, A. V.; Smirnova, M. E.; Kessel, D. E.; Bedin, S. A.; Razumovskaya, I. V.; Philippova, O. E. Remotely self-healable, shapeable and pH-sensitive dual cross-linked polysaccharide hydrogels with fast response to magnetic field. Nanomaterials, 2021, 11, 1271. [CrossRef]
  109. Xue, W.; Liu, X.-L.; Ma, H.; Xie, W.; Huang, S.; Wen, H.; Jing, G.; Zhao, L.; Liang, X.-J.; Fan, H. M. AMF responsive DOX-loaded magnetic microspheres: transmembrane drug release mechanism and multimodality postsurgical treatment of breast cancer. J. Mater. Chem. B 2018, 6, 2289-2303. [CrossRef]
  110. Ostrovidov, S.; Annabi, N.; Seidi, A.; Ramalingam, M.; Dehghani, F.; Kaji, H.; Khademhosseini, A. controlled release of drugs from gradient hydrogels for high-throughput analysis of cell–drug interactions. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 1302-1309. [CrossRef]
  111. Xu, N.; Wang, J.; Liu, L.; Gong, C. Injectable hydrogel-based drug delivery systems for enhancing the efficacy of radiation therapy: A review of recent advances. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2024, 35, 109225. [CrossRef]
  112. Bruneau, M.; Bennici, S.; Brendle, J.; Dutournie, P.; Limousy, L.; Pluchon, S. Systems for stimuli-controlled release: Materials and applications. J. Control. Release 2019, 294, 355-371. [CrossRef]
  113. Jalili, N. A.; Muscarello, M.; Gaharwar, A. K. Nanoengineered thermoresponsive magnetic hydrogels for biomedical applications. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 2016, 1, 297-305. [CrossRef]
  114. Lin, F.; Zheng, J.; Guo, W.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Dong, B.; Lin, C.; Huang, B.; Lu, B. Smart cellulose-derived magnetic hydrogel with rapid swelling and deswelling properties for remotely controlled drug release. Cellulose 2019, 26, 6861-6877. [CrossRef]
  115. Ribeiro, M.; Boudoukhani, M.; Belmonte-Reche, E.; Genicio, N.; Sillankorva, S.; Gallo, J.; Rodríguez-Abreu, C.; Moulai-Mostefa, N.; Bañobre-López, M. Xanthan-Fe3O4 nanoparticle composite hydrogels for non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging and magnetically assisted drug delivery. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 7712-7729. [CrossRef]
  116. Chen, Z.; Jian, W.; Huixiang, J.; and Fang, Z. Magnetic nano-Fe3O4 particles targeted gathering and bio-effects on nude mice loading human hepatoma Bel-7402 cell lines model under external magnetic field exposure in vivo. Electromag. Biol. Med. 2015, 34, 309-316. [CrossRef]
  117. Jahanban-Esfahlan, R.; Soleimani, K.; Derakhshankhah, H.; Haghshenas, B.; Rezaei, A.; Massoumi, B.; Farnudiyan-Habibi, A.; Samadian, H.; Jaymand, M. Multi-stimuli-responsive magnetic hydrogel based on Tragacanth gum as a de novo nanosystem for targeted chemo/hyperthermia treatment of cancer. J. Mater. Res. 2021, 36, 858-869. [CrossRef]
  118. Paulino, A. T.; Guilherme, M. R.; de Almeida, E. A. M. S.; Pereira, A. G. B.; Muniz, E. C.; Tambourgi, E. B. One-pot synthesis of a chitosan-based hydrogel as a potential device for magnetic biomaterial. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2009, 321, 2636-2642. [CrossRef]
  119. Jha, S.; Sharma, P. K.; Malviya, R. Hyperthermia: Role and risk factor for cancer treatment. Achievements Life Sci. 2016, 10, 161-167. [CrossRef]
  120. Moros, M.; Idiago-López, J.; Asín, L.; Moreno-Antolín, E.; Beola, L.; Grazú, V.; Fratila, R. M.; Gutiérrez, L.; de la Fuente, J. M. Triggering antitumoural drug release and gene expression by magnetic hyperthermia. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2019, 138, 326-343. [CrossRef]
  121. Sumitha, N. S.; Krishna, N. G.; Sailaja, G. S. Chitosan-TEMPO-oxidized nanocellulose magnetic responsive patches with hyperthermia potential for smart melanoma therapy. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2023, 5, 9170-9179. [CrossRef]
  122. Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Chen, Z.; Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Zhai, H.; Ding, J.; Yu, L. Autophagy inhibition mediated via an injectable and NO-releasing hydrogel for amplifying the antitumor efficacy of mild magnetic hyperthermia. Bioact. Mater. 2024, 39, 336-353. [CrossRef]
  123. Barra, A.; Wychowaniec, J. K.; Winning, D.; Cruz, M. M.; Ferreira, L. P.; Rodriguez, B. J.; Oliveira, H.; Ruiz-Hitzky, E.; Nunes, C.; Brougham, D. F.; et al. Magnetic chitosan bionanocomposite films as a versatile platform for biomedical hyperthermia. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2024, 13, 2303861. [CrossRef]
  124. Cheng, T.; Mishkovsky, M.; Junk, M. J. N.; Münnemann, K.; Comment, A. Producing radical-free hyperpolarized perfusion agents for in vivo magnetic resonance using spin-labeled thermoresponsive hydrogel. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2016, 37, 1074-1078. [CrossRef]
  125. Yan, S.; Hu, K.; Zhang, M.; Sheng, J.; Xu, X.; Tang, S.; Li, Y.; Yang, S.; Si, G.; Mao, Y.; et al. Extracellular magnetic labeling of biomimetic hydrogel-induced human mesenchymal stem cell spheroids with ferumoxytol for MRI tracking. Bioact. Mater. 2023, 19, 418-428. [CrossRef]
  126. Mistral, J.; Ve Koon, K. T.; Fernando Cotica, L.; Sanguino Dias, G.; Aparecido Santos, I.; Alcouffe, P.; Milhau, N.; Pin, D.; Chapet, O.; Serghei, A.; et al. Chitosan-coated superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles for magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic hyperthermia, and drug delivery. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2024, 7, 7097-7110. [CrossRef]
  127. Liang, Y.; He, J.; Guo, B. Functional hydrogels as wound dressing to enhance wound healing. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 12687-12722. [CrossRef]
  128. Kamoun, E. A.; Kenawy, E.-R. S.; Chen, X. A review on polymeric hydrogel membranes for wound dressing applications: PVA-based hydrogel dressings. J. Adv. Res. 2017, 8, 217-233. [CrossRef]
  129. Ahmed, E. M. Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applications: A review. J. Adv. Res. 2015, 6, 105-121. [CrossRef]
  130. Qi, L.; Zhang, C.; Wang, B.; Yin, J.; Yan, S. Progress in hydrogels for skin wound repair. Macromol. Biosci. 2022, 22, 2100475. [CrossRef]
  131. Bal-Öztürk, A.; Özkahraman, B.; Özbaş, Z.; Yaşayan, G.; Tamahkar, E.; Alarçin, E. Advancements and future directions in the antibacterial wound dressings–A review. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: Appl. Biomater. 2021, 109, 703-716.
