Submitted:
26 August 2025
Posted:
28 August 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Result
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| Abbreviations | |
| UTI | Urinary Tract Infection |
| rUTI | Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection |
| CMV | Cytomegalovirus |
| BK | BK virus (polyomavirus) |
| MDRO | Multi-Drug Resistant Organism |
| DM | Diabetes Meletus |
| KTR | Kidney Transplant Recipient |
References
- Alangaden GJ, Thyagarajan R, Gruber SA, et al. Infectious complications after kidney transplantation: current epidemiology and associated risk factors. Clin Transplant 2006;20:401–9. [CrossRef]
- Alangaden, G. Urinary tract infections in renal transplant recipients. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2007;9:475–9. [CrossRef]
- Veroux M, Giuffrida G, Corona D, et al. Infective complications in renal allograft recipients: epidemiology and outcome. Transplant Proc 2008;40:1873–6. [CrossRef]
- Hosseinpour M, Pezeshgi A, Mahdiabadi MZ, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of urinary tract infection in kidney recipients: a meta-analysis study. BMC Nephrol 2023;24:284. [CrossRef]
- Goldman JD, Julian K. Urinary tract infections in solid organ transplant recipients: Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Clin Transplant 2019;33. [CrossRef]
- Wu X, Dong Y, Liu Y, et al. The prevalence and predictive factors of urinary tract infection in patients undergoing renal transplantation: A meta-analysis. Am J Infect Control 2016;44. [CrossRef]
- Behzad D, Hakimeh A, Hossein R, et al. A middle east systematic review and meta-analysis of bacterial urinary tract infection among renal transplant recipients; Causative microorganisms. Microb Pathog 2020;148. [CrossRef]
- Nascimento EHG, Nascimento E, Lasmar MF, et al. Effects of Bacterial Urinary Tract Infection on Clinical Outcome and Survival of Kidney Transplant Patients. Transplant Proc 2022;54:1262–9. [CrossRef]
- Britt NS, Hagopian JC, Brennan DC, et al. Effects of recurrent urinary tract infections on graft and patient outcomes after kidney transplantation. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2017;32:1758–66. [CrossRef]
- Fiorentino M, Pesce F, Schena A, et al. Updates on urinary tract infections in kidney transplantation. J Nephrol 2019;32. [CrossRef]
- Velioglu A, Guneri G, Arikan H, et al. Incidence and risk factors for urinary tract infections in the first year after renal transplantation. PLoS One 2021;16. [CrossRef]
- Alevizakos M, Nasioudis D, Mylonakis E. Urinary tract infections caused by ESBL -producing Enterobacteriaceae in renal transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transplant Infectious Disease 2017;19. [CrossRef]
- Rabkin DG, Stifelman MD, Birkhoff J, et al. Early catheter removal decreases incidence of urinary tract infections in renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 1998;30:4314–6. [CrossRef]
- Guler S, Cimen S, Hurton S, et al. Risks and Benefits of Early Catheter Removal After Renal Transplantation. Transplant Proc 2015;47:2855–9. [CrossRef]
- Werneburg, GT. Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections: Current Challenges and Future Prospects. Res Rep Urol 2022;Volume 14:109–33. [CrossRef]
- Gupta K, Hooton TM, Naber KG, et al. International Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Cystitis and Pyelonephritis in Women: A 2010 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2011;52:e103–20. [CrossRef]
- Kranz J, Bartoletti R, Bruyère F, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Urological Infections: Summary of the 2024 Guidelines. Eur Urol 2024;86:27–41. [CrossRef]
- Barber AE, Norton JP, Spivak AM, et al. Urinary Tract Infections: Current and Emerging Management Strategies. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2013;57:719–24. [CrossRef]
- Pitout JDD. Infections with Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae. Drugs 2010;70:313–33. [CrossRef]
- El-Gamal MI, Brahim I, Hisham N, et al. Recent updates of carbapenem antibiotics. Eur J Med Chem 2017;131:185–95. [CrossRef]
- Tan X, Pan Q, Mo C, et al. Carbapenems vs alternative antibiotics for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection. Medicine 2020;99:e18769. [CrossRef]
- Antimicrobial therapy of complicated urinary. 2012.
- Wagenlehner FME, Vahlensieck W, Bauer HW, et al. Prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2013;65.
- Dason S, Dason JT, Kapoor A. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of recurrent urinary tract infection in women. Canadian Urological Association Journal 2011:316–22. [CrossRef]
- Al-Badr A, Al-Shaikh G. Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections Management in Women : A Review = الإلتهابات المتكررة للمسالك البولية عند النساء و طرق علاجها : مراجعة. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2013;13:359–67. [CrossRef]
- Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Transplant Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2009;9 Suppl 3:S1-155. [CrossRef]
- Mehnert-Kay, SA. Diagnosis and management of uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Am Fam Physician 2005;72:451–6.
- Bono MJ, Leslie SW, Reygaert WC. Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections. 2024.