  132. Yang, X.; Zhang, C.; Deng, D.; Gu, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhong, Q. Multiple stimuli-responsive MXene-based hydrogel as intelligent drug delivery carriers for deep chronic wound healing. Small 2022, 18, 2104368.
  133. Pires, F.; Silva, J. C.; Ferreira, F. C.; Portugal, C. A. Heparinized acellular hydrogels for magnetically induced wound healing applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 9908-9924. [CrossRef]
  134. Li, X.; Tan, Z.; Guo, B.; Yu, C.; Yao, M.; Liang, L.; Wu, X.; Zhao, Z.; Yao, F.; Zhang, H.; et al. Magnet-oriented hydrogels with mechanical–electrical anisotropy and photothermal antibacterial properties for wound repair and monitoring. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 463, 142387. [CrossRef]
  135. Zhou, H.; Jin, Z.; Gao, Y.; Wu, P.; Lai, J.; Li, S.; Jin, X.; Liu, H.; Chen, W.; Wu, Y.; et al. Thermoresponsive, magnetic, adhesive and conductive nanocomposite hydrogels for wireless and non-contact flexible sensors. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 636, 128113. [CrossRef]
  136. Ostrovidov, S.; Ramalingam, M.; Bae, H.; Orive, G.; Fujie, T.; Hori, T.; Nashimoto, Y.; Shi, X.; Kaji, H. Molecularly imprinted polymer-based sensors for the detection of skeletal- and cardiac-muscle-related analytes. Sensors, 2023, 23, 5625. [CrossRef]
  137. Banan Sadeghian, R.; Han, J.; Ostrovidov, S.; Salehi, S.; Bahraminejad, B.; Ahadian, S.; Chen, M.; Khademhosseini, A. Macroporous mesh of nanoporous gold in electrochemical monitoring of superoxide release from skeletal muscle cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 88, 41-47. [CrossRef]
  138. Sadeghian, R. B.; Ostrovidov, S.; Han, J.; Salehi, S.; Bahraminejad, B.; Bae, H.; Chen, M.; Khademhosseini, A. Online monitoring of superoxide anions released from skeletal muscle cells using an electrochemical biosensor based on thick-film nanoporous gold. ACS Sens. 2016, 1, 921-928. [CrossRef]
  139. Wang, K.; Hao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Mao, L.; Deng, Y.; Chen, J.; Yuan, S.; Zhang, T.; Ren, J.; et al. Functional hydrogels and their application in drug delivery, biosensors, and tissue engineering. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2019, 2019, 3160732. [CrossRef]
  140. Kim, H. S.; Lee, J. S.; Kim, M. I. Poly-γ-glutamic acid/chitosan hydrogel nanoparticles entrapping glucose oxidase and magnetic nanoparticles for glucose biosensing. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2020, 20, 5333-5337. [CrossRef]
  141. Hosseini, F.; Dashtian, K.; Golzani, M.; Ejraei, Z.; Zare-Dorabei, R. Remote magnetically stimulated xanthan-biochar-Fe3O4-molecularly imprinted biopolymer hydrogel toward electrochemical enantioselection of l-tryptophan. Anal. Chim. Acta 2024, 1316, 342837.
  142. Doblado, L. R.; Martínez-Ramos, C.; Pradas, M. M. Biomaterials for neural tissue engineering. Front. Nanotechnol. 2021, 3, 643507. [CrossRef]
  143. Leipzig, N. D.; Shoichet, M. S. The effect of substrate stiffness on adult neural stem cell behavior. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 6867-6878. [CrossRef]
  144. Vijayavenkataraman, S. Nerve guide conduits for peripheral nerve injury repair: A review on design, materials and fabrication methods. Acta Biomater. 2020, 106, 54-69. [CrossRef]
  145. Tay, A.; Sohrabi, A.; Poole, K.; Seidlits, S.; Di Carlo, D. A 3D magnetic hyaluronic acid hydrogel for magnetomechanical neuromodulation of primary dorsal root ganglion neurons. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1800927.
  146. Koffler, J.; Zhu, W.; Qu, X.; Platoshyn, O.; Dulin, J. N.; Brock, J.; Graham, L.; Lu, P.; Sakamoto, J.; Marsala, M. Biomimetic 3D-printed scaffolds for spinal cord injury repair. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 263-269.
  147. Lacko, C. S.; Singh, I.; Wall, M. A.; Garcia, A. R.; Porvasnik, S. L.; Rinaldi, C.; Schmidt, C. E. Magnetic particle templating of hydrogels: Engineering naturally derived hydrogel scaffolds with 3D aligned microarchitecture for nerve repair. J. Neural Eng. 2020, 17, 016057. [CrossRef]
  148. Li, K.; Ye, D.; An, Z.; Xu, J.; Sun, X.; Liu, M.; Li, P. Nerve tissue regeneration based on magnetic and conductive bifunctional hydrogel scaffold. Mater. Today Commun. 2024, 39, 109120. [CrossRef]
  149. Han, Q.; Guan, W.; Sun, S.; Zheng, T.; Wu, L.; Gao, H.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Li, G. Anisotropic topological scaffolds synergizing non-invasive wireless magnetic stimulation for accelerating long-distance peripheral nerve regeneration. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 496, 153809. [CrossRef]
  150. Taghizadeh, S.; Tayebi, L.; Akbarzadeh, M.; Lohrasbi, P.; Savardashtaki, A. Magnetic hydrogel applications in articular cartilage tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2024, 112, 260-275. [CrossRef]
  151. Chen, Z.; Yan, C.; Yan, S.; Liu, Q.; Hou, M.; Xu, Y.; Guo, R. Non-invasive monitoring of in vivo hydrogel degradation and cartilage regeneration by multiparametric MR imaging. Theranostics 2018, 8, 1146-1158. [CrossRef]
  152. Yang, W.; Zhu, P.; Huang, H.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, J.; Feng, L.; Guo, H.; Tang, S.; Guo, R. Functionalization of novel theranostic hydrogels with kartogenin-grafted USPIO nanoparticles to enhance cartilage regeneration. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 34744-34754. [CrossRef]
  153. Zlotnick, H. M.; Clark, A. T.; Gullbrand, S. E.; Carey, J. L.; Cheng, X. M.; Mauck, R. L. Magneto-driven gradients of diamagnetic objects for engineering complex tissues. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2005030. [CrossRef]
  154. Choi, Y.; Kim, C.; Kim, H. S.; Moon, C.; Lee, K. Y. 3D Printing of dynamic tissue scaffold by combining self-healing hydrogel and self-healing ferrogel. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 2021, 208, 112108. [CrossRef]
  155. Alford, A. I.; Kozloff, K. M.; Hankenson, K. D. Extracellular matrix networks in bone remodeling. Int. j. biochem. cell biol. 2015, 65, 20-31. [CrossRef]
  156. Katsamenis, O. L.; Chong, H. M.; Andriotis, O. G.; Thurner, P. J. Load-bearing in cortical bone microstructure: Selective stiffening and heterogeneous strain distribution at the lamellar level. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2013, 17, 152-165. [CrossRef]
  157. 157 Arjmand, M.; Ardeshirylajimi, A.; Maghsoudi, H.; Azadian, E. Osteogenic differentiation potential of mesenchymal stem cells cultured on nanofibrous scaffold improved in the presence of pulsed electromagnetic field. J. Cell Physiol. 2018, 233, 1061-1070. [CrossRef]
  158. Xu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, L.; Cai, H.; Yang, X.; Xue, Y.; Wan, Q.; Chen, J.; Li, Y. Magnetic scaffold constructing by micro-injection for bone tissue engineering under static magnetic field. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2024, 29, 3554-3565. [CrossRef]
  159. Babakhani, A.; Peighambardoust, S. J.; Olad, A. Fabrication of magnetic nanocomposite scaffolds based on polyvinyl alcohol-chitosan containing hydroxyapatite and clay modified with graphene oxide: Evaluation of their properties for bone tissue engineering applications. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2024, 150, 106263. [CrossRef]
  160. Bolonduro, O. A.; Duffy, B. M.; Rao, A. A.; Black, L. D.; Timko, B. P. From biomimicry to bioelectronics: Smart materials for cardiac tissue engineering. Nano Res. 2020, 13, 1253-1267. [CrossRef]
  161. Shin, S. R.; Zihlmann, C.; Akbari, M.; Assawes, P.; Cheung, L.; Zhang, K.; Manoharan, V.; Zhang, Y. S.; Yüksekkaya, M.; Wan, K.-T., et al. Reduced graphene oxide-GelMA hybrid hydrogels as scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. Small 2016, 12, 3677-3689. [CrossRef]
  162. 162 Qazi, T. H.; Rai, R.; Dippold, D.; Roether, J. E.; Schubert, D. W.; Rosellini, E.; Barbani, N.; Boccaccini, A. R. Development and characterization of novel electrically conductive PANI–PGS composites for cardiac tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10, 2434-2445. [CrossRef]
  163. Kai, D.; Prabhakaran, M. P.; Jin, G.; Ramakrishna, S. Polypyrrole-contained electrospun conductive nanofibrous membranes for cardiac tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2011, 99A, 376-385. [CrossRef]
  164. Zhu, K.; Shin, S. R.; van Kempen, T.; Li, Y.-C.; Ponraj, V.; Nasajpour, A.; Mandla, S.; Hu, N.; Liu, X.; Leijten, J. et al. Gold nanocomposite bioink for printing 3D cardiac constructs. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1605352. [CrossRef]
  165. Martins, A. M.; Eng, G.; Caridade, S. G.; Mano, J. F.; Reis, R. L.; Vunjak-Novakovic, G. Electrically conductive chitosan/carbon scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 2014, 15, 635-643. [CrossRef]
  166. Ahadian, S.; Yamada, S.; Ramón-Azcón, J.; Estili, M.; Liang, X.; Nakajima, K.; Shiku, H.; Khademhosseini, A.; Matsue, T. Hybrid hydrogel-aligned carbon nanotube scaffolds to enhance cardiac differentiation of embryoid bodies. Acta Biomater. 2016, 31, 134-143. [CrossRef]
  167. Shin, S. R.; Jung, S. M.; Zalabany, M.; Kim, K.; Zorlutuna, P.; Kim, S. b.; Nikkhah, M.; Khabiry, M.; Azize, M.; Kong, J. et al. Carbon-nanotube-embedded hydrogel sheets for engineering cardiac constructs and bioactuators. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 2369-2380. [CrossRef]
  168. Bonfrate, V.; Manno, D.; Serra, A.; Salvatore, L.; Sannino, A.; Buccolieri, A.; Serra, T.; Giancane, G. Enhanced electrical conductivity of collagen films through long-range aligned iron oxide nanoparticles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 501, 185-191. [CrossRef]
  169. Vannozzi, L.; Yasa, I. C.; Ceylan, H.; Menciassi, A.; Ricotti, L.; Sitti, M. Self-folded hydrogel tubes for implantable muscular tissue scaffolds. Macromol. Biosci. 2018, 18, 1700377. [CrossRef]
  170. Liu, Y.; Xu, K.; Chang, Q.; Darabi, M. A.; Lin, B.; Zhong, W.; Xing, M. Highly flexible and resilient elastin hybrid cryogels with shape memory, injectability, conductivity, and magnetic responsive properties. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 7758-7767. [CrossRef]