- Hooton, TM. Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection. New England Journal of Medicine 2012;366:1028–37. [CrossRef]
- Halskov ACL, Dagnæs-Hansen J, Stroomberg H V., et al. Incidence of and Risk Factors for Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections in Renal Transplant Recipients. Eur Urol Open Sci 2023;52:115–22. [CrossRef]
- Al Tamimi AR, Alotaibi WS, Aljohani RM, et al. The Impact of Urinary Tract Infections in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Six-Year Single-Center Experience. Cureus 2023. [CrossRef]

| Eligibility (Y/N) | |||||||||
| N | % | ||||||||
| YES | 75 | 15.3% | |||||||
| NO | 416 | 84.7% | |||||||
| Eligible patients | |||||||||
| N | % | ||||||||
| Developed one episode or no episode of UTI post-transplant | 339 | 69.0% | |||||||
| Patients with missing information or lost follow-up | 67 | 13.6% | |||||||
| Paediatric patients | 10 | 2.0% | |||||||
| INCLUDED | 75 | 15.3% | |||||||
| Gender | |||||||||
| N | % | ||||||||
| Male | 32 | 42.7% | |||||||
| Female | 43 | 57.3% | |||||||
| Descriptive Statistics | |||||||||
| N | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Std. Deviation | |||||
| Age | 75 | 19 | 78 | 48.21 | 15.828 | ||||
| BMI | 74 | 15.90 | 39.00 | 24.9493 | 5.91289 | ||||
| Valid N (listwise) | 74 | ||||||||
| Factors | P value | OR | 95% CI | |
| Age | 0.151 | 1.022 | 0.992 | 1.054 |
| Gender: Female | 0.048 | 0.382 | 0.148 | 0.99 |
| DM: Yes* | 0.039 | 1.833 | 0.685 | 4.909 |
| Smoking: Yes* | 0.811 | 0.741 | 0.064 | 8.559 |
| Structural factor: Yes* | 0.809 | 1.156 | 0.357 | 3.750 |
| CMV: Yes* | 0.183 | 2.800 | 0.616 | 12.733 |
| E.Coli 1st UTI:Yes* | 0.695 | 0.824 | 0.312 | 2.171 |
| Deceased donor | Reference | |||
| Living donor | 0.094 | 3.120 | 0.825 | 11.799 |
| Basiliximab | Reference | |||
| Thymoglobulin (ATG) | 0.572 | 1.306 | 0.517 | 3.297 |
| Symptoms: Yes* | 0.469 | 1.607 | 0.445 | 5.808 |
| Uncomplicated UTI | Reference | |||
| Complicated UTI | 0.005 | 4.600 | 1.567 | 13.502 |
| MDRO: Yes* | 0.021 | 3.143 | 1.185 | 8.334 |
| Stent: Yes* | 0.042 | 4.065 | 1.054 | 15.670 |
| Catheter: Yes* | 0.002 | 0.189 | 0.066 | 0.540 |
| Descriptives | |||||||||
| Statistic | Std. Error | ||||||||
| SCr0 | Mean | 106.23 | 8.228 | ||||||
| Median | 85.00 | ||||||||
| Minimum | 16 | ||||||||
| Maximum | 544 | ||||||||
| Range | 529 | ||||||||
| Interquartile Range | 48 | ||||||||
| WBC_level | Mean | 9.16 | 0.553 | ||||||
| Median | 8.65 | ||||||||
| Minimum | 2 | ||||||||
| Maximum | 29 | ||||||||
| Range | 26 | ||||||||
| Interquartile Range | 6 | ||||||||
| Ranks | |||||||||
| N | Mean Rank | Sum of Ranks | |||||||
| Scr at Baseline - Scr at UTI#1 | Negative Ranks | 14 | 35.93 | 503.00 | |||||
| Positive Ranks | 58 | 36.64 | 2125.00 | ||||||
| Ties | 3 | ||||||||
| Total | 75 | ||||||||
| Test Statisticsa | |||||||||
| Scr at Baseline - Scr at UTI#1 | |||||||||
| Z | -4.552b | ||||||||
| Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.000 | ||||||||
| a. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test | |||||||||
| b. Based on negative ranks. | |||||||||
| ABTIBIOTIC CALSS | ALONE | IN COMB | Total | % | ||||
| Carbapenem | 84 | 11 | 95 | 40.8 | ||||
| Cephalosporin | 50 | 17 | 67 | 28.8 | ||||
| Penicillin | 22 | 6 | 28 | 12.0 | ||||
| Fluoroquinolone | 20 | 7 | 27 | 11.6 | ||||
| Fosfomycin | 12 | 1 | 13 | 5.6 | ||||
| Nitrofurantoin | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1.3 | ||||
| Total | 191 | 42 | 233 | 100 | ||||
| Descriptives | ||||||||
| Statistic | Std. Error | |||||||
| Duration of treatment | Mean | 9.7793 | .53613 | |||||
| 95% Confidence Interval for Mean | Lower Bound | 8.7111 | ||||||
| Upper Bound | 10.8476 | |||||||
| 5% Trimmed Mean | 9.2378 | |||||||
| Median | 9.0000 | |||||||
| Variance | 21.558 | |||||||
| Std. Deviation | 4.64304 | |||||||
| Minimum | 3.00 | |||||||
| Maximum | 37.50 | |||||||
| Range | 34.50 | |||||||
| Interquartile Range | 3.50 | |||||||
| Skewness | 3.349 | .277 | ||||||
| Kurtosis | 17.162 | .548 | ||||||
| Chi-Square Tests | Value | df | Asymptotic Significance (2-sided) |
| Pearson Chi-Square | 43.462a | 10 | <.001 |
| Likelihood Ratio | 52.697 | 10 | <.001 |
| Linear-by-Linear Association | 1.413 | 1 | .235 |
| N of Valid Cases | 72 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).