  171. Han, J.; Kim, B.; Shin, J.-Y.; Ryu, S.; Noh, M.; Woo, J.; Park, J.-S.; Lee, Y.; Lee, N.; Hyeon, T. et al. Iron oxide nanoparticle-mediated development of cellular gap junction crosstalk to improve mesenchymal stem cells’ therapeutic efficacy for myocardial infarction. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 2805-2819. [CrossRef]
  172. Kankala, R. K.; Zhu, K.; Sun, X.-N.; Liu, C.-G.; Wang, S.-B.; Chen, A.-Z. Cardiac tissue engineering on the nanoscale. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 4, 800-818. [CrossRef]
  173. Nazari, H.; Heirani-Tabasi, A.; Hajiabbas, M.; Salimi Bani, M.; Nazari, M.; Pirhajati Mahabadi, V.; Rad, I.; Kehtari, M.; Ahmadi Tafti, S. H.; Soleimani, M. Incorporation of SPION-casein core-shells into silk-fibroin nanofibers for cardiac tissue engineering. J. Cell. Biochem. 2020, 121, 2981-2993. [CrossRef]
  174. Cicha, I.; Alexiou, C. Cardiovascular applications of magnetic particles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2021, 518, 167428. [CrossRef]
  175. Ma, H.; Yu, G.; Cheng, J.; Song, L.; Zhou, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Liu, L.; Wei, X.; Yang, M. Design of an injectable magnetic hydrogel based on the tumor microenvironment for multimodal synergistic cancer therapy. Biomacromolecules 2023, 24, 868-885. [CrossRef]
  176. Xu, J.; Wang, P.; Zou, Y.; Zhang, S.; Huang, C.; Liu, L.; Yu, J.; Fan, Y. One-step preparation of Fe3O4/nanochitin magnetic hydrogels with remolding ability by ammonia vapor diffusion gelation for osteosarcoma therapy. Biomacromolecules 2022, 23, 1314-1325. [CrossRef]
  177. Long, J.; Wang, Y.; Lu, M.; Etxeberria, A. E.; Zhou, Y.; Gu, P.; Song, P.; Min, L.; Luo, Y.; Nand, A. V.; et al. Dual-cross-linked magnetic hydrogel with programmed release of parathyroid hormone promotes bone healing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 35815-35831. [CrossRef]
  178. Abenojar, E. C.; Wickramasinghe, S.; Ju, M.; Uppaluri, S.; Klika, A.; George, J.; Barsoum, W.; Frangiamore, S. J.; Higuera-Rueda, C. A.; Samia, A. C. S. Magnetic glycol chitin-based hydrogel nanocomposite for combined thermal and d-amino-acid-assisted biofilm disruption. ACS Infect. Dis. 2018, 4, 1246-1256. [CrossRef]
  179. Mañas-Torres, M. C.; Gila-Vilchez, C.; Vazquez-Perez, F. J.; Kuzhir, P.; Momier, D.; Scimeca, J.-C.; Borderie, A.; Goracci, M.; Burel-Vandenbos, F.; Blanco-Elices, C.; et al. Injectable magnetic-responsive short-peptide supramolecular hydrogels: Ex vivo and in vivo evaluation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 49692-49704. [CrossRef]
  180. Zhang, N.; Lock, J.; Sallee, A.; Liu, H. Magnetic nanocomposite hydrogel for potential cartilage tissue engineering: Synthesis, characterization, and cytocompatibility with bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 20987-20998. [CrossRef]
  181. Yang, C.-Y.; Meng, Z.; Yang, K.; He, Z.; Hou, Z.; Yang, J.; Lu, J.; Cao, Z.; Yang, S.; Chai, Y.; et al. External magnetic field non-invasively stimulates spinal cord regeneration in rat via a magnetic-responsive aligned fibrin hydrogel. Biofabrication 2023, 15, 035022. [CrossRef]
  182. Karimi, S.; Bagher, Z.; Najmoddin, N.; Simorgh, S.; Pezeshki-Modaress, M. Alginate-magnetic short nanofibers 3D composite hydrogel enhances the encapsulated human olfactory mucosa stem cells bioactivity for potential nerve regeneration application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 167, 796-806. [CrossRef]
  183. Wang, J.; Li, P.; Li, K.; Xu, J.; Liu, M.; Fan, Y. The effect of magnetic poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) microsphere-gelatin hydrogel on the growth of pre-osteoblasts under static magnetic field. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2020, 16, 1658-1666. [CrossRef]
  184. Silva, E. D.; Babo, P. S.; Costa-Almeida, R.; Domingues, R. M. A.; Mendes, B. B.; Paz, E.; Freitas, P.; Rodrigues, M. T.; Granja, P. L.; Gomes, M. E. Multifunctional magnetic-responsive hydrogels to engineer tendon-to-bone interface. Nanomedicine: NBM 2018, 14, 2375-2385. [CrossRef]
  185. Ma, Y.; Yang, J.; Hu, Y.; Xia, Z.; Cai, K. Osteogenic differentiation of the MSCs on silk fibroin hydrogel loaded Fe3O4@PAA NPs in static magnetic field environment. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 2022, 220, 112947. [CrossRef]
  186. Zou, Y.-P.; Liang, H.-F.; Wang, B.; Zhang, Q.-C.; Su, D.-H.; Lu, S.-Y.; Zhang, Q.-Y.; Wu, T.; Xiao, L.; Xiao, Y.; et al. Precipitation-based silk fibroin fast gelling, highly adhesive, and magnetic nanocomposite hydrogel for repair of irregular bone defects. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2302442. [CrossRef]
  187. Santhamoorthy, M.; Thirupathi, K.; Kumar, S. S. D.; Pandiaraj, S.; Rahaman, M.; Phan, T. T. V.; Kim, S.-C. k-Carrageenan based magnetic@polyelectrolyte complex composite hydrogel for pH and temperature-responsive curcumin delivery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 244, 125467. [CrossRef]
  188. Eivazzadeh-Keihan, R.; Mohammadi, A.; Aghamirza Moghim Aliabadi, H.; Kashtiaray, A.; Bani, M. S.; Karimi, A. H.; Maleki, A.; Mahdavi, M. A novel ternary magnetic nanobiocomposite based on tragacanth-silk fibroin hydrogel for hyperthermia and biological properties. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 8166. [CrossRef]
  189. Carrelo, H.; Escoval, A. R.; Vieira, T.; Jiménez-Rosado, M.; Silva, J. C.; Romero, A.; Soares, P. I. P.; Borges, J. P. Injectable thermoresponsive microparticle/hydrogel system with superparamagnetic nanoparticles for drug release and magnetic hyperthermia applications. Gels 2023, 9, 982. [CrossRef]
  190. Hu, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Xu, M.; Zhang, J.; Dong, W. Design of a pH-sensitive magnetic composite hydrogel based on salecan graft copolymer and Fe3O4@SiO2 nanoparticles as drug carrier. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 107, 1811-1820. [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of multifunctional MHs and their applications.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of multifunctional MHs and their applications.
Preprints 178019 g001
Figure 2. Overview of the principal methods used in the fabrication of MHs: (a) The blending technique where MNPs are amalgamated with a precursor hydrogel solution at a designated molar ratio followed by cross-linking; (b) The in situ synthesis approach where MNPs are generated through in situ precipitation within the polymer hydrogel network subsequent to cross-linking; and (c) The grafting-onto technique which involves the introduction of multiple functional groups on the MNPs that will serve as crosslinkers.
Figure 2. Overview of the principal methods used in the fabrication of MHs: (a) The blending technique where MNPs are amalgamated with a precursor hydrogel solution at a designated molar ratio followed by cross-linking; (b) The in situ synthesis approach where MNPs are generated through in situ precipitation within the polymer hydrogel network subsequent to cross-linking; and (c) The grafting-onto technique which involves the introduction of multiple functional groups on the MNPs that will serve as crosslinkers.
Preprints 178019 g002
Figure 3. Schematic showing the different methods used for the fabrication of MHs with well-ordered architecture.
Figure 3. Schematic showing the different methods used for the fabrication of MHs with well-ordered architecture.
Preprints 178019 g003
Figure 4. (i) Schematic representation of a hydrogel-based approach for bladder cancer treatment. (ii) Mechanism of gel formation. Targeting capability and tissue adhesion properties of the GelDA hydrogel. (iii) Release profile and corresponding fitting curves of bovine serum proteins at pH 7.4. Reproduced with permission from [59]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 4. (i) Schematic representation of a hydrogel-based approach for bladder cancer treatment. (ii) Mechanism of gel formation. Targeting capability and tissue adhesion properties of the GelDA hydrogel. (iii) Release profile and corresponding fitting curves of bovine serum proteins at pH 7.4. Reproduced with permission from [59]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier B.V.
Preprints 178019 g004
Figure 5. Representative confocal laser micrographs (A) showing C2C12 cells cultured on RSF, RSF-Fe, and ASF-Fe nanofibers, along with their orientation angle (B). Additionally, the MTS assay results (C) depict mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) proliferation. Statistical significance is indicated as *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 Reproduced with permission from [66]. Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society.
Figure 5. Representative confocal laser micrographs (A) showing C2C12 cells cultured on RSF, RSF-Fe, and ASF-Fe nanofibers, along with their orientation angle (B). Additionally, the MTS assay results (C) depict mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) proliferation. Statistical significance is indicated as *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 Reproduced with permission from [66]. Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society.
Preprints 178019 g005
Figure 6. (i) A schematic representation illustrating the fabrication of the scaffold and the induction of cellular alignment for engineered muscle using a micro-channeled PEG scaffold integrated with magnetic Fe3O4, designed to enhance esophageal muscle regeneration. (ii) Assessment of cell orientation on various substrates: (a) Immunofluorescence (IF) staining images depicting the orientation of SMCs cultured on different substrates, including standard culture plates (normal), PEG scaffold (control), PEGM0.5, and PEGM1.0, after 24 hours. (b) Statistical analysis of cytoskeletal and nuclear orientation angles. (c) Quantitative evaluation of SMC elongation. (iii) Characterization of the PEG scaffold: (a) Surface morphology, (b) apparent topological structure, (c) 3D structure visualization, and (d) size measurement using 3D laser confocal microscopy. Reproduced with permission from [67]. Copyright 2023, The Authors (open access).
Figure 6. (i) A schematic representation illustrating the fabrication of the scaffold and the induction of cellular alignment for engineered muscle using a micro-channeled PEG scaffold integrated with magnetic Fe3O4, designed to enhance esophageal muscle regeneration. (ii) Assessment of cell orientation on various substrates: (a) Immunofluorescence (IF) staining images depicting the orientation of SMCs cultured on different substrates, including standard culture plates (normal), PEG scaffold (control), PEGM0.5, and PEGM1.0, after 24 hours. (b) Statistical analysis of cytoskeletal and nuclear orientation angles. (c) Quantitative evaluation of SMC elongation. (iii) Characterization of the PEG scaffold: (a) Surface morphology, (b) apparent topological structure, (c) 3D structure visualization, and (d) size measurement using 3D laser confocal microscopy. Reproduced with permission from [67]. Copyright 2023, The Authors (open access).
Preprints 178019 g006
Figure 7. (i) Schematic representation illustrating the synthesis of MNP-embedded hydrogel sheets with groove patterns for wound healing applications. (ii) Characterization of hydrogel sheets featuring different groove patterns:(a) Cross-sectional view of the groove structures.(b) Bright-field microscopy images showcasing hydrogel sheets with groove patterns at varying line-to-space ratios: 1:1 (10:10 μm), 1:3 (10:30 μm), and 1:5 (10:50 μm). Scale bar = 50 μm.(c) F-actin/DAPI staining images depicting cellular adhesion and alignment on the patterned hydrogel sheets.(d) Quantitative analysis of cell orientation (n = 40), scale bar = 50 μm.(iii) In vitro wound healing assay:(a) Bright-field images capturing the wound healing process at different time points (0, 18, 22, and 27 hours).(b) Quantitative evaluation of wound closure rates (n = 3), with statistical significance indicated as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001, ***p < 0.0001. Scale bar = 400 μm. Reproduced with permission from [68]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.
Figure 7. (i) Schematic representation illustrating the synthesis of MNP-embedded hydrogel sheets with groove patterns for wound healing applications. (ii) Characterization of hydrogel sheets featuring different groove patterns:(a) Cross-sectional view of the groove structures.(b) Bright-field microscopy images showcasing hydrogel sheets with groove patterns at varying line-to-space ratios: 1:1 (10:10 μm), 1:3 (10:30 μm), and 1:5 (10:50 μm). Scale bar = 50 μm.(c) F-actin/DAPI staining images depicting cellular adhesion and alignment on the patterned hydrogel sheets.(d) Quantitative analysis of cell orientation (n = 40), scale bar = 50 μm.(iii) In vitro wound healing assay:(a) Bright-field images capturing the wound healing process at different time points (0, 18, 22, and 27 hours).(b) Quantitative evaluation of wound closure rates (n = 3), with statistical significance indicated as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001, ***p < 0.0001. Scale bar = 400 μm. Reproduced with permission from [68]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.
Preprints 178019 g007
Figure 8. An analysis of the rheological characteristics during the sol-gel transition of a hydrogel-forming solution. Modified with permission from [69]. Copyright 2005, Elsevier Ltd.
Figure 8. An analysis of the rheological characteristics during the sol-gel transition of a hydrogel-forming solution. Modified with permission from [69]. Copyright 2005, Elsevier Ltd.
Preprints 178019 g008
Figure 9. Cell viability assessments of MDA-MB-231 cells following treatment with either monotherapy or combination chemotherapy. The viability of MDA-MB-231 cells was quantified using the Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK-8) assay. The reported values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD); n = 5 (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.001). Reproduced with permission from [80]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.
Figure 9. Cell viability assessments of MDA-MB-231 cells following treatment with either monotherapy or combination chemotherapy. The viability of MDA-MB-231 cells was quantified using the Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK-8) assay. The reported values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD); n = 5 (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.001). Reproduced with permission from [80]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.
Preprints 178019 g009
Figure 10. (a) The mechanical characteristics of the gels were examined through the compressive stress-strain curve of the PDMAAm SN gel and the G4·K+/PDMAAm DN gel. (b) The tensile stress-strain behavior of both PDMAAm SN gel and G4·K+/PDMAAm DN gel. (c) The tearing energies of G4·K+/PDMAAm DN gels at various crosshead speeds (the inset figure represents the tearing energies of PDMAAm SN gel and G4·K+/PDMAAm DN gel at a tearing crosshead speed of 50 mm/min). (d) The crack resistance exhibited by the notched G4·K+/PDMAAm DN gel. Reproduced with permission from [90]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society.
Figure 10. (a) The mechanical characteristics of the gels were examined through the compressive stress-strain curve of the PDMAAm SN gel and the G4·K+/PDMAAm DN gel. (b) The tensile stress-strain behavior of both PDMAAm SN gel and G4·K+/PDMAAm DN gel. (c) The tearing energies of G4·K+/PDMAAm DN gels at various crosshead speeds (the inset figure represents the tearing energies of PDMAAm SN gel and G4·K+/PDMAAm DN gel at a tearing crosshead speed of 50 mm/min). (d) The crack resistance exhibited by the notched G4·K+/PDMAAm DN gel. Reproduced with permission from [90]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society.
Preprints 178019 g010
Figure 11. Flowchart of efficient removal of contaminants from wastewater using magnetic hydrogel. Reproduced with permission and with slight changes from [89]. Copyright 2021, The Authors (open access).
Figure 11. Flowchart of efficient removal of contaminants from wastewater using magnetic hydrogel. Reproduced with permission and with slight changes from [89]. Copyright 2021, The Authors (open access).
Preprints 178019 g011
Figure 12. Modification of the physical characteristics of a MH upon exposure to an AMF (1.26 MHz, 1.3 kA m−1). a) The photographs depict the chromatic transition of the film over the duration of the AMF stimulation, (scale bar 1 cm). Corresponding reflection spectra captured at various time intervals during the AMF operation. b) CIE chromaticity coordinates corresponding to the film at different durations under AMF stimulation. c) Dynamic plots showing the temperature (square symbol) and λmax (circular symbol) of the film under the AMF. g) Diffraction wavelengths recorded over 6 cycles with the AMF applied for 6 minutes (AMF ON). For replication, this process was reiterated, with the film being cooled back to its initial temperature of approximately 11 °C after the magnetic heating was ceased (AMF OFF). Reproduced with permission from [101]. Copyright 2017, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & co.
Figure 12. Modification of the physical characteristics of a MH upon exposure to an AMF (1.26 MHz, 1.3 kA m−1). a) The photographs depict the chromatic transition of the film over the duration of the AMF stimulation, (scale bar 1 cm). Corresponding reflection spectra captured at various time intervals during the AMF operation. b) CIE chromaticity coordinates corresponding to the film at different durations under AMF stimulation. c) Dynamic plots showing the temperature (square symbol) and λmax (circular symbol) of the film under the AMF. g) Diffraction wavelengths recorded over 6 cycles with the AMF applied for 6 minutes (AMF ON). For replication, this process was reiterated, with the film being cooled back to its initial temperature of approximately 11 °C after the magnetic heating was ceased (AMF OFF). Reproduced with permission from [101]. Copyright 2017, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & co.
Preprints 178019 g012
Figure 13. Schematic of the treatment process with hydrogel microrobot. (I) the hydrogel microrobot carrying MNPs and PLGA–DOX navigated under magnetic field to the targeted position (II) NIR irradiation is carried out to degrade the hydrogel microrobot (III) then the remains MNPs in the vicinity of the lesion is captured by the magnetic field (IV) Modified with permission from [107]. Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V.
Figure 13. Schematic of the treatment process with hydrogel microrobot. (I) the hydrogel microrobot carrying MNPs and PLGA–DOX navigated under magnetic field to the targeted position (II) NIR irradiation is carried out to degrade the hydrogel microrobot (III) then the remains MNPs in the vicinity of the lesion is captured by the magnetic field (IV) Modified with permission from [107]. Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V.
Preprints 178019 g013
Figure 14. Schematic of biomedical application of MHs.
Figure 14. Schematic of biomedical application of MHs.
Preprints 178019 g014
Figure 15. Schematic illustration which shows drug molecules are released from hydrogels with and without an applied magnetic field. Reproduced with permission from [42]. Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society.
Figure 15. Schematic illustration which shows drug molecules are released from hydrogels with and without an applied magnetic field. Reproduced with permission from [42]. Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society.
Preprints 178019 g015
Figure 16. Explanatory diagram of MNP-mediated MHT for selective tumor cells ablation.
Figure 16. Explanatory diagram of MNP-mediated MHT for selective tumor cells ablation.
Preprints 178019 g016
Figure 17. Characterization of ferumoxytol-labelled spheroids was conducted utilizing both in vitro and in vivo magnetic resonance imaging techniques. This figure illustrates (A) longitudinal T2 MRI sections of agarose infused with cells cultured on distinct hydrogels, accompanied by a relative quantitative analysis. (B) T2 MR images of spheroids subjected to varying concentrations of ferumoxytol at 0, 50, 100, 200, and 500 μg mL−1 are presented alongside a quantitative analysis of contrast enhancement. (C) In the context of this study, protocol designed for MRI monitoring post-transplantation in nude BALB/c mice. (D) displays of axial T2 MR images of mice at 1, 3, 7, and 10 days after the transplantation of labelled hUC-MSC spheroids, along with a relative quantitative analysis. Reproduced with permission from [125]. Copyright 2022, The Authors (open access).
Figure 17. Characterization of ferumoxytol-labelled spheroids was conducted utilizing both in vitro and in vivo magnetic resonance imaging techniques. This figure illustrates (A) longitudinal T2 MRI sections of agarose infused with cells cultured on distinct hydrogels, accompanied by a relative quantitative analysis. (B) T2 MR images of spheroids subjected to varying concentrations of ferumoxytol at 0, 50, 100, 200, and 500 μg mL−1 are presented alongside a quantitative analysis of contrast enhancement. (C) In the context of this study, protocol designed for MRI monitoring post-transplantation in nude BALB/c mice. (D) displays of axial T2 MR images of mice at 1, 3, 7, and 10 days after the transplantation of labelled hUC-MSC spheroids, along with a relative quantitative analysis. Reproduced with permission from [125]. Copyright 2022, The Authors (open access).
Preprints 178019 g017
Figure 18. Illustration of syntheses and uses of stimuli-responsive MXene-based hydrogel system for bio-, thermo-, and pH-responsive applications. a) The synthesis mechanism of the MXene based hydrogel system and the mechanism of drug release in this system. b) Deep chronic infected wound model treated with non-invasive red light sensitive AgNPs/MXene hydrogel system. Reproduced with permission from [132]. Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Figure 18. Illustration of syntheses and uses of stimuli-responsive MXene-based hydrogel system for bio-, thermo-, and pH-responsive applications. a) The synthesis mechanism of the MXene based hydrogel system and the mechanism of drug release in this system. b) Deep chronic infected wound model treated with non-invasive red light sensitive AgNPs/MXene hydrogel system. Reproduced with permission from [132]. Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Preprints 178019 g018
Figure 19. (I)schematic of heparinized magnetic hydrogels serves as a promising approach to promote angiogenesis in different types of tissue damage. (ii) MSC proliferation on non-heparinized and heparinized hydrogels containing 0.25% and 1% MNPs after exposure to a 0.08 T magnetic field (MF) for 24 hours. Each asterisk (*) denotes a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). (iii) Fluorescence microscopy images of MSCs stained with DAPI/FITC–phalloidin in non-heparinized and heparinized magnetic hydrogels on the seventh day post-seeding. Green fluorescence represents actin filaments, while blue fluorescence indicates cell nuclei. Reproduced with permission from [133]. Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society.
Figure 19. (I)schematic of heparinized magnetic hydrogels serves as a promising approach to promote angiogenesis in different types of tissue damage. (ii) MSC proliferation on non-heparinized and heparinized hydrogels containing 0.25% and 1% MNPs after exposure to a 0.08 T magnetic field (MF) for 24 hours. Each asterisk (*) denotes a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). (iii) Fluorescence microscopy images of MSCs stained with DAPI/FITC–phalloidin in non-heparinized and heparinized magnetic hydrogels on the seventh day post-seeding. Green fluorescence represents actin filaments, while blue fluorescence indicates cell nuclei. Reproduced with permission from [133]. Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society.
Preprints 178019 g019
Figure 20. Formation of the anisotropic GOH-MPG conductive hydrogels: (a) Schematic illustration showing the preparation process of the anisotropic GOH-MPG conductive hydrogel and its application in the medical field. (b) Optical images displaying the formation of the anisotropic GOH-MPG hydrogel and the distribution of MPG nanosheets. (c) SEM images comparing isotropic and anisotropic hydrogels (GOH-MPG1.0), with alignment indicated along the red line. (d) Two-dimensional SAXS patterns of both isotropic and anisotropic hydrogels. Reproduced with permission from [134]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 20. Formation of the anisotropic GOH-MPG conductive hydrogels: (a) Schematic illustration showing the preparation process of the anisotropic GOH-MPG conductive hydrogel and its application in the medical field. (b) Optical images displaying the formation of the anisotropic GOH-MPG hydrogel and the distribution of MPG nanosheets. (c) SEM images comparing isotropic and anisotropic hydrogels (GOH-MPG1.0), with alignment indicated along the red line. (d) Two-dimensional SAXS patterns of both isotropic and anisotropic hydrogels. Reproduced with permission from [134]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier B.V.
Preprints 178019 g020
Figure 21. Schematic representation delineating the procedural steps for the preparation of LBC-Fe3O4/-MIPDA (A), the impregnation of LBC-Fe3O4/-MIPDA within XG and the associated sample pre-treatment (B), the drop casting of the formulated mixture onto a magnetite SPE (C), and the functional mechanism underlying magnetic redox-responsive detection (D). Reproduced with permission from [141]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 21. Schematic representation delineating the procedural steps for the preparation of LBC-Fe3O4/-MIPDA (A), the impregnation of LBC-Fe3O4/-MIPDA within XG and the associated sample pre-treatment (B), the drop casting of the formulated mixture onto a magnetite SPE (C), and the functional mechanism underlying magnetic redox-responsive detection (D). Reproduced with permission from [141]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier B.V.
Preprints 178019 g021
Figure 22. Synthesis and characterization of magnetically responsive anisotropic topological channels (A) Schematic representation of the fabrication methodology, (B) Macroscopic assessment of the conduits exhibiting varying degrees of DFe3O4 incorporation. (C) A fluorescence analysis of both transverse and longitudinal sections of the conduit containing 2 mg/mL DFe3O4. (D-G) The stress–strain relationship, elastic modulus, peak loading force, and suture strength of the magnetic conduit with different concentrations of DFe3O4 set at 6. (H) A bridging model illustrating sciatic nerve injury for a sciatic nerve gap measuring 1 cm in a rat model. (I) A schematic representation of the magnetic interference processing, (J) Macroscopic images of the surgical site following 2 weeks and 8 weeks, as evidenced by Figures 4G, 4H H&E staining; ns denotes no significant difference across groups with varying concentrations of CS and the CS@AS group * p < 0.05, indicates statistical significance. Reproduced with permission from [149]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 22. Synthesis and characterization of magnetically responsive anisotropic topological channels (A) Schematic representation of the fabrication methodology, (B) Macroscopic assessment of the conduits exhibiting varying degrees of DFe3O4 incorporation. (C) A fluorescence analysis of both transverse and longitudinal sections of the conduit containing 2 mg/mL DFe3O4. (D-G) The stress–strain relationship, elastic modulus, peak loading force, and suture strength of the magnetic conduit with different concentrations of DFe3O4 set at 6. (H) A bridging model illustrating sciatic nerve injury for a sciatic nerve gap measuring 1 cm in a rat model. (I) A schematic representation of the magnetic interference processing, (J) Macroscopic images of the surgical site following 2 weeks and 8 weeks, as evidenced by Figures 4G, 4H H&E staining; ns denotes no significant difference across groups with varying concentrations of CS and the CS@AS group * p < 0.05, indicates statistical significance. Reproduced with permission from [149]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier B.V.
Preprints 178019 g022
Figure 23. (1) Overall structure of hydrogel, structure of (1A) magnetic gelatin/β-CD/Fe3O4 hydrogel, structure of (1B) ordinary gelatin/β-CD hydrogel. (2). MTT assay study (A) CCK-8 solution absorption: The two hydrogels prepared in this work are: (a) plain gelatin/β-CD hydrogel and (b) magnetically responsive gelatin/β-CD/Fe3O4 hydrogel. Surface characteristics (3A) SEM of magnetic gelatin/β-CD/Fe3O4 hydrogel; the surface of the material is rough with the presence of pores on the surface of the hydrogel. The surface morphology of the ordinary gelatin/β-CD hydrogel at the microscopic level has got small voids but is quite smooth. (4) Live/Dead cell staining: self-assembled organic-inorganic hybrid hydrogels including: (4a) ordinary gelatin/β-CD hydrogel and (4b) magnetic gelatin/β-CD/Fe3O4 hydrogel. (5) The macroscopic characteristics of repaired articular cartilage. Photographs of rabbit knee articular defects at 8 and 12 weeks after operation: (A–H). The black circles show where the initial defect margin was obtained. Summarize data Distribution of the ICRS macroscopic scores of the repaired cartilage at 8 and 12 weeks; (I and J) Data are expressed as mean ± SD; n = 6; *P < 0. 05, **P < 0. 01, ***P < 0. 001. Group (a) magnetic gelatin/β-CD/Fe3O4 hydrogel complexed with BMSCs (plus pulsed electromagnetic field), Group (b) magnetic gelatin/β-CD/Fe3O4 hydrogel and BMSCs complex, Group (c) magnetic gelatin/β-CD/Fe3O4 hydrogel, Group (d): blank control it is possible to leave the model entirely open to external feedback, so that there are no specific barriers to influence and feedback in the first place. Reprinted with permission from [100]. Copyright 2020, The Royal Society of Chemistry (open access).
Figure 23. (1) Overall structure of hydrogel, structure of (1A) magnetic gelatin/β-CD/Fe3O4 hydrogel, structure of (1B) ordinary gelatin/β-CD hydrogel. (2). MTT assay study (A) CCK-8 solution absorption: The two hydrogels prepared in this work are: (a) plain gelatin/β-CD hydrogel and (b) magnetically responsive gelatin/β-CD/Fe3O4 hydrogel. Surface characteristics (3A) SEM of magnetic gelatin/β-CD/Fe3O4 hydrogel; the surface of the material is rough with the presence of pores on the surface of the hydrogel. The surface morphology of the ordinary gelatin/β-CD hydrogel at the microscopic level has got small voids but is quite smooth. (4) Live/Dead cell staining: self-assembled organic-inorganic hybrid hydrogels including: (4a) ordinary gelatin/β-CD hydrogel and (4b) magnetic gelatin/β-CD/Fe3O4 hydrogel. (5) The macroscopic characteristics of repaired articular cartilage. Photographs of rabbit knee articular defects at 8 and 12 weeks after operation: (A–H). The black circles show where the initial defect margin was obtained. Summarize data Distribution of the ICRS macroscopic scores of the repaired cartilage at 8 and 12 weeks; (I and J) Data are expressed as mean ± SD; n = 6; *P < 0. 05, **P < 0. 01, ***P < 0. 001. Group (a) magnetic gelatin/β-CD/Fe3O4 hydrogel complexed with BMSCs (plus pulsed electromagnetic field), Group (b) magnetic gelatin/β-CD/Fe3O4 hydrogel and BMSCs complex, Group (c) magnetic gelatin/β-CD/Fe3O4 hydrogel, Group (d): blank control it is possible to leave the model entirely open to external feedback, so that there are no specific barriers to influence and feedback in the first place. Reprinted with permission from [100]. Copyright 2020, The Royal Society of Chemistry (open access).
Preprints 178019 g023
Figure 24. a) CCK-8 assay to determine the BMSCs cytotoxicity and proliferation after seeding the scaffolds with H-Mag, L-Mag, and NC for 1 day, 3 days, and 5 days. b) and c) Representative images of fluorescent staining of live (green) and death (red) BMSCs in the cells of PL-0, PLF-1, PLF-2, and PLF-3 groups which were treated by L-Mag, H-Mag, and NC for 4h (Magnification ×200). d) (* P<0. 05, ** P < 0. 01, *** P < 0. 001, (**** P < 0. 0001). d) The shape of the BMSCs when they were cultured on the surface of the scaffold using L-Mag and NC for 24 h. DAPI was used to stain the nucleus which appears blue while F-actin was stained using TRITC was stained and appears red (scale bar for 100μm). e) and f) The density of the live/dead staining of BMSCs (*P < 0). Reprinted with permission from [158]. Copyright 2024, The Authors (open access).
Figure 24. a) CCK-8 assay to determine the BMSCs cytotoxicity and proliferation after seeding the scaffolds with H-Mag, L-Mag, and NC for 1 day, 3 days, and 5 days. b) and c) Representative images of fluorescent staining of live (green) and death (red) BMSCs in the cells of PL-0, PLF-1, PLF-2, and PLF-3 groups which were treated by L-Mag, H-Mag, and NC for 4h (Magnification ×200). d) (* P<0. 05, ** P < 0. 01, *** P < 0. 001, (**** P < 0. 0001). d) The shape of the BMSCs when they were cultured on the surface of the scaffold using L-Mag and NC for 24 h. DAPI was used to stain the nucleus which appears blue while F-actin was stained using TRITC was stained and appears red (scale bar for 100μm). e) and f) The density of the live/dead staining of BMSCs (*P < 0). Reprinted with permission from [158]. Copyright 2024, The Authors (open access).
Preprints 178019 g024
Figure 25. Diverse uses of iron oxide nanoparticles that has been approved for use in cardiovascular imaging and treatment. Modified with permission from [174]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 25. Diverse uses of iron oxide nanoparticles that has been approved for use in cardiovascular imaging and treatment. Modified with permission from [174]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier B.V.
Preprints 178019 g025
Table 1. Table of magnetic hydrogels (MHs) used in various tissue engineering applications.
Table 1. Table of magnetic hydrogels (MHs) used in various tissue engineering applications.
Preprints 178019 i003
Preprints 178019 i004
Preprints 178019 i005
Preprints 178019 i006
Preprints 178019 i007
Preprints 178019 i008
Preprints 178019 i009
Preprints 178019 i010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